Compass thread post em
https://www.politicalcompass.org/test
Go big or go home.
>>68775194
Ehh, 6.5 out of 10
Honest hard working citizen, but still thinks the government should have next to no power.
am i beyond saving?
>>68775301
Can you explain to me what Fundamentalism is? I am confused on what is is. . .
>>68775473
It can only have power as long as it benefits me. And since we never know when that might cease to be, we have to take our chances with freedom.
>>68775493
No, you'll be on Purple square cancer, and then evolve to Authoritarian, and then eventually, you'll be where I am or a similar ideology (Fascism, Nationalism, etc. . .) Master race. but right now your a 0/10 commit suicide welfare nanny faggot.
>>68775696
No we can't. Big government and a central party is needed to get things done. I mean look at China, that nation is glorious and rich, the only problem they have is pollution and there child laws, and that is understandable as they are just coming into the modern era in like the last 50 years or so.
>>68775194
sauce on that krueger sec thingy?
>>68775545
like traditionalism, but more rule following
>>68775954
working on it rn senpai, thx
Anarcho-capitalist reporting in.
>>68775954
As much as I would like to live in a totalitarian fascist world government whose purpose was to purge the entire galaxy of degeneracy, we never know when that government might lash out at us. So I think Democracy + Free-market capitalism (no handouts, bailouts or regulations) + Execution on public square for corruption + Colonizing Africa and the Middle East would equal greatness.
>>68776034
It's from Mirror's Edge. I just went to their website and downloaded the photo.
>>68775150
If you're not in the blue, you're either brain damaged or a hippie faggot.
>>68776034
It's good. I still don't understand, do fundamentalists want bigger government? Like communists or what? I mean if you look at where fundamentalism is on the red square you get communism.
>>68776248
4/10.
Probably a hard working citizen but is a anarchist faggot.
>>68776309
7.5 out of 10
According to 2 compasses your a Nationalist which are based hard working citizens that are 10/10, would rate higher but according to one your a traditionalist.
>>68775954
As if pollution might not be the nail in the coffin for their country.
Just get off my damn property
>>68776326
It's calibrated for green I think
>>68775150
I'm almost true netueral. Love it.
Some of the questions were to cut and dry though. Like the same sex adoption or mothers working.
>>68776650
5.5/10
Still purple square cancer but is probably a hard working citizen, just keep working your way up to the top blue/the whole red square (Besides degenerate socialism) and you can be 10/10
>>68776816
Green square fag, but is a centrist almost close to red square master race, so I guess you can be 6.5/10
>>68776326
Blue is good, sometimes if your a nationalist or fascist, other than that there faggots.
>>68776326
Plus your probably not even blue square because you haven't posted your compass.
if it ain't blue,it's gotta be a jew
>>68777811
8/10
based Authoritarian, give yourself a pat on the back for being a honest hard working citizen.
>>68777929
Where's your compass faggot.
smells like spooky property
>>68778188
I'm genuinely curious by what your trying to convey by making this post. Please explain.
>be nigger
D-did I dun gud massa?
>>68776832
>>68776927
>red square
>good
Fuck off pinko.
I love my private land and freedom, but fuck greedy corporations.
>>68778410
6.5 out of 10,
Would rate higher, your probably a honest hard working citizen, but your a cuckservitave who supports limited government. Move yourself up to Nationalist or fascist go a little bit more left to right authoritarian to uncuck your shit up.
>>68775473
>>68775740
>>68775954
The only thing worse than a bootlicker is an arrogant bootlicker.
>>68778662
0/10
Anything green square that is not centrist is gay.
>>68778662
>"I love freedom"
>doesn't support economic freedom
>>68778696
How am I a bootlicker? Explain.
>>68778525
Tell me why red square isn't good then faggot.
>>68778838
Post your compass faggot let's see where you are, probably green square cancer who hides it because he is a faggot.
>>68778662
Mr. Gekko would like to have a word with you.
>>68778696
I'm not a statist you fucking faggot, I'm a Totalitarian.
>>68779271
How am I a fedora tipper you faggot.
>>68778881
>How am I a bootlicker? Explain.
