If /pol/ can give me any actual evidence that blacks have lower intelligence than whites I'll believe it, but I've never actually seen any.
google black twitter
that one MS Paint chart I saw on /pol/ once
>>69014116
1) It's called IQ
2) You have never been around niggers if you need to ask this
3) Everyone knows you area nigger if you honestly need to ask this and can not do 5 minutes of research and will probably respond to this with some bullshit like not an argument or you didn't answer the question
4) Hang yourself
>>69014315
/thread
>>69014116
Africa.
>>69014116
if a lil nigga was raised by white parents away from nigga music he would behave normally
>>69014350
all I'm looking for is a link to a study that shows that blacks have lower IQ than whites
>>69014116
Do you acknowledge that black athletes run the fastest? I think we can all pretty much agree that they do. So what is so hard to grasp about whites being the smartest?
>>69014350
You make all americans look retarded.
>>69014673
>blacks run the fastest so whites are the smartest
that's not evidence
>>69014116
>>69014530
Look at a foster home
Nobody with parents all start off pretty shit
only around 3 percent of people actually go to college
Go ask peopl who have been in a foster hom what the 3 percent looked like
White, Hispanic and Aisan
Niggers can into smart
>>69014832
can't*
There's no way to prove any of it, because there is no precise way to measure intelligence. Know your aptitudes, and utilize them accordingly, or don't, and blame your failures on external factors like a little trans girl on her ... ass period.
>>69014832
>Nobody with parents all start off pretty shit
>Go ask peopl who have been in a foster hom what the 3 percent looked like
I don't think you should be in this argument. Just stop while you're behind. No one knows what you're even trying to say.
>>69014764
The graphs and evidence are out there. Do you believe that all human races are of equal intelligence?
>>69014813
>IQ estimate
hmmm... this looks to me like total and complete bullshit..how long is that neckbeard anon?
>>69014832
they are not away from nigga music and nigga culture
>>69014665
How about countries that were established and relatively advanced, then took over by blacks and literally DE-EVOLVED..
Haiti, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Rhodesia, ect.
>inb4shitsorm of statistical charts
>>69014665
Here you go:
http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/10/james-watson-tells-inconvenient-truth_296.php
All studies are sourced at the bottom of the article and there are huge amounts of them.
Sub-Saharan Africa
Countries: 43
W/ data: 20 (47% coun/78% pop)
Studies: 65
IQ: 68
West Africa
Countries: 20
W/ Data: 6 (30% coun/65% pop)
Studies: 15
IQ: 67
Central Africa
Countries: 5
W/ Data: 3 (60% coun/80% pop)
Studies: 9
IQ: 64
East Africa
Countries: 8
W/ Data: 5 (63% coun/93% pop)
Studies: 16
IQ: 72
Southern Africa
Countries: 10
W/ Data: 6 (60% coun/76% pop)
Studies: 25
IQ: 69
So there's over a hundred studies that all say the same thing. How many studies do you need? THEY ARE ALL AT THE LINK.
>>69015130
Pretty much this.
>>69014116
Read "The Bell Curve"
https://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
Got time for 60 pages. Enjoy
>>69014116
>but I've never actually seen any.
You mustn't have looked very hard.
Look at any cognitive test administered on multi-racial samples during the past 100 years.
In fact, I'm not sure there has been a single instance of blacks outscoring whites on any kind of cognitive test.
>>69014116
Just look at pictures of white civilisations
Then look at black ones
>white people held black people back
we took their land with guns whilst they were running around with leafs and spears
>>69015378
>Bijmer lads
>American names
Always irks me a bit.
>>69014116
Well you dont live in the US or you would see it everyday.
>>69014116
Op ask for one single legit source. Thread provides 1 obviously bias link with no backing in the science community.
Maybe whites have low IQ since they don't understand citing credible sources when statements of facts
>>69014371
isn't an IQ below 70 classified as retarded?
are aborigines retarded?
>>69014371
So that's why there's so much shitposting.
>>69014116
Are their actions not enough evidence?
>>69016076
No, huffing gasoline and sleeping on the road are signs of heightened intelligence.
