How did Canada's gold reserves drop to ZERO in 2016?
>>68312227
Dude weed lmao
>>68312227
Because it's 2015.
>>68312227
Cause the Conservatives sold all of Canada's gold. Over 500 tonnes.
Trudeau sold the last 0.1 cause wtf was the point of holding on to it. Wasn't even worth the storage cost.
>>68312362
You know Trudeau said that only once right?
>>68312227
Beats me.
I'm glad Norway isn't lead by quite as retarded people.
>>68312227
Gotta pay for the weed some how.
>>68312458
Once is all it takes
>>68312227
trudeau traded it for weed
Gold is the white male of precious metals, it had to go.
>>68312227
because its 2015
>>68312227
Pic related definitely had nothing to do with it...
Maybe it's because demand for gold went down after the Nixon thing in 71?
>>68312458
Are you unironically defending him?
>>68312390
>>68312853
Sorry, meant to ask you.
>>68312666
WHAT WEED. WE DIDN'T GET ANY FUCKING WEED. REEEEEEE
>>68312852
Every single piece of exposure I have to Justin Trudeau leaves me slightly more gobsmacked
>>68312458
>You know Trudeau said that only once right?
He has already taken it into the future now m8
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-governor-appointment-diversity-1.3445877
Trudeau said the next appointment would express Canada's diversity and referenced the answer he gave last November when he was asked why he created a cabinet with equal number of men and women.
"I suspect I might be saying 'because it's 2017' when the time for that decision [on the Governor General] comes around to be explained," he said.
>"I suspect I might be saying 'because it's 2017' when the time for that decision
>I might be saying 'because it's 2017'
>it's 2017
That's his legitimate answer for things now
CANADA IS KILL CAUSE THE "DUDE WEED LMAO" LIBKEKS FUCKED IT
YOU FUCKED IT YOU DEGENERATE LIBKEKS
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>68312227
Canadian Prime Minister Dude Weedlmao sold it all, presumably to pay for hundreds of thousands of new immigrunts
How else was he going to give law enforcement the <current year> upgrade?
>>68312227
Canada has decided to convert the gold reserves into stockpiles of Truvada & tonnes of amyl nitrite...
>>68313048
wake me up
>The United States holds the largest stockpile of gold reserves in the world by a considerable margin. In fact, the U.S. government has almost as many reserves as the next three largest countries combined. Rounding out the top five are Germany, Italy, France and China.
>>68312458
Yeah but once is enough, considering that it may be the dumbest thing that a nation's leader has said in all of known history.
>>68313153
>>68313048
cant wake up
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x384xvz_truth-about-justin-trudeau-and-the-liberals-
>yfw he has said the islamic conversion 'shahada' in a mosque that was found to have ties with & was funding Hamas
mfw I have more gold than Canada
It's literally okay to sell off all your gold reserves.
>>68313172
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjmjqlOPd6A
>>68313048
>>68312227
Justin "The Cuck Canuck" Trudeau successfully implemented all of Bernie Sander's plans.
Syrup-backed currency! We don't need no fucking gold.
>>68312227
hmm....
>>68313048
The guy's a fucking drama teacher
We elected a fucking drama teacher as our prime minister
And literally all he does is run around making his cabinet as diverse and incompetent as possible inbetween his constant photo-op stints where he metaphorically sucks SJW cock nonstop.
desu I wouldn't even be surprised if he dropped to his knees and literally started sucking dick at one of the gay pride parades.
The guy has no fucking clue what he's doing, and he literally doesn't do anything more than rubber stamp whatever his "advisors" (read: Jews) tell him to do.
This country is unbelievably fucked.
I want to immigrate to space. I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
>>68312227
They sold all of it. Everything.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/liberals-heart-larry-summers/article23854302/
>>68313048
did someone say gobsmack
>>68313354
>>68313431
>Canada sold all of their gold
Did they spend the money on dildos or refugees?
>>68313297
Only in an economic emergency
>>68313431
Literally 0.1 gold!
>>68313436
jesus christ
someone nuke ontario already
>>68313484
jesus christ
>>68312227
Meanwhile in Texas: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/texas-bullion-depository-challenges-federal-reserve-system-1437175565
>>68313500
http://www.680news.com/2016/03/14/thousands-of-refurbished-computers-provided-to-syrian-refugees/
>$1.25million on 7,500 computers for 'refugees'
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2016/02/29/return-of-refugee-health-care-a-redefining-moment-scharper.html
"After fulfilling its promise to admit 25,000 Syrian refugees, Ottawa announced last week that it will restore health-care coverage for all refugee and asylum claimants, coverage that was axed by the Conservatives in 2012. Moreover, the government has promised not only to restore coverage, but to extend it"
>refugees literally getting better health care than tax paying citizens
>>68312852
“It gives them more strategic flexibility to sell the gold, take the money and invest in U.S. government bonds, or United Kingdom bonds or French bonds or German bonds,”
FUUUUUUUUUUKKK!!!
