If you have no Neanderthal blood in your veins then I have bad news for you.
>>69235393
MUH MASTER RACE
So Neanderthals and early nigs bred to create the superior master race?
So this is proving that whites are more advanced and genetically superior to Africans?
Thanks, I mean I knew it but it's nice to have the science support it.
>>69235393
Race is a social construct!!!!!
That means we are a different species. We have hybrid vigor, the Neanderthals just died out from low birth rates. They also invented many things humans built off
>>69235843
I agree the master race is produced by interbreeding.
This was already a known fact.
Damn people are getting dumb.
>>69235393
If you don't have an occipital bun you are not master race.
>>69235393
Sorry Plumberkoski but there is not so much neanderthal genetics in north-central europe.
>>69236204
>Large nose
So JEWS have the MOST Neanderthal blood?
>niggers are niggers because they didnt fuck neanderthals
kek
>>69235393
TFW only black people are purely human.
>>69236096
Neanderthals were most likely interbred into humanity then died off. Early subHuman girls could not resist the superior Neanderthal cock
>>69235393
Yeah found this out recently, shockingly africans actually have none while whites have ~2%.
>YFW everything good and civilized came from your Neanderthal ancestor.
>>69236204
Dane living in Canada here, that pretty much describes every aspect of my head. Am I master race or subhuman race?
>>69236673
>tfw only non-black people are purely human
>>69236673
TFW you realize that humans and niggers are not the same species. Let the extermination of the murderous monkey niggers begin. Because they ARE NOT the same as us. Fully human requires 1-3 % Neanderthal DNA. Niggers also have chimpanzee, DNA, which humans do not.
>>69236673
What we consider human is a genetic fusion between early homosapiens and Neanderthals. They make up modern man. Blacks are essentially early humans or subhumans. A lot of things are starting to make sense now.
>>69236578
Actually they do. Memes aside. neanderthals are thought of to be(in one theory) as creative schizophrenics. Jews are very creative and have a high likelyhood of being schizo or paranoid. That could be due to inbreeding though.
>>69235393
NEANDERTHAL PRIDE
STOP CULTURAL APPROPRIATION OF NEANDERTHAL CULTURE
NON-NEANDERTHALS OUT!!!
>>69236673
Homo sapiens bred with Homo neanderthalis to create the superior precursor to the white and asian races.
Its kinda of like having a mutt vs having a pure bred. The mutt gets the good traits from its parents and lives a long healthy life.
The pure bred has skeletal muscular issues, gets sick frequently, and dies early death. Because they are inbred.
Africans are inbreds.
>>69236854
This is some vampire the masquerade tier shit. Our abilities are greater the closer we are to the neanderthals(caine) and they regress the further we go down our lineage. Nu-males and other cucks are thinbloods.
>>69236947
Nogs are literally less evolved, kek
>>69237000
Its from inbreeding in the jewish community.
>>69236947
>TFW you realize that /pol/ doesn't even know what a fucking species is
>>69237139
>Homo sapiens
>Homo neanderthalis
These are different species.
>>69236920
TFW White people betrayed their species so man y times by having Neanderthal babies.
>>69235393
Is this OOA finally BTFO? I mean I know that we all came out of there at some point. But it seems more and more lilely that Neanderthal came directly from Erectus as Erectus left africa a million years ago. Speciation occurred over this period before hybridisation.
>>69235393
I habs neanderthal wallet, dat counts?
>>69237066
Defending coal burning
>>692371393
According to SJWs. different species can't interbreed. If so....how did humans get Neanderthal DNA? Obviously, closely related but different species CAN interbreed. Liberals BTFO AGAIN.
>>69237139
TFW when YOU don't even know what a species is....
>>69237389
>According to SJWs. different species can't interbreed
wtf are you talking about
>>69237347
I did the opposite.
You want to breed with white and asians because they have more genetic diversity.
>non african
>rhesus positive
Cant win em all i guess.
>>69235393
Imagine the glory of a full neanderthal? Dindus killed and raped our ubermensch ancestor. We are but a shadow of the former glory.
>>69237244
> A species is often defined as the largest group of organisms in which two individuals are capable of reproducing fertile offspring, typically using sexual reproduction.
>Species
>a group of living organisms consisting of similar individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding.
By definition, they are the same species.
