This is just a reminder that everything Trump does is a long-game effort. Even if he falters in the GOP race and can't make it to 1237 due to extreme shilling by the media, both parties, and countless slob minions on both sides of the spectrum, all that means is he'll destroy the GOP by taking us all with him to a Nationalist party, effectively getting all of the Neocons out in the open when they ultimately meld with the Democrats. We're already seeing it with Ben Shapiro and Megyn Kelly. This is real, guys. Even if he can't get to 1237, our game is far from over. I am still confident that he'll secure the nomination but even if he doesn't, he knows what he's doing and he wouldn't back down if he was disrespected in a brokered convention by having the nomination ripped out of his hands. He'll become more high energy, more dangerous and /pol/ will be there every step of the way.
Stay the course, my brothers and sisters, no matter what. If we can't have Trump, we crash the ship.
>no survivors
>>69422482
wait.
are there people on /pol/ that unironically support Trump as a GOP candidate?
>long-game effort
His comments on abortion make it clear that he can't fucking remember what he said five minutes ago.
>>69422872
You morons aren't fooling anyone. Everyone who has been here for any amount of time can tell that we've been overrun more and more as this election has gone on because you're all fighting to protect the political elite. I genuinely hope you die soon, shitposting or not. Don't look next time you cross the road, guy.
>>69423066
Probably another bernout man (pic related)
Anyways, I actually believe the ideal scenario would be the death of the GOP. I also believe the Democrats will face a meltdown soon either way. Both parties are seeing the youngest generations go for the insurgent candidates.
Most of my friends are split between Trump and Sanders, so the party system is facing an existential crisis.
Also, no one give me an argument about people mellowing out. Young people have always been in politics but we've never seen a charismatic businessman and stale commie sweep votes like this before.
The worst kinds of people are the moderates desu
I want to snatch that hat off her head and take a shit in it.
>>69423627
>the party system is facing an existential crisis.
good riddance
>>69423627
>>69423885
Moderates are idiots anyways. It means they can't even take a side on the most basic, overlying issues. This election is globalism versus nationalism and it's slowly coming into focus for more and more people. The GOP is going to die or be totally rewritten as the nationalist party. Either way, even if we lose to Shillary and have to suffer four years under Merkel 2.0, more people will awaken to this insanity and we'll win by 2020. This has to stop and we are finally nearing that tipping point. I just hope it comes before November 2nd.
>>69424507
I very much doubt we're headed for 12 years of democrats in office. Historically they've never pulled that off before, while republicans have had multiple 12-16 year stretches
>>69425024
I keep telling myself this too but history doesn't guarantee the future. This is a wild election cycle and I doubt we've ever seen anything even close to this level of chaos before. It's going to get uglier before the end.
>>69422872
Yes, newfriend. Trump is essentially /pol/ incarnate. Now either leave, or shutup and lurk more.
>>69422482
Y'all sing a mighty beautiful swan song.
>>69424201
BRRRRTTT BRRRRTTT!
Don't mind me and my commiemobile! We are rushing to Make America Equal Again by taxing the rich!
>>69422872
OMG, I never thought I'd care so much what people online thought of my political choice, so I guess I'm a CRUZ MISSILE now so that I don't look stupid to such important folks as yourself. WEW LAD, thanks for making me see the light!
>>69426331
Suicide hotline is going to be ringing off the hook
with Bernie supporters who were so stupid as
to invest their children's savings to some
crusty old politician that never gave a fuck
about anything he preaches.
>>69422482
The rest of the republican primary states would not fuck us who have given Trump the lead over by forcing a contested convention would thay????
They would forever be hated and shunned by the early states who showed the way to MAGAVILLE...
Get on this Train you fucking shitlords!
>>69426527
kill yourself
>>69426730
What I don't get is, Bernie plans on taking more of everyone's money if he were elected, why were his cultists so determined to redistribute their own wealth before he had a chance to do it for them?
Leftists are a funny bunch.
>>69426878
I was being ironic, dummy, we're on the same team here. First day on /pol/?
>>69422872
God fuck off jesus christ
Are you retards planning on shilling for hillary too? Because I guarantee it wont fly under the radar like it does bern/rato/kasich
>>69422482
He'll lock in less than 20% of the vote as a 3rd party candidate, just like Perot. Trump's not running 3rd party, he'd lose badly and that hurts the brand. Time to put away the 3rd party meme.
>>69422482
I just hope the fire he has started doesnt go out. The cuckservative right needs to die. They wont fight the left and someone needs to.
>>69426886
Many of his intelligent supporters
have their personal interest in mind.
The huge driving factor that I see if
I was in their shoes, it's about
having college debt they accumulated
to be forgiven. That would make almost
anyone a fanatic.
>>69422482
INCREASINGLY
>>69427643
Except that all those people who took on the debt should have NEVER anticipated anyone coming along to absolve it for them.
They have hard lessons to learn that just because someone claims they'll do you a favor does NOT mean you're going to receive it.
