All memes aside, why is /pol/ so intellectually inferior? Is it because this board is the newfag central of 4chan right now?
>>69160466
No. It's because of cognitive dissonance.
>>69160466
That's bullshit. /pol/ is actually one of the smarter boards and Trump has an IQ of 156.
>>69160466
Pretty much.
Also because of how general this board is. Its the host of all political discussion in 4 chan. Its gonna have stupid people.
>>69160466
>/lit/ that high
into the trash it goes
>>69160466
>/tv/
>118 iq
whoever made this wasn't even trying
>>69160466
Somehow I do not trust these numbers.
Were they just Flesching it out, so /x/'s big fake words were miscounted as an edumacated vobalucary?
>>69161041
Also keep in mind what the board is about. No fucking shit /sci/ and /lit/ is at the top.
>that high /sp/ score
it's my favourite board but it's literally just banter and shitposting with intellectual discussion being mocked. I'd say /pol/ users are much more intelligent.
>>96
>>69160466
OP pic is obvious bait,
/pol/ appears to be intellectually challenged at first glance but upon further examination its cause can be attributed to the newfag-detterant tried and true method we all know and love, shitposting
>here's an explanation of how we got our numbers
>s-source? we don't need that, it's a double-blind test
>totally didn't just make up numbers based on generalizations
>>69160466
>/int/
>120
Sure thing, dankest menes and stuff.
Would it have really been that much of an effort to make a chart where all the data fits? Why did /lit/ go off the scale when it's only 6 points higher than the highest shown?
>>69160466
>/mu/ not with /mlp/ and the bunch at the bottom
Chart is all kinds of fucked tbhfam
/wg/ seriously
literally just wallpaper
>>69160466
>/int/ that high
>based on logical arguments, and opinions
you mean the board that endlessly circlejerks the lamest memes and shitposting generals on the entire website exhibits an IQ of 120?
So
>poo in the loo
and
>a fucking leaf
being reposted 1000x = high IQ?
>>69160466
/o/ intelligent?
the GTR has more computing power than the whole userbase
>>69162145
Bunch of Scionfags on there, theres some good threads there, but people sucking off that FRS like its gods gift is embarrassing and shows the average age of people there.
>No source
Also, standard IQ tests don't complete a total picture of someones intelligence.
>>69160466
>/sci/
>intelligent
its just pseudo-intellectual circlejerking over the STEM meme
/diy/ is best board
>>69160466
All the bernouts from reddit must pull our average down quite a lot.
>people actually believe the data in that graph is real
I don't even know what to say. I'm shocked.
I didn't think people on /pol/ were this stupid.
>>69164185
Did you even read the thread Nigel?
>>69164229
I see people discussing it. That's enough to make me believe people believe it.
Well first off its a poor made shit graph because the bars don't even line up and it has zero sources. And second off I wouldn't doubt /pol/ is lower IQ since we're actually not all autists here like most other boards are. It seems like more people on this board actually have some real life experiences unlike the retards on other boards who just sit at home all day being NEETs.
>>69160466
Because it's a satirical board where people take serious enough to post funny things but nobody actually acts like that irl
/x/ has the smartest posters
yet another libcuck propaganda to make questioning authority unfashionable
>>69164349
banned
>>69160466
IQ over 140 here. Just stay in here for the lulz.
>>69160466
Anyone have the raw data for this study?
>>69160466
>/sci/
>/lit/
>smart
>>69164451
I wot m8
>>69160466
>I'll make a bait image with no source
>that'll show 'em
>>69160466
You don't have to be smart to enjoy politics. In fact, you more likely are not smart at all if you enjoy politics.
Mfw people take the graph seriously
>/tv/
>Above average
/tv/ is basically /pol/ except with an even dumber board topic.
>>69164822
mods can still see deleted posts you idiot.
>>69160466
>/mu/
>114
>>69160466
>/fit/
>intelligent
Literally just parrot the same shit day in, day out.
>Calories in vs calories out bro, thermodynamics
If you try and discuss something quite specific "fuck off special snowflake", and no one has any insightful information
>>69164965
>>69164451
u wot mate?
>>69160466
>/wg/ almost on top
You would have to be a autistic mouth breathing retard to think a wallpaper board would score that high.
"Intellectuals" supported Maoism, I see no reason why anyone should take their opinions seriously just because they have high IQ.
This IQ is based on 4chan's population. It doesn't actually mean your iq was calculated based on a larger set of population.
