>Within just a few years, Iraq was providing social services that were unprecedented among Middle Eastern countries. Saddam established and controlled the "National Campaign for the Eradication of Illiteracy" and the campaign for "Compulsory Free Education in Iraq," and largely under his auspices, the government established universal free schooling up to the highest education levels; hundreds of thousands learned to read in the years following the initiation of the program. The government also supported families of soldiers, granted free hospitalization to everyone, and gave subsidies to farmers. Iraq created one of the most modernized public-health systems in the Middle East, earning Saddam an award from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).[32][33]
>Saddam was the first man to let Iraqi women go to school
>Saddam's advisor and best friend was a Christian
>Saddam's Baathist party was based on nationalism and not religion, and Iraq was officially a secular country
>Saddam arrested and executed ISIS tier durkas
>Saddam kept a country once divided among Shia and Sunni united
He did literally nothing wrong.
That's why he was a problem.
>>69496257
>Saddam sympathizers on /pol/
jesus how blue pilled can you fucking get
>>69496257
As long as we're being honest, he also did a few stupid things that made invading him possible.
>gassing kurds
>invading kuwait
>threatening to kill bush
>letting his sons have violent prima nocta whenever they spotted a wedding
>not getting involved in zog banking and falling in line
>>69496864
>We should invade Iraq because we need to le protect Israel and muh WMDs (which were never found)
The Iraq war was pushed for by a bunch of Jews.
http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/white-man-s-burden-1.14110
>The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history. Two of them, journalists William Kristol and Charles Krauthammer, say it's possible. But another journalist, Thomas Friedman (not part of the group), is skeptical
>Apr 03, 2003 12:00 AM
>>69496257
>earning Saddam an award from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
Is that true?
I look the source in Wikipedia but I can't confirm it.
>>69497593
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddam_Hussein#Political_program
>>69496864
Bush did 9/11. Deal with it.
>>69497670
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddam_Hussein#Political_program
Yeah a read that but I went to the source and it leads me to this article:
http://www.cbc.ca/news2/indepth/words/saddam_hussein.html
I haven't find the part of the UNESCO prize.
The Baathist Party was modeled on European Fascists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCJ8JqtGahQ
Saddam was based, RIP
>>69496257
Tried to destabilized the petro dollar.
You can't wage economic warfare then get mad when you get your shit slapped.
>>69496676
Exactly.
Can't have stability in the Middle East, that would stop the globalist agenda.
>>69496950
>gassing subhumans is bad
>>69496864
He is not blue pilled, you are just delusional. Can you at least explain what did he do wrong?
>>69498159
By saying this you are inadvertently being a muslim apologist
> When Iraq's Baath Socialist Party first came to power in 1968, with Saddam Hussein as vice-president, it outlawed the use of tribal names. Citizens were told that they owed their loyalty to the state and its president instead of to a local tribe and its chief.
He was an unifier, like Trump.
>>69498471
Providing any obvious pretext for invasion is bad.
>>69497194
I guarantee enormous positive reverberations throughout the region of you take out saddam
>>69498212
Arab Socialism took a lot of inspiration from fascist movement, yes.
He attacked and occupied Kuwait.
>>69498827
>i am not muslim.
