So we all agree that fascism is best but what branch of fascism? And what are your corner beliefs?
Note: this is not primarily a racism thread so if you're just a racist democück you need not apply
British Fascism and Italian fascism > German national socialism
>>69106337
true
Adapt and evolve. There is not a particular branch of fascism you should adhere, don't stick to a book like the communist does.
Take what is best from the Romans, from Mussolini from Hitler or Pinochet and redefine your form of ideal society.
I don't like the racial one of Hitler, because Italy is not a single race and I don't want too much emphasis on war because Italy is not ready now.
But other nations may want to form a different view of fascism. The only important thing is the love for your own people and the desire for his advancement.
The Italian model is the best. No anti-semitism
>13 yo fascioboys are not going to school today so they go on /pol/
>>69106732
>>69106732
>>69106732
This is the only true way.
>>69106997
>projecting this hard
>>69105412
National Syndicalism and National Catholicism.
ARRIBA ESPANA!!!!
>>69105412
Neo-fascism, trying to cling to the old ways is nothing more than larping.
>>69106997
I'm 36, kid and wife are out. Not at work today.
how does this make you people feel
>>69107555
I don't believe that right-wing or left-wing are anymore applicable in
> le current year
apart from that, the definition is correct.
What's your point?
Traditionalism, Nationalism, Economic Liberalism
>>69107555
It's mostly accurate. Right wing is defined by the conservative or reactionary section of a political system. Conservative is defined as holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion. Which is mostly true of fascism execept for the cautious of change and innovation part.
>>69107555
There isn't actually a "left-right spectrum". Political ideologies are better described by a spectrum of in-group preference. Fascism has a very high in-group preference so it is seen by most as being "right-wing".
>>69106997
Fucking this.
>>69106838
>Jews in a highly centralized government
What could go wrong?
Might as well ignore all of the last 100 years.
>>69108118
Economic liberalism hates those two though. It gets in way of making more profit.
You are trying to serve two different gods. Certain regulation-socialistic policies must be enacted If you want to also have nationalism and traditionalism.
>>69105412
National-syndicalism > Fascism > National Socialism
>>69108908
What about Falangism?
>>69105412
National Socialist Clerical Fascism. Falangism and Iron Guardism is pretty good too. Italian Fascism failed spectacularly.
>>69106997
>13yo italian marmocchi
>being able to understand english
>ever
>>69109008
Falange Española (Spanish Phalanx) is the name of the party, but the ideology is National-syndicalism, not "falangism".
>>69105412
Il fascismo Albanese è la soluzione
Left fascism
>>69109473
Fascism is economically left wing.
>>69109421
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falangism
>>69109496
Alright, so it's redundant
but morons need their redundancy or they can't understand things
>>69109473
Benito himself was a socialist, before he decided to go his own way.
Is the socialist rhetoric observed in fascism the same as modern 'gibsmedat' socialism, because anytime I hear that word, I think of some nigger begging (forcing, with the government) money from hardworking citizens. Or has the game changed since the Cold War, changing the definition of these terms.
>>69110180
I'm not sure of what you mean, Benito was giving a lot to the poors, subsidies, houses and other privileges, but in change, they had to work and respect some production quotas.
>>69110180
Fascism is anti-capitalist as much as it is anti-communist. Libertarianism and free market have no place in a Fascist society, even Hitler has said that the Fascist economic policy is close to Communism in that regard. The difference is that instead of abolishing all social classes and seizing the means of production the party simply fully controls and market and the Capitalists, thus preventing them from exploiting the people.
>>69110915
And yes welfare programs are integral to Fascism, but as >>69110557 stated you cannot leech off of them.
>>69110557
somewhere along the line people lost that will to work, then.
>>69110915
Doesn't that give an enormous amount of power to the government? A benevolent dictator or something along the lines of that form of leadership would be the only way (also, arming the people) to avoid tyranny. It's a big leap of faith, is it not? The best case scenario is a utopia, though.
>>69111178
A notable example of Fascist welfare comes from nazi germany
"A canister used for collections during the Winter Relief Fund.
