>Cows produce more methane than literally all the other kinds of emmisions COMBINED
>We need to reduce our carbon foorprint!!!
>Volcanoe Eruptions cause more greenhouse gas and fucking pyroclastic clouds that should BTFO what we do to the environment
>Literally nothing happens when volcanoes erupt
>Our effect on climate is simply following the heat trend of Earth
When will Global Warming be dismissed as jewry of the highest sort?
>>69223903
Ban volcanoes
>>69223903
That's fine I agree trends in climate are never constant over time however the acidification of the ocean due to increases CO2 is real and will likely kill off alot of sealife
>>69224083
>Ban volcanoes
Ban assault volcanoes
>>69224247
Just a path to banning volcanoes. My second thousandth amendment gives me the right to a volcano.
The cow thing is caused by humans though.
>>69224576
Are you saying you're against beef, traitor?
>>69224247
Volcanoes taller than 5m are illegal here
Why are we not harnessing the energy stored in cow asses? Just another example of how unuseful our government is
>>69223903
95% of GHG effects come from Water Vapor, of which humans produce 0.001%
>>69223903
Cows are officially pulled in as man made global warming.
Not sure about volcanos though, they could count it in as man made eruptions if they find an increased volcano activity correlating with CO2 emission..
>>69224733
>Al Gore is caught fucking cows
>Greenies take it as a new alternative energy source
>Every cow across the globe gets raped with methane extractors
>India rages
>Cow happiness goes up
Yes
>>69224733
People do this on farms already. Its called a methane digester. The cow shit is processed, and the energy is used on the farm with the remainder being sent to existing methane gas lines for use.
>>69224733
I tried direct ignition, hoping to secure some sort of steam turbine behind the cow. Unfortunately, it flashed back and detonated the poor beast, leading to a chain reaction which consumed an entire farm.
>>69223903
Limit the amount of ammo volcanoes can buy. Also the second amendment says right to BEAR ARMS not COW HARMS it's 2016 people!
>>69223903
>>Cows produce more methane than literally all the other kinds of emmisions COMBINED
You understand that it's carbon moving in the air/food/animal cycle?
>>Volcanoe Eruptions cause more greenhouse gas and fucking pyroclastic clouds that should BTFO what we do to the environment
No, they don't.
>>Literally nothing happens when volcanoes erupt
Cooling from ash blocking sun light happens.
>>Our effect on climate is simply following the heat trend of Earth
No, it's not. We are introducing CO2 that was outside of the cycle.
THE BIOSPHERE IS UNABLE TO REMOVE IT.
>>69223903
Climate change isn't man made, god is doing it. That fucking cunt.
>>69225193
>THE BIOSPHERE IS UNABLE TO REMOVE IT.
>Cooling from ash blocking sun light happens.
just add more ash to the sky #solved
>>69225193
>discussinf with Americans
50% of them believe God created Earth 6000 years ago.
It's not cause they are dumb, they just don't let facts stand in their way.
>>69223903
it's just a popular internet myth that volcanoes emit more CO2 than humans.
And volcanoes DO have a very real, measurable effect on the climate. There was basically no summer on the Northern hemisphere because a volcano erupted in 1815 in Indonesia. The eruption of the Pinatubo (1991) on the global climate also allowed climatologists to test their climate models.
>>69225193
>You understand that it's carbon moving in the air/food/animal cycle?
It's methane gas, it's effect is similar to carbon dioxide. To much in the atmosphere makes it impossible to reabsorb.
>We are introducing CO2 that was outside of the cycle.
Fossile fuels are organic materials, compressed. They where once a part of the cycle and now we are restoring the cycle once again.. we bring balance to our systems, cows ruin it
>>69223903
kill
yourself
>>69223903
In Merkel's book 'Visions for 2050', not only is one of her 'visions' that racism will be gone because there will be only race-mixed people left; she also had a 'vision' that no one will eat meat anymore, of any kind...
>>69224914
>Indians world wide refuse to poo in the LOO as a form of protest
>>69223903
>mfw we need to reduce the size of our dairy and meat industry thanks to global warming alarmists
>>69225293
Exactly. God credit taxes when?
>>69225582
>Fossile fuels are organic materials, compressed. They where once a part of the cycle and now we are restoring the cycle once again..
No, you can't prove that all carbon was in the bio-cycle. Some is oil and methane is geological.