>>69236673
modern human =/ only human
Neanderthals are Archaic humans.
>>69237550
What?
Canis familiaris and Canis lupis are different species and yet can still interbreed.
Genus, Species
Homo (same genus)
neanderthalensis / sapiens (different species)
>>69237543
Over time the Neanderthal genes get more and more watered down by filthy sapiens
>>69235843
Early nigs... no.
Even if you subscribe to the out of Africa theory, there is no reason to assume those that left Africa were Negroid and that there was only 1 phenotype before then.
Read, learn, grow more intelligent.
>>69235393
Yeah we know that
Being part neanderthal is a good thing
The more neanderthal dna you have the more likely you are to be intelligent and white
Jealous?
>>69237389
>what is a mule
There's a risk of something like sterile offspring occurring. I read somewhere that geneticist believe only the Male Neanderthal- Female human offspring could reproduce and Male human- female Neanderthal were genetic dead ends. Humans are literally cucks
>>69237744
Yabba dabba doo
>>69236578
Confirmed. Jews (Ashkenazi) are almost always on the high side of average in Neanderthal dna. The European average is 2.7%. Jews average around 3%
How much does the genetic distance have to be between two samples to be considered different species? What's the distance between caucasians and sub-saharan africans?
Check&mate dindus.
>>69237744
Ok Robert.
>>69237744
I want to do one of those tests
But dont want jews to have my dna
WHICH MEANS that nogs are Homo Erectus. Bitches with daddy issues are fucking apes.
>>69237915
Enough do have distinct features?
>>69237915
Its fairly abritrary. Its based on genetic similiarities.
dogs and wolves are different species but share more DNA together than white people and africans, whom are still both considered same species.
>>69237670
We have to kill our inner sapien and embrace the cultural heritage of our unjustly vilified ancestor.
>>69237744
>Bobbert McRoberts
>>69237916
>>69237924
>>69238033
Don't give the Jews your real name. Use a prepaid Visa
>>69235393
>Neanderthal
Oh, Boy. If this is backed up by other scientist that aren't just doing it for a fad then suddenly.
Things are going to change...
>>69237915
Dunno. Chimps and Humans are 98-99% identical.
Gorillas are like 96-98% identical to us.
I'd say our situation is pretty much Ligers, Tiger Lion hybrids but very close to semblance.
>>69236707
How can denisovans even compete?
>>69235843
It proves two things that will piss off both sides
Pissing off conservatives:
>there is literally NOTHING wrong with race-mixing
Pissing off liberals:
>Afrcains (blacks) are fundamentally genetically different from every other race
>>69238118
There's a standard difference that's being used but when it's applied to humans everybody goes catch 22
>>69237657
>yet can still interbreed
If they produce fertile children then they by definition the same species.
You aren't just arguing against me, anon. You are arguing against every english language dictionary.
WUZ
>>69238385
To be fair, sharpton is a swindler saying what he thinks (black) people want to hear. Similar to Trump.
>>69236204
I have this. Wiki says they're rare now, how come?
>>69237096
That was a good game but I hear the tabletop version is a fucking mess more confusing than Call of Cthulhu
>>69238458
Feel bad for the kid.
>>69238523
>Similar to Trump.
Boy you trying to start a riot in this thread? topkek
>>69235393
hahaha, science confirms Black Superiority.
I wonder how long will pass before they will try to suppress dis information.
>>69238111
It's pretty solid research. Neanderthals did not breed past the Sahara
>>69237915
This is not very well known. But take this for example.
>previously people estimated that H.sapiens and Neanderthals were not compatible for breeding
>around 100k-75k years apart from a common ancestor
>Now we have evidence they bred
>Chimps are 6 million years from common ancestor
>cannot breed with chimp
You're going to need over 1,000,000 years of isolation of two populations to form two speices.
Basically a really fucking long time. It's not going to happen
>>69238118
That's an old estimate that only takes into account "DNA letters" and mostly in genes (which are conserved). If you factor in structural variation we are probably 90% related.
>>69238312
So the polar bears and the brown bears are the same species? Their offspring is fertile.
This is a good thing, Neanderthals were by far stronger and tougher than Sapiens.
