What do you think would be the best form of government.Please explain your answer
>>68422228
Dictatorship
federal republic
Form of government: Republic
System: National Conservatism
Constitutional Monarchy as it existed before WWII, of course.
It includes the best of both worlds. Representation of the underclass, but with a healthy respect for tradition. No Weed Man either.
>>68422228
Technically, a benevolent dictatorship with elements of a republic would be the best. That way, decisions could still get made at a local level by the people who know best, but the big stuff would have a final authority lay down the law and not allow for gray areas, confusion, and vagueness. However, a "benevolent dictatorship" is just as unlikely to work in practice as communism, so the next best thing is a republic.
A great leader that exists forever. Higher IQ than anyone with a benevolence heart.
The form of government doesnt fucking matter. Implying niggers with best form of government will not burn themselves.
>>68422228
Republic.
The republic is the tried and true best method of government. It gives people a voice and enforces the rule of law.
Libertarianism.
>>68422228
Best hypothetical?
Technocratic dictatorship with a perfect, omnipotent machine. Theoretically no bias, with none of those pesky downsides of having an enlightened despot dying!
But since we live in the real world:
Representative Constitutional Republic, with CLEARLY defined purposes and jurisdictions of government.
am i shadowbanned or is it just nobody gives a shit about my posts
>>68422228
Best for everyone? Oligarchy or Monarchy, people know fuck all about politics and the way the world turns. Best for me? Probably a republic.
>>68422228
Monarchy.
Monarchies are able to survive hundreds, even thousands, of years. Republics and democracies are way too unstable to ensure a nation's long term survival.
>>68423055
Has Libertarianism ever been tried anywhere? I heard it's what the founding fathers had in mind anyway.
>>68422228
For a small homogeneous society, almost any socialist or monarchic system, democracy and/or oligarchy is optional.
For a large homogeneous society, a constitutional monarchy or republic with stong leader- fascism could work here.
For a small non-homogeneous society, usually a republic, preferably becoming a mercantile republic or something along the lines of that. Oligarchy is also optional.
For a large non-homogeneous society, a federal republic, most preferable with a strong leader and military as well as shared morals.
>>68423427
No one gives a shit either way.
>>68422553
Gas yourself
>>68423055
>>68423639
Libertarianism isn't a governmental system, it's a political philosophy
One world Republic government hellbent on space conquering
>>68422228
A constitutional monarchy where the king has actual powers. It's a mistake to leave the direction of a state to people who have a conflict of interest between it's continued prosperity and their own power base.
>>68423892
I don't think you have thought this post through lad
Oligarchy
>>68422228
Strong monarchy + democratic parliament
>>68422228
Monarchy with a benevolent king is the best government possible.
>>68422228
Absolute monarchy because God want it. Seriously
>>68422228
Democratic communism (real communism not state capitalism).
Pros:
Everybody has access to anything they could possibly want
Everybody has a direct say in the government
Cons:
Does not actually work outside a utopian matrix simulation/post-scarcity star trek type of situtation
>>68422820
>but with a healthy respect for tradition.
You know that XIX century was the cancer that destroyed the XX and XXI centuries right?
Most of shit that exist today is just ideas from XIX evolved.
Nothing good came when the monarchs lost their power.
Nobles were a bunch of snakes, the people were dumb and poor, merchants were greed and dishonest.
>>68424614
>Government
>Communism
You mean socialism right? Communism is a society where no state exiist anymoree
>>68422228
Technocraty with someone who bears full responsibility for wrong decisions and has power to act quicly if needed.
>Theocracy
Who needs anointed kings when you can have God given leaders. Naturally infidel theocracies will fall crumble before the true might of the Cross!
![220px-EndsAndMeans[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Oa6sJ3d.jpg "220px-EndsAndMeans[1].jpg")
This, tbqh senpai. Very interesting read. https://archive.org/stream/endsandmeans035237mbp/endsandmeans035237mbp_djvu.txt
>>68422228
What we have here.. Total anarchy is the best form of government, because you do as you like when you like and how you like it.. Isn't that wonderful OP.
>>68425717
Rare fag
>>68424556
Great men from the northern hemisphere examined South America a few centuries ago and determined it is incapable of self government and forever would be.
>>68425717
wew, don't see many of your kind around here. Anarchy is the only hope mankind has for the future, the alternatives are just assorted despotisms and totalitarianism.
>>68425048
>You mean socialism right?
No I mean literal communism. Basically the government from the game transistor. There's also a book that I cannot for the life of me remember the name of (I think it was written by Asimov) that describes a society where people exist entirely in electronic format aboard a satellite and live in simulated environments. There was no need for a government in this book as people could not harm each other and resources were unlimited. It's a great form of 'government' it just doesn't work in reality.