> we bring balance to our systems, cows ruin it
no, we don't. The sun is now 10% brighter than it was millions years ago, therefore WE DON'T NEED SO MUCH GHGs.
>>69225015
Instant burgers
If we reduce carbon dioxide by half vegans need twice as much land to grow their shit.
Vegans should be screaming for more carbon dioxide.
>>69223903
>he does not understand cyclical models, that there are multiple systems that capture and store greenhouse gases in nature or that human activity is reducing the capacity of those systems while releasing gases that were stored long ago
Even if you doubt the models is that a die that is really worth tossing? We dont exactly have a backup biosphere.
Also, go nuclear or go home.
>>69225582
>To much in the atmosphere makes it impossible to reabsorb.
doesn't there come a point where a bit more doesn't make as much difference?
negative feedback rather than positive, which all of the IPCC models presume, and can't predict
![pH-chart[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/gQACiE9.png "pH-chart[1].png")
HERE is something to worry about.
This is pure chemistry, it can not be denied!
>>69223903
gubmint cant make money out of banning cows or volcanoes.
![Murica+on+funnyjunk+lately+yeah+this+sums+up+the+comments_8c205e_4929039[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/yOVFCYk.jpg "Murica+on+funnyjunk+lately+yeah+this+sums+up+the+comments_8c205e_4929039[1].jpg")
>globul warming is le semetic man myth
americants when will they learn
>>69227075
"im not russia"
kek
>>69225193
>muh circle of life
>muh humans bring nature out of muh balance
kill yourself desu
>>69227167
I do not need to kill myself because we will die together.
>>69226853
why don't they use their time machine to warn people of climate change instead of making silly graphs?
>>69223903
Methane is measured in parts per billion in the atmosphere. co2 is parts per million. There is literally a thousand times more co2 than methane in the atmosphere. Cutting back co2 means turning off your lights and PC when not in use. Cutting methane involves the world going veggie.
>Volcanoe Eruptions cause more greenhouse gas
This is false too lad. Human emissions dwarf volcanic emission.
>inb4 sources
No. Just fucking google it.
>>69226853
OMG, it's approaching a perfectly neutral 7.0 pH. The horror.
>>69227355
time is not a flat circle.
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2015/11/ocean_acidification_and_climate_change_at_the_paris_talks.html
>>69223903
you are wrong about the volcanoes and our effect of environment. Everything else is right.. not bad its usually worse on here.
>>69227588
i know i know
we're all gonna die
just a few years more
we somehow survived global cooling, acid rain and ozone depleation but this time it's for real
>>69224247
SHALL
>>69224576
>evolved animal
>using another evolved animal as a food source
>GEE I SURE HOPE HUMANKIND DIES OFF THIS PLANET SO COWS, HORSES AND THOUSANDS OF OTHER SPECIES CAN DIE OFF SINCE THERE WILL BE A LARGE VOID WHERE HUMANS USED TO BE.
This is how all these fucking "low environmental impact" hippies sound to me.
We're on this planet and its because of us that it is the way it is. Should we trash the place? No. Not at all but should we stop having an impact on it? FUCK NO.
>>69223903
FARTING CREATES GLOBAL WARMING AND IF YOU DON'T FART YOU WILL SPONTANEOUSLY COMBUST
>"science"
basically any 5 yo can yell you that cows smells, they fart a lot, and have been doing it since even before we were apes and niggers
>>69227901
>we somehow survived global cooling,
didn't happen.
> acid rain
required only filters in powerplants
> and ozone depleation
required agreement on easy substitution.
still not back full ozone.
>>69227516
Shows what you know.
>Ocean acidification causes bleaching and productivity loss in coral reef builders
http://www.pnas.org/content/105/45/17442.full
>inb4 not acidification
It is. By definition, more acidic = acidification
![pmel-oa-imageee-1024x576[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Vim623t.jpg "pmel-oa-imageee-1024x576[1].jpg")
>>69227516
>>69223903
Did you know they even tried to blame the war in Syria on global warming?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/11446093/Syrias-civil-war-linked-to-global-warming.html
>>69223903
BRAAAAAAAAAP
![03WAElectronMicroViewOysterLarvaeAcidifCO2DamageOSU[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/X8gKUrI.jpg "03WAElectronMicroViewOysterLarvaeAcidifCO2DamageOSU[1].jpg")
>>69228425
>>69223903
>2k16
>not driving euro-1 or EPA-1 car
>not bursting flames out exhaust
>not liking antilag sound
![acidificacion1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/GzMlmP0.jpg "acidificacion1[1].jpg")
>>69228532
this is now armchair marine biologist image board
>>69223903
>Jewish global warming science science BTFO'd by a fucking a nigger
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nSGJ7EMMiI
>>69224638
That doesn't refute the point
Honestly Americans should eat less meat overall
>>69228642
that literally happens since forever
and since the earth started heating up 16 years ago what's the fucking issue?