There's also evidence that they had just as complex of a culture as the incoming Homo sapiens but had not yet domesticated dogs, and probably could not speak the same language (physical difference in palate structure limited the phonemes they could produce in speech). Like the cave bear, the ground sloth and wooly mammoth, they were built for the Pleistocene and were absorbed into the non-african gene pools over time.
>>69238807
>You're going to need over 1,000,000 years of isolation of two populations to form two speices.
Someone didn't listen in biology class, you don't actually need geographical isolation at times for speciation, sometimes all that is needed is two opposed evolutions "path" (ex:small beak or big beak for a bird) that are largely superior to a middle "path" (middle sized beak=no food).
meaning both birds with big or small beaks will not copulate with the other groups because it cause their offspring to die so eventually in the same geographical area speciation will happen, first by making the offspring infertile or feeble due to genetic differences and will end up with straight up incompatibility.
>>69235393
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlBypnWxL3M
:) We win again.
>>69235393
>/pol/ believes whites, the product of racemixing, are the master race
>/pol/ opposes racemixing
Stormweenies BTFO. Let's see that damage control, you pathetic idiots.
>>69238960
>Neanderthals outnumbered 1 to 10
>Neanderthals were cucked and attacked by chimps with dog
>We're the offspring of those chimps and Neanderthals
history repeat itself meme magic confirmed
>>69239688
except all shitskins fear dogs so we might be on the other side of history this time
I wouldn't breed niggers out though, gas chambers are far more practical
>>69238890
I don't understand why you need to ask me. You have the definition. Surely you can work it out yourself?
But I'll answer. Any two organisms that can produce fertile offspring together are the same species. The organisms may be slowly diverging into separate species but as long as the previous sentence holds true they are the same. So polar bears and brown bears are the same species (assuming what you said is true) but lions and tigers (who produce infertile offspring) are not.
>>69235393
this is old shit they found neanderthal dna also in africans just less
>>69239657
>implying Neanderthals couldn't have been greater than us
>implying we aren't just diluted ubermenchs
>implying that if we're the byproduct of crossbreeding we have to accept that it's good
nice try nigger
>>69237389
same species, Homo sapiens
different subspecies, Homo sapiens sapiens x Homo sapiens neanderthalis
>>69239833
>chimps group 1 find out how to domesticate dogs
>chimps group 1 proceed to fuck every other chimps with his prehistoric domesticated dog
>chimps group 1 mix with Neanderthals and become our group
>nowadays chimps group 2 is still scared of dogs
theory checks out
>>69237657
again, same species
Canis lupus x Canis lupus familiarus
>>69239483
francois nigga I'm a PhD student in genetics.
> you don't actually need geographical isolation at times for speciation, sometimes all that is needed is two opposed evolutions "path"
That's called natural selection. Which is true, but under conditions of severe selection.
Population bottlenecks or highly selective alleles have the same effect which they sweep into a gene pool. (It's called selective sweep)
These have occurred many times in the history of hominids and varying scales of selection (think black plague, out-of-Africa, etc).
>Basically for humans it has happened. Classic example are the Neanderthals which separated from H.sapiens over 100,000 years ago were able to interbreed with both a geographically isolated and a new "path" as you say it.
>>69239657
neanderthals are dead
of the extant racial groups, those with neanderthal genes advanced civilization to its current state
>>69239483
>>69240020
>>69240176
To dispel the species fiction:
The difference between chimp and human DNA is strucutral. Chimp chromosomes are different in topology. For example chr2 in humans is related to chr14 and chr16 in chimps because in humans those two ancestral chromosomes fused together and was advantageous (translocation it happens a lot in cancers)
Basically, you need severe chromosomal changes to make a new species. As you know these changes tend to do more harm than good. Example: Downs syndrome.
But in the rare chances it works, you can get a new species.
Also geneticists are finding out that these changes in chromosome structure change how genes are regulated more than the actual genes themselves.
You can think of a human expressing more synaptic proteins compared to a chimp
>>69240020
Okay.
So Humans and Black "Humans" are just different subspecies.
>>69240577
basically.
In genetic studies you have to separate the africans from the europeans from the east asians or you get errors in the results called "genomic stratification"
I know for a schizophrenia study I had to throw out over 3,000 samples because they were black.
I can link the biorxiv paper if people are interested.
>>69239840
So why are the brown bears and polar bears considered different species then? You have to tell those biologists they are wrong.
