Todays blacks should be thankful for slavery IWAHWO
>Today's blacks don't have to go through slavery or segregation
>If slavery hadn't happened they would be stuck in the shithole that is Africa
>Slavery has always been a thing, but nig nogs got to be integrated into the greatest country in the world
So do blacks owe whites reparations now or what?
>>68422179
don't give a shit, send them to africa.
>>68422179
map legend?
>>68422179
But would Africa have been a shithole if Europeans didn't fuck the place upp?
>>68422336
green = aids
>>68422459
I doubt a European traveled to all of Africa.
>>68422459
>Sweden
>Shilling for Africans
Sounds about right
>>68422179
Waiting on some white tanker ships to hijack..I'm getting compansate well by the white man
>>68422459
>has 4384639739848573 years to develop civilitzation
>Don't make shit
>Whites opressed us
>WE WUZ KANGZ N'SHEIT
>>68422711
Yes and?
>>68422824
>American
>Shilling for his ancestors
Sounds about right
>>68422581
Thanks Mr Taliban
Africa/Area
Image result for area of africa
11.67 million mi2
150million pop 1800 75 million men around 18 million soldiers in total, Europeans barely touched Africa.
>>68422459
Possibly Carthage could of become something decent and spread itself across Africa but they went for Rome instead
>>68422922
How can you say Europeans fucked up Africa if Europeans barely did shit to """"Africa"""".
>>68422459
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0C4_88ub_M
time to redpill you, swedenbro.
>>68423028
You mean Cathage would become Brazil?
>>68422907
>Has harder conditions then anyone else
>So naturally shit is going to move a lot slower
>Whites show up
>WE HAD EMPIRES AND STUFF
The Surma tribe of Ethiopia avoided all Western contact for years. Though they were well-known by Westerners for their giant lip plugs, they wanted nothing to do with any sort of government. The Surma lived in groups of a few hundred, and carried on with their humble cattle ranching for centuries while colonization, World Wars, and struggles for independence were going on all around them.
The first people to hold a conversation with the Surma people were a few Russian doctors in the 1980s, thought by the tribesmen to be walking dead because of their skin color. One of the few fixtures of modernity adopted by the Surma is the use of AK-47s to protect their livestock.
http://listverse.com/2013/01/24/10-tribes-that-avoided-modern-civilization/
>>68422336
it's a map of the african union
>>68423126
Im not following what you meant by this
>>68423284
No Europeans even knew fully what the fuck was Africa and certainty no African knew what the fuck was "Africa".
>>68423358
They would be race mixed and be retarded half niggers.
>>68423131
>Harder consitions
>tropical climate perfect for growing
>lots of tame wildlife
>rich in minerals
They didn't even farm when the europea s arrived, it's not about conditions it's just that they're nig nogs
>>68423028
You can't really blame the Punic Wars on Carthage alone
>>68423047
But they did, they did a lot to Africa. >>68423068
WELL GEZ I WONDER WHO'S FAULT IT IS THAT SHIT ENDED LIKE THAT
>>68423534
What are you talking about? be specific.
Majority of Africans never saw a European in their lives.
>>68423477
I was going to give you a serious respond. But the fact that you think that Africa
>lots of tame wildlife
Means that it's not worth it ro bother and your an idiot, so fuck off why don't you.
>>68423686
Are you really going to claim that colonisation did not have a negative impact on sub Sahara Africa?
>>68423450
I thought we was talking about a complete different history so who knows what could of happened
>>68424120
Yes, they had more tech and more contact with greater tech than before.
>>68424153
We do know, look at Brazil and Dominican Republic, there is no Spain there.
>>68424196
Right you're an ignorant idiot then
>>68424120
European colonization was the only good thing to happen to Africa in its existence.
>>68422459
They wuz kangz n shit.
>>68424369
Am I wrong or correct?
Did they have greater technology prior to colonization?
>>68422179
>leftists hate slavery
>forget to talk about how the biggest slave traders were mudslimes.