>>69224638
Heart disease isn't patriotic. Idiot fuck
Except all those are fedora myths or shitty studies with no sources.
>>69228673
>that sing songy negro accent
informative and hilarious.
>>69226853
how do they measure it 25 million years ago?
>>69228350
>By definition, more acidic = acidification
nooo, it's neutralization if it is basic moving towards neutral
it's not acidic till it goes past 7
>>69228735
cuck detected
>>69223903
Tard, volcanoes cool the atmosphere, they release shit that cool it off. Not every gas is a greenhouse gas dumb fuck.
>>69228912
Actually the Earth stopped heating up 17 years ago. The global warming occured in the 70s though 90s. Not before, not after.
>>69223903
The one volcano, where you get this disinformation, was that Icelandic volcano that pumped ash into the Jetstream for many days. Particularly dirty
If you look at it the other way it's like we have been in giant volcano pumping for 20 years straight.
>>69228735
That's treason against McDoald's!!!
>>69229791
Neutralisation has a more specific meaning. Regardless the change is enough.
>Great Barrier Reef 'devastated' by coral bleaching, scientists warn
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/12206488/Great-Barrier-Reef-devastated-by-coral-bleaching-scientists-warn.html
>>69229854
This is nonsense and an absolute abuse of statistics.
Go here.
http://woodfortrees.org/plot/
Only one dataset will produce a graph that allows you to make this claim. Using any other start point shows a clear trend
>>69223903
I thought this was common knowledge by now?
>>69230531
>scientists warn
how did the coral manage to survive for millions of years if it's so fucking sensitive?
It's deliberately hysterical to call it acidification when it isn't
as you well know
>Go here.
>
>http://woodfortrees.org/plot/
>
>Only one dataset will produce a graph that allows you to make this claim. Using any other start point shows a clear trend
I notice you didn't give any examples, you can post full urls from there
>>69223903
>>69224083
>>69224246
>>69224247
>>69224449
>>69224576
>>69224638
>>69224645
>>69224733
>>69224849
>>69224853
>>69224914
>>69224956
>>69225015
>>69225042
>>69225193
>>69225293
>>69225297
>>69225399
>>69225539
>>69225582
>>69225599
>>69225629
>>69225732
>>69225847
>>69225923
>>69226032
>>69226034
>>69226055
>>69226095
>>69226413
>>69226853
>>69226925
>>69227075
>>69227130
>>69227167
>>69227252
>>69227355
>>69227357
>>69227516
>>69227588
>>69227731
>>69227901
>>69228095
>>69228223
>>69228257
>>69228324
>>69228350
>>69228425
>>69228439
>>69228447
>>69228532
>>69228572
>>69228642
>>69228673
>>69228735
>>69228912
>>69229088
>>69229169
>>69229285
>>69229634
>>69229791
>>69229823
>>69229841
>>69229854
>>69230034
>>69230451
>>69230531
>>69230567
DO YOU SEE THIS TRAITOR TO THE BURGER??>? >>69228735
>>69229088
>>69223903
>Cows produce more methane than literally all the other kinds of emmisions COMBINED
no they don't
Nuking some place which causes a nuclear winter therefore lowering the global average tempertaure
You nay now dismiss global warming
>>69228223
cows are extremely inefficient for the meat they return compared to the energy they require and greenhouse gases they release
Every cow needs a path to citizenship.
>>69230860
venison tastes better than beef tbqh
you can make deerburgers and turkeyburgers you know
>>69230871
>>69230882
>>69230922
>>69231023
DO YOU SEE TRAITOR?? i SEE BLOOD
>>69231066
aBURGER
>>69230860
you annoying fuck
but yes, yes I saw the traitor!!
they walk among us
>>69230860
I agree with less meat vegiburger poster.