Are you unfamiliar with the term "bootlicker"? It's applied to authoritarians such as yourself. It means that you enjoy licking the boots of those who dominate you, such as those in the government.
>>68778951
I already did. Don't you know how ID's work?
>>68779113
>I'm not a statist you fucking faggot, I'm a Totalitarian.
All political philosophies can be grouped into one of two categories: statism or anarchism. You can only be a statist or anarchist.
Furthermore, are you of the opinion that totalitarians aren't statists? Is there a form of totalitarianism that doesn't involve the presence of a state? I'm usually pretty good at detecting b8, but can you actually be this unintelligent?
>>68779113
>I'm not gay, I'm a homosexual
>>68775150
Common-sense patrician coming through.
>>68779359
Oh sorry I missed your compass
>Are you unfamiliar with the term "bootlicker"? It's applied to authoritarians such as yourself. It means that you enjoy licking the boots of those who dominate you, such as those in the government.
'Totalitarian
>All political philosophies can be grouped into one of two categories: statism or anarchism. You can only be a statist or anarchist.
Furthermore, are you of the opinion that totalitarians aren't statists? Is there a form of totalitarianism that doesn't involve the presence of a state? I'm usually pretty good at detecting b8, but can you actually be this unintelligent?
Evidence? I am a Totalitarian not a statist, your b8ing me now, I won't even argue with you on this one considering that statist are a little different from Totalitarians.
Btw, I'm in no way licking there boots, I am just stating facts.
>>68779345
>be totalitarian
>omg guise he has a different opinion! D:
>ebin, gas him! xD
>omg guise that dirty crapitalist is exploiting muh workers
>gee! I really like to suck the state's cock
>implying totalitarianism doesn't end in a bloody massacre like uh, every single one-party totalitarian state has
>implying social freedom doesn't require economic freedom
>implying the economy and society progress when everyone is afraid of making the wong move and get sent to the gulags
>>68779386
>Can't refute political argument
LOLOLOOLOLOLOLOL UR A GAY FAG TROLOLOOLOLOLO XDDDDDDDDDDDDD
r8 me
>>68779828
4/10
Libertarian.
>>68779891
I know what you were trying to say but it in no way makes sense.
>>68779747
>Autistic people are the superior beings
If that were true, /vr/ would be in control of 4chan. I like the board, if it wasn't for them I wouldn't have gotten into shmups, but god damn the autism is out of this world.
>>68779747
Besides the killing of jews Hitler made Germany rich as hell. If you remove the genocide and put in a Totalitarian like me who is not a genocidal maniac then yo uget a good country that gets things done.
>>68779717
>I am a Totalitarian not a statist...
IS ANYONE ELSE READING THIS SHIT?!
>I won't even argue with you on this one considering that statist are a little different from Totalitarians.
What in the actual fuck. Totalitarians are by definition, statists. If you believe that a state ought to exist then you are a statist. Is there a subset of totalitarianism that calls for the abolition or absence of the state? Not all statists are totalitarians, of course; minarchists are statists and are on the opposite side of the political spectrum than totalitarians.
I refuse to believe that this is not b8.
>>68780315
Time to cite my sources
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statism
Statists think government should control social and economic policy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism
Totalitarians recognize no limits to the power of the government.
>>68780347
9/10
Based authoritarian. Honest hard working citizen.
>>68780635
>"Totalitarianism (or totalitarian rule) refers to authoritarian political systems where the state recognizes no limits to its authority and strives to regulate every aspect of public and private life wherever feasible."
I, like, cant even right now. like, I just cant even even right now. bye.
my voting order: Sanders>Trump>Clinton
>>68780313
Define getting things done. Because I have a feeling you mean having a secret police killing every political opponent and dissident on a regular basis. And how would you make the economy even richer if you had to control EVERYTHING? Remember, totalitarianism is defined by absolute power over everything by the state. You'd have to control the economy, society, each person's lives and what they can and cannot do. And guess what, people get tired of being controlled and state monopolies always become inefficient (see food & steel production in the USSR). You have to be one big fucking retard if you think you get to say how people can and cannot live their lives. And this is coming from a guy who hates every single kind of degeneracy on this planet. Except I realize that a free-market libertarian capitalist country would be perfect to purge out degenerates, as it would be survival of the fittest without government-loving NEETs and wastes of oxygen building up my taxes.