A prime philosophy of Germany at the time was that all citizens should share the same standard of living. With this in mind, National-Socialist Germany boasted one of the largest public welfare programs in history with the slogan “None shall starve nor freeze”. Every year, high-ranking Nazi’s and citizens would take to the streets to collect charity for the unfortunate, which generated a feeling of comradeship toward those in need.
They even went to the extent of publishing names of those who didn’t give charity in the paper as a punishment or reminder of their neglect. According to Mark Weber of the Institute for Historical Review,
“On one occasion, a civil servant was prosecuted for failure to donate, and his argument that it was voluntary was dismissed on the grounds it was an extreme view of liberty, to neglect all duties not actually prescribed by law, and therefore an abuse of liberty.”"
>>69111252
>Doesn't that give an enormous amount of power to the government? A benevolent dictator or something along the lines of that form of leadership would be the only way (also, arming the people) to avoid tyranny. It's a big leap of faith, is it not? The best case scenario is a utopia, though.
This is the thing with totalitarian systems. If the party rots the entire system collapses. The government does indeed have too much power, and it is indeed a leap of faith, but if the revolution is succesful, as it has been in many countries historically, Fascism leads to prosperity for the nation.
>>69111324
>everyone has same standard of living
>donate to the unfortunate
also
>people donate to the unfortunate by force
>government taxes the """"rich""""
why doesnt the government provide for the unfortunate through taxes and the market that they control? why force the people to give even more?
>>69111324
Was that "shared standard of living" just another term that really meant dragging everybody down to rock bottom, because it sure sounds like it. If it wasn't like this, then how did they avoid outcomes like that?
>>69111691
>>69111695
>why doesnt the government provide for the unfortunate through taxes and the market that they control?
Taxes came through the people of all social classes. Also everyone, rich and poor was expected to donate equally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reAvWtL4ecE
>>69111655
But while it may seem that Democracy is preferable, it is in fact much more disastrous to the nation than one may think. The risk is very much worth it.
Following is an excellent critique of Democracy by Cordeanu
1. Democracy destroys the unity of the Rumanian nation, dividing it among political parties,
making Rumanians hate one another, and thus exposing a divided people to the united
congregation of Jewish power at a difficult time in the nation's history. This argument alone is so
persuasive as to warrant the discarding of democracy in favor of anything that would ensure our
unity or life itself. For disunity means death.
2. Democracy makes Rumanian citizens out of millions of Jews by making them the Rumanians'
equals. By giving them the same legal rights. Equality? What for? We have been here for
thousands of years. Plow and weapon in hand. With our labors and blood. Why equality with
those who have been here for only one hundred, ten, or even five years? Let's look at the past:
We created this state. Let's look at the future: We Rumanians are fully responsible for Greater
Rumania. They have nothing to do with it. What could be the responsibility of Jews, in the
history books, for the disappearance of the Rumanian state?
Thus: no equality in labor, sacrifice, and struggle for the creation of the state and no equal
responsibility for its future. Equality? According to an old maxim: Equality is to treat un-equally
the unequal. What are the reasons for the Jews' demanding equal treatment, equal political rights
with the Rumanians?
>>69112110
3. Democracy is incapable of perseverance. Since it is shared by political parties that rule for
one, two, or three years, it is unable to conceive and carry out plans of longer duration. One party
annuls the plans and efforts of the other. What is conceived and built by one party today is
destroyed by another tomorrow.
In a country in which much has to be built, in which building is indeed the primary historical
requirement, this disadvantage of democracy constitutes a real danger. It is a situation similar to
that which prevails in an establishment where masters are changed every year, each new master
bringing in his own plans, ruining what was done by some, and starting new things, which will in
turn be destroyed by tomorrow's masters.
4. Democracy prevents the politician's fulfillment of his obligations to the nation. Even the most
well-meaning politician becomes, in a democracy, the slave of his supporters, because either he
satisfies their personal interests or they destroy his organization. The politician lives under the
tyranny and permanent threat of the electoral bosses.
He is placed in a position in which he must choose between the termination of his lifetime work
and the satisfaction of the demands of party members. And the politician, given such a choice,
opts for the latter. He does so not out of his own pocket, but out of that of the country. He creates
jobs, sets up missions, commissions, sinecures, all rostered in the nation's budget which put
increasingly heavy pressures on a tired people.