Abo = master race
>>69016100
it's for Indigenous peoples
>>69016076
>62 IQ on average
>never invented anything relevant
>burned all their big ass island's flora
>known for sniffing oil
>Need governement ads telling them not to sleep on roads
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XA241Lg70fg
>Regularly die in governement paid houses because they make fire in the center of living rom
http://www.cbc.ca/news/aboriginal/first-nations-10-times-more-likely-to-die-in-house-fires-1.3374631
I don't know Anon, are they?
>>69014813
>>69014371
Any study based on IQ tests is pretty fallacious, since almost all psychologists agree it doesn't measure real intelligence. Also, IQ scores have been shown to increase with education level. However, I think the real question is why didn't Africans invent schools, universities, etc.
>>69016480
>Any study based on IQ tests is pretty fallacious, since almost all psychologists agree it doesn't measure real intelligence.
I hate this meme.
Literally every single psychologist agrees that IQ tests are accurate measures of intelligence. The only people who deny the validity of IQ are not psychologists, but (usually marxist) social """"scientists"""".
>Also, IQ scores have been shown to increase with education level
No shit, could it be that smarter people make it to college?
>>69016480
>"Hey it's been proven that Democrats have higher IQs than Conservatives!"
>Point out how it also proves niggers are mentally retarded
>"Wow, you know that IQ doesn't equate to intelligence right?"
>>69016604
>Literally every single psychologist agrees that IQ tests are accurate measures of intelligence.
fuckin lol
>>69016480
Define "real intelligence".
>IQ scores have been shown to increase with education level
Wrong, high intelligence is correlated with education level but the later doesnt really extend your intelligence, which is 75-80% genetic and correlated on 0.4 with your brain size.
Intelligence is correlated with a lot of factors, like criminal rate, type of job, success in mariage, etc.
>>69016755
>fuckin lol
Are you literally a drooling retard?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainstream_Science_on_Intelligence
2 years is all they need to turn the "breadbasket of africa" into a starving nation.
Please take not how the more "genetically pure nigger" afro-americans are the more they fail at life on average.
>>69014665
https://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
>>69016076
They were fauna until the second half of the 20th century
>>69016480
Actually IQ is the most reliable, replicable type of measurement in psychology
https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/2004-deary.pdf
Nothing predicts intelligence of success better than IQ
>>69014336
Yes, I vividly remember a collage of images with the words: "Nigger" in bright red over the top of the image.
Something about paying a toll of some sort
>>69015130
>established and well - developed.
>haiti
If your definition of modernization means colonialization
>Taken over
Caribbean Islanders and slaves from Africa.
Two very different things friendo.
>>69014315
first post best post
>>69016755
>>69016480
Muh all scientists made up facts.
Here is an actual study of intelligence researchers.
http://drjamesthompson.blogspotDOTCODOTUK/2016/03/what-intelligence-researchers-think.html
Only 17% think genetics has no impact on the black/white iq gap in the USA.
>>69017029
>>69016604
>>69016772
just googled some stuff about the IQ tests validity, sounds like you guys are actually right. In school I was always taught that IQ wasn't valid, but according to wikipedia, most psychologists agree it is.
>>69016665
nice strawman argument, I didn't say anything along those lines
http://www.nature.com/articles/srep11713
>genes explaining a bigger proportion of the differences between children (54-65%) than environmental factors, such as school and family combined (14-21%)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770698/
>global brain volume and intelligence, results from existing studies have shownpredominantly positive correlations ranging from 0 to 0.6, with
the majority of MRI studies reporting correlations around 0.3 or 0.4 (Wickett et al., 2000; McDaniel, 2005; Witelson et al., 2006)
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028960200137X
>These brain size differences, containing millions of brain cells and hundreds of millions of synapses, were hypothesized to underlie the race differences on IQ tests, in which Blacks average an IQ of 85, Whites 100, and East Asians 106. The validity of the race differences in brain size, however, continues to be disputed. In the present study, the race differences in brain size are correlated with 37 musculoskeletal variables shown in standard evolutionary textbooks to change systematically with increments in brain size.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289604001357
>For all age and sex groups, it
is clear that brain volume is positively correlated with intelligence.
You guys need more? I do have some in stock.
>>69015429
Hey OP, this is the real deal.
>>69015151
Check it op
>>69017394
>In school I was always taught that IQ wasn't valid
Schools should be renamed "marxist indoctrination centers". You can safely assume that anything non-STEM related you learned in school is a distortion of truth to fit a marxist agenda.
