Do you think nationalism is/should be tied to race or are the two inseparable?
In other words, would you stand with blacks, mexicans, etc. in order to remove the threat of the death of western ideological/culture because of the massive influx of rapefugees in Western countries
>>69071895
>would you stand with blacks, mexicans, etc. in order to remove the threat of the death of western ideological/culture because of the massive influx of rapefugees
Niggers are a far bigger problem than refugees.
A nation is a people of similar race, culture, history, religion, and language. Niggers, Spics, Kikes, etc are none of these. Therefore, it is not possible to be a nationalist, and support other races that have no interest in supporting our European race.
>>69071895
Nationalism without race/ethnicity is known as "civic" nationalism and we tried that already in the United States and it failed miserably, because it has no naturalistic component to support itself.
>>69073745
I disagree that Civic Nationalism failed. The "White" American populace was already composed of Slavs, Mediterraneans, Germanics, and Celts, with only minute traditions lingering in their respective communities, during WWII. It was after that war that America rose to Superpower status.
The problem of today is that race-relations are at an all-time low and it's considered "racist" to force these new immigrants to abandon the core of their identity in exchange for an American one.
As long as such a policy continues, we'll turn into a repeat of Yugoslavia.
If, however, we can enforce assimilation with an iron fist, we can prolong the life of our nation.
>>69073745
Exactly. That's anti-racist fags can't grasp.
I still believe in civic nationalism desu
>>69071895
No. fuck off cuckservative.
>>69073745
/thread
>>69071895
Civic nationalism is retarded. Citizenship doesn't matter. Race does.
>>69071895
When the Italian fascists said that race didn't matter, they were thinking Italians, Germans, and Albanians, not niggers
>>69071895
Nations have fundamentally been formed to protect the interests of one unified group: one race. One ethnicity. That is the entire raison d'etre of nation states, to protect the interests and safety of an ethnicity. It has no right to exist if it doesnt fulfill that obligation.
>>69075552
This is also why colonial nations like Canada, USA, Australia and so on rather struggle with their national identity. Why issues like race and immigration are such an issue there. You can hardly legitimise "fuck off spics" by saying its a white country, when its not really, and the state is supposed to represent the interests of such a diverse group of ethnicities. It only seems to work to an extent in the USA due to its power and pressure to be patriotic.
>>69075949
Quebec does not struggle with identity like the other colonials do. Our identity issues are more like the identity issues that Europeans are having (trying to be more like the US, or in our case the US and France)