>>69105412
>>69112154
5. Democracy cannot wield authority, because it cannot enforce its decisions. A party cannot
move against itself, against its members who engage in scandalous malfeasance, who rob and
steal, because it is afraid of losing its members. Nor can it move against its adversaries, because
in so doing it would risk exposure of its own wrongdoings and shady business.
6. Democracy serves big business. Because of the expensive, competitive character of the
multiparty system, democracy requires ample funds. It therefore naturally becomes the servant of
the big international Jewish financiers, who enslave her by paying her.
In this manner, a nation's fate is placed in the hands of a clique of bankers.
>>69111913
It is undeniable the positive social impact the German collective spirit of camaraderie had, but is that spirit of giving really a matter of "divide the task, multiply the success"? It seems too good to be true, but that might just be by today's standards.
Also, It kind of seems like they are abandoning capitalism, which I agree with in part, so long as capitalism is embraced as a tool, not as a goal.
>>69111913
what im tying to get at is: is there room for social mobility within a fascist state?
I know you said everyone lives under the same standard but this sounds like communism with a big government in control. I would prefer communism without a big government in power in that case
>>69109496
It can be economically left or right. Pinochet was hardly left wing.
>>69106838
As if that's the only thing that matters? Jude detected.
>>69112258
The main difference between Fascist and Communist economics is that Fascist economics do leave room for social mobillity. You can become rich in a Fascist state, and you have much economic freedom in the lower classes, but you cannot become rich enough to be a threat to the nation. If you become too rich your company will be heavily controlled by the party and become semi-national in that regard. There is much economic freedom in the lower classes though, like small business owners and the like. The largest company in a Fascist nation would be about as big as Siemens, but the party would never allow you to create a company like Microsoft or Apple.
Anauê!
Vargas out fascisted our fascist party tho. Integralism is still interesting though. It's interesting to see the developments of catholic traditionalism and monarchism through a quasi-fascist experiment.
>Critics and opponents of integralism argue that the movement can be associated with fascism (especially in Latin America), although there exist deep points of disagreement: integralism stresses trade unionism and localism while fascism defends a centralist state; the traditionalist and Catholic foundation of integralist ideas against the often secular and anti-clerical, and modernist philosophical basis of fascism.[9] In addition, integralism lacks the imperialist, violent, and extreme social darwinist narratives of Fascism.
>The Integralismo Lusitano (Lusitanian Integralism) was the integralist movement of Portugal, founded in 1914. The Portuguese integralism was traditionalist, but not conservative. It was against parliamentarism and, instead, it favored decentralization, the national syndicalism, the Catholicism and the monarchy.
>Somewhat rooted in the Portuguese integralist tradition, the Brazilian integralist movement led by Plínio Salgado – Ação Integralista Brasileira – became the largest political party ever found in Brazil, with over a million members, even though it lasted less than six years as a legally recognized organization.
>>69112161
>implying the fasces is an exclusive fascist symbol
Kid's first history lesson.avi.
>>69112581
That means you can be rich and have a big mansion with lots of money to invest and give voluntarily, not by force from the government while theres another citizen that is in a small poor house (but with food on the table) and help from the government?
>>69112581
Is this because they realize the amount of power these companies hold? The idea that I'm getting is that fascism realizes that there is a void of power that some entity needs to hold, and that if those with wicked intentions come to power, then the country will become corrupted. So they hold the position, but do so with open spirits (although we are taught that they are the devil incarnate; perhaps this is to dissuade people from reliving in the glory of fascism?).
>>69105412
You guys understand that willing deciding to submit to an authoritarian ruler is top tier cuck behavior right? Why don't you realize that you're cucks?
>>69112961
You are spot on
>>69109454
>>69112967
Lolbertarian detected
DUDE OPEN BORDERS AND NO TAXES LMAO
>>69112967
This is the dilemma I am faced with as well. I don't want to give up my freedoms (or present the opportunity to do so), but I don't want to be deliberately stubborn and impede all growth by not providing some leeway. As far as my understanding goes (I am not a worldly man, I still have much to learn), fascism stands on the line I was referring to earlier. In many cases of fascism, the people all revolt against the regime, opting towards the system that coddles them the most because they have been spoiled. Fascism (or tough love-tier systems) try to fix the problem head on by addressing the issue, while the other systems dance around the problem and feed the demon. I like the "everyone gives to support the collective spirit of the nation" sentiment the greekbro brought to my attention, I didn't know that that was the case. Look at the other system that rely on welfare, feeding the demon and coddling the people so that they grow dependent on the system that solves nothing and revolt against those that do.
