Please explain to me in great detail why socialism wouldn't work in the richest nation in the world.
Capitalism is what made us the richest nation in the world.
>>68651522
Because of the amount of people we have.
>>68651609
>""""richest""""
You do realise the 1% owns most of that money?
You're just rich on paper, nothing else.
Because the people who are negatively affected by it are the ones who have the means to pack their bags and leave
>>68651609
>us
You mean capitalism is what made kikes in wallstreet use our money as monopoly money so they could live in luxury while paying the government to make sure what they do is still barely legal.
Robber barons have returned with more money than ever and they're telling you that trying to stop them is "against capitalism".
>>68651975
>>68651816
>>68651922
>>68651660
>>68651609
I said great detail, not a vague sentence.
>Peace is War
>Freedom is Slavery
>Ignorance is Strength
>Sickness is Health
Might want to rethink your metaphor bruh.
>>68651522
Because the desperately poor population of the nation to our south would move en masse here, bankrupting the system
>>68651522
>great detail
>no! greater detail!
So the goalposts are moving instead of the ball. You're conceding a loss.
>>68652110
fuck off reddit stop using Finland proxy you dumb cucks
>>68652110
Okay, because it has destroyed the one great Nordic nations.
AND because you have no idea how many people already abuse the system here, if you make it easier to be a NEET there will be plenty more.
>>68652413
Why even bother to reply at all if you're not going to answer the question?
He asked for details, explain HOW it destroyed the Nordic nations and prove you're not just talking out of your ass...
>>68652110
What else is there to say?
I believe it would work, they're not the richest.
As I stated before, most of their money is owned by the Jews shilling in Wall Street.
In reality most of their population are quite poor, compared to an average European because the rich just completely jew the working class in order to make that profit.
TL;DR Your question makes no sense as in reality, America ain't the richest nation in the world, only on paper.
>>68651522
Humans are cunts and too inherently selfish for socialism to work properly.
Try again in another 1000 years or so... maybe.
>>68651816
Yes, I'm sure America's 99% live in slums, drink their own piss and can't poo in loo.
>>68651816
Every single American lives in a bigger house than you, dude.
Nigger apartments in the Bronx are more spacious than places Brits live.
>>68653052
Well your houses are made out of stiff paper that break if the wind blows too much.
You can rename Illness whatever you want.
It's still a bad thing.
Socialism is simply the organized looting of accumulated wealth.
It always ends the same way - economic and societal collapse.
We have more niggers and illegal spics than most "socialist" countries have people in their entire country. Not to mention way more old people, way more fat people, and way more disabled people. Socialism doesn't work when a large amount of the people don't contribute anything back to society and take more than they give. As fun of an idea as you think saying "well the rich people will pay for it all!" there is simply not enough money for that to be possible. You can take away 99% of the 1%s wealth and it would be enough to pay for the socialist programs of everyone for only 1-2 years.
>>68651522
>20T in debt
>rich
top lel
we are poor
ill consider socialism when we pay off the debt
>>68651522
>Please explain to me in great detail why socialism wouldn't work in the richest nation in the world.
niggers
>>68653515
USA already has socialist practices, and they work phenomenally. As the economy has grown, they can use some expanding.
Economics isn't binary, you're not either full libertarian or full communist. Rather, these are tools for the government to guide the economy is a healthy direction.
>>68651522
Don't need to, socialism doesn't work because
>decide to tax super rich 90%
>super rich nope out of there quickly
>suddenly your major revenue stream is gone
>country goes to shit
>the left still think that good intentions, puppies and rainbows will pay for your country
You've got to be clinically retarded not to realise that 10% of 100m is a hell of a lot better than 100% of nothing
>Be Finnish
>Get free education
>Yay
>Get a good job and make over 9000€ per month
>The finnish government takes over 50% of it in taxes and gives it to the unemployed that don't even WANT to work
>Fug
I hate to say this, but the smart option is to get your degree here, and then move to another country. Many native finns are doing this already.
