Why is the media trying to associate the word "encryption" with the word "terrorism"?
Oy vey goyim, what do you need encryption for?
Nothing to hide, nothing to fear.
>>68489222
Checked.
>>68489037
>>68489222
Because the Jews find it useful that they can use "terrorism" as an excuse for increasing surveillance.
because the end goal is police state 1984 tier monitoring. terrorism is a manufactured "threat" integral to this because they use encryption that is impossible to break, or people who create CP encrypt their drives. if you are against terrorism you MUST be against encryption and FOR the backdooring of all encryption algorithms. This was the idea they were trying to push along with "think of the children."
It failed. They're still trying, but it has failed. Now the NSA, Google, and Intel are HEAVILY involved in creating a quantum computer that has enough qubits (power, basically) to run an algorithm that breaks all encryption instantly just by saying "give me the key."
There are legitimate uses for quantum computing but this is why it is being researched right now. i don't know what the future of encryption will be when you have a trump (lol) card for basically everything that depends on a key, but conventional encryption dies the moment the NSA gets a functioning qcomp.
>>68489037
How is that suggestive of encryption in any way
Fucking jews
>>68491268
Feel the encryption, anon.
>>68492137
damn this is some real hacker shit
Could it be that the "line of gibberish" was a line of their disgusting mudslime arabic language?
>>68489037
Because the kikes need all your metadata, goyim.
The goal of the government is to use terrorism as fearmongering in order to completely restrict our freedom and privacy. It happened under GWB and it will happen again under Hillary or Trump.
>>68492341
Half in English, Half in Squiggly
>>68489037
Because encryptionistas are terrorists.
> Your post has been logged and forwarded to the NSA.
>Remain in your seat, citizen, and commit no further crimes.
>>68489037
Ask Trump aka the biggest enemy of our freedoms.
>>68492506
Trump doesn't give a fuck about freedoms in Poland.
>>68492137
Are you that guy 4chan the news was talking about?
BAN PORTABLE ENCRYPTED ASSAULT MUSLIMS
>>68492704
Nothing wrong with assault Muslims you racist!
>>68489037
>Why is the media trying to associate the word "encryption" with the word "terrorism"?
Because their government masters want everything to be an open book to them.
Just like how the FBI was demanding Apple create a backdoor "just for this one case".. then a week later it was revealed they had a backlog of hundreds of non terrorism cases waiting for the same backdoor.
The government wants a monitor in your asshole every single day, there's just no way they can do it yet.
Every paranoid fantasy of 20 years ago is becoming reality including shit like government being able to listen and watch you through your webcam and phone mic.
They use big data from Facebook and Twitter and cell towers to track everyone in the abstract and that is honestly worse than having them swarm a single individual with all this shit.
>>68489037
You really gotta ask?
>>68489037
why would a suicide bomber check his laptop before exploding? one last shit post on /pol/?
Does this stupid twat think people who use encryption are deliberately viewing """"""gibberish""""""" """""""code"""""""" on screen? And what, decoding it in their heads?
>>68491077
>They're still trying, but it has failed. Now the NSA, Google, and Intel are HEAVILY involved in creating a quantum computer that has enough qubits (power, basically) to run an algorithm that breaks all encryption instantly just by saying "give me the key."
Not all encryption, friend. But yes RSA/DH/ECC need alternatives in a quantum world.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_size#Effect_of_quantum_computing_attacks_on_key_strength
>turn on laptop
>BIOS pops up, starts checking memory etc
>libcucks expecting apple logo
>shot by anti terror police
It'd be bad enough if idiots were trying to outlaw encryption because of terrorism. The fact that it's actually completely unrelated just makes things worse.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/03/paris-terrorist-attacks-burner-phones-not-encryption/
There was probably no encryption involved in Brussels, either, but power-hungry politicians and useless idiots are going to try to regulate it anyway.
>>68492137
ITT: Show encryption skills.
>>68492137
Guys don't open this
It makes musturd gas
>>68493945
THIS IS THE FUTURE YOU CHOSE
>>68489037
It's like the same thing as
>Year 2000 What's a Muslim
>Year 2001 now you all Gonna get your freedoms Taken away to protect you from yourselves but not because of Muslims
>>68492137