>>69230769
The idea was for you to play about with it yourself. The overwhelming majority of graphs you can plot on it show warming.
>how did the coral manage to survive for millions of years if it's so fucking sensitive?
Because of the timescale involved in the changes. NASA reckon that a change of 1 degree C takes 1000 years. We've managed 80% of that in little over 100. This is related to the fact we've had higher temps in the past too. Yes, the earth can cope but it changes to do so. We are forcing change faster than it should be and as such the earths 'coping mechanisms' will be more violent and dramatic.
>>69223903
Only hamburgers recycled from shit from now on amerilard.
http://inhabitat.com/poop-burger-japanese-researcher-creates-artificial-meat-from-human-feces/
>>69231432
anyone who denies climate change is an idiot, the problem is that we can't come to a solution
US right wing thinks it's a conspiracy
US left wing thinks nuclear power is "rly scary :(((" and we should solve it with hugs and kisses and smelling our own prius farts
>>69224247
Ban assault volcanoes with extended magma chambers
>>69231258
Shocking, yes! Among us they walk!
>>69231283
blood of beef, sacrifice required!!!
>>69231432
You see traitor around here??? Defeat must!
>>69230922
we don't care, there is enough land to produce the meat we want, and 95% of all GHG effect is from Water Vapor, of which humans contribute 0.001%
faggot vegans can give up their lives for mother gayer whenever they want
>>69231283
fug you gommie! xdddd
>>69231432
I'm less than impressed, you seem pretty amateur
where is the trend line? where is the link to that graph?
none of us are claiming that there has never been any warming. we are claiming that for the last 19ish years there hasn't been any. this is important because CO2 has kept rising during this time. so temperatures staying steady breaks the CO2 hypothesis.
not that we even need that since the CMIP 73 v observations shows that NONE of the IPCC prediction models were valid. get that? NONE
N
O
N
E
not one
why do you still believe they know what they are talking about after this fact
look at the greenland ice core data, there have been swings of many degrees very rapidly before, the coral survived that
>>69231530
I'm getting a degree in nuclear energy
So when the climate continues to change and forces millions of refugees to mass migrate into your country, will you be okay with?
>>69231892
Forgot gif
>>69231892
>>69232021
make a time machine and go back and kill every founding member of greenpeace before they got a chance to completely fucking ruin nuclear power's public image
they deserved having their ship sunk by france for what they've done to us, we've been set back half a century or more
>>69231530
I agree. I think the first thing to be done is deal with the 'skeptics'; though. Frank Luntz for example made it policy under bush to keep the impression of ambiguitity. To paraphrase, 'the science is almost settled. What we should do is work to maintain the illusion that this is not the case'. The idea that it is all made up is what gives those who profit from inaction space to breath.
Those opposed to nuclear are just as bad though fission is not the long term solution. Without extracting uranium from seawater we'd only have about 100 years of the stuff if the whole world went nuclear. Thorium offers a solution as does fusion.
I thinkj the first thing to tackle is emissions through power generation as we do have an (albeit expensive) alternative. This would require international cooperation on a level that most won't accept though.
>inb4 NWO shill
>>69231892
What do you think of LFTRs? Are they the next step in nuclear tech or just a meme?
>>69232187
>I think the first thing to be done is deal with the 'skeptics'; though. Frank Luntz for example made it policy under bush to keep the impression of ambiguitity. To paraphrase, 'the science is almost settled. What we should do is work to maintain the illusion that this is not the case'. The idea that it is all made up is what gives those who profit from inaction space to breath.
the entire point is to keep it an election issue, like abortion or the wage gap myth and various other bullshit that politicians pretend matters
which is why trump is so influential because he was the only one that targeted actual issues and not fake ones
>>69231936
they're called rapefugees, and we have no responsibility to let them invade, then rape and murder, and steal resources. you cuck
>>69231892
cool, what do you think of Thorium as a fuel?
>>69232187
>Frank Luntz
a fucking GOPe insider who supported Lubio, yet was still allowed on air doing supposedly neutral focus groups, what a prick
>>69231855
>where is the trend line? where is the link to that graph?
Go plot it yourself. Jesus fuck...
>we are claiming that for the last 19ish
You still don't understand how this is abusing statistics do you? 1998 was abnormally hot. If you use 1998 as a start point then yes, the difference between the peak of 1998 and the peak of last year isn't that great. BUT if you pick any other year as your starting point, the trend (warming) is visible again. One anomalous year does not negate a trend observed for almost 40 years.
