>Tfw Science fags stumped once again.
How can you even debate that science hasn't been taken over by SJWs?
>sub-species should be grouped by superficial phenotypes
How can you even have a debate when you have no idea what you're talking about?
>>68563809
Please explain what you mean by superficial phenotypes. What arbitrary line do you draw to decide which phenotypes are superficial or not?
>>68563809
This.
The skeletal structure of the two tigers in OP's picture is very different.
>>68563809
What about IQ?
>>68564364
MARIO BTFO. Mama mia.
>>68563640
>You must go back to high school biology
>>68564767
>chocolate skin color
are you trying to flirt with him?
>>68563640
>>68564110
You're a retard.
What you're saying is the equivalent to calling a black sheep a different subspecies.
>>68563640
biochemistry fellow here
races are sub-species it's just taboo to say it.
>>68564767
>caucasoid's wearing a yarmulke
I wish these subverters would perish.
>>68563640
>>68563809
>>68567203
Threadly reminder that niggers lack neanderthal genes, something both whites and asians have. The're literally less evolved.
>>68567203
Spotted the cuck faggot
>Science fags stumped
>science been taken over by SJWs
Except it's not. Scientists agree for the most part that there is variance between human populations. They also agree that IQ is genetic.
Scientists hate SJW as we do, even the "non-racist" ones. They're mostly liberal, but there's a difference between "liberal" (Richard Dawkins, Bill Maher, Stephen Pinker, etc.) and "SJW" (Laurie Pennie, Tim Wise, etc.)
>>68564767
I hate being inbred
>>68564364
>The skeletal structure of the two tigers in OP's picture is very different.
Are you saying between niggers and Europeans that it is not? Forensic anthropologists will tell you otherwise. Abos are even different.
Dogs can vary anywhere from poodles to german shepards. they're all still the same species though.
>>68563640
You guys are never going to learn.
Subspecies is a subjective categorization. It's not widely accepted and suffers from the exact same classification problems as race does. You keep referencing subspecies like it's a definitive, well understood classification that has an agreed upon classification among taxonomists and it isn't. For every classification of bird or animal you can find, you can find other taxonomists that dispute it. Because there's nothing definitively and logically separating the populations.
>>68564767
>All Caucasians/Europeams have the same skull shape
Nigga you've just gone full retard
>>68563640
>race is just phenotype
All these images show is that these idiots have 0 knowledge of genetics.
That aside, what does classifying groids as a different sub species achieve? Will it help you sleep better at night?
>>68569933
Ah, see! The Caucusoid population is even further divisible than humanity as a whole: this PROVES we're all the same!
Englishman =/= Italian, therefore Norwegian = Nigger
Lefties on the cutting edge of scientific thought as always
>>68569960
A step toward recognizing our differences as peoples?
>>68570265
ahahahahhahahahahaha I just said his image was bullshit since it said caucasoids were all dolichocephalics, no need to go full strawman fatsoe! ahahaha
>>68570390
Is that not what classifying different "races" of humans already does?
>>68563640
>hurr durr durr how does science work
Fucking idiot. There's a legitimate argument that there are different human races but your image is made by someone who has never spoken to a Biology professor in their life.
If this isn't allowed why do we have to tolerate all the they xe/xir stuff and million shades of genders? If anything it seems like it should be even more of an issue to categorise this.
>>68570486
Oh, you're not some lefty?
Except all breeds of dog are the same sub-species despite looking incredibly different.
>>68571286
No.
>>68563640
Felines are so fucking lazy. Love those bastards
>>68563809
>superficial
huehuehue
>>68571426
Well, more power to you then
>>68563640
Once in prep school in 2002 we were having a biology class and this professor started talking about classifications and what not, then I (a naïve boy then) asked what about races, thinking about how a chiuaua could be the same especies as a Saint Bernard. He flipped his shit out thinking I meant whites and niggers. After a heated short debate, he basically gave up arguing race is not part of the test we were taking for College acceptance. Sorry about the blog.
>>68564767
hello phrenology
are you still pseudoscience?
>>68573538
That isn't phrenology
>>68563640
A FUCKING LEAF