I think you should get out of your bubble and start reading Hazlitt, Hayek, Friedman and Rothbard, famalam.
>>68780904
>Proven wrong
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA THIS IS B8 WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA LIKE ARE YOU KIDDING ME??? YOUR A WHITE MALE!!! YOU ARE A WHITE MAN
Shut the fuck up you fucking faggot, I hope you hang yourself.
>>68781055
I don't think that secret police should kill every single political opponent. In fact if I had my way and I was president, I would hang or execute every single corrupt official, blackout degeneracy by wiping porn off of the US internet, and making a effort to stomp out neets by making them have to look for work (Unless there autistic or disabled.) And if I caught one of my secret servicemen trying to kill a presidential candidate he would be killed no if ands or buts.
>>68780734
Thank you. I hope your elections go well and influence western Europe to stop killing itself. God bless.
>>68781527
No problem m80.
>>68781490
Yeah, good luck doing all that crap when you have a document called The Constitution preventing you to do so. What would you do, then? Invalidate the Constitution and declare yourself Emperor? You'd have your body dragged to the street and burned at the stake in a day.
I'd also like you to explain how this totalitarian fantasy of yours would have a functioning economy when your autism requires you to control absolutely everything. As I said, people don't like being controlled and planned economies stagnate and sink.
Read Friedman. Read Sowell. At this point I think you're just baiting, dude.
What does this region mean? Pretty sure Perot and Trump fit around here
>>68781819
Yeah, good luck doing all that crap when you have a document called The Constitution preventing you to do so. What would you do, then? Invalidate the Constitution and declare yourself Emperor? You'd have your body dragged to the street and burned at the stake in a day.
I wouldn't declare myself emporor, I would invalidate the constitution and declare martial law for my term and stay in the white house at all times.
>>68781934
It means your a based Authoritarian.
>>68782109
Yeah, you're definitely baiting. Shame on me for replying.
>>68778838
Doesn't mean he doesn't support all freedoms other than the freedom to run shitty business practices and pay your workers chicken shit.
>>68782245
>Yeah, you're definitely baiting. Shame on me for replying.
I swear on everything holy, I swear on my soul that I am not baiting. Lol, I love when people like you a proven wrong and loose and argument and say I'm baiting, go crawl back to your whole where your belong you jew.
>>68782259
Economic freedom and social freedom are intertwined.
>>68782392
>Staunch authoritarian
4chan probably wouldn't exist if you had your way, so why are you posting here?
>>68782626
Don't even bother with that retard, greatest ally.
>>68777658
you totally got me
>>68782626
No, 4chan/pol is a hub for anti degeneracy, why I love this place even if the people here are libertarians, they still share one thing in common with me and that is degeneracy hating.
>Red
We tell you how to live and how to starve
>Blue
We only care about what you do in your bed
>Green
Dropped as a baby
>Purple
Your freedom ends where mine begins
Blue square coming through
>>68782860
What meth are you on
>>68782860
>No, 4chan/pol is a hub for anti degeneracy
>>68783680
needs to be more to the right
So /pol/ give me your worst.
>>68782548
Not necessarily. Some states with moderate or neoliberal market policies had brutal instruments of repression and state terror.
>>68784242
I know. Chile, for example. But in that case it transitioned to democracy when Pinochet stepped down. However, when you compare maps of economic freedom and social/political freedom, you'll see the countries match up.
You are all a bunch of COMMUNISTS AND NAZIS.
A real American conservative.
>>68784816
Haha I am -9 -8.4
>>68783975
I mean at the time I took that test I didn't discover pol
>>68785076
I was in the green before /pol/ but always thought myself of a Gordon Gekko-like capitalist. I was shocked when I saw I was in the green. Moved to authoritarian red, to authoritarian blue and now I'm in the far-right libertarianism. At last I truly see.