GODDAMN, you monkeys, are retards
>>69164450
>/x/ has the smartest posters
>>69160466
>there are people RIGHT NOW that beilieve that internet iq tests are accurate
>these people are also autistic enough to make this graph and claim its legitimacy without even mentioning sample size
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/7611284
wew
>>69160466
/lit/ and /sci/
hahah they're retards.
>>69160466
>source
>none
>147 IQ is higher than Trump's, literally less than 0.01% of the population
>AVERAGE on /lit/
Whoever couldn't tell this was fake in less than 5 seconds is fucking handicapped.
>>69160466
HAHAHAHHAha
https://newrepublic.com/article/132039/tay-exposes-fairy-tales-tell-racists
>>69165164
enjoy being b&
>browse /pol/ 70% of the time
>136IQ from the Mensa test
I saw an anon say this once and it has stuck with me forever.
>4chan is where smart people go to act stupid
>Reddit is where stupid people go to act smart
This was the truth initially, until stupid people wandered here and felt like they belong and now the place is a mix between shitposting and ironic shitposting. Some posts have so many layers of irony that everyone will have a different perspective on what the poster meant. It's kind of funny.
>>69160466
>/fit/
>131
saged and reported faggot
>>69160466
Yeah, this graph isn't bullshit or anything, I can tell right away.
>>69162369
This. Also don’t forget the miata circlejerks, triptards, autotragics triggering manuels, manuels triggering autotragics, 555-come-on-now threads and many more shitposts.
Sometimes if you are lucky you get a good thread, also quality control is nearly non-existent.
>>69165846
I think it's better that way to be honest.
>/3/
>127
i vist there frequently, literally half the posts are telling people how shit they are and will never be good at anything (while having no skills themselves).
>/lit/ 147
>such areas include religion, ethics, arts, philosophy, climate change, economics, wealth distribution, climate change
what is bias?
>arts philosophy wealth distribution
>>69165846
>good luck I'm behind 7 layers of irony
I second the notion though
>>69160466
Funny, /v/ may be shit but I'd sooner take they reviews on games then any other place on the internet.
fuck year where my /fit/ brahs at
>>69160466
nice source
>>69160466
>lit
>sci
Highest you literally cannot make this shit up desu!
>>69160466
>Boards that think highly of themselves post report higher numbers
>Boards that are used for shits and giggles report lower scores cause humor
Also without providing a source of how data was collected, raw data, and sample size this graph is pretty useless.
Even more useless when supposedly intelligent boards like /biz/ or /int/ are essentially /pol/ in terms of discussion but with a different flavor.
>>69160466
They based the test on areas such as RELIGION, POLITICAL OPINION, RACIAL AND SEXUAL DIFFERENCES, ECONOMICS, FUCKING WEALTH DISTRIBUTION, FUCKING CLIMATE CHANGE, DEFINING ART OF ALL THINGS, PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS. LMAO
This whole graph is a liberal troll.
>>69160466
Someone literally took the time to make this graphic over being hiney hurt that his illogical liberal bullshit gets blasted on this board for keks
>>69160466
Tired of seeing this /lit/ disinfo graph with no source.
>there are people in this thread who actually believe the chart to be anything but plain bait
>>69164450
The only thing /x/ has a lot of are schizophrenics.
>>69160466
/pol/ isnt even on your graph so wtf are you on about
>>69164450
/x/ has some people who are smart but a lot of them are also literally crazy at the same time
>>69166947
What is the Weishaupt's Plateau?
>>69160466
/fit/ average IQ in 130s?
Holy fucking kek, this chart seems to be the inverse of reality!
>>69160643
This. Pol is currently in the process of integrating a shit ton of conservatives who didn't know shit about politics before coming here. By this time next year they will probably be mostly natsocs again, but until than, Trump generals are pretty cool.
>>69160466
>/lit/ on top
>spamming DFW is the most intellectual past time
Also no board has an average IQ of 150.
>>69160466
I was driven here from reddit. It's getting stupider with every passing week as the election year progresses. I can't fucking take it there anymore. I think I lost 10 pts of IQ just from typing "reddit" earlier in this past. Shit.
>>69166700
I actually doubt /lit/ would make this and I already know /sci/ would rip this unsourced piece of shit to shreds.
Probably just normal bait.
>>69167586
They seem to have based most of the IQ off liberal values, if you read the discription. I'm not even sure how the fuck that worked.
Which makes the whole graph a lot more funny.
>>69165846
oh yeah but can you reach layers of irony that have never been explored before?
>>69160466
>/x/ dead last
This made my tulpa hue before she was eaten by a skinwalker.
>>69160466
>/lit/ on top
>/a/ that low
OP got rekt for having a shitty waifu.