>>69239486
so neandertals where just humans like us
African Americans have neanderthal blood because they have significant European admixture compared to native Africans.
>>69235393
Whites are not part neanderthal, this is a liberal meme that idiots on pol embrace because they think it makes them half-ape supermans, it doesn't. Neanderthals went extinct for a reason, they're inherently inferior. Sure they were stronger than the average human, but intelligence was far more important to our species survival. Their caves are completely barren devoid of the art and tools we find in sapien caves, things indicative of the creative spark and true sentience we associate with humanity. Because of this, in spite of their simian strength, they were wiped out by a superior species, our species. Liberals dislike the narrative of natural selection, believing it to be too bigoted to be the truth and have been trying for years to promote the alternative idea that man and ape followed the multiculturalism, love, and tolerance instead (in a deliberate effort by the way to muddy the white gene pool). Like with most issues, they've succeeded thus far in pushing this narrative by repeating it loudly over and over again, with little to no evidence supporting it.
>>69236152
>>69240577
i dare you to say that loud in public :^)
>>69238656
hes completely right. do you think that trump believes vaccines cause autism?
>>69236578
they also have the highest average iq so maybe
>>69240876
Maybe the neanderthals had a designated painting spaces and didndus just graffitied the walls of former neanderthal residences. Dindus don't live in caves, though. They live in cribs.
>>69240577
not really.
A pomeranian and an albanian shepard are both dogs.
>>69240572
I was making a reduction for simplicity. I know little about the various ring species that comprised the Homo genus. My background is more on the botanical side of biology.
>>69235393
6.2% Neanderthal here.
Life can be suffering, lots of minor health quibbles that come across as hybridization issues.
>>69241075
pretty sure that's the english. when iq tests include slavs, southern europeans, etc. then of course it's lower.
>>69240740
>I had to throw out over 3,000 samples because they were black
so unlike most of /pol/ you have an actual reason to hate niggers lmao
>>69240740
I'm interested
Does this mean I'm master race now guys?
>>69240876
>had larger brains
>did have cave art
>had music
>pretty advanced weapons
The fuck are you talking about?
>>69241343
Forgot to mention religion and burials, advanced medical skills which allowed people to live through limb amputation.
>>69235393
I have a recurring dream were I wear fur and wield a spear made with stone. I live in a frozen place, with high mountains and a beautiful sky full of stars. Sometimes I go to hunt (but never have dreamed with the hunting), others I open a hole in the ice to drink water. In other dream I am just with others like me, walking and enjoying nature.
I have never in my life seen snow, nor touched it nor feel that kind of cold, since I live in one of the most hot cities in Spain.
Since I was 12 I have a weird idea in my mind, I want to live in the forest with some people like me. I always felt like I was wrong in the wrong age... Of course I always though these were teenager bullshit... But I still imagine myself making stone tools, living in the wild.
>tfw these are my neanderthal ancestors talking to me through genetics
>>69236267
Are spanish neanderthal? I'm Spanish descendant
>>69241330
>Does this mean I'm master race now guys?
>Filipino
>Master race
Pick one you sub Asian specie
>>69240876
>Libewuts dislike natural selection
>Conservatards try to get Darwin out of school
>>69240740
I interestinged
>>69241541
>>69241543
Actually, some of the most ancient neanderthal skeletons were discovered in Spain, so yes.
>>69241543
Yes. Aztec mayans and native americans had neanderthal and so did europeans.
You will have less neanderthal than White european though.
>>69241541
That sounds retarded
>>69241013
I do
>>69241343
Larger brain ≠ Smarter dumbshit, the rest has been proposed but remains unproven and I'm highly skeptical of do to the political motivations.
>>69241754
Asians have even more Neanderthal DNA than white europeans. Native Americans are closer to Asians, so naturally, they also have a good share of neanderthal DNA.
>>69235957
can not deny there are different species among the human race.
>>69235638
Neanderthals were actually much smarter and more effective survivors than their contemporary counterparts.
The others, however, despite being dumber and weaker and less healthy, outbred the Neanderthals and and mixed with them, to create our ancestors.
>>69236152
Only in some cases, and very rarely are there overall positive results between white people and brown people. The only for sure plus to interracial breeding is "hybrid vigour" which only lasts for a single generation, and in many cases can open up a person to genetic diseases from another race, and can dillute any beneficial genes to the point where there is a sub-standard result.