If you're interested in eating the fruit of forbidden knowledge, you can start with these wiki articles :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ
>>69014116
Hey op, we've had to provide this proof so many times everybody is a bit apathetic towards the topic. I know that you will almost assuredly revert to your beliefs as they are now regardless of what evidence I show you but I can try.
I'll respond my sources to this post
>>69014665
Hundreds of studies. Sources at the bottom. Draw your own conclusions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence
>>69017790
Nevermind it looks like 10 people have already posted good sources. Good go see pol hasn't lost its touch
Anyway op is a britcuck so he's been indoctrinated since fucking birth, he's fucked no matter what he reads barring a major life event.
>>69014665
Reality says hi:
Intelligence is largely heritable
http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/v16/n10/full/mp201185a.html
http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ng.2250.html
http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ng.2237.html
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/309/5741/1717.abstract
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/international-team-uncovers-new-231989.aspx
https://gene.sfari.org/GeneDetail/CNTNAP2#HG
CNTNAP2 and MCPH1 genes.
The rs10784502 (T allele) variant of the CNTNAP2 gene associated with increased cranial volume has a greater frequency in
East-Asian and Indo-European populations, and less in most African populations:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/snp_ref.cgi?rs=rs10784502
The Haplogroup D allele of MCPH1 gene is unique to Eurasian populations. Sub-Saharan Africans lack this allele:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcephalin#Evolution
The 15 point IQ difference between blacks and whites is in part due to genetics
http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/pppl1.pdf
http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/2005hereditarian-hypothesis.pdf
http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/2012RaceandRushton.pdf
http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen-reply-to-commentaries-on-30years.pdf
http://www.gnxp.com/MT2/archives/004064.html
>rs236330 is a gene strongly expressed in neurons, including. hippocampal neurons and developing brains, where it regulates neuronal morphology. rs324650 is a gene involved in neuronal excitability, synaptic plasticity and feedback regulation of acetylcholine release. Another 10 genes may have been found. East Asian populations (Japanese, Chinese) have the highest average frequency of beneficial alleles (39%), followed by Europeans (35.5%) and sub-Saharan Africans (16.4%).
http://www.ibc7.org/article/journal_v.php?sid=312
Addendum for Stomfags -
The difference in means is probably real, but that doesn't eliminate the outliers either. That black uni prof is still smarter than you.
this here is the Minnesota trans-racial adoption study, it's special because the researchers actually sought to reach the opposite conclusion, that intelligence is largely environmental and that blacks raised by white intellectuals would perform at an equal level as whites but alas it's yet another victory for the heredetarianists' narrative
>>69018209
Second part:
>Following the world distribution of the major gene of intelligence, recently discovered by Volkmar Weiss, we notice that in Sub-Saharan Africa this gene is practically non-existent, as its carriers amount to 1-2% of the population whereas in many regions of Eurasia the gene can be found in almost 50% of the population.
http://www.v-weiss.de/C2orf16.pdf
>New findings are generally concordant with recent work that brain structure may vary significantly across populations of different racial or ethnic backgrounds. Single nucleotide polymorphism in the neuroplastin locus associates with cortical thickness and intellectual ability in adolescents. Common variants at 6q22 and 17q21 associated with intracranial volume are more common among Eurasians.
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0013642
http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/mp2013197a.html
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608001074
http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v44/n5/full/ng.2245.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/snp_ref.cgi?rs=rs10784502
>we find that genes involved in osteoblast development, hair follicles development, pigmentation, spermatid, nervous system and organ development, and some metabolic pathways have higher levels of population differentiation.
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/16
>The ASPM gene of Chromosome 1 has been shown to effect brain morphology and defects lead to smaller brains and low IQ.
http://hmg.oxfordjournals.org/content/13/5/489.abstract
>A new ASPM allele arose in Eurasia and has been suspected at increasing intelligence and has been demonstrated to be absent in Blacks.
http://www.pnas.org/content/104/26/10944
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/309/5741/1720.abstract
>>69014315
This is where the thread stops.
>>69018225
>That black uni prof is still smarter than you.
except that he's only there to fill a quota. I guess we'll never know.
>>69018225
No shit, we're talking about averages here.
>>69014116
There is no evidence that Blacks are, in general, as intelligent as Whites.
>>69018225
Tell that to nigger enablers
>I know a smart nigger! This proves that all niggers are smart!
