Give me one good reason why all people with an IQ less than say 100, be shouldn't kept in work camps as labourers.
>>68947402
is okcupid a satirical site?
because stupid people can still occasionally have valuable ideas or opinions
because prisons and camps are for people who have implicitly committed some sort of dangerous transgression
because the IQ system is not a definitive measure of intellect due to there being many different kinds of intelligence
because if we put retarded faggots in camps you would be the first in line
because I'm too lazy for a work camp.
>>68947949
But if we look at every GREAT society, it has thrived because of slavery. Think of all the time we'd have to dedicate ourselves to intellectual pastimes!
Key word
>occasionally
Most of the time they're just a drain on our resources.
Sure the IQ system isn't perfect, but if we revised it a little, I'm sure we'd have some degree of success in weeding out the brain-dead.
>different kinds of intelligence
Yeah, I completely agree. However, if they are deemed as unworthy to participate in society, they can still use their unconventional intelligence in the camps as they rise to higher positions among the dummies. Following this, I think it would be reasonable to have a system where they can file to have their case reevaluated and can then , if successful, rejoin society.
>>68947402
Killing them?
>>68948262
To this I would propose: everyone physically incapable and/or unwilling should be euthanised. Unless their relations pay an annual tax to the government to compensate for letting this trash roam our streets.
>>68948860
Eventually, once they reach a stage where they are no longer productive they shall be systematically euthanised.
Because thats half the population. And high IQ doesnt solve the human problems and flaws, like vanity, envy, etc
>>68948705
Yeah, and 1/3 of Greece's and Rome's population were slaves also automation made it pointle- OH WAIT I JUST NOTICED THE FLAG
>>68949387
It actually does solve a lot of problems.