> this is important because CO2 has kept rising during this time. so temperatures staying steady breaks the CO2 hypothesis.
You know the greenhose effect is easily demonstrable in a lab right?
>>69232216
They'd be in use today if greeniggers and fossil fuel jews weren't so loud and powerful
We'd need government funding for it to be widely implemented, it's probably better to try in a different country, say Japan or Germany
Of course in reality, both those countries are shit for entrepreneurship right now, and China is in the shitter and nobody would willingly give tech to China anyway
>>69231549
Don't forget assault cows with high capacity udders.
>>69232608
>>69231855
>look at the greenland ice core data, there have been swings of many degrees very rapidly before, the coral survived that
These are localised. What we are seeing is global. Hence the term...
Have you seen the royal society's article on this? 20 common question addressed. Well worth a look if you've not.
https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/climate-evidence-causes/
>>69232608
>Go plot it yourself. Jesus fuck...
you're so mediocre that you can't copy and paste out of your address bar? jesus fuck
>> this is important because CO2 has kept rising during this time. so temperatures staying steady breaks the CO2 hypothesis.
>
>You know the greenhose effect is easily demonstrable in a lab right?
that's not an answer to my point, try explaining how temperature has failed to increase in line with expectations, despite more CO2
>>69232608
I thought they found out all that info was false because they made up most of the information because they diddnt want to loose thier jobs.
>>69232803
0.6 what?
What exactly would be the problem with eating less meat and more vegetables?
>>69232608
you also ignored my point about none of the IPCC models being able to predict temperature
>>69231508
>>69231508
>>69231508
EVIL PURE!
>>69231530
FOOL!
>>69231549
SECOND THOUSANDTH AMENDMENT
>>69232973
Less proteins
Less fats
Belive it or not, meat ia better for us than plants
>>69232936
Says on the left-hand side of the graph.
>>69232863
>you're so mediocre that you can't copy and paste out of your address bar? jesus fuck
Here my friend. Though your unwillingness to try it for yourself reflects more on you than me. http://woodfortrees.org/plot/wti/from:1990/to:2015/trend
> try explaining how temperature has failed to increase in line with expectations, despite more CO2
Well the oceans are still heating so the total energy in the system is still increasing, not to mention the number of record breaking warmest years,months/seasons we've had recently. Of 2014, RSS ranked it (I think) 6th hottest. remember RSS is the datasource most commonly reporting lower values than others and thus the favorite of the 18 year crowd. UAH third. NASA have it at no2 behind 2015.
>>69223903
IIRC they were looking to replace bovine gut bacteria with wallaby gut bacteria, as wallabies did not produce methane when farting or shitting.
However, they discovered that wallabies actually burp out their methane, in a much steadier rate than cows fart out theirs (so wallabies will slowly release methane consistently, while a cow will fart every now and again and release a huge blast of it).
It's a shame because it looked super promising at first.
>>69223903
>>Volcanoe Eruptions cause more greenhouse gas and fucking pyroclastic clouds that should BTFO what we do to the environment
Volcanic activity is around 75 million tonnes of C02 a year. Passenger vehicles alone are 5 billion tonnes of C02 a year.
>>69233037
meat consumption has never been this high though. It's not like people were generally any less healthy before the 1950s when it really exploded
>>69229634
Fossils i presume or just knowing by how much it normally changes and backtracking but probably fossils
The methane exuded by cows is extracted from organic material already living on the surface. There's not a net increase in gases. Cows eat grass, produce methane, the methane is reabsorbed by the ecosystem.
Carbondioxide is a byproduc of burning fossil fuels that have been locked away under the ground for millions of years. For the entirety of our evolutionary development this carbon source has been separate from our living environment, partitioned off from the living atmospheric ecosystem. And now we're extracting it from its separate partition and pumping it into our own ecosystem. An ecosystem which, in its current incarnation, has never known this carbon. It didn't develop to handle this carbon because it was locked away under the ground while the ecosystem developed, you see? So if we take all that carbon, and burn it, and put it into the atmosphere, then something is going to change, because we are shifting the balance that we evolved to fit.