Cuz you know... Golds historically such an unreliable investment.
>MFW Canada bases our currency off of bonds of other countries.
http://globalnews.ca/news/2508940/canada-sells-nearly-half-of-all-its-gold-reserves/
>>68313050
>it's 2017
It's gone too far
>>68313338
Don't forget pretty red leaves! Stockpile those leaves!
>>68313500
refugees
literally collected billions of dollars and just threw it all away for shitskins
could've helped with education, could've funded some science, but nah, let's just give handouts to arabs and africans because they need it so bad.
>>68313430
it was either him or tommy the commie
harper destroyed canadas housing market
>>68313140
Honestly CA how do you stand it? I would have immigrated to somewhere else by now.
>>68312227
SELL GOLD
BUY WEED
>>68313729
kek. oohh yes. but those are pwecious! we would never sell them.
>>68313221
That's a lie, it's full of gold. Trust me, goy.
>>68312227
>>68313430
Good. GTFO and take your copy pasta with you.
>canada cannot purchase dagger
>>68314036
rich coming from the autist who spams the same shit in every thread
>>68313846
I am eagerly awaiting the result of your election this fall. I pray it goes republican, I will head there immediately, because if not my only options are eastern europe or heading north and going innawoods in the Yukon
Or I may just still take my chances and head to a based state regardless, there seems to be a better chance there for overcoming the cuckening, thanks to those wonderful 1st & 2nd amendment
>>68312227
.
>>68314115
I do not.
>>68312227
and yet trudeau still has a 98% approval rating
>a leaf
>>68314294
Those fucking polls man, complete horse shit
>>68314258
>low iq autist is amazed that employment increases with recovery
kek keep spamming
>>68313533
tfw uncle fidel will never tell you it's gonna be alright
>>68313300
>implying Bush wasn't the funniest president of all time
>>68312965
Isn't it pretty much decriminalized now there?
>>68314369
Low IQ conservative (aren't they all) wants to vote Republican even though every time they're in charge, the economy crashes.
>>68314490
He was a riot.
>>68313914
>kek. oohh yes. but those are pwecious! we would never sell them.
PERFECT! Never selling the leaves would make them worth so much more than that icky gold.
Be glad it's gone. I'm sure gold smells bad.
>>68312227
>>68312390
lmao classic misleading representation of statistics. and of course this post gets totally ignored because dude weed man lmao
>>68312227
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
SELL LOW GET HIGH
>SELL LOW GET HIGH
>>68312390
He should have bought more, the price was low.
>tfw the media shills for him and says how all the other countries are doing it because it's the current year, instead of giving a real reason
>>68314502
>when you spend a lot, there's job growth
lel
>(aren't they all)
Yes, I'm sure severl of the top rated presidents had low iq, whereas you're a genius. A genius who thinks correlation= causation
>>68312227
Where o where did the jewgold go?
>>68313846
Can't afford it
>>68314258
What this doesn't show:
Almost all the new jobs are part-time
Most of the people getting the jobs are foreigners/immigrants, rather than native born americans.
>sells huge chunks of gold right when 5 year bear market ends
ahahaha
>>68315018
just fuck our shit up senpai
>>68314983
lol don't bother
he'll ignore very true statement you make and bank on a misstatement
I only engage him because I've rekt him several times, and fun to watch his breakdown toward the end
It's 2016.
May we serve as a shining example of what the USA can come to expect if Shillary Clinton gets elected
>pic related
>>68314966
From what I see of his policies, I don't agree with him, or most leftist policy.
However, I just see him genuinely enjoying spending time with his people. Nothing wrong with that if he isn't putting off work.
>>68314877
At some point, even an exceptional conservative like you should be able to identify a pattern.
>>68312227
Thank the Weedman for making it happen.
>>68315287
>him genuinely enjoying spending time with his people
Type in google image: muslim praying in canada
>>68314983
>>68315118
95% of Obama job creation is full time.
Who lied to you and told you they were part time?
>>68314232
I don't even want to know how much the US is spending on sand nigger resettlement. Hopefully it drops to 0 when Trump takes office.
>>68315118
Yeah he is just a libtard with a proxy to live his dream of being canadian.
gets rekt and changes the subject to the previous thing he was just rekt on and acts like its a new part of the conversation
Or could just be a troll
>>68315300
>At some point, even an exceptional conservative like you should be able to identify a pattern.
>muh easy pattern hurr durr
Going by that shitty chart, Obama is better than Roosevelt, who actually had a higher rate of job creation. You realize the population is always increasing right? lel
The only thing to take from the chart is that spending= job growth and job growth does not necessarily indicate a strong economy. Both Carter and Johnson left weak economies, yet you desperately cling to this chart to ignore that.
