SCOTUS vacated a Massachusetts ruling upholding the states ban on stun-guns.
Unanimously declared it in violation of Heller v DC.
stated that
>The 2nd amendment protects the right to defensive arms despite certain arms not being in existence at the time of adoption.
Holy Crap!
Despite a 4-4 split Justices are actually sticking with precedent and doing their jobs.
This bodes very well for the conflicting AWB cases already appealed to SCOTUS.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/03/25/scotus-trashes-massachusetts-court-ruling-on-stun-guns-n2139018
but /pol/ told me the scotus was going to personally take muh funs away
>>69136926
its literally an Easter miracle
praise kek
>despite not existing at time of adoption
Time to re-open the machine gun registry.
>>69137063
:DDDDDDD
>tfw when we win it all
>>69137246
Can't wait until someone uses the SC ruling on gay marriage as grounds for nationwide reciprocity on concealed carry permits.
>>69136785
This is actually huge. This ruling will keep gun-grabbers on the defensive for years. Thank god Obama's plans never came to fruition.
>>69137417
that would be pretty smart.
gotta honor dem licenses.
IL is facing a lawsuit right now, for blanket banning all other states CCLs
>>69137508
sounds like cause for some appropriate victory music
since gun-grabbers are facing their Waterloo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sj_9CiNkkn4
Wouldn't anti-gun fags prefer stun guns?
>>69138412
no. theyre idiots,
they're actually anti-self defense
they even ban body armour
