Was femminism always retarded?
>>68552158
Yes
Short answer: yes.
Long answer: yeah.
>>68552158
was/is/will always be
They were behind Prohibition.
So yes.
>>68552158
Short: yes
Long answer: if suffragettes were paddled more often everything would be better.
>>68552158
No. Deep in the mists of ancient history, "feminism" used to mean advocacy for equal treatment.
not until now
it was about affirming their natural rights to not be beat for leaving their husbands i.e. making the west less like the niggers
now it's just about perceived social issues and a need to feel important
>>68552158
Because of the smallness of your penis and the ineliminability of your virginity, OP. I'm sorry. You'll adjust. I'd recommend xvideos to help with acceptance.
Women rights is fine.
Feminism is not.
>>68553074
That's retarded too.
Feminism is only retarded if you believe that the people truly pushing it from the top-down actually believe it is good for society. I do not believe that.
Women did not go to work for the sake of equality, they went to work for the sake of devaluing labour and breaking White families so that we could be wiped out and the world could be globalized.
>>68553074
Pretty much this.
Yes.
Women have always been the protected class.
The entire concept of "patriarchy" as feminists spew it is based on historical innacuracies and lies.
Women got the vote without selective service and they have used it to destroy our country by voting in more leftists every year since they've been allowed a say by enacting policies like VAWA, the Tender Years Doctrine, and other leftist policy.
>>68553025
>1920
>>68553231
you're retarded and have no sense of nuance
the feminist movement was around to affirm free choice, not to affirm some mystical jewish plot to destroy whites for whatever half assed reason
some people do things for themselves, anon
>>68553178
butthurt/10
>>68553025
>>68553378
>2020
>>68553231
>Women did not go to work for the sake of equality, they went to work for the sake of devaluing labour and breaking White families so that we could be wiped out and the world could be globalized.
lol. but how does this tie into chem trails?
>>68553379
>mythical Jewish plot
They openly talk about it. This your first day on /pol/?
As for "free choice", women are not equal to men and should not be treated as equal.
>>68553305
>american men can only vote if they sign up for the draft
top "freedom"
>>68553508
>they openly talk about it
yeah i'm sure every jew talks about how much they hate white people. i've been on /pol/ since a few months before ebola-chan got to be a thing, and most of the "open talking" seems to be cherrypicked, out of context, or fabricated quotes.
women might not be equal to men but people aren't statistics. women should have the CHANCE to be in high positions, because some individual women are both smarter and better than you in every way. it might not be all of them like modern feminists try to get us to believe, but it's enough.
>>68553571
it's not free
you're either a slave to the government or you get your rights restricted
it's bad either way
Blanket generalizations are always retarded, so assuming no woman was capable of voting reasonably was something that was rightfully campaigned against for the few intelligent women.
But assuming all men and women are capable of voting is just as retarded. It's just too hard to settle on criteria that enough people would agree on, since the majority is retarded.
Second wave feminism and the anti-pornography movement was sort of non-degenerate, but their reasoning was still retarded. 'Objectification' is just how people most interact with 90% of strangers that don't affect our lives that much. Seeing someone as an 'object' doesn'y mean you think they are worth less or anything usually, just that their emotional state isn't relevant to you.
Third wave sex positive 'grrl power' feminism tried to stop women being patronised and seen as the children most of them are. This also ended up being degenerate from a conservative viewpoint, destroying the family unit so that silly bitches could have 'careers' and be slags whilst being in denial about their sell-by-date.
I won't bother explaining why the current wave of 'intersectional' professional victims that most feminists 'identify' as now is retarded.
>>68553437
Man, why the fuck would you accept to be in those pictures like that, like wtf? It's just hard to image have so little self respect.
Feminism always sounded retarded to the general public and that's their argument for their "progressiveness"
>>68552158
H A W T
Gimme sauce Italian-bro
>>68553074
>advocacy for equal treatment.
But that's not a good thing. Dissimilar things should not be treated the same.
>>68553223
>Women rights is fine
How?
>>68553231
Women outnumber men 3/1. Women are more likely to buy products off of impulse. More women in workforce means more women who have the money to buy stupid shit impulsively.
>>68553868
money
>>68552158
yes. read abut the white feather movement.
>>68553868
This dude does represent europe right now pretty well I guess
>>68553868
you've never went to brazilian hookers is see.
>>68554036
This. I was a modeling agent for a couple of months. We would charge upwards of $100 an hour to do a shoot like that.
>>68553930
Afida turner, put afida turner + femen on google.
>>68553508
>They openly talk about it. This your first day on /pol/?
A lot more non whites talk about it, but you ignore then don't you, anon? They DINDU NUFFIN ITWUZ AL DEM JOOZ DEY KEEPIN US DOWN
>>68553996
because humans are individuals with individual and VARYING skills and abilities? not everybody can be put under a category.
>>68553930
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/silvio-berlusconi/9890936/Italy-election-Silvio-Berlusconi-vote-disturbed-by-topless-Femen-protesters.html
>>68554390
Haha, meant to say non jews. Non whites do too though.
>>68554486
exactly
there is jewish involvement in almost everything, but comparatively, it's small and irrelevant