>>68312390
Stephen Harper didn't come to power until 2006.
Largest drops came under Liberal prime ministers Pearson, Trudeau, and Cretien.
Somehow this is all conservatives fault.
>>68314500
NOPE
Weedboy said just the other week they won't decriminalize it until they can regulate it, and that they aren't even close to being able to regulate it. The weed is now "hopefully we can get it done but idk lol". And the weed was 80% why he got elected.
>>68315300
Establishment trade deals
Bought and paid for cucks from both parties selling off our manufacturing base for donations
We need Trump, Sanders isn't strong enough to fight the good fight
>>68315476
> You realize the population is always increasing right?
Yeah so why did Bush have virtually no job creation then?
Oh I have many more charts. You have nothing but tears and childish insults.
> Both Carter and Johnson left weak economies
The 1960's being the highest ever growth decade in American history.
The "highest economic growth decade was the 1960s. Income tax rates were 90 percent."
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/may/17/bill-gates/bill-gates-high-taxes-and-high-growth-can-co-exist/
Jimmy Carter doesn't have anywhere near the terrible record that you right wing tards claim. In fact the Carter economy created over 10 million jobs in just 4 years. An incredible record.
Carter was done by high inflation caused by OPEC.
What kind of economy would you say your hero Bush left?
>>68315381
>usually work full-time
Usually? Is this some kind of statistical magic? Also source on the 95%.
>>68315612
As you can see on that chart, between 1984 to 1993, over 500 tonnes were sold by the Conservatives. That's that huge dip.
>>68313153
because they have the nazi gold
>>68315913
That's how the BLS and FRED label it. Take it up with them. I'm just using official statistics.
Here's a chart of all job creation under Obama. Full time and part time. You can see all of it was full time.
>>68315881
>Yeah so why did Bush have virtually no job creation then?
because he was shit and fought several wars.
> You have nothing but tears and childish insults.
kek, coming from the autist who screams bush whenever he gets rekt
>The 1960's being the highest ever growth decade in American history.
There's more to the economy than jobs
In fact Coolidge was great with jobs- to bad the economy went to shit soon thereafter
>In fact the Carter economy created over 10 million jobs in just 4 years.
Already said it, economy is more than jobs. You're so autistic
> An incredible record.
Not particularly
>your hero Bush left?
You think you can win if you associate me with Bush? desperation tbqh
> He had severely criticized former President Ford for his failures to control inflation and relieve unemployment, but after four years of the Carter presidency, both inflation and unemployment were considerably worse than at the time of his inauguration. The annual inflation rate rose from 4.8% in 1976 to 6.8% in 1977, 9% in 1978, 11% in 1979, and hovered around 12% at the time of the 1980 election campaign. Although Carter had pledged to eliminate federal deficits, the deficit for the fiscal year 1979 totaled $27.7 billion, and that for 1980 was nearly $59 billion
there's your hero, senpai
>>68316076
Yeah, they probably lied about all that stuff now.
Just like how they lie about the core CPI by removing all of the everyday goods that have gone up in price the most.
They're keeping the stock market propped artificially until Obama leaves office.
>>68316076
Does this even account for underemployment?
>>68316258
>objective statistics don't match my preconceived world view
>call objective statistics lies
Found the trump supporter!
>>68312227
>oh shit the maple currency is dropping
>better sell the rest of the gold XDD
>>68316352
>space between lines of greentext
Found the redditor!
>be canada
>economy is ass
>how do we pay off all these liabilities, eh?
>sell all the fucking gold
>now no more gold
>mfw
>>68313153
I yurop still mad we stole their jewgild?
>>68316342
This question doesn't even make sense it in this context. We're talking about the ratio of
part time jobs to full time jobs and how it's been 95% full time.
>Does this even account for underemployment?
Is this just like a standard line that right wingers throw out?
>>68315933
You're right. Mulroney is equally deplorable.
That's still one conservative of a dead party selling off 500 tons against three liberals selling off 800 tons.
>>68313805
>harper controlled every aspect and variables of our economy
plz stop this meme
>>68316352
How come I have been watching financial shows like CNBC and Bloomberg and they always talk about how the job creation has been lackluster and many of the jobs are part-time?
What about all the companies that have forced people into part-time jobs because of Obamacare?
That graph appears to show very little increase in part-time job growth. Kind of unbelievable.
>>68316352
>>68316258
So just because the facts don't line up with a debunked narrative that you bought into, they m must be fake? Even though you have no evidence of that and the BLS has been reporting labor statistics since the 1800s.
Who told you it was all part time?
It's not that hard finding a full time job in the US right now. You guys have the best labor market since 2000.