>>69112946
The government asks of you to show solidarity with your fellow citizens as much as it asks those of every class. And yes, the ideal was that every citizen has a house and food on the table, not that every citizen lives equally in luxury, that is what the welfare programs were for for the most part.
>>69105412
>racism
Fascists aren't anti-Puristic.
>>69105412
>>69113331
GET IN HERE
AUSSIE DAD KILLS AN ABO TRYING TO RAPE HIS DAUGHTER IN HER ROOM
AUSSIE COPS ARE CHARGING HIM WITH MURDER
FUCKING INSANE
HOME DEFENSE THREAD
GET IN HERE BURGERS YOU LOVE THIS SHIT
>>69105412
Hidden Subversion thread/
OP, i'm glad you distinguish between fascism and racism. mussolini was not an extreme racist.
the two are not the same.
>>69108294
You are putting a definition that doesn't define fascists.
>>69113505
by racism you mean an anti-purist?
Mussolini realized he was retarded and because a racial-purist.
>>69113127
Nope, grow up.
>>69113375
"The system" should be an instrument of the people to make their society better that is within popular control.
>>69113398
pretty much what >>69113375 said, i love everything about fascism expect the freedoms you lose which is an extremely contradiction.
On one hand im extremely patriotic and would love my country and sacrifice for the 'collective spirit' but i care about individual rights (like owning guns) and economic freedom just as much. So for that, i dont think im willing to give up my rights for the state tho
>>69113998
extreme*
How accurate is this?
>>69113998
?..
Fascism secures freedom.
>>69106838
The ANTISEMITISM of NS is the best part. Nigga where r u
Fascism is simple, bad things removed, strength prioritized.
>>69114059
Hitler got his nation completely destroyed within 12 years when he took the reigns. So much for freedom.
>>69107555
Yeah, and?
>>69114059
>>69114158
the fuck? no it doesnt. The state takes away your freedom so it gets more control over the system and inturn benefit you.
thats basically fascism. that "freedom" is individual right such as the US amendments
>>69106838
Why does this get replies?
Would an authoritarian, ultra-nationalist, traditionalist, militarist one-party state that used distributism instead of the corporatism, syndicalism or state capitalism espoused by most fascists still count as fascist?
>>69111655
The government being too powerful often results in war, though. Not easy to accept and vocalize constructive criticism when you're the supreme authority that cannot be questioned. So you just blame all problems on others or the Jews and go to war. Hardly a superior form of government.
>>69109008
National-syndicalism refers to the economic and political ideas of the Falnge Española de las Jons, falangism also refers to said theories while also identifying as a catholic movement
>>69114304
The state doesn't take away any "freedom" (a false concept) it removes everything undesirable.
>>69114304
>The state takes away your freedom so it gets more control over the system and inturn benefit you.
This is the essence of Fascism basically, you sacrifise your freedom for prosperity and national unity. It is a question of what you value more
>>69114353
So long as it's a racial-purist state, that is authoritarian it is Fascist.
>>69114304
It isn't anti-freedom, it is anti-degeneracy
>>69114391
I think what he's saying is that they sure as hell don't not have the opportunity to do so (i.e. go beyond the call of duty in removing the undesirable things).
>>69114420
No, freedom only exists in Fascism.
>>69112581
What you're basically saying is you have to succumb to corruption and special interest once you're even a little successful, and you have to compete against other companies that are backed by a corrupt state.
>>69114391
How is freedom a false concept? If you have more say in your state and have guaranteed rights you have more freedom than those without.
>>69107555
>Left-right spectrum exists
Neck yourself kid.
>>69105412
i like italian fascism because its not caught up in all the degeneracy shit. hitler was too obsessed with the past while mussolini looked more to the future
>>69114554
How is freedom a false concept? If you have more say in your state and have guaranteed rights you have more freedom than those without
Say something and tell me if it will happen in your freedom land, is your will valid?