>>68424007
>He thinks Africa has lots of tame wildlife, therefore i will ignore his all of his other arguments
>>68424477
No, they did not. But do you honestly think that they were allowed near this tech?
>>68424269
You can't make the connection of ex slaves and free men and women of one of if not the richest civilisations of its time
>>68424644
Sometimes someone says something so stupid, wrong and idiotic that it's a clear sign you shouldn't even bother
>>68424670
They used the Europeans schools, hospitals, roads, medicine, food etc.. so yes.
>>68422179
Yes
>>68424770
Little sven is out of his hugbox.
>>68422179
Why is Morocco grey? It's Africa's best nation tho.
>>68424941
They don't agree to be part of Africa.
>>68424941
B& from African union for anexing western sahara
>>68424849
Then why is Africa the shithole it is today? If blacks truly were given the roads, schools and hospitals then Africa would not be what it is today.
What stormfront propaganda have you been swallowing that makes you believe that blacks were seen as anything else but cheap disposable labour?
>>68424770
What he said was not that stupid, you just have no answer or are a lazy piece of shit
>>68422459
Also, yes it moss likely would, they already had slavery, stagnant tachnology, disease
>>68425109
Does someone have the "China in Africa" webm for this dude, the one with Eddy and the Grave chinaman
>>68425109
Same reason Haiti is a shithole, Brazil is a shit hole, DR is a shit hole, Detroit a shit hole, saint luis a shit hole, Blacks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVEcvdclrqo
>>68425311
Gravel*
>>68422581
> Said the second lowest human form possible
> a fucking muslime
>>68422459
A hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
>>68422459
It depends, a lot of nations are in their right to bemoan colonization, but the vast majority of Africa nations are not in that right.
India, the Americas, South East Asia, Arabia can all bitch. Their systems really didn't help the country industrialize or improve standards of living.
Africa? Africa is bedrock for civilization development. Literally if you're in subSaharan Africa, you lost next to nothing, but gained infrastructure.
>>68425109
They were cheap and disposable labor. That doesn't mean that they couldn't have learned from whitey.
>>68425000
noone wants to be part of africa
>>68422872
>>68422459
why do you not have the same flag
>>68426627
Thay aren't wanted anywhere else
>>68426239
This.
>hey anon let me come to your home.
>No, I don't know who you are...
>*goes in by force*
>Hey! get out!
> shut up nigger, fucking piece of shit.
>*european eats all the food and shits in his living room*
>does it all day and every day.
>no more food, time to leave.
This is the colonization of Africa in a nut shell
>>68427289
when exactly did anything like that happen?
>>68427289
Be more specific.
>>68427605
it was real in his mind, we ate all the Africans food that they grew, no mention their population increased under europeans.
>>68422459
lel niggers still dont understand why its hard to create a civilization in africa
>>68422872
>Somali piracy
>still common
Nice ruse mate, the pirates got BTFOd are they stole an oil tanker
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/04/09/zimbabwe-blacks-admit-rhodesia-was-better/
“When the country changed from Rhodesia to Zimbabwe, we were very excited,” one man, Kizita, told me in a village of mud-walled huts near this town in western Zimbabwe. “But we didn’t realize the ones we chased away were better and the ones we put in power would oppress us.”
“It would have been better if whites had continued to rule because the money would have continued to come,” added a neighbor, a 58-year-old farmer named Isaac. “It was better under Rhodesia. Then we could get jobs. Things were cheaper in stores. Now we have no money, no food.”
Over and over, I cringed as I heard Africans wax nostalgic about a nasty, oppressive regime run by a tiny white elite. Black Zimbabweans responded that at least that regime was more competent than today’s nasty, oppressive regime run by the tiny black elite that surrounds Mr. Mugabe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbM_0hRTSiA
no reason for both whites and blacks to respect each others races and progress.
>>68427289
>implying the biggest sources of money don't come from private investments
>implying those said sources aren't basic resources extracted in large amounts
>implying africa doesn't has those said resources
>implying the evil white man didn't left a lot of infrastructure behind
>implying they haven't left that to rot
>implying a decent government wouldn't have been able to explore the situation
>implying you know shit about what you're talking about
>>68427289
>Hey! get out!
