this is, Quite Awkward, :)
nice try retard
>>68617501
>australia
>>68617501
Thanks Red Coat OP, you have shown me the error of my ways. I'm Cruz Missile now.
>>68617501
>plastic mug for boiling water
awkward indeed
>>68617972
Fucking this. Ceramic cups don't absorb shit, scratch as easily, and is better for the environment.
Fuckin' sandersfags.
>>68617972
>>68618118
can't boil water in a hat either you fucking idiot
whats your point?
interesting
*sips tea*
>>68617501
I've seen this before and I haven't found any proof against it. Isn't it kind of stupid of Donald?
>>68617501
Wow.. I'm a trump supporter but this is hard for me to justify...
>>68618363
myth busted
>>68618451
see >>68617644 >>68618363
His ties are made in china though
>>68618451
Are you trolling? Ops image is a bootleg
>>68617501
I agree, making the same thread over and over again is pretty awkward.
wanna know wats awkward? getting fucked by ur 2 dads
>>68618451
His official hat, purchased from his website, is made in USA, you dumbass. He has 0 control over other people printing hats with that motto.
>>68617501
>resorting to fake shit like this to try and stump trump
this is why you should NEVER trust a lefty
Trump's company manufactures a lot of it's products overseas. Our government, through regulations, has made it cheaper to do so. Therefore, it is any businessman's best sense to go the route which is cheapest and provides the best profit. Trump wants to change the current policies giving companies incentive to make their shit over here.
Only reactionary low IQ liberals with little critical thinking capacity would argue this shit.
>>68618265
my sides
>>68617501
its ok, australia. vegemite is a real food.
>>68618863
Relax m8. He has makes clothes outside of USA too.
>>68619027
if apple would produce their products in USA, an Iphone would be about 15.000 $ and an i mac about 30.000 $. Clothes would be unafordable. Only people with low IQ do not understand why capitalism works for us and not for the poor countries. Also it would not mind those companies because they would simply change the location of their companie. How can you force international companies to produce their products in the USA. Thats the most stupid thing ever
>>68619271
Moto X was made in the US and was dirt cheap.
Try again.
>>68619271
Apple could easily afford the loss in profit many times over.
>>68619538
>apple could afford the loss in profit many times over
you dont understand economy
>>68619387
yea thats maybe one of the reason they went from 30 billion sales in 2008 to 5.8 billion in 2014. Great deal what motorola makes
>>68617501
Nihao, Mr. Ping.
>>68619694
>moving the goalpost
Alright, I'll bite.
That's a supply and demand issue, Motorola as a company was never big in the Android area.
However, it doesn't change the fact that manufacturing in the US is not as expensive as you think it is.
>>68620403
Manufacturing in the US is expensive because MUH $15/HOUR, MUH UNIONS, MUH RIGHTS. How's GM Motors doing over in Detroit these days?
>>68620558
Cool memes you got there, but not every state is Commiefornia/Washington, and companies do go out of their way to dismantle unions, depending on state.
Manufacturing still needs to be at a profitable level, which it is for a lot of products in the US.
If you look at car companies moving to Mexico for example, a lot of it is because of logistics. Japanese companies place their factories right next door to the companies producing other items for their cars, effectively eliminating extra costs.
I'm not saying everyone should produce in the US, I'm just saying it isn't as unprofitable as some think it is.
>>68621016
the problem is, if you dont grow as a big companie, this is a huge problem. Every companie which is not earning more money than the last year will have problems. Their stocks will decrease, their capital will decrease, they have to get new money for a more expensive interest and so on. The producing alone would not be the main problem. The construction around it and what would happen if a big company like apple would announce their production in the usa.
>>68621493
Which I never said anything against, and why I did say
>>68621016
>I'm not saying everyone should produce in the US