>>69105412
Fascism is shit.
>>69114551
The Fascist party is the master of the state, it is above the corporations, a party composed of the nation.
>>69114659
Democracy is shit.
>>69114715
Agreed. Now let's think of a good fix.
>>69114420
A good example of freedok prevailing over prosperity and national unity is the fall of Fascism in Spain. Franco secured a booming economy and prosperous society for the Spanish people, but the regime did not survive past his death. The leftists that took the reins later proceeded to destroy the country.
>>69114779
*freedom
>>69114715
There's a huge middle ground between democracy and fascism. The optimum is somewhere between.
>>69114420
it really is a tough choice, because i value both a lot
>>69114391
Thats a really good deceptive post, are you a lawyer by any chance?
>>69114495
i agree
>>69114620
Except at the future of his economy
Just like the Nazis, they would have collapsed within a few years anyway
>>69114631
I'm only one person, I have the legal right to organize people together and vote for my interests and my whole society shares that right.
>>69114822
You're retarded. \
>>69114858
Fantasies.
>>69114715
wew right? Good thing usa is a replublic
>>69114858
The treatment of Hillary and Trump show how free freedom is. Anything going against the elites gets shut down. It's the same in any western country
>>69106997
>projecting this hard
Wew lad
>>69106337
So blair then?
>>69114916
Not an argument.
You're a doo doo head
>>69114845
cant find anyone who can back that up without screaming leftist buzzwords
>>69114822
i could see that
Fascism secures the future of the nation with one path.
>>69107214
>national catholicism
Duck off cuck, go kiss some more sand nigger feet.
>>69115015
Republics are trash.
>>69114779
The fall of the Greek Junta is a similar case. The economy and society prospered, but the people despised the regime. They would rather have their freedom than live in prosperity. This is why Fascist regimes need a cultural revolution to be fully established.
what the end of the line for fascism looks like
fugg the americans woke up and greekbro is gone
>>69114916
Good thing to see you have absolutely nothing.
>>69115046
Other European nations report a much lower perception of corruption in their nations and a much higher rate of satisfaction with their governments.
>>69114916
Nice discussion! I'm glad we have someone as constructive as you here :^)
>>69115197
I responded to shut downs with a shut down.
>>69114058
This is a nice leaflet.
Healthy food and respect for animal rights is not a fundamental part of fascism, but sure, they are compatible if you like.
>>69114858
>I have the legal right to organize people together and vote for my interests
this kind of idiocy is why I love /pol/. fascists and nazis letting anyone challenge the dictator.
HAHA AHAHA AHA AHAHAHAHAHA AHA AHAAAA
whew. that was a good one, anon. were you one of these guys on /b/?
>>69115291
Sure thing pal
>>69115140
>>69115329
I'm not a fascist, dude. I'm arguing against fascism.
>>69115117
Edgy
>>69115392
THANK YOU ETERNAL ANGLO
>>69115343
Just hide his posts he's obviously underage.
>>69115329
That guy was a fellow citizen of a republic.
>>69115418
Edgy
>>69105412
>>69105412
Pasha in turkey was pretty cool. Pretended to be 2 party but coup'd the cucks everytime! Wicked
Fascism represents the will of the nation, not the personal interests of millions and thus the interest of none but the corporations and elites/
4Chan will re-establish the Independent State of Croatia under the banner of /pol/ack ustasha
Kek has forseen it in the prophecy thread yesterday
>save Europa
>build wall
>/pol/acks aka "The Shining Ones" aka the guardians of the key to the Kingdom
>muslim fate is eternal fire
and don't forget
MEME MAGIC IS REAL
>>69107555
Fascism is right wing. Mussolini said so himself.
>>69115909
dubs have already confirmed
>>69115139
Hey Greek, you seem a smarter person than me.
How do you think about a 2 tier system like Starship Trooper: the citizen, who serve in the army and can vote, and all the other, who get much more personal freedom, the same economic liberty, but can't take part in politics?
>>69115911
Right and left wing don't exist, you can't define Fascism other than this, Racial-Purist, Authoritarian, Socialist, Nationalist, that's all.
>>69114683
How do you make the party infallible to corruption?