America has near record 5.6 million job openings
http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/09/news/economy/america-5-6-million-record-job-openings/
It only took me 2 seconds the other day to find this job for a Trumpfag.
>>68313109
Budget cuts
Stalin:
1924 - 180 tones
1952 - 2600 tones
1992 - 250 tones.
Three fuckers after him fucked everything.
>>68316128
You've never rekt me and you never will. You lack the ability to do.
You've been BTFO at every turn and that's why you're so upset.
I have the facts on my side. All you have is:
>I don't agree with this, so it must be fake
Nice green text.
Wtf did I say?
Do you even read
>Carter was done by high inflation caused by OPEC.
>>68316883
http://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/Full-Time-vs-Part-Time-Employment
>>68312227
who needs gold when you have GREEN say it with me brothers
DUDE
>>68317190
Weed!1111!1!1!
>>68316883
http://money.cnn.com/2014/11/20/news/economy/america-part-time-jobs-poverty/
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/6652000-more-americans-working-part-time-not-choice
http://www.usnews.com/news/the-report/articles/2015/08/23/the-part-time-economic-recovery
>So just because the facts don't line up with a debunked narrative that you bought into, they m must be fake?
No, it's more like I had a feeling you were using statistics selectively to fit your narrative, and I was right.
>>68316664
>How come I have been watching financial shows like CNBC and Bloomberg and they always talk about how the job creation has been lackluster and many of the jobs are part-time?
Maybe they've been lying to you? Do they actually present any evidence or do they just say it?
Not sure how they can claim job creation has been lackluster when the US is currently on its longest streak of job creation in history.
>>68316883
"Yes, we have created 11.5 million jobs as of June during the last five years of labor force expansion, but the number of full-time jobs today is 0.7 percent, or 822,000, lower than it was at the pre-recession peak and that was eight years ago. "
>>68317190
OH GOD DONT SHIT ON THAT BABY
>clicks image
WAT
>>68312292
First post best post.
>>68313048
>>68313710
The whole Maritimes section hates Trudeau.
Newfoundland's LIBERAL PREMIER wants to open fishing lanes again, and it has already been predicted he'll be denied by Trudeau. He stated "He won't take NO for an answer, especially from BOY WONDER!". (Newfoundland is contrarian as fuck when it comes to this shit. Danny Williams was Conservative and hated Harper, and vice versa for any Liberal Premier.)
New Brunswick has no economy anymore so they are holding on to the last pennies they have.
Nova Scotia is trying to recover from the NDP sabotage that they were forced into for 4 years.
And if we want to excuse that, Alberta is about to go into a fucking Civil War due to the NDPs hostile take-over.
The nation is ready to come undone, all you need is a bit of CIA Funding, and the right momentum.
>>68317309
>Not sure how they can claim job creation has been lackluster when the US is currently on its longest streak of job creation in history.
See the articles here >>68317107
>>68317281
and you'll know why. With NAFTA's passage alone we lost 40,000 factories. I remember arguing with you in another thread.
>>68317190
That thumbnail looks like a hairy ass spread over that baby. Kek
>>68317095
>the leader of the country controls the entire economy
plz stop posting
>>68312458
But his actions both before and after show that it's something deep in his heart.
>>68317281
What actual evidence are you providing that 95% of Obama job creation has not been full time? That is the fact that I am standing by. The job creation during his presidency has been 95% full time. There has been miniscule increase in part time employment. You spamming a couple links doesn't change anything.
cnsnews and usnews, aren't those the websites that convinced right wing morons and Donald Trump that the US had 42% unemployment and that 96 million Americans were unemployed?
Donald Trump says the unemployment rate may be 42 percent
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/sep/30/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-unemployment-rate-may-be-42-perc/
>>68312458
He has brought up CURRENT YEAR several times.
>>68317451
>The whole Maritimes section hates Trudeau.
Then WHY THE FUCK DID THE EAST COAST GO ENTIRELY RED
>>68317386
So you're agreeing with me that 95% of Obama job creation has been full time jobs?
As the charts I presented correctly indicated.
>>68316076
>>68315381
>>68317645
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/more-americans-are-stuck-in-part-time-work/2014/07/02/2eefaa72-f7e7-11e3-a3a5-42be35962a52_story.html
Is the Washington Post right-wing? Same article.
>What actual evidence are you providing that 95% of Obama job creation has not been full time?
And I'm sticking by the fact that NAFTA gutted the nation of 40,000 factories and we want our good trade deals and jobs back. Trump. Trump. Trump. Trump.
>>68317700
because we hate Harper more, and he hates us back
>>68317700
They always go RED.
They hate Trudeau, they hated Harper.
Newfoundland generally goes Red because they weren't neglected by the Liberals like the Conservatives did and the Conservatives basically stated "We don't care for Newfoundland