>>69014371
why does /pol/ always fail to acknowledge the existence of the flynn effect?
>>69014116
stop by east cleveland, sometime
>>69017394
>In school I was always taught that IQ wasn't valid
Teacher here. Multiple intelligences are all the rage nowadays even though we barely know shit about them.
They're more like ways to learn. Your teachers are always supposed to avoid telling smart kids they're smart because motivation is the single biggest factor in learning; if everyone tells you that you're dumb, you won't bother studying; whether you're actually smart or dumb you'll never know because you didn't try.
>>69014116
They were just left behind...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEEGO-39sqY
>>69018640
"The Bell Curve" was cited though. Also Flynn effect doesn't compensate everything gene-related that has been cited ITT.
>>69014116
ever seen Detroit?
>>69018640
I'll google this to learn more, but considering you already seem to know, care to enlighten me?
>>69018209
>Intelligence is largely heritable
This is the wrong statement. You are trying to say that one race has different allele frequencies for intelligence; e.i. Blacks have higher frequencies of "bad" alleles. As one of your papers points out, intelligence is probably highly polygenic, with hundreds or thousands of genes contributing to it. if blacks had allele frequencies clustered for that many genes we would have detected that in the human genome project decades ago.
>The Haplogroup D allele of MCPH1 gene is unique to Eurasian populations. Sub-Saharan Africans lack this allele:
Haplogroups have nothing to do with genes or alleles. Also, no allele for any gene has been found to be unique or excluded from any human population. also, the allele you are referncing causes microcephaly, a genetic disorder (common among stormfront memebers)
>The 15 point IQ difference between blacks and whites is in part due to genetics
Rushton was as PSYCHOLOGY professor with no training in genetics or biology. He provides no basis in genetics for any of his claims. He's not a real scientist.
>http://www.ibc7.org/article/journal_v.php?sid=312
Unpublished manuscript that has no been peer reviewed.
>Common variants at 6q22 and 17q21 associated with intracranial volume are more common among Eurasians.
None of those papers make any claims whatsoever about allele distributions. That statement is a lie. Also, the correlaton between brain/skull size and IQ is less than 0.3
>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/16
Your skin is not your brain. Very few genes have been showed to have geographic allele distributions. Pointing out the few that do does not discount that tens of thousands of genes that don't.
>http://www.pnas.org/content/104/26/10944
This paper only talks about "linguistic tone" and doesn't mention intelligence or IQ at all.
Once again, storm from, you make connections that aren't there, prove you nothing about science, and lie.
>>69016476
Show me a retard capable of building a fire and then we'll talk. They're clearly noble savages
>>69018242
One fault social science study from the 70s does not discount 40 years of research in genetics.
http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1455.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2271140/
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.10079/abstract;jsessionid=F7CE43E76C6B6AF7D965CF1A2F1C7E34.f02t03
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929707610015
http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1435.html
http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1436.html
http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1454.html
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2739576?sid=21105479746581&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739904&uid=3739256
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14655871
>>69016480
>since almost all psychologists agree it doesn't measure real intelligence.
I wonder why.
>>69019188
1st world countries tend more to buy educational toys to their kids wich prepare them better for IQ tests.
I don't believe it. The hen or the egg thing. Buying educational toys to your kids don't make them smater.
Better explanantion is: High IQ parent tend more to buy educational toys to their kids and high IQ parent tend to have high IQ kids.
Flyyn had white guilt.
>>69019274
I see you carefully avoid everything else I've posted, but let's go I guess.
>None of those papers make any claims whatsoever about allele distributions. That statement is a lie. Also, the correlaton between brain/skull size and IQ is less than 0.3
Wrong, I gave a paper talking about that here >>69017460
>Rushton was as PSYCHOLOGY professor with no training in genetics or biology. He provides no basis in genetics for any of his claims. He's not a real scientist.
Nice ad hominem. You're still not disproving anything he has done, nor do you aknowledge Jensen or Lynn works with similar results.
>Haplogroups have nothing to do with genes or alleles.
They literally "mark" your tribe of origin, who your ancestors were and, of course, some of the genes you inherited from them. Those particular SNP are what allow us to distinguish the big human races clusters (pic).
Not even answering your other points, you are purposely not understanding what they are implying.
>>69017574
>You can safely assume that anything non-STEM related you learned in school is a distortion of truth to fit a marxist agenda
Truth.
>>69019188
Basically, developed nations and areas tend to have higher IQs on average. This eventually sort of plateaus once a nation's quality of life has reached a certain point.
So, for example, you likely have a higher IQ than someone of the last generation, and so on because the nation is more developed now than it was 20 years ago.
So yeah, black nations have lower IQs because they are amongst the least developed. This can also be said for black neighborhoods in the US for example. Consider those a sort of underdeveloped microcosm within the nation.
>>69019878
I think you're right, but also there must be some effect that education and society have on people in general, for the average IQ is said to go up about 10 points every generation, and I'm sure if you could go back in time, whites would have lower IQ's in the Victorian era than now. I don't think humans are immune to the same mechanisms that animals are subject to, for if you take a pig out of domestication, the piggies that pig has will be like wild boars. I think this should be evidence of a physical alteration that occurs because of environment.
>>69020043
>Nice ad hominem. You're still not disproving anything he has done, nor do you aknowledge Jensen or Lynn works with similar results.
I don't need to, the past decades of research in REAL HARD SCIENCE already discredit him.
>They literally "mark" your tribe of origin, who your ancestors were and, of course, some of the genes you inherited from them.
You need to look up haplogroups are and what they are based on. They are always in non-coding regions on the Y chromosome or mitrochondrial DNA. They have nothing to do with coding genes or allele frequencies. You have no knowledge on how haplogroups work. educate yourself. SNPs are literally SINGLE base pair mutations. Also, no haplogroups line up with what most people call "races."
>Wrong, I gave a paper talking about that here
You linked another Rushton paper. His papers have no evidence based in genetics, especially not as specific as allele distributions.
>>69020152
And yet all the "race" scientists like Rushton, Jenson, Singer, and so on were all professors of psychology, sociology, or economics with no education in hard science.
>>69020203
But these changes, I would argue, are not immediate, and would only occur after decades at least. Otherwise it would stand that you could take a person out of their conditions, and foreseeable they would change rather quickly. I think you guys in germany are a good example of how that simply won't happen.
>>69014116
Nigga looks 40.
lmao, OP BTFO
>>69020484
>I don't need to, the past decades of research in REAL HARD SCIENCE already discredit him.
Except they don't and everything have been provided ITT to prove that. You didnt provide anything to counter it.
>You have no knowledge on how haplogroups work. educate yourself
I said haplogroups are a mark of your ancestors, and of course if your ancestors had some SNP (the ones linked with intelligence, of blue eyes and red hair for example) you and you race possess it from them. Either you're not understanding the link on purpose or you're idiotic and i'm done with you.
>You linked another Rushton paper. His papers have no evidence based in genetics, especially not as specific as allele distributions.
You didnt even read did you?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770698/
>global brain volume and intelligence, results from existing studies have shownpredominantly positive correlations ranging from 0 to 0.6, with
the majority of MRI studies reporting correlations around 0.3 or 0.4 (Wickett et al., 2000; McDaniel, 2005; Witelson et al., 2006)
You have to go back my Reddit friend.
>>69020596
You're absolutely right, it would not be an immediate thing. Taking someone out of a shitty ghetto and putting them in a nice comfy mansion won't make their IQ skyrocket. It certainly does take decades because it takes decades for nations to undergo development.
>>69020977
>Except they don't and everything have been provided ITT to prove that. You didnt provide anything to counter it.
Here you go >>69019356
>>69020977
>the majority of MRI studies reporting correlations around 0.3 or 0.4 (Wickett et al., 2000; McDaniel, 2005; Witelson et al., 2006)
>0.3 to 0.4
hahaha it's still not above. 0.95.
>>69020977
>I said haplogroups are a mark of your ancestors, and of course if your ancestors had some SNP (the ones linked with intelligence, of blue eyes and red hair for example
Haplogroups have nothing to do with distributions of genes or "races." You have no understanding of genetics and are just parroting stuff you read on stormfront. Like I already said, haplogroups are not based on coding autosomal DNA. SNPs are nothing something exclusive to haplogroups, it's just had SNPs of certain regions of DNA can be used in haplogroup studies. It's impossible to use SNPs or allele frequencies for haplogroup studies because of crossing over.