>>69105412
Extreme leftism. Exterminate half the population, put anyone who disagrees in work camps, and put some top level planners in power so we don't get four fucking years of Brezhnev.
>>69105412
Okay I know the wikipedia definition of facism, but what would you consider a more precise definition including a list of crucial policies?
>>69106337
Italian Fascism really is the best.
Why the fuck did Mussolini have to ally himself with that retarded Austrian faggot.
>>69115909
>>69116009
there is a third option if we wont be able to erradicate the muslims
we can form Yugoslavia as the official /pol/-made nation
although this one only offers Nigger slavery
>>69116145
It has all the power.
>>69116195
1. We demand the union of all Germans in a Great Germany on the basis of the principle of self-determination of all peoples.
2. We demand that the German people have rights equal to those of other nations; and that the Peace Treaties of Versailles and St. Germain shall be abrogated.
3. We demand land and territory (colonies) for the maintenance of our people and the settlement of our surplus population.
4. Only those who are our fellow countrymen can become citizens. Only those who have German blood, regardless of creed, can be our countrymen Hence no Jew can be a countryman.
5. Those who are not citizens must live in Germany as foreigners and must be subject to the law of aliens.
6. The right to choose the government and determine the laws of the State shall belong only to citizens. We therefore demand that no public office, of whatever nature, whether in the central government, the province. or the municipality, shall be held by anyone who is not a citizen.
We wage war against the corrupt parliamentary administration whereby men are appointed to posts by favor of the party without regard to character and fitness.
>>69108294
this is how progressives define left wing/right wing
i think its better to think of it as right wing = survival in tough times, focus on purity, (avoiding poisons and disease) strength, (ability to defend yourself and take what you need from others) and unity (ability to survive ideological threats that could destabilize the society from within)
while left wing is better defined as a focus on enjoyment and creating wealth during the absence of real threats
7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. If it should not be possible to feed the whole population, then aliens (non-citizens) must be expelled from the Reich.
8. Any further immigration of non-Germans must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately.
9. All citizens must possess equal rights and duties.
10. The first duty of every citizen must be to work mentally or physically. No individual shall do any work that offends against the interest of the community to the benefit of all.
Therefore we demand:
11. That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished.
Breaking the Bondage of Interest
12. Since every war imposes on the people fearful sacrifices in blood and treasure, all personal profit arising from the war must be regarded as treason to the people We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits.
13. We demand the nationalization of all trusts.
14. We demand profit-sharing in large industries.
15. We demand a generous increase in old-age pensions.
16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle-class, the immediate communalization of large stores which will be rented cheaply to small tradespeople, and the strongest consideration must be given to ensure that small traders shall deliver the supplies needed by the State, the provinces and municipalities.
17. We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.
18. We demand that ruthless war be waged against those who work to the injury of the common welfare. Traitors, usurers, profiteers, etc., are to be punished with death, regardless of creed or race.
19. We demand that Roman law, which serves a materialist ordering of the world, be replaced by German common law.
20. In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. The conception of the State Idea (science of citizenship) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State.
21. The State has the duty to help raise the standard of national health by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor, by increasing physical fitness through the introduction of compulsory games and gymnastics, and by the greatest possible encouragement of associations concerned with the physical education of the young.
22. We demand the abolition of the regular army and the creation of a national (folk) army.
23. We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press. In order to make possible the creation of a German press, we demand:
(a) All editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German language shall be German citizens.
Monarco-facist master race
(b) Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State. They must not be published in the German language.
(c) All financial interests in or in any way affecting German newspapers shall be forbidden to non-Germans by law, and we demand that the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper and the expulsion of the nonGermans from the Reich.
Newspapers transgressing against the common welfare shall be suppressed. We demand legal action against those tendencies in art and literature that have a disruptive influence upon the life of our folk, and that any organizations that offend against the foregoing demands shall be dissolved.
24. We demand freedom for all religious faiths in the state, insofar as they do not endanger its existence or offend the moral and ethical sense of the Germanic race.
The party as such represents the point of view of a positive Christianity without binding itself to any one particular confession. It fights against the Jewish materialist spirit within and without, and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our folk can only come about from within on the principle:
COMMON GOOD BEFORE INDIVIDUAL GOOD
25. In order to carry out this program we demand: the creation of a strong central authority in the State, the unconditional authority by the political central parliament of the whole State and all its organizations.
