[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
If animals can't give consent, they why can we kill them?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 40
Thread images: 9
File: 7316959_orig.jpg (131 KB, 960x720) Image search: [Google]
7316959_orig.jpg
131 KB, 960x720
If animals can't give consent, they why can we kill them? Children can't give consent, but we don't kill them. Why?

Because we care about children, and don't care about animals? So why do we care if they can give consent or not? We breed them out to other animals all the time, do animals have consent to do so?

You might instead say we don't care because we as a society find it abhorrent. But denying a human basic sexual rights to self-autonomy with non-consenting objects is accepted. It's not liked, but it's accepted. We don't legally care if someone masturbates with a tool. And we've made the 'it's an abomination' with homosexuality, and that's with two consenting people.

We force animals to mate against their will.
We kill animals for food and material and sometimes just because we can.
We control their lives in every facet.
And yet we forbid ourselves sexual congress with them because of faulty logic.

There is no reasonable legal case against a man wanting to fuck an animal.
>>
>>68718280
Because animals have been our food source since the dawn of time. Domesticated animals exist only on the whim of humans. If they no longer served a purpose as companions, work animals or products such as meat and leather than they would never be bred in the first place.

Even a child has more intelligence than an animal. Also, children can be caused physically harm and they can be left mentally fucked up thanks to sexual abuse. When you slaughter an animal it's not going to be living with the memory of its death. It's dead. We don't "force animals to mate," either; they're driven by hormones and instinct and once a female is in heat they will be driven to breed. Humans are higher on the cognitive chain so we simply exploited it.

Fucking an animal isn't comparable to fucking a child. A child has no concept of sex and that it why they do not understand. Animals understand sex but only as a reproductive means. You are selfishly using an animal as a sexual outlet if you choose to fuck it.
>>
Who is the semen demon?
>>
>>68718280
Not sure where you live, but bestiality is legal in my state.
>>
>>68718833
/thread
Dubs of truth.
>>
>>68718280
>If animals can't give consent, they why can we kill them?

When has anyone ever asked the victim for consent to be killed?
>>
>>68718280
We are highest in the food chain. We can eat what the fuck we want.
>>
>>68718833
>I disagree so I'm gonna call it selfish behavior

You fucked yourself in your own argument anon. Animals are also driven to protect themselves if in harms way. They'll lash out and attack things that frighten them. Therefore if one is able to sexual an animal and it doesn't fight back then it must, on instinct, be enjoying it.
>>
>>68718280
It's not about the animals.
Fucking animals fucks YOU up in the head.
Society doesn't need any more fucked up degenerates.
Anime has already done enough.
>>
>>68719437
Plenty of guys have been kicked while trying to fuck horses because animals are very nervous about people being behind them. Also the only reason domestic animals put up with humans fucking them is because they've been bred to live close to humans for hundreds of years. They are reasonably willing to let humans poke and prod them because they lack the capacity to understand breeding outside of mating. The only animals known to engage in sexual activity for the fun of it are dolphins, and this again is a part of their being so much more intelligent than other animals.

Seriously, go out into the wild. Try to fuck a wild stallion or a wolf. You will have no luck because these animals have not been bred and trained to be bugged by human beings.
>>
To have life you must take life. It's just nature, you can't live without killing. It sucks, but ultimately living is just taking the life out of weaker beings. Don't believe me eat rocks and sand.
>>
bump for degeneracy
>>
So needing an animal for food is eqaul to needing it to fuck? fuck off
>>
>>68719849
>/k/omnando fucks a she-coyote in heat.jpg
>>
>>68719849
This discussion is more about consent, and animals not giving consent for the actions humans take upon them. Horses that fit your criteria of being nervous are likely to kick someone behind them with or without the fucking part. Regardless of which situation actually occurs you've stated yourself that if the animal doesn't want something done to it, it will lash out. This act of self-preservation could be considered non-consent for being too close to the animal. It's therefore true that the opposite case exists where the animal can now consent to the touch.

There does exists a problem with the OP combining sex and death. Death is purely negative for the animal, where sex may/may not have any negative impacts to the life of animal. Pretty much making the two cases incomparable. Unless we assume animals just want to die.