>>68785033
>online IQ test
>>68784546
There are still examples today. Singapore, for example, is famous for its market policies, but is a rather repressive state. The same is true of some Middle Eastern countries like Bahrain.
>>68785068
This image is a throwback to earlier times. Times when Trump & Cruz had good relations. Sad!
>>68785421
Singapore works good. But it's not totalitarian. They just have fear that "lack of morality" will derail the country. Wouldn't mind living there because that example of authority benefits me.
>>68785289
>and now I'm in the far-right libertarianism
Libertarianism with nationalistic values, that I like.
>>68785316
>progressive matrices
>not a real subtest on literally any given IQ test
>doesn't on avg. correlate with how well you do on the other subtests
>doesn't know what g is
political compass a shit. Post these.
>>68785421
Signapore isn't politically repressive like Bahrain you nog, it's probably freer than USA
>>68785701
Essentially, that's what it is, João.
master race reporting in
>>68786022
>>68786015
stop posting these, the quiz is inaccurate and written by two Jewish political science college students.
take/post this one: http://www.gotoquiz.com/politics/political-spectrum-quiz.html
pic unrelated
>>68786202
i agree, this thing makes me look like a communist but I'm extremely against communism
>>68785753
Whatever helps you sleep at night my man.
>>68785875
>>68785421
I take it back, they're pretty totalitarian kek. I guess I only ever read up on their markets.
https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/2013/singapore
>>68785289
take the gotoquiz one (http://www.gotoquiz.com/politics/political-spectrum-quiz.html), this political compass is complete shit
>>68786202
It's not inaccurate. Got nearly the same score multiple times on 4 different compass tests.
>>68786022
>>68786325
I've got some bad news.
>>68786022
>leftist authoritarian faggot
You will be one of the first shot.
where the fuck do you niggers get these tests?
i know about i side with and politcalcompass but there are so many others
also
Economic Left/Right: -2.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.92
>>68786567
it wasn't inaccurate in your specific case, but it flipped my y-axis score (and that of many other right-wing respondents) because it so heavily conflates "society" with "government". The questions themselves are all weighted equally even though invariably some people will put more value on some and less value on others, and to begin with the questions are poorly worded.
>>68786680
>http://www.gotoquiz.com/politics/political-spectrum-quiz.html
>http://www.gotoquiz.com/politics/political-spectrum-quiz.html
>>68784816
Hey bro
>>68786367
>Canacucks can't even admit when they're wrong
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics)#Cognitive_ability_testing
>>68787004
[claps]
>>68787046
It's not even the fact it's a bullshit online IQ tests, it's the fact you stuck it on your political chart like it means anything.
>>68786202
Yeah, I think this better represents me.
>>68786621
yeah sure buddy :^)
>>68787460
>posts a picture of Adolph
>thinks his political views match his
Wew lad.
>>68787394
>more right-wing than me
wew
>>68783052
i love you
>>68787531
surprisingly accurate
>>68787390
>shifting goalposts in first sentence
>contradicts himself in latter part of sentence
I know thinking isn't your strongest subject Ahmed, perhaps Mr. Trudeau will give you extra weed stipends to get through these cognitively taxing times
>>68787698
>hasn't even read mein kampf
>doesn't understand national socialism
at least read the NSDAP's 25 point plan you faggot
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/25points.htm
>>68775150
I dint even know how I got this. Everything I answered was in line with conservative ideals except for the fact that I'm against laissez-faire business practices
>>68788035
> I'm against laissez-faire business practices
WEW
E
W
LAD
A
D
I don't support that Jew quiz and its faggy colors. Not quite AnCap here but definitely well on the way.
>>68787956
You're an idiot and your day will come.
>>68787922
Go ahead and explain how I'm contradicting myself, I'll wait.
>>68788035
wow, what an interesting conundrum. Maybe, (this is just speculation), the test is inaccurate and written by Jews and we should stop posting it and making it ever more popular, and replace it with a better test?
>>68788035
So you're an American "liberal". Not hard to understand.
>>68776650
Mah nigga
I was 6 & -2.21
I used to be around 7 and 5. I think I'm just growing up.