The formation of professional committees and of committees representing the several estates of the realm, to ensure that the laws promulgated by the central authority shall be carried out by the federal states.
The leaders of the party undertake to promote the execution of the foregoing points at all costs, if necessary at the sacrifice of their own lives.
>>69105412
>Fascism emerged later than the other major political theories and vanished before them. The alliance of the first political theory with the second political theory, as well as Hitler's suicidal geopolitical miscalculations, cased it to expire prematurely. The third political theory was a victim of 'homicide', or perhaps 'suicide', not living long enough to see old age and natural decay, in contrast to the ideology of the Soviet Union. Therefore, this bloody vampiric ghost tinged with an aura of 'absolute evil' is attractive to the decadent tastes of postmodernity, and is still used as a bogeyman to frighten humanity.
The Fourth Political Theory proclaims, 'Say "no" to fascism, "no" to Communism, and "no" to liberalism!' 'Liberalism will not work' It 'will not pass!' (¡No pasaran!), much like fascism once failed (no ha pasado). The Berlin Wall, too, collapsed: only dust remains from the only visible barrier put up by Communists to separate themselves from the liberal capitalists. The Communists 'did not pass', either. What remains is not for liberals to pass—and they will not pass! But in order for them not to pass, the fragments of the Berlin Wall are insufficient for us, as the Wall itself was insufficient. The Wall existed, but they still passed. Even less helpful are the dark shadows of the Third Reich, its nezalezhyne, inspiring only the brutal punk youth and the perverted dreams of sadomasochists.
>>69116399
>>69116441
>>69116465
>National Cucksialism
Well memed
>>69115909
what happened to the /pol/ony project?
>>69113998
You can still have those things in a fascist state. You just give up democracy.
>>69116399
>>69116441
>>69116465
>>69113998
germans under the nazis had loosened gun laws.
>>69114620
Hitler very much looked towards the future. However his biological materialist ideas about race were autistic and dumb. National socialism would have been better had it not been for the extreme racial supremacist views. I'm in favour of ethno-nationalism and I don't really like Jews but Hitler took the whole thing too far.
>>69116735 <--- especially this
>>69116633
PROOFS ??!?!
Fascism ensures the strength and abilities of each of its members.
>>69107555
Got into an argument over this exact thing with a Brit a while back. Over a joke calling someone a liberal fascist. Of course there's next to no resources on fascist behavior transcending left right dichotomy. Instead I guess I should have made the argument that the progressive left of current year exhibit behavior of fascism. I still think fascism is more a behavior, and can def transcend left and right. Of course since Wikipedia said otherwise I was dismissed.
I feel like an accurate 'lowest common denominator' definition can be 'extreme collectivism', and that is definitely possible in any quadrant of political ideology.
>>69116619
isn't /pol/ony a post-habbedongs thing?
if we fail with this we retreat to our last resort
>>69116824
it made sense at the time to recapture the lost german territories peacefully, im sure it would have morphed into something less extreme eventually. my only problem is that he literally hated and wanted to ban almost every kind of music that wasnt straight up classical. i get banning degenerate shit but not everything new is degeneracy, some things are just new.
>>69116857
i hope wikipedia meets your standards senpai
.>Few citizens owned, or were entitled to own firearms in Germany in the 1930s.[1] The Weimar Republic had strict gun control laws.[7] When the Third Reich gained power, some aspects of gun regulation were loosened, such as allowing ownership for Nazi party members and the military.[4]:672 The laws were harshened in other ways. Nazi laws disarmed "unreliable" persons, especially Jews, but relaxed restrictions for "ordinary" German citizens.[4]:670,676 The policies were later expanded to include the confiscation of arms in occupied countries.[8]:533,536
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_gun_control_theory
>>69117068
The individual is only a member of the race.
>>69117144
That's good, Hitler was the Nation, his will was that of the nation and race, the people wanted to exterminate degenerates from their lives.
>>69117144
There's a common cuckservative American meme that Hitler took away everyone's guns. It's not true at all though, as you said only Jews were disarmed.
>>69117144
shiet that awesome thanks anon
have an italian qt