>>69235393
Don't the vast majority African-Americans have non-African ancestry because of slavery n stuff?
>>69241685
http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/02/23/040493
I can do a short AMA about genetics. I study psychiatric genetics.
>summary of the paper
>looked at copy number variation in 41,000 subjects. half schizos half controls (largest study yet)
>didn't find anything really new (need more samples)
>however found some protective CNVs. That's if you have a duplication of the region it protects you from schizophrenia.
I'm in the top 10 authors....
>>69241882
With mammals, especially primates, larger brain IN PROPORTION to body means higher intelligence.
>>69236673
>tfw if black people are purely human then whites and asians are x-men mutants
>>69241897
This is true
>>69241923
different species suggests no interbreeding.
but there are different subspeices.
>>69241931
>Neanderthals were actually much smarter and more effective survivors than their contemporary counterparts.
Did someone give a Neanderthal an IQ test??? sauce on this claim
>>69241987
so are niggers subhuman? do niggers not get as much schizophrenia? who is superior genetically?
>>69239886
If the neanderthals were sooooo stronk, why are they all dead?
Face it fags, they were unable to adapt to the transition out if the ice age. They were outcompeted because they were weak.
Plus you yuropoors are too focused on black and white. How about Asians, aka the actual masters of the longest lasting civilizations?
You guys are so delusional and insecure it's almost sad, but still funny.
>>69240506
>ausfailia
opinion discarded.
>>69241814
>denisovan subhuman getting butthurt of a real neanderthal
20000 years from now there is going to be a shitposting fight between master race niggers who are 1% white and niggers who are 0% white. God i hope there is an afterlife to witness this
>>69235393
Usually people attach links to articles so it can be reviewed. Polock.
>>69235393
>MUH RACE IS A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT
>>69242102
>Did someone give a Neanderthal an IQ test??? sauce on this claim
It's just logical thinking. They had lived in Europe for over 500k years. They went through several ice ages, had to fight huge and dangerous beasts for survival. They had to adapt to the environment to survive, so obviously they needed to be smart as well. But for whatever reason, they lived in small tribes and didn't reproduce much. Maybe it made sense back at the time, I don't know. But the Africans who came to Europe reproduced like, well, monkeys. Neanderthals were simply outbred.
>>69242160
>subhuman
As a scientist I would have to argue that subhuman is subjective.
Are niggers genetically different... oh yes!
Schizophrenia is actually consistent among all races, it's around 1%. You only see it enriched in related families (because it's genetic).
Sporadic schizophrenia is most likely caused by new mutations that occur in a sex cell. I study these "de novo" or new mutations. Which could maybe explain 30% of the schizophrenia patients.
>>69241541
>>69241541
>bruh you need to get laid
>bruh
>bruh
>go shitpost or something, it's hella boring here
>>69242102
They were a lot more creative and effective at making tools as compared to their contemporary counterparts. Can't source you because it's been a while since I've read the articles that detail these sorts of things.
>>69242215
They were able to adapt fine, the species as a whole just ran into conflict with the sapiens very often and did not breed as effectively. They bred fine, their offspring were generally healthy and lived long lives, but there was nowhere near as much of them as of sapiens, because sapiens fucked a lot more.
This is why the Neanderthals died out: they interbred with the people that were far more numerous and far more prone to having babies.
>>69241931
Hybrid vigor is specially selected. People breed different strains of organisms together because they come out stronger.
This can happen 'in the wild' but often hybridization simply causes problems.
When people talk about hybrid vigor, it is usually related to agriculture or horticulture and specific strains are bred intentionally because the hybrid exhibits outbreeding enhancement.
To reiterate, hybridization is often a disadvantage. Heterosis is the exception, not the rule.
I'm 3.8% neanderthal, i have no chin.
>>69236204
thank god i have this. based aryan genetics.
>>69242425
>It's just logical thinking
No it's not. It's handwaving.
Look at contemporary archeological finds of Neanderthals in Europe, H.sapiens in Europe, and H.sapiens in Africa.
The thing that stands out is that the H.sapiens no matter where they were had better technology. They had needles and buttons. CLOTHES. If Neanderthals were smarter why didn't they have better technology. Also they didn't trade.