Proud norwayfag here
>>68788295
Try the one here >>68786202
I got this >>68787394
>>68788220
no u
>>68788141
I believe the government should have some control over business practices, like establishing a minimum wage and making sure every worker has sick time or at the very least some form of insurance
>>68788267
>>68788260
The i side with test is better tbhf
MAGA
>>68775493
Your shit to be sure, but soon you will become part of the left wing authoritarian intj master race. It's the natural progression
>>68788497
Meh, that's alright. I come from a "if a business wants to compete it should voluntarily offer these things" perspective.
>>68788564
Make (Great) Britain Great Again
>>68775150
Better dead than red
>>68775150
Mostly a moderate, but environmental issues pull me left.
>>68776248
Gross
>>68788220
>IQ isn't bullshit
>it doesn't mean anything
>>68788564
BNP plz stay
>>68788772
It doesn't mean anything in regards to your political views.
>>68788497
iSideWith is breddy gud, but I like the gotoquiz's results section better. Also iSideWith uses responses from parties and actual users instead of the pure philosophical paradigms.
>like establishing a minimum wage and making sure every worker has sick time or at the very least some form of insurance
kek but why, for "humanitarian" reasons? or because you acknowledge its true effects and hate poor people/blacks?
Post your I Side With results
>>68788709
Holy... Kill yourself.
>>68789202
>Austin Peterson is actually running
KEK. I thought it was a joke
>>68789065
Nor do half of those tests you degenerate mouthbreather. Who looks at an amalgam of bullshit including a facial preference test then feels inclined to comment about the one matrices test?
A Canacuck shitposter of the highest order, that's who.
>>68789370
[autism intensifies]
Father was a Soviet, he fled after the collapse and had me in the US. I ended up about where I thought.
>>68789113
I believe a minimum wage gives your workers some purchasing power, which they could use to buy your products.
Sick time? Yeah, humanitarian reasons I guess. But I also realize how it's abused and I get some keks from idiots who use it all up for vacation purposes before they're required to use said sick time.
>>68789370
"half" of those tests have more to do with political views than your free online IQ test.
If "half" of this doesn't matter why are you getting so upset? What's your problem, friend?
well how fucked am i?
>>68789444
nice trips desu
no autism, just a quasi sociopathic free market fetishist
Although as a kid I was fire with legos
>>68789618
>scores low on IQ tests
>insecurely shitposts on 4chan about it
le weed man wcan't save the day this time
>>68789565
http://www.nber.org/papers/w12663
>>68789847
Do you have a problem answering questions as well, buddy?
>>68789823
Pretty fucked. How are you supposed to overthrow the filthy capitalists and create strong socialist state when you're a SJW pansy? Move up into the master race red square and you're good to go.
>>68786884
>>68786680
Well, jumped from one side to the other, but a lot of those questions conflated two issues.
It's almost like you maples compete with Australia for worst shitposters daily
>>68789823
bretty fucked
>>68775150
commie bastard
Left nationalist
>>68775150
Fuck, i trought i were in the real right wing :')
Hello, friends.
>>68790086
I think they separated them quite nicely, which questions do you think conflated the two?
>>68789565
Another thing: increasing wages doesn't increase the actual value of the economy.
>>68790523
MY NIGGA.
Green master race reporting in.
>>68776650
Woohoo, cancer forever!
>>68790714
For my people and only my people
>>68790714
National socialist so?
>>68776248
Left libertarianism does not exist
>>68779747
>>68790970
you mean to say, you don't agree with a left-libertarian system
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hW6zI9iy27Y
>>68775150
I dont consider myself lib :'(
>>68791374
take the gotoquiz one instead
>>68791293
Left libertarian is shit, only reasonable leftism is centrist or authoritarian.
Hello.
>>68791293
The tenets of left libertarianism cannot be met without significant government control, which would defeat the whole "libertarian" piece.
It's like asking for wet dry water
I do love that episode of metalocalypse though
>>68791856
Also, I didn't quite understand some questions.