>>69233145
>>69233071
1/2 of a SINGLE DEGREE????
omg, I can feel it heating up and burning, I'd better get into my fridge
gonna attempt this? >>69232989
>>69232803
Its not just temperature thats affecting coral today ya dingas. Its the acidification of the water and dare i say it, pollution. All of these put together really can fuck em up
>>69231892
You are the future. Godspeed.
Nuclear energy is best energy, cleanest power source by far, all the arguments against it involve 'muh chernobyl', 'muh nuclear waste' or 'muh fukushima'. Kek, Chernobyl was outdated as fuck and mismanaged. Nuclear waste is dangerous yes, but they bury it so far underground who cares, no-one will find it there. And nuclear power plants aren't exactly designed to be hit by fucking tsunamis.
>>69232106
The damage those tree-hugging liberal idiots can do to the world is frightening.
Also global warming is not real, it's just an excuse to tax us. I saw something the other day that said that all higher CO2 levels in the atmosphere would even do is create bigger trees because they have more food, thus creating more precious oxygen. Did these idiots even pay attention in biology?
Pic unrelated.
>>69223903
Doesnt mean we cant cut this emission shit I dont wanna sound like a hippie but we can pump alot less shit in the air and keep more woodland we dont have to expand as fast as we do I mean the perfect solution is to kill chinks and niggers so we dont need half as much shit as we do now but that will never happen were fucked anyway tho
>>69234302
The main downsides of emissions are acid rain, smog and asthma. I agree that we should burn less shit that emits gases like sulphur dioxide, as they have a detrimental effect on humans, but CO2 is literally plant food. If you want evidence of the dangers of smog, look at pictures of any industrialized city in China. There's a good reason they wear those mouth-covering masks.
>>69233577
>gonna attempt this?
What do you want me to say? The models have overstated the warming so may as well just through out the entire theory? That's retarded. I see you are at the stage now of recycling talking points so we have little more to discuss unless you want to offer an alternative theory to explain the observed warming.
And btw half a degree over this short a timescale likely is a big deal.
>>69233829
I..I didn't say it was. >>69228350
>>69233905
The nuclear plan survived both the tsunami and the earth quake just fine. What broke the plant were the placement of the desiel generators, which were put in a basement which then got flooded. So much for planning ahead.
It was also the poorly trained tepco workers who did not know how to use the emergency cooling system, which only needed water to operate. No power needed. It is designed to just boil away the heat. But they did not know it was not running, even though it should sound like a jet engine when in operation.
Nuclear is safe when operated by decently trained and competent people.
>>69234535
CO2 is also a GHG.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwtt51gvaJQ
It is a problem in itself. But yeah, the other factors you listed are pretty real too.
>>69233037
McDonalds can't turn the soy fields they burnt down the amazon to make into any other usable soy product. They have to be for feeding cows or we will have to bail them out.
>>69234851
>The models have overstated the warming so may as well just through out the entire theory? That's retarded.
well, glad you can admit even that, perhaps there is hope for you
73 goes by the IPCC
0 successes
73 failures
how much would you bet on number 74?
>>69234890
thorium fails safe and doesn't need backup cooling
>>69234995
95% of GHG effect is from water vapor, and we produce only 0.001% of it
>>69235284
Water vapour is short-lived in the atmosphere. It acts kinda like the earths pressure release valve. Too much water vapour accumulates and it'll rain. This give the earth some capacity for dealing with the extra heat that is being trapped but also shows why the weather is more extreme today. The isue with co2 is it lasta much longer in the atmosphere, so even if we stopped all emissions of it today it would be a hundred years or so before the atmospheric concentrations started to come down. And just a reminder that (based on ice core samples) the earth sat around 280ppm for the past million years. Only since the industrial revolution has this started rising.
>>69235764
how much would you bet on number 74?
>>69236011
That they cannot accurately predict climate (longview weather which is itself notoriously hard to predict) does not invalidate the theory. You accept it is warming right? Where is this extra heat coming from?
>>69225399
fuckin rare.
>>69236285
>That they cannot accurately predict climate (longview weather which is itself notoriously hard to predict) does not invalidate the theory.
you serious?
even though they were wrong every time, they are right?
>>69236699
The theory still fits. Take a step back.
Is CO2 a GHG?
Is the greenhouse effect real?
The answer to both the above is yes. With me so far?
Does human activity lead to accumulation of co2?
Again, answer is yes. The Royal Society link I left above shows an isotope study has determined much of the co2 added to the atmosphere recently was added by human activity.