We also bred with them so they weren't outbred. 30,000 years later and there are people 3-5% Neanderthal. That's pretty significant!
>>69242540
>They were a lot more creative and effective at making tools as compared to their contemporary counterparts.
That's not true. They might have hada fancy way of starting fire but H.sapiens traded a lot more and had things Neanderthals never had like needles, buttons, pins, sewn clothes
>>69237744
No.
>>69237915
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/02/28/science/orangutan-hybrid-bred-to-save-species-now-seen-as-pollutant.html?pagewanted=all
Not a whole lot. Sumatra and Borneo are much closer than Europe is to any Sub-Saharan country.
>>69236204
It's a good feel when you're part nig but inherited none of this.
>>69242540
I heard the opposite regarding neanderthal behavior, that they were less aggressive, highly social, matured faster and were more promiscuous than sapiens. It is difficult to separate conjecture from fact.
Regardless, most were killed and those that weren't were absorbed by sapiens.
>>69238257
This slav gets it
So them calling us Neanderthals is actually good, because they were superior to the average human
>>69242784
How do you even prove they didn't trade? That would be really difficult to prove, no? Besides, they weren't very social or communicative, so if they didn't trade, this might have been the reason.
>>69242984
True, because organic material that would have been used for such fishhooks and 'buttons' (loop and hook is easier, btw) would definitely still be around after all this time.
>>69243404
>How do you even prove they didn't trade? That would be really difficult to prove, no? Besides, they weren't very social or communicative, so if they didn't trade, this might have been the reason.
How do you explain finding seashells from the Red Sea in France? Or ocher pigment from the Middle East in Europe?
Neanderthals didn't have these things when archeologists excavate their sites. H.sapiens used these pigments to make cave art
There's nothing wrong with Neanderthals, but to say they are """"SUPERIOR""""" I think is an overstatement.
>>69243601
>implying bone buttons and bone fish hooks were not found
>>69241754
>>69241697
>>69241897
>>69241931
>>69242102
Chile isn't México pal. Aztec and Mayans are Mexicans. In chile we have Mapuches (germans and english kill all our southern native people, search for Kaweskar, yaganes and selknam) Darwin thought they aren't humans. Europeans took them to Europe to live in a zoo...
>>69243701
I can't argue about seashells, but they did use ocher pigment to colour shit. There are also flutes made of bones, as well as burials and evidence of early religion.
>>69242215
>why are they all dead?
They currently inhabit europe.
Homo sapiens is also dead by your standart.
There is no pure homo sapiens anymore.
Funny thing:
When they say 3% neanderthal dna, they omit the part where it's 3% of dna only found in neanderthal, but since most dna was common to both subspecies it is very likely a lot more than 3% is FROM a neanderthal line but not dna UNIQUE to neanderthals.
>>69242784
Neanderthals are Homo sapiens. That is the importance of this study. There was a long contested argument over whether they were a separate species that shared a common ancestor with extant humans, or whether they were a separate subspecies of H.sapiens, such as H.sapiens idaltu.
This study also lends more weight to the multi-regional theory.
>>69243889
>Chile isn't México pal.
All North and South-American natives have the same ancestor, who came to America 15k~ years ago.
>>69243971
>ocher pigment to colour shit. There are also flutes made of bones, as well as burials and evidence of early religion.
Yeah they used it in the cave paintings and probably as a body art.
Neanderthals were not """"cave men"""" as the stereotype suggests at all. They were advanced but not advanced enough
>>69244117
>This study also lends more weight to the multi-regional theory.
That's true but it also suggests out of africa too. Because you see Neanderthals only in Eurasians. You have a mixture of the two theories now
>>69237096
Hi /tg/ good to see ya
>>69243980
there never was a 'pure' Homo sapiens.
Humans today are a subspecies of Homo sapiens, Homo sapiens sapiens. All other subspecies of Homo sapiens died out, or have been absorbed into our subspecies.
>>69244567
That's correct. Evolution is a like a bush
>>69244567
>there never was a 'pure' Homo sapiens.
Before the first variation appeared, it was a single species.
It's an ontological necessities.
>>69244234
>not advanced enough
The migration crisis of 2016 happened to them.
No one can survive that genetically.
>>69241987
>AMA
You don't belong here, scum.
>>69244567
Pure humans existed 200,0000 years ago but they were most likely niggers in behavior.