>>69165846
>>69167899
>discription
Yeah /pol/ is much smarter than everyone gives them credit for. Surely there isn't a shred of truth in this chart.
>>69165846
too true anon
>>69160466
>memes aside
>posts a bait meme image
no wonder your empire failed
>>69168660
Kek, if it makes you feel better you believe any unsourced chart you want.
Calling out a typo doesn't make you any smarter Skylar.
>/tv/, /sp/ and /lgbt/
What a fucking retarded poll this is
>>69169098
I can say, with complete certainty and devoid of any arrogance, that I am smarter than you are. I literally come to /pol/ to watch you fling shit at one another and rally behind a reality TV star running for the presidency. It's good for a laugh, save for the odd occasion when it makes me a little sad.
>>69169459
You're not, but OK.
This is obvious important to you, because of how much you're banking on a single letter typo I made while a bit tipsy.
So I'm letting you have it, you go on, feel smart. I doubt you have much else in your life worth living for it matter that much.
>>69160466
>jelly
/lit/ is dumb as hell
lies and statistics, obviously
>>69167164
No clue. Without searching for answer I'm guessing it's either....
a. A point at which the common man is separated from the genius.
Or
b. A point which I.Q. levels out as a cap stone before the truly intellectual.
Still the fact that /ic/ or /sp/ is above /g/ seems like bullshit. Especially when /pol/ some how manages to be beneath /v/, or /vp/.
>>69160466
> /out/, /sci/, /lit/, and /wg/ are supposedly THREE STANDARD DEVIATIONS above the average IQ
You really expect me to believe that shit, nigga? HAVE YOU EVEN POSTED ON /sci/? It's a shitshow. AT BEST.
The more trolls the lower the IQ
>>69165846
agreed, this is why redditors come to the conclusion this board is either insanely racist or one big joke.
The idea that it is really neither is beyond them
Like those redpill comics, as insane as they are there is a truth to them that I love
>>69160466
Most people who browse this board are degenerated americans who think they're redpilled because they scream: ''WOOOOOHOOOOOOOOO MURRICA YEAAAAAAAAAAH'' while thinking they're redpilled because they: ''dun fall for that shit in the librul media'', which is actually precisely what they do, because what they fail to realize is that both parties in the U.S serve the same long-term agenda, and they fall for it one way or another.
average /pol/ user is actually a perfect example of millennials who think they ''get it'' and that they're ''special'' but the truth being that they're a perfect case of ''just another sheep''.
>>69170499
Sweden gives his valued opinion as always on the intelligence of the people trying to stop him from destroying himself.
>>69160466
several /pol/tards thinking the pic is legit, point proven op
>>69160466
Too many stormfags and newfags who swallow bait without even looking
>>69160466
This research is absolute trash
lmaooo just checked the graph again, how dumb do you have to be to not know thats fake within 2 seconds? kill yourselves
>>69169859
The "I'm actually drunk right now" angle is pretty transparent. I'm embarrassed for you.
Plenty to live for, actually. A thriving business, wonderful friends, and a relationship spanning several years. But I appreciate your concern. Sometimes it's just fun to burn the ants.
Back to your rampant chart denial, rube.
>>69164339
First day huh?
>>69171286
I am pretty drunk right now, got half a bottle of vodka in me, but you go on, I'm happy for you.
Surprisingly I'm not as filled with hate as you seem to be. I just think you're kind of a faggot.
>>69171235
I dont think anyone actually thinks it is real study buckko
>>69160466
>fit is near the top
>x is near the bottom
>vg is higher than v
Good
>The average IQ of /lit/ being 147, a 1 in 1,157 IQ.
>The left side of the graph
You guys know this is a troll image... right? Right?
Any forum where people are ACTUALLY trying new ideas (like here) is going to sound stupid, because we're experimenting, in comparison to forums where people are PRETENDING to try new ideas, but in reality are mostly just trying to sound smart (like university classes, or televised debates) in order to garner prestige.
>>69170499
Coming from a country that banned our lobsters because they're worried they will become an invasive species that brings disease.
And if your assessment was true we would be voting Cruz not Trump
>>69160466
/b/ is newfag central.
Go back to newfag central.
>>69165846
of course, it's why they have upvote/downvote.
Here we just fucking reply, much better system.
>>69160466
>'average' is that far over 100
>bar graph isn't proportionate
>/lit/ at the top
>/g/ not under Negligible
>no sources
>double-blind testing for IQ
>4th paragraph is specifically designed to trigger spergs from boards under the 'average'
>posted by a Spic
It's beautiful. Have my (You), OP. You deserve it, even if that isn't yours.
>>69171286
Wow, you're a pretentious faggot.