Regarding the wild animal crap. The OP is clearly referring domesticated animals, so close human contact is implied.
>>
>>68718280
saged and reported all the way back to b
>>
>>68721001
Seems like /pol/ supports fucking animals
>>
>>68718280
It's legal in several states still. It's just taboo because religious god fearing fags invaded our government and made laws that agree with their beliefs. Aka christfags
>>
File: 581166-trzxlh.jpg (68 KB, 1024x576) Image search: [Google]
581166-trzxlh.jpg
68 KB, 1024x576
The issue OP is bringing up is that we give animals the right to be classified as rape victims. Yet we have no qualms about eating these animals with rights.
>>
>>68718280
Children can give consent. Anyone who says otherwise is lying.
>>
>>68724528
Fuck them, slaughter them, cook them. The semen protein just adds more to your gains.
>>
>>68718280
if rocks aren't poison, why don't we eat them? food isn't poison and we eat food.
>>
>>68719849
I knew a chick who sucessfully fucked a domesticated ape once. She thought that was enough knowledge to fuck one of the wild ones in a refugee camp. Needless to say, she isn't around anymore.
>>
File: Goron_Artwork_(Ocarina_of_Time).png (2 MB, 1837x1747) Image search: [Google]
Goron_Artwork_(Ocarina_of_Time).png
2 MB, 1837x1747
>>68725233

We don't eat rocks because they have no nutritional value. We aren't Gorons...
>>
>>68718280
So fuck them at home and don't waste everybody's time? Many unforgivable fetishes like Islam become tolerable as long as it doesn't leave your apartment, be decent human when out and become animal when in, as long as it doesn't interfere with outside world, also because I don't want to eat cum filled meat from horny farmers that would only pass in America as McMayo
>>
>>68725726

By that logic, every steak has a healthy dose of Taurine.
>>
>>68725726
>become animal when in
Beastmode that animal ass
>>
File: 716.png (248 KB, 594x411) Image search: [Google]
716.png
248 KB, 594x411
>>68725923
>cooking with Taurine
>>
>>68718280
Animals are property, children are wards. There are limitations to the disposal of property, just as you can't plant a vegetable garden in your front yard, you can't skin your labrador alive.
>>
Logically speaking the only reason to not fuck animals is because it wont produce kids. Considering the lengths people go through to avoid having kids, like abortion. It seems reasonable that people like sex without pregnancy. In fact it's pretty much an endorsement to go fuck your dog right now. Consentually as possible.
>>
need more data, bump
>>
>>68727811
There is no legal justification founded in logic as to why animals can't be fucked. The only reason laws exist in the first place regarding sex with animals is because someone, likely religious, said its bad and made it illegal. That's pretty much the whole arguement in a nutshell
>>
File: Ika - what the hell.jpg (165 KB, 1366x768) Image search: [Google]
Ika - what the hell.jpg
165 KB, 1366x768
>>68718280
Of all the animals you could've posted, you had to go with a fucking horse??
>>
OP's opinions absolutely mirror mine and are totally correct both logically and morally.

Animals consent to having sex with humans all the time. Additionally, if an animal is passively receiving sexual stimulation from a human, this is by its very nature consensual. It takes SJW levels of mental gymnastics to claim its wrong to fuck a horse when horses literally pin men against the walls in a barn when they get horny.
>>
File: 1440616925619.jpg (317 KB, 1000x1000) Image search: [Google]
1440616925619.jpg
317 KB, 1000x1000
>>
File: horseposting.jpg (36 KB, 300x240) Image search: [Google]
horseposting.jpg
36 KB, 300x240
>>68718280
The only reasonable legal case isn't about sex, but more about abusing the animal.

Now is sticking your dick in a horse inherently abuse? No. But restraining the animal purely so you can do that is one of the most abhorrent things I can think of. It pisses me off how so often they have a mare tied up somewhere so they can copulate with it.

If you're going to fuck a horse like a sensible person, do it with balls and leave the horse completely unrestrained. You'll know if it doesn't feel the same way you do, and if you push it, the horse will really let you know.

Really though, the main reason bestiality is illegal is because most of its subscribers are horrible for PR.
>>
File: 1452558625405.gif (2 MB, 360x265) Image search: [Google]
1452558625405.gif
2 MB, 360x265
Animals are property. How a person treats their own property is their own business so long as it does not pose a danger to others. Any law or regulation that inhibits a person's will with their property goes against basic property rights, and this is irrefutable
>>
File: 1440343415366.jpg (127 KB, 736x299) Image search: [Google]
1440343415366.jpg
127 KB, 736x299
>>
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/b3aRebr75fg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
>>
>>68718280
> Children can't give consent, but we don't kill them. Why?

More proof vegans are mentally challenged.
If you asked a child if it wanted to die, what do you think it would say you fucking retard.
Thread replies: 40
Thread images: 9

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.