>>69244924
That's a good point. Even if they were more advanced than Homo Sapiens, If they were outnumbered 1:10, they couldn't survive in the long term.
>>69236204
Is the occipital bun a little bump on the back of your head?
>>69244119
Altough I have spanish blood (little french) mixed. Here 43% are mixed (spanish-native) 7% native; the rest are white (German, Spanish, english) The good side of this.. we don't know nigger, asians or arabs :D
I have never seen a black person before. I don't how I will react when I see one.
>>69245975
>I don't how I will react when I see one.
Shoot, don't ask questions, then shoot again to make sure.
Do not let a single one settle, they multiply at night.
>>69245975
>arabs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Chileans
It's like 1% here
>>69246602
those are christian Arabs, i.e. the good ones who left to escape the grasp of Islam
>>69235393
am I supposed to be offended that I'm not a nigger?
>>69237550
>>69238312
Polar bears and grizzly bears can produce fertile off-spring. They are different species. The same goes for wolves and dogs.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2010/05/pizzly_bears.html
More importatnly, there is also the beefalo
http://modernfarmer.com/2014/01/10-farm-animal-hybrids-didnt-know-existed/
>Ah yes, how fondly we remember the 1970s. A time of afros, Nixon, and of course, the peak of America’s interest in beefalo. English settlers in the American south noticed genetic mixes between American Bison and domestic cattle as far back as 1749, but it would be 100 years until the first intentional hybrids and more than two hundred until beefalo entered the mainstream of American culture. That decade, a peak 6,000 ranchers agreed to raise the fertile hybrid.
>fertile hybrid
>>69240740
You need to make a separate thread with your insights on this topic
>>69241545
chocolate bar flag
>>69246857
My last name is a christian Syrian one.
>>69238312
Appeal to authority, good job fuckstick.
>>69246602
Christian Arabs are a thousand times better than your muslims thou
>>69237718
>there is no reason to assume those that left Africa were Negroid
If they weren't black, they'd be dead. How about you pick up a book, nigger. If it left Africa, it was black. It HAD to be. Of course over time skin lightened outside Africa. You're probably getting confused there, or that's what you meant to imply but just worded it like an idiot
>>69235393
Why would scientists admit to discovering race? Don't they realize they could be unfunded over this?
>>69247984
about half of the american arabs are christian
Most of the new immigrants are muslim tho
>>69248143
Only the equatorial region of Africa requires dark brown skin, the latitudes of the sahara and the south of the continent would require a more golden brown skin similar to middle eastern people. Where as the ones in the north and the othermost tip of the continet would be light skinned due to the lack of UV radiation.
>>69242640
Thanks for making the hybrid vigor myth debunking post so I did not have to. Also would like to add, that when they're trying to come up with a new cultivar for say, the apple. They go through THOUSANDS of hybridization attempts to finally get a new cultivar that is 1. high yielding 2. sweet, 3. crisp, etc. The rest are unviable. I used apples as my example because they are notoriously hard to breed, you can't just plant apple seeds and expect them to grow, 19 out of 20 won't. Most people use grafts or cuttings/clones.
>>69242102
Cranial capacity. Not perfect but it does indicate intelligence.
>>69242784
>If Neanderthals were smarter why didn't they have better technology.
The prevailing theory is that IF they were smarter, they died out partly because humans are better as social animals. We can plan and share ideas more easily, which would obviously contribute to a faster technological progression.
>>69237915
I think there might be some truth to the whole epigenetic memory thing. I certainly don't think it can happen over 2 generations like the Jews claim with the Holocaust. Over 10s of thousands of years of doing relatively the same behavior, seems possible.
>>69243889
> Darwin thought they aren't humans.
Easy enough mistake to make, just look at your pic.
>>69236152
>implying you shouldn't breed wiht asians instead of niggers to get higher iq children
>>69247363
>Your women are shaped like squares
Nigeria with the top ba.ntz
>>69249107
Race transcends faith more often than not. I wouldn't be surprised if Christian Arabs were sympathetic to Muslims because "muh intolerance".
>>69242425
>>69241343
>Neanderthals
>Intelligent, creative, strong
>Lived in Europe
>Bred out by primitives coming from africa/middle east
It all makes sense now. Neanderthals were the first liberal society.
>>69235393
I'm 4%.