>>68791856
why are slavs the only ones who get the same on the compass as me
So close to neutral
>>68792319
because you are a Moor
>>68791452
>gotoquiz
>>68775150
Far-right Islamist reporting in
anarcho-communist here
What does this mean?
>>68787698
If you answer the the quiz based solely on opinions laid out in mein kampf you end up mid-upper red square, I've tried
>>68792652
Oxymoron.
>>68793042
looks like you match up very well with Bernie Sanders
>>68793574
Man, this shit confuses me. I like and agree so much with Cruz, yet i'm >>68790894
Seriously, wtf.
>>68789202
same guy who did
>>68775493
>>68793573
Not at all.
>Life and property are sacred and inviolable
>There is a higher natural order in which the state can not and should not intervene
>Social services should be provided privately
>The only function of the state is to maintain order
>Every society must preserve and ensure five goods: Religion, life, reason, lineage, and property
And so on.
Oxymoron is a Leftist Islamist.
>>68794481
Man, McAfee is awesome.
I love how a Social Democrat is apparently more libertarian than me, someone who outright calls themselves a libertarian.
>>68779511
Brother!
>>68794593
How will you make sure religion, reason and lineage live on? It seems that you'd need to forbid a hell of a lot of things (pornography, drinking, gambling, etc.) to keep that sort of "sacrecy" you talk about, which would require state intervention in the economy and also violate the "live and let live" approach of libertarians.
thanks for making me do this, now i can feel like a piece of shit for the rest of the day
>>68795007
Hey I still love yo-
>Sees Flag
Oh, nevermind.
>>68794686
it's funny. i really dont see myself as what im getting in these tests, must be something in my head. also youre a minority purple. in fact i think youre almost kind of what the government needed way back when freedom was their goal
also did you take those other tests besides the spectrum one?
>>68792811
i also did one of these
Man, I love having freedom
OP here, I'm surprised you guys kept my thread going for so long, thanks guys! I'll be staying on here rating some of the compasses posted until it archives.
Why is the purple square cancer?
>>68795535
2/10 Probably a working citizen, but purple square cancer.
>>68795712
Because it is Libertarian, all of it advocates small government, in my political standing, I think the further up you go the better, the further down you go, the worst.
>>68795810
Like I'm gonna listen to a god damn commie
Too lazy to take the test but before I've landed almost dead center before and a few times green square. I have very polarizing opinions.
>>68795984
I am a Totalitarian.
>>68794882
>How will you make sure religion, reason and lineage live on?
Then comes the social organicity. Much more effective than coercion. The force of tradition, family ties, and community bond, are more effective than the irreversible threat of violence. It must create an environment in which it may be exercised.
>It seems that you'd need to forbid a hell of a lot of things (pornography, drinking, gambling, etc.) to keep that sort of "sacrecy" you talk about,
Abstain to all this is a personal stance. While not cause harm to others, of course. Still, nothing will prevent someone from suffer social ostracism, if preferred to do so.
>which would require state intervention in the economy and also violate the "live and let live" approach of libertarians.
Again, unnecessary state involvement in it. In fact, its harmful. Replaces real cohesion by threat - that if not accompanied by a perception of the social whole, it becomes useless.
>>68796040
Based Statist. 9/10, pat yourself on the back for begin a honest working citizen and contributing to your society. But 9 because your teetering on socialist degeneracy.
>>68795712
because purple is a gay color
>americans
>logics
Greetings, Imperial citizens.
>>68796071
fascists GET OUT
>>68796117
I get what you're saying. You wouldn't need laws against certain behaviors because peer pressure and societal norms would be so embedded into the citizens' minds. Not sure if that would last very much, considering kids like to rebel and some of them don't move out of that phase (who could then influence others and you'd start to stray away from tradition a couple of generations after).
>>68795283
I took the isidewith one.
>>68794481
>>68775150
A lot of these statements are filled with implications and incomplete views. This is a seriously shit poll. So many I had to disagree with based on little things or agree with based on the text but disagree on the implication.
How did I do?
Le edgy libertarian
>>68797233
Needs more to the right and then you'll become truly based
>>68796601
Indeed, this is a risk.
