>implying they werent basically the same
Other than Hitler being a space cadet tier idealistic autist, and Stalin being a cold sociopathic misanthropic cunt, there werent any real differences.
Sure you cant list the text book points about how fascism and communism are "OMG TOTALLY DIFFERENT" but in practice, its the same shit
>>68960050
You're right, but the autists on this website will never accept that Hitler was an Islam-loving, pro-censorship, self-contradicting, slav-hating, manlet imperialist who destroyed Europe by being arrogant enough to think he could conquer it all and made the whole continent into a war zone.
>>68960295
>slav-hating,
Thats another thing I dont get at all. All the neo-nazi stuff in slavic countries. Makes about as much sense as jewish nazis
>>68960050
No. The very foundation of the ideology was different. This shapes public policy and the future of the nation. All revolutions have their beginnings, some bloodier than others, but when the smoke clears, what kind of civilization will the people who are left build?
The Communists would have attempted to make every human on Earth equal. The civilizations of Europe and the US would regress toward the global mean, which, thanks to niggers, is below the average for a technologically advanced society. Under Hitler we would have purified the race and *hopefully* recolonized the Earth and brought the shitskins to heel. We would definitely be in a better place to deal with global overpopulation, the solution to which we currently have is to pretend it doesn't exist and claim everyone could live happily in Texas so there's plenty of room for us all.
Hitler and Stalin needed to kill a lot of people in order to free themselves of their opponents and people weighing down their progress, but the Nazis quickly improved Germany after the dust settled. Did Stalin? Nope.
>>68960792
Hitler's ideology honestly couldn't be matched with any modern ideology, including the mainstream alt-right.
>>68960991
Aaannd you literally wrote a paragraph and a half of nothing besides "but Hitler was stronk and liked whites more".
Also
>The Nazis quickly improved Germany after the dust settled
What dust? Last time I checked, the only dust settling was after the 2nd world war, which destroyed Germany. Improving the Weimar republic isn't much of an accomplishment.
Grab a rifle and just blow your fucking brains out, you need to update your algorithms shillbot.
>>68960991
>No. The very foundation of the ideology was different. This shapes public policy and the future of the nation. All revolutions have their beginnings, some bloodier than others, but when the smoke clears, what kind of civilization will the people who are left build?
>The Communists would have attempted to make every human on Earth equal. The civilizations of Europe and the US would regress toward the global mean, which, thanks to niggers, is below the average for a technologically advanced society. Under Hitler we would have purified the race and *hopefully* recolonized the Earth and brought the shitskins to heel. We would definitely be in a better place to deal with global overpopulation, the solution to which we currently have is to pretend it doesn't exist and claim everyone could live happily in Texas so there's plenty of room for us all.
This is all "on paper" differences though, Im talking about in practice.
>Did Stalin? Nope.
Stalin obviously did better than Hitler. He turned his country into one of the two super powers in the ashes of WW2, even though he had this fucking huge empire that he shouldnt have been able to handle and after he got hit the hardest of all the allies in the war.
>>68960792
>Makes about as much sense as jewish nazis
Jewish Nazis are actually very common.
>>68961320
>reee shill!
great response stormfag
>>68961666
>Jewish Nazis
lol what are you talking about satan?
Other than some fringe group, or something like the Aryan brotherhood which is lead by a jew