If women are naturally degenerate/liberal, there must be a biological reason behind this. If you believe in Evolution, as I do, this must be so. However, I cannot for the life of me figure out what the advantage of a woman tending to be degenerate/liberal is
>>68686503
they are more conformist because pregnancy and shiiiieeet, cant survive without the tribe.
they vote for welfare state because they want to feel safe, vote for immigration because they wanna feel like loving mothers (or are horny)
>>68686503
Women are like children. They need constant stumulation. This is ok early in life.
As they grow older, they need more and more and it eventually becomes like a drug.
Also women aee rebelliius by nature. This is why throughout history they have been repressed. Our forefathers knew this and so they didnt let them vote, didnt let them work, didnt let them have money etc.
People call the Taliban and such 'backwards'. They probably call us forgetful.
>>68686503
Women feel the need to "care" for everything, however many lack the capability to see how they could indirectly help others by improving a nations state of being and instead just belive that giving """""disadvantaged""""" groups hand outs will fix everything and not just make said groups leechs on society.
>>68686503
Women are naturally submissive and follow group values. It really is that simple.
>>68686503
Men>women
>>68686503
Women are more emotional and the liberals target emotional people.
>>68687051
>>68686894
interesting, perhaps women are stuck in an infantile state, so that they enjoy raising children and playing with babies, which most men tire of quickly
Women are supposed to be perpetually pregnant and raising children. Most of the women who are retarded have no skin in the game and are degenerates or cat ladies. They are not in their natural state. Periods shouldn't be happening so they're all fucked up biologically in general. Pregnant women and nursing women don't have their period.
>>68686503
Their supporting immigration is a shit test. If all men rejected it women would too. They just want to see if we are strong enough. If we aren't, they will choose the stronger immigrant men.
>>68687372
Men evolved a 20% more pyramidal nerons in their neo-cortex for shrewd executive deals in cave-towers where alpha males earned big bux and got top fux.
Women spent their time sitting around and playing catch or whatever.
>>68687999
Plus their periods attract bears. The bears can smell the menstruations!
This is terrible evolutionarily speaking :p
>>68687051
This so much, they are more emotional.
>>68686503
>If you believe in Evolution, as I do, this must be so.
Well, kind of.
Evolution hasn't perfected women.
It is possible that liberals are simply evolutionary dead-ends.
I mean, the West, run by liberals, is receding, and being replaced by Islam. White people are receding in the Anglosphere and Western Europe. This is evolution. Saying that, this will also be due to unfortunate cultural circumstances as well as genetics.
Evolutionary selection worked more on men than women. It doesn't matter if women are dumb degenerates so long as they could be controlled by physically stronger men who could keep the degeneracy at bay. The important thing for survival of tribes was strong men who cared about their own preservation. What the women thought was irrelevant.
Well, this is more black-and-white than reality, but something along those lines holds true, I think.
>>68688016
Exactly. It's in their benefit to oncrease the amount of males to increase their own raw value.
>>68686503
I don't buy into the "le womin are all librulz" meme that get's tossed around a lot.
Yes young women, particularly single ones without children, are disproportionately liberal/progressive in their social views, but this changes once they get married and/or have children.
Once women have children they often swing to the opposite direction and become staunch conservatives to preserve whatever security they have (which is why stability is what women look for most when they want to settle down).
You think Jody the soccer mom is going to be thrilled with letting in thousands of dangerous-looking foreign men that could potentially pose a threat to her children or her country's economy?
Soccer mom Jody and her younger sorority girl/free love self have totally different priorities.
>>68686503
Men think more in the long term than women, they think about consequences down the road, i.e. dangers of importing millions of barbarians into western countries. Women on the other hand feel a need to nurture and care for without weighing the possible disadvantage.
>>68688738
This is the most unexplainable thing that such a detrimental trait is still around.
A bunch of prehistoric beats should have detected that scent and had dinner , eliminating the human species.
>>68688016
Also this.
There are 2 facets to this:
1) Women's dismissal of borders can be seen as merely a method to increase competition amongst groups of men. Will white men allow their homelands to be conquered without a fight? If so, then they are genetically weak and hence unattractive.
Of course this situation would change if women thought their own safety would be substantially at risk by letting other tribes of men in, but the media tells them that we are all equal, which leads me to my other point:
2) White men have allowed this to happen.
Say you're a white woman. You've been brought up to despise racism. You've never come across a redpill. You're told that everyone is equal. Moreover, you are told this by white men.
So a black guy hits on you at a club. Well, according to the white male establishment, you have no reason to treat him any differently to your own race. So why would you reject him?
If white men made clear that they favour their own race; if they spoke truthfully of racial differences, and so on, then racemixing would become much more undesireable.
>>68689091
>but this changes once they get married and/or have children
I think you have really hit upon something here - if a woman is not married, having children, she remains as an infant
>>68689606
>women are subconsciously pushing for immigration to diversify breeding opportunity
how fucking stupid and gullible can you possibly be? top kek. you believe anything you hear some faggot with an anonymous icon-avatar say in a youtube video.
>>68686503
Liberalism allowed them to have civil rights and protect them from abuses by men, ergo, they will be sluts to ensure the status-qou.
>>68690127
> women are just like men
you can fuck right off you mincing liberal faggot
>>68690127
Women are naturally hypergamous, polygamous and promiscuous. Over 80% of women have reproduced in history compared to less than half of men.
They need to be kept in line or they ruin civilisation. This has been known since the Ancient Greeks. If you don't enforce monogamy and strict social customs they let their feelings take over and ruin society.
>>68686503
How many female chess players do you know? Even among the smartest of women, how many are actually competent players on a novice level?
Women evolved to be competent housekeepers. They excel at management positions and other high-stress but noncompetitive working tasks (with some exceptions as usual). But men developed outside the home. They were bred for competition; for hunting and being hunted.
Women believe that their ability to seduce men and manipulate their outside partners to produce desired in-home results passes for something resembling skill in deception, but the fact is that men generally know they're being manipulated by women but do it anyway because they think with their dicks around women.
However, when it comes to facing manipulation themselves, when it comes to detecting deceit and thinking a few moves ahead, women are woefully unequipped. This is why you find so few female chess players, they simply don't have the hardwiring to outwit an opponent without utilizing their sex to their advantage.
This is why women are naturally prone to the seduction of degeneracy and are easily duped into projecting their mothering instincts onto outsiders. A good home should have a man at the door and a woman at the hearth to greet strangers. The man assess threats and the woman accommodates those that are welcomed in. We have placed women at the door. Don't be surprised when they let in charlatans and sob stories looking to get a quick screw and some new diggs at the expense of your family.
>>68690805
But what is the genetic advantage of women ruining a civilization? Are women the kill switch - designed to destroy a weakening, degenerate society? Are they made so by nature to eat the weak with their mad socialist ideals?
>>68686503
Women are morw liberal because of a misused maternal instinct: that's why they are often vegan, animalists, pro-immigration and bullshit like that. It's part of their biology, even when they don't want to have children
>>68686503
Is that woman the russian spy?
>>68686503
MFW MY EX WAS A FULL CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN THAT NOW SUPPORTS TRUMP
she got me fucked up definitely
>>68691031
Well said anon.
>>68686503
Simply put, instincts have not evolved as fast as society.