Still, I see no other effective way.
One thing is to be coerced into doing something; another is to realize that something is correct.
hmm
>>68790343
dont compare us to the leaf boys cunt
>>68796580
Praise the emperor
>>68797554
>another is to realize that something is correct.
ayy, that's it man. Preach it. I don't mind fags and degenerates to exist, but I acknowledge their behaviors are objectively poisonous, counterproductive and inefficient.
I buy into Objectivism, so I think people, if putting feelings aside and using pure reason, logic and empirical data, will always reach the Truth. And in this case, the Truth is that these behaviors are disgusting.
>>68775150
feels good
Holy shit I'm lame
>>68797493
How's this then?
Weird I'm almost in the exact same position as Sanders yet I think he's a cuck faggot. Figured I would be in the middle of the blue.
>>68775150
BROTHERRRRRRR
>>68798419
Milton Friedman-tier. Great, but not god-tier. You're almost there, though!
>>68797836
My bad Aus, no one could ever take your place brother
You will always be my favorite and the best shit posters bar none
>>68798471
Political compass has a left wing bias.
here you are
>>68775150
he, i though i would be a little higher
>>68793830
i got the same, yet 95% sided with trump on isidewth...
whoami
Tell me what's wrong with me
>>68799571
you are a canadian TED, you gotta go back
and this is the compass of my girlfriend who was obviously dropped on her head
>>68778677
I don't think you know how that chart works.
I'm certainly support Trump for reasons other than agreeing with him on every issue.
>>68793574
How do I manage to be more left lib than sanders when I'm a left nationalist?
>>68790523
Meh.
>>68800509
If you become slightly more left and libertarian you could be the ultimate fence sitter
Rate me /pol/
>>68800954
maximum autism/10
>>68800954
Illuminati
>>68800634
I just support what makes sense. No side seems entirely correct to me, so I think we have to compromise.
>>68800954
people see your nose coming around corners
i remember when i was a red square babby who wanted to tell people what was up and how to do things
then i realized how screwed we were and embraced the fact that im so much better than most of you sad fucks that it's a waste of time to even bother
give us a relatively even playing field and watch as the retards drop like flies. probably the best way forward, too
>>68800954
Damn. What do you believe in, economics and politics wise? You're me from 2013, down to INTJ.
used to be greenie faggot, how bout now friendos
>>68802471
As far as economics go, I believe Libertarianism is proper and right.
Privatize as many things as possible, de-regulate everything.
No welfare, no minimum wage.
I don't believe in the non-aggression principle, but I do believe in the use of tariffs and trade wars when needed.
Basically as far as economics to I'm a national libertarian.
Now as for laws, social matters and the like? I'm a fascist. I've studied the works of Mussolini and Giovanni gentile.
I believe in spencerism and social darwinism, life is struggle and suffering for ever greater refinement.
I believe government should be small yet totalitarian. It need not be involved in much but it should have that capability whenever needed and it should regulate morality and it should work to perfect man.
I do not believe that man should be allowed to determine who he breeds with nor do I believe man has a right to decide to abort a child. I believe these should be determined scientifically.
As for race, I believe a master race should be created through a scientific effort of slowly breeding Ashkenazi Semite blood, east Asian blood and European blood.
I see a nation and it's economy like an army, the government is the general who gives the directions and orders but the actual movements and the details and the like are worked out by the soldiers.
The commander gives direction and the soldiers unleash their economic and cultural efforts towards the overall goal of the nation.
I guess Libertarian-Fascist would be the most accurate term?
>>68802649
What caused the change ?
Could you describe the internal shift and your thoughts during?
Gradually noticed myself moving from left to right every time I do this test, always stayed about the same point on the y axis though
>>68804669
this was over the course of about 8 months, and i guess i just started to get more into politics. the recent rapefugee crisis in europe has also changed a lot of the views i previously held, and in general i suppose i started to see through the false ideas of equality and acceptance that the media keeps pushing.
>pic related, previous political compass from way back when
>>68805121
Interesting, random question have you ever read the doctrines of fascism? It's a rather good read especially considering where you are on the compass.