>>69021546
All he did was acknowledge the IQ gap. He didn't make any claim that the basis of it was in race, nor did he publish any evidence to that effect.
>>69021434
Here >>69019274 you said:
>Also, the correlaton between brain/skull size and IQ is less than 0.3
That's just wrong, as you know acknowledge. I've never pretended it was "0.95". I guess this fine example of you lying or being in the wrong and then twisting what I said pretty much show how intellectually dishonest you are. You can go back now.
>>69020977
/argument
>>69021804
I've just seen different evidence. Either way it's irrelevant because a correlation of 0.3-0.4 is nowhere near statistically significant. The point still stands that there is no real correlation with brain/skull size and IQ.
>>69014116
>be black race
>be living in mud huts for 2000 years
>tell your self you was kingz'n shieet
>start beliving the lie
>>69014116
>ive never been around niggers
>>69020436
This may interest you, anon. A study about trans-racial adoption. Sample too small to be significant but interesting.
tl;dr : environement plays a role but heredity is still the major factor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study
>>69014116
>>69014315
Fpbp
>>69022089
The annual engineers and doctors picnic!
>>69022089
Same as canadians after a hockey game.
>>69022089
world star
>>69022271
Pretty sure that won't happen this year since Habs play like shit and won't do the series.
>>69014371
WRONG
CROATIA IS IN EUROPEAN RANGE,IT?S THE FUCKING BOSNIANS AND ALBANIANS THAT TANK THE IQ POINTS
FIX THIS CRAP
>>69022089
Why don't they turn that agressivity into some money making show?
>>69021934
>I've just seen different evidence
And they where wrong, as I proved to you.
>Either way it's irrelevant because a correlation of 0.3-0.4 is nowhere near statistically significant. The point still stands that there is no real correlation with brain/skull size and IQ.
Looks like you nigger can't even read
>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2770698/
>For assessments of relationships between global brain volume and intelligence, results from existing studies have shown predominantly positive correlations ranging from 0 to 0.6, with the majority of MRI studies reporting correlations around 0.3 or 0.4 (Wickett et al., 2000; McDaniel, 2005; Witelson et al., 2006). A visual impression of how total brain volume (TBV) relates to intelligence is provided in Figure 1 (first panel). In order to determine whether all brain regions are equally related to intelligence or whether there are certain structures that are selectively altered in more intelligent individuals, a number of studies have increased their regional specificity by measuring the area or volume of regions of interest (ROIs) following boundaries based on structural or functional anatomy. Again, mainly positive correlations have been reported, where the most significant and frequently detected associations are observed within the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes, the hippocampus, and the cerebellum (Andreasen et al., 1993; Flashman et al., 1997; MacLullich et al., 2002).
I could give you other studies going this way but you will not give them a shot because "muh stormfront" (I'm not from there but I know you won't trust me).
I've already proven you wrong on the brain size/IQ relationship and still you don't even try to read or understand what I'm saying. I'm done with you, and thanksfully I've dumped enough of what I have to help OP. Bye Reddit.
>>69016480
Its a mix of geological conditions with cultural heritage desu. Africa (in its vast majority) was unable to achieve some degree of centralism because of its sparse population and unforgiving conditions which lead to no political institutions that regulated society at large. It was just a bunch of tribes who were entirely focused on surviving which lead to no icentive for innovation or evolution as a society.
>>69022354
GO SUCK DICK WITH YOU MAP
>>69022354
>Albania 82
>Serbia 92
>Serbias south full of Albanians
kek, why are Albanians so dumb?
>>69022457
Nowhere in that statement does it say the correlations are statistically significant, just that they are "mainly positive correlations."
For something to be scientifically accepted it has to meet certain statistical standards. You don't even have an undergraduate level of science itself.
I also like how you're sticking to this one topic when I clearly debunked all your other claims, and you completely ignored the papers I linked that state in black and white with no uncertain terms the nature of genetics and race.
I know it's all pointless though. You don't care about truth, you're just going to keep on making connections that aren't there, believing in 40 year old disproven studies, and making claims on topics of which you know nothing about.
>>69022076
thanks hat
>>69022766
interesting - this makes sense to me. I know a lot of African tribes did crazy shit like running for hours every day in the desert trying to catch an antelope or whatever, I guess when youre doing that you dont really think about government or math or whatever.
>>69019349
wait, it's hard to use a lighter?
