>america
>the most vanilla yuri doujin is considered obscene, must ban, 20 years.
>tranny faggots fucking eachother with horsecocks and licking eachothers prolapsed anuses is protected "speech"
whats even the point of obscenity laws today?
>>69048936
Wtf are you even talking about?
>>69050341
obscenity laws, pretty much in almost all states there are laws that make it so you can be jailed for possessing "obscene material" with very vague definitions that let the goverment restrict the 1st amendment as long as it fits and isn't specificly protected via other laws.
>>69050839
muh hentai persecution
>>69050839
Those still exist? Furthermore what fucking cop is going to arrest you for this? Are you afraid the FBI is coming after your Yuri or something, you absolute autist
>>69050839
That was struck down by SCOTUS several years ago dumbass.
>>69051330
>Those still exist?
yes
>Furthermore what fucking cop is going to arrest you for this?
the kind who think they know better then you, you know, moralfags
>Are you afraid the FBI is coming after your Yuri or something, you absolute autist
no, I just find the idea of restricting free speech that does not harm others or support harming others abhorrent
>>69051436
citation? I here this alot but never actually see the case. There have been public cases in the last 5 years in the US.
>>69052554
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/16/national/16CND-PORN.html
>>69048936
I've come to tell you all that the prophecies will be fulfilled: He will come on a winter's night, unbeknownst to his people, and he will deliver all from evil. He, who is to be borne as a Briton in Britain, will usher in the new light.
>>69053642
>2002
that just keeps it from getting charged the same as actual shit, obscenity laws are different and cover anything a "reasonable person" would consider obscene
>>69054212
That's not at all what it did, it struck down two parts of a law dealing with virtual child pornography. Did you actually read the article or the majority opinion?
>>69054552
Yes, it stops it from being banned itself, It doesn't stop it from being banned as obscene material under state laws though.
>>69055294
>It doesn't stop it from being banned as obscene material under state laws though.
Yes it does. If you challenge the state's law in court the precedent set in this case will result in that law being deemed unconstitutional.
>>69055753
then why are there still cases after this law? take U.S. v. Handly from 2010 for example where some guy got forced into a plea deal in the end for even mild shit, wouldn't you think a professional lawyer would have thought of using the SCOPUS case?
>>69048936
Which doujin was it again?
>>69056379
Because he took the plea deal. Had he taken it to court he likely would have won and there's no possible way he would have received the maximum sentence.
>>69056928
So your saying he just had a shit lawyer then?
>>69057403
That or he was afraid of doing 15 years in prison if he lost the case. People take shitty plea deals all the time.