It might further radicalize your views but that's fine.
In any case I think it takes a lot of intellectual honesty to look at a situation and change your beliefs accordingly when presented with new and different evidence that proves and disproves some beliefs.
>>68802112
There is really no such thing as sides, it's a false dichotomy and the hunger to be a middle neutral ground is a very modern idea loved by hipsters.
I dream that with enough technology advancement in artificial intelligence we will be able to make working utopia on earth.
>>68803432
Noice. I pretty much agree on everything except I don't see how a libertarian economy works when you have a fascist totalitarian government regulating morality, but I guess you fix that by not believing in "muh NAP". Absolutely agree on you scientifically, but maybe let women still have retards if they sign a document whereby the government is completely free of responsibilities for it, and its holders are entirely responsible for any damages. Also agree with you on specieism and social Darwinism. Overall, would-plot-to-instill-transhumanist-fascist-world-government-with /10.
>>68807107
Even with AI and full automization resources shall still be scarce.
The only way to have a true utopia of which you seem to most likely desire, would be to have a post-scarcity society and that requires faster than light travel and extremely fast movement of resources.
Once you have that you won't even need AI.
>>68807432
>how a libertarian economy works when you have a fascist totalitarian government regulating morality,
Well we can see a bit of it in China, in pinochet's chile, in nazi Germany and Italy.
It's well documented that nazism and Italian fascism actually privatized many things (along with nationalizing a few monopolies.)
And chile is a perfect example of a fascist mode that uses very liberal economics, the only thing I would have banned are things which ultimately weaken and serve no purpose for the nation such as pornography which have no real benefits besides quick and fast pleasure.
As for women, I think the best way to instate nationalism and collectivism is to empower and expand the family unit. allowing women that much control will make sure to keep the family unit small.
Tell me from your understanding, wouldn't it be better if children were considered the entire nation's responsibility more or less? Wouldn't this instate that nationalism?
I also wouldn't be opposed to the best parents/people getting the highest quality children to raise (such as in Plato's timaeus) however I do not realistically see how that would work.
In any case, it's nice to find people with very similar opinions and beliefs.
Member of youth parliament reporting in
I answered too liberally - I'm a die hard authoritarian
>>68808565
>Tell me from your understanding, wouldn't it be better if children were considered the entire nation's responsibility more or less? Wouldn't this instate that nationalism?
Nope. I think bettering Man and colonizing the galaxy would be priorities. Of course children would be 2nd, because we'd need healthy and intelligent scientists, enginners, etc.
Overall, I agree with what you say and you seem like the kind of person I'd have a beer with. I always say: I'm only opposed to totalitarianism when I'm part of the masses. If I were the Emperor, we'd achieve wonders.
>>68809162
Honestly I think fascism is the only ideology that could survive a galaxy spanning empire.
Can you imagine the democratic process expanded to a galaxy level? Just imagine how inefficient. It's a horrid thought.
Question out of the blue, what do you think will happen politically when real transhumanism actually manifests? I mean at that point the merit of egalitarianism (as all people naturally being equal) is dealt a killing blow really.
AnCom detected.
>>68810085
>Honestly I think fascism is the only ideology that could survive a galaxy spanning empire.
Yes, you're absolutely right. I believe democracy will be seen as an outdated system by the end of the century. Clearly the masses have shown they are too easy to be controlled.
>Question out of the blue, what do you think will happen politically when real transhumanism actually manifests? I mean at that point the merit of egalitarianism (as all people naturally being equal) is dealt a killing blow really.
It depends on what sort of transhumanist technology we're talking about. I'm guessing "simple" stuff like bionic limbs and organs will be fairly common and accessible, but more advanced stuff will probably be kept to a certain elite. We're going to have riots between "normal" people and transhumanists. Of course, we'll still have the leftists and SJWs demanding everyone to be a robot, but I dunno.
Hopefully we will evolve into a galaxy-conquering fascist empire empowered by transhumanism. No more talking about race, etc. since we'll all have been spliced with perfect genes, intelligence and bodies.
![chart[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/1LnAUSQ.jpg "chart[1]")