>>68652110
>great detail
do your own research faggot, based on the fact that capitalism brings wealth and prosperity, not socialism.
>>68653984
50%? I pay like 35%.
>>68653515
Lmao
If Christian churches lived up to their savior and let us tax them, those taxes along would ensure medical treatment for every single person in this country.
This is before you consider that part of socialized medicine is reducing bloated costs.
No, reducing costs won't make doctors leave the country. Where would they go, Denmark? Somalia?
When "I" i replaced with "We"
It becomes Wet
>>68654193
>not taking into account sales tax
>>68651522
>$19 trillion in debt
>richest
pick one
>>68652675
>In reality most of their population are quite poor
heh
>>68651522
Socialism and Freedom cannot coexist. Socialism will take the drive and innovation out of mans natural despostion to achieve things, it will turn a nation into a sea of drunks and drug addicts, and immoral people who only live to seek pleasure. Kind of like it is now in fact.
>>68652110
>>68651816
>You do realise the 1% owns most of that money?
You do realize that this 1% myth is an attack to destroy upper middle class?
>1% make up individuals that make around $430,000 per year
>TFW the .0001% is trying to get rid of competition by blaming job creators and innovators and it's actually working
http://www.kiplinger.com/kipimages/pages/2015_income.jpg
>>68654266
>If Christian churches lived up to their savior and let us tax them
The people walking into those churches on Sunday have already payed their taxes. Let me say this clearly:
You cannot tax organizations, because organizations are not people. If you are levying a tax against an organization, then you are demanding money only from those who are capable of paying taxes, meaning you are only taxing the people of those organizations. This means you want to levy a tax against religious people who are engaging in non-profit exercises of free speech.
Now while some churches and other religious organizations flout this tax-free status for profit, they do not represent the larger body of organized religion. Even then, there are laws on the books and entire branches of the IRS that are designed to investigate and punish anyone who abuses their tax exempt status.
You may even attempt to level accusations of political involvement by organized religion, but you would still be missing the point. Currently, organized religious bodies can only be exempt from taxes so far as they do not engage in political speech. If they violate this exception, then the law demands that their tax-exempt status be revoked. THIS ACTIVELY DISINCENTIVIZES INVOLVEMENT OF RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS IN POLITICS.
The moment you attempt to tax these groups is the moment that they are entitled to full and direct political intervention. Since they are taxed, they have a right to representation by those passing the tax laws. So, if you think that religion is too involved in politics right now, you would be out of your mind.
Does not one think this shit through?
>>68651522
No society on the planet has THRIVED when there was a growing class of PARASITES feeding off of a shrinking number of PRODUCERS.
>>68651522
Socialism removes the incentive for people to work hard.
America is rich because of capitalism.
America is in fuck tons of debt.
With socialism, eventually you run out of other peoples money, so even if America were still rich, it would run out of money.
Nigga, just read Atlas Shrugged for an idea of how a socialist scenario in the US would play out.
>>68655394
>organizations are not people
Neither are corporations but they still get special protection under the law.
>RENDER UNTO CAESAR
>>68653352
thats funny every house in my neighborhood is brick
>>68655888
>special protection under the law
What? Name any special protection they receive.
>>68654266
So your solution is to make our healthcare shit and allow Churches to be treated as businesses so they can lobby and be involved more politically? They'll also now receive deductions too and most likely become for the most part tax exempt anyways because there isn't really any profiting that could come from churches except through donations which actually isn't profit. So now churches would have to find a way to actually make money as a profit if they were going to be taxed so now you actually have to charge at the door to get in.
Congratulations organized religious practice is now dead and so is your uncle for getting shit cheap healthcare thanks to wanting to make sure that all niggers, illegals, fat, old, and stupid people get their tummy aches fixed by a cheap Indian doctor who barely speaks English. retard. And our doctors, no they won't go to Denmark or Somalia, they'll go into different fields fuckface.
Nat Soc could work in america
Socialism? how are they going to leech from other countries?
trillions of dollars in debt baka