But, a gibsmedat is a gibsmedat regardless of intelligence or education, some people just want free shit at any cost and are willing to make excuses for what it's "critical to the nation's well-being" for them to get free college or whatever.
>>69427750
romney vs obama july 2012.jpg
also (you)
>>69427035
ok just duck and let it hit the cruzmissile behind you.
>>69427894
>romney vs obama july 2012.jpg
except that poll was from 2014 not 2012, /pol/ blown thee fuck out once again
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/07/27/cnn-poll-romney-tops-obama-but-loses-to-clinton/
>>69427930
Much better! We can still be friends.
>>69427750
> meanwhile actual voter turnout shows record republican voting
>>69428151
You Bernouts and Hilfags have a funny habit of claiming BTFO status long before anything actually gets BTFO'ed, if it ever actually even does.
I guess you've got to keep those spirits up by any means necessary knowing that MAGA arrives later this year, just don't get your hopes too high that it'll be anything different.
>>69422872
>>>/Reddit/
>>>/Facebook/
>>>/Ebaums/
>>>/Gaia/
>>69428260
pro tip: primary turnout has a much stronger correlation with the # of candidates than who wins in November. There were twice as many votes in the Democratic primary in 1988 but that didn't mean shit
>>69428151
> http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/07/27/cnn-poll-romney-tops-obama-but-loses-to-clinton/
This only shows polls don't mean shit, actual elections do.
>>69428323
>-50 disapproval margin with women
>trump winning shit
>>69428620
Just like how they said "a conservative can't win unless they pander to the Latino community", where Trump does not do this and has the highest approval rating across the board.
I wish I were naïve enough to believe every online poll that agreed with how I wished things were. It really makes life simple when you trust the "experts" and stop thinking critically for yourself!
>>69428620
>-50 disapproval margin with women
So 50/50?
>>69427035
No one gives a fuck if you were being 'ironic' when you were being a fucktarded moron. Fucking kill yourself.
>>69428744
Nah, I'd rather see you die first, you humorless cunt.
I've got a friend I'd like you to meet, pic related. I think he's the only hope for you.
>>69428705
>Just like how they said "a conservative can't win unless they pander to the Latino community", where Trump does not do this and has the highest approval rating across the board.
among a very small subsection of Latino voters that vote Republican. Come November he's not going to be so lucky
> It really makes life simple when you trust the "experts" and stop thinking critically for yourself!
I was calling out everyone's skewed poll bs in 2012 when Romney was running and I was right. In 4 years everyone will claim the Trump support was mostly ironic and no one actually thought he had a chance.
>>69428744
I really do enjoy it when I make CRUZ MISSILES angry, shouldn't you be listening to Glenn Beck talk about how Ted was put on earth by Jesus to save us from Trump and the democrats?
>>69428979
Well, we'll see, won't we?
Funny thing is, if you weren't so terrified of the impending Trump victory, you'd be content to keep to yourself smugly in confidence that you're 100% on the mark. Funny how shills can't stop shillin' because they're terrified of what's around the corner, because in your heart, you know I'm correct.
if you're at all wondering about Trump's tactics, pick yourself up a copy of The Art of War.
these tactics aren't new but they're blowing up the establishment
>>69422482
>If we can't have Trump, we crash the ship.
This is important. Remember he told us to riot if he doesn't get the nomination
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/trump-riots-gop-nominee-220859
>>69428608
The polls in 2012 showed Obama leading throughout. Guess who won the election?
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html#polls
>>69429116
I know deep in my heart Trump is the most unelectable candidate since Goldwater.
>>69422872
You have to go back!
If you guys can't have Trump separate and have Civil war 2
>>69429367
doesn't matter. /pol/ will just pick some outlier poll that shows romney winning and pretend like that was the general trend.
Have another Civil War. Conservatives vs Liberals. Conservatives will win for sure because we have all of the guns and military training.
>>69429393
Like I said, we'll see come November. Just don't forget, he's running against:
1. A very unlikeable old twat who may well be asked to face up to her criminal activity before election day, and
2. An old socialist who has ZERO chance of victory if it were between him and a drunken gutter bum because not a single conservative would vote socialist, and half of the democrats wouldn't do so either.
I MIGHT be worried if Trump were running against worthy adversaries, but it's like carnival sideshow for the dems this cycle, not good for them at all.
Looking forward to November!
>>69429865
>not a single conservative would vote for a socialist
I wish this was true, there's plenty of cuckservatives who quote Reagan on amnesty and would go Bernie or Johnson before Trump.
Don't doubt the power of useful idiots
>>69430613
If there are such cretins, to hell with them, they're not conservatives in the least. They're faggy moderates who want the "best of both worlds" because they're still too afraid to be who they really want to be, and continually fear being "too radical" in the eyes of others.
Let them change sides if need be, because they'd be going the exact opposite of conservative if they voted Bernout.
