Why don't we just do this with ISIS?
>>69533153
Because it's illegal to kill CIA assets.
>>69533238
fpbp
>>69533153
Because Natives weren't terrorists, the majority were okay people without extreme ideologies.
You know the smallpox blanket thing never happened right?
>>69533287
I don't think you understand that picture anon. The blankets are being used to kill the indians by giving them smallpox.
>>69533153
>Why don't we just do this thing that never happened in the first place?
k.
>>69533356
>British officers, including the top British commanding generals, ordered, sanctioned, paid for and conducted the use of smallpox against the Native Americans. As described by one historian, "there is no doubt that British military authorities approved of attempts to spread smallpox among the enemy", and "it was deliberate British policy to infect the indians with smallpox".[11]
>In this instance, as recorded in his journal by sundries trader and militia Captain, William Trent, on June 24, 1763, dignitaries from the Delaware tribe met with Fort Pitt officials, warned them of "great numbers of Indians" coming to attack the fort, and pleaded with them to leave the fort while there was still time. The commander of the fort refused to abandon the fort. Instead, the British gave as gifts two blankets, one silk handkerchief and one linen from the smallpox hospital,[12] to two Delaware delegates after the parley, a principal warrior named Turtleheart, and Maumaultee, a Chief. The tainted gifts were, according to their inventory accounts, given to the Indian dignitaries "to Convey the Smallpox to the Indians".[13][14]
Dixon, David; Never Come to Peace Again: Pontiac's Uprising and the Fate of the British Empire in North America; (pg. 152-155); University of Oklahoma Press; 2005; ISBN 0-8061-3656-1
^ Jump up to: a b c d e Fenn, Elizabeth A. Biological Warfare in Eighteenth-Century North America: Beyond Jeffery Amherst; The Journal of American History, Vol. 86, No. 4, March, 2000
^ Jump up to: a b c Pontiac and the Indian Uprising; Peckham, Howard H.; University of Chicago Press; 1947; Pgs. 170, 226-7
Jump up ^ Crucible of War: The Seven Years’ War and the Fate of Empire in British North America, 1754
>>69533356
I believe it did but all historical research points to some low level outpost quartermaster unknowingly giving out the blankets, not any officer ordering their dispersal with the sinister intent to infect.
However, during the Revolutionary War, when the brits were getting their ass kicked there is evidence, in letters between officers, suggesting the use of diseased blankets and such on the American rebels.
>>69533531
>A single instance proves that there was widespread use of infected blankets to kill people who we had little non-hostile contact with.
k
Watch 'The Revenant', that's a pretty good depiction of white man/Indian relations. Fuck 'em.
>>69533287
and you still had to genocide them