Literally when?
>>68427612
the colonization of Africa was monetary gains.
>>68428982
Okay?
Nothing was done to Africa to destroy them, they were simple laborers.
>>68427289
Uh, no. Africa is an odd case for the sub-saharan because very few organized governments were available to be dealt with. For contrast, in India the BEIC didn't really need to do much; they simply replaced the Mughal emperor's right to rule with their own through the already existing channels. Similar things happened in Arabia, North Africa, and parts of West Africa; system remains the same, tax revenues are monopolized through a puppet state.
For instance, in South Africa there were dozens of already existing tribes that had rough boundaries and concepts of ownership. It was more akin to
>Colonies develop along essential trade routes as Europeans seek political freedoms and cheap lands for the individual
>Dealing with local tribes happens, and large scale intervention rarely happens by local powers
>When local powers do intervene, the colonists are either wiped out, or manage to fend their own with European help
>These stable colonies develop infrastructure to better allow trade
>As they grow larger, they form their own quasi states to better manage their territory
>When local powers attempt to exploit, attack, or intervene, they're seen as interlopers by the colonists
This concept is rather important. This would be around 19th century cape of Africa. It would essentially be like building a camp in the middle of a fuck off forest and random bears decide to raid it. Yes, the forest is where the bears live originally, but the camp is the campers.
>In Africa, larger African tribes get some representation in government as a peacekeeping tool and to enforce legitimacy
>With proper management and infrastructure they do well
Why did colonists leave Africa?
continued part 1
>>68429083
You want to know what different from Europe colonizing Canada,and Europe colonizing Africa?
Africa got used by Europeans, and Canada got built by Europeans.
Still don't understand?
>hurr durr rhodesia bs
Well Africa is an entire continent,and not one country. That country was going to be great,equal opportunities and everything. South Africa would've been great If they didn't strip native's fucking citizenships,and other basic human rights. If you don't understand still, have you ever been used before? Have you ever seen someone get used before? Europeans literally used Africa for monetary gains,but not to settle and live. If they wanted to settle and live their. It would probably be just like a first world country.
>>68427688
THIER POPULATION ONLY INCREASED BECASUE EIRUOPEANS WANTED MORE PEOPLE TO OPPRESS YOU FAGGOT SHITFUCKER!!!!!!!
>>68430405
South Africa is an entirely different situation. The most heavily colonized by Europeans,but what they did with treating their locals was just like how US treated blacks back in the 30s. They had no opportunities, and was only beneficial for Europeans. Hence the Pre- apartheid. Literally the reason why South Africa has so much Europeans was cause of the opportunities they had just cause they where white.
>>68427112
Lul
>>68430405
Cold War. The NWO had a lot of hard choices to make concerning territory. For instance, the UK had to drastically curb its power projection to rebuild, Vichi France had a substantial amount of overseas territories which then went to the legitimate French government slowly that held onto them with a death grip. So, for Italy and Germany, it was a rough paradigm.
If the territories were to be divided akin to WW1 and the Ottoman's a good portion of them would probably end up in Soviet Hands. Self determination was the buzz word of the day. Africa slowly left European hands and fell into cold war power vacuums. Etc.
>>68431038
Yes and no. Most South African blacks weren't South African citizens in a way of speaking. It was more akin to Native American relations with the US; yes there are indian independent states... that operate through the US internationally.
Bantustan's were separated areas for black representation in government and were eventually supposed to be readied for independence.
>They had no opportunities, and was only beneficial for Europeans. Hence the Pre- apartheid.
Yes and no. The quality of life for a native colored person in South Africa was much better than comparable in other parts of Africa. South Africa was flourishing... mainly through limited rule.
>Africa has so much Europeans was cause of the opportunities they had just cause they where white.
I guess? People do leave for opportunities. The majority of the population had been there for multiple generations circa 1948 when apartheid systems formally went into place. Most political/religious settlers came a very long time ago, many others went there simply because of the prosperity.