Modeling the weather is hard. The climate much harder. The one thing they have been right about is that warming will occur. Have you any alternative mechanisms to explain this? If you were serious in your skepticism you would at least have an alternative.
>>69237068
what % of the GHG effect is CO2? is it positively reinforced or negatively?
HURRRR
DURRRRRRRRR
I HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT BASICALLY ATMOSPHERE SCIENCE OR ECOLOGY
I JUST LISTEN TO WHAT THE NEWS, AND SCIENTISTS PAID OFF BY OIL COMPANIES SAY.
NEVER MIND THE EXTINCTION RATE RIGHT NOW IS 1000X NORMAL BACKGROUND RATES.
SURE, THE EARTH IS JUST FOLLOWING HEATING TRENDS. BUT, LETS JUST IGNORE THE FACT THAT TEMPERATURES ARE RISING AT A FASTER RATE THAN EVER PREVIOUSLY OBSERVED IN EARTH'S LONG HISTORY.
LETS ALSO IGNORE DEFORESTATION RATES, OCEAN ACIDIFICATION, AND THE ONGOING NUCLEAR CONTAMINATION OF THE PACIFIC BY FUKUSHIMA.
HURRRR, DURRRRR.
I DON'T EVEN KNOW THAT WATER VAPOR IS THE PRIMARY GREEN HOUSE GAS. I REFUSE TO LEARN BASIC CHEMISTRY, THEREFORE THE AMPLIFYING EFFECTS OF CARBON DIOXIDE AND METHANE OF SAID WATER VAPOR MEANS NOTHING TO ME.
I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE WATER CYCLE IS. TROPHIC CASCADE IS A MEANINGLESS WORD INVENTED BY THE LIBERAL MEDIA.
WE'VE DESTROYED 60% OF THE WORLD'S FORESTS OVER THE PAST 100 YEARS? YEAH, THAT ISN'T GOING TO INFLUENCE ANYTHING. MORE FORESTING IMO.
GOD SAYS ITS OKAY TO RAPE THE EARTH. IT SAYS SO IN THIS BOOK WRITTEN BY VIOLENT, HATEFUL, SAVAGES.
>This thread.
>Kill yourselves.
>>69231936
CUFCKOLD
>>69232106
do
>>69232187
kebab
>>69237456
SELFKILL DO YOU?
>>69235764
This is right, except the fact that CO2 dissipates fairly quickly. 40 Years we'd be good.
>>69237311
Why do you refuse to answer three simple questions when I've spen the past hour jumping through hoops for you? Are you actually interested in this, just here to argue or have decided that all the cool kids say it's bullshit so you're with them?
>>69237669
Source on this? I know its still up for debate but I've not heard one this low before?
>>69237896
you mean the way you dodged my question several times
then admitted my facts were true
then claimed you were still right, even though you admitted your holy priest class scientists can't predict shit?
hahaha, your a joke m8
none of the IPCC models were correct, you admitted it. The "science" behind the prediction models is also wrong. You are now acting solely on faith, you poor deluded fucker
>>69238363
You have no argument, no understanding of what you're talking about and no desire to actually look at the evidence. I don't know how many more ways I can say that failure to predict does not invalidate the theory.
> The "science" behind the prediction models is also wrong.
What part pray tell?
>>69228223
Non-Americans don't need beef to survive.
There are lots of animals that don't create bad emissions too (kangaroo? I think they're yummy?)
>>69238736
>What part pray tell?
the bit that they based their predictions on
you already admitted they don't know WHAT THE FUCK they are doing
you say I have no argument, yet that is my main argument, they don't know WHAT THE FUCK they are doing, yet they want us all to still believe that they do
and more than that, they want us to accept higher energy prices(poor grandma freezing to death because of high energy costs, but who cares because planet!)
you know my argument, you agreed it is correct, yet you still have faith in your priests
DELUSION!
>>69237456
Don't forget the peat bogs in Siberia.
>>69238736
>failure to predict does not invalidate the theory
Ah ok so you're retarded
Filtered.
>>69237456
Bro check the PETM... that rapid increase <just as, if not more rapid than today> allowed rainforests to come into istence.
>>69239608
>I am unable to realize these are not supposed to be 100% accurate.
Ah ok so you're retarded.
>literally blocking people on 4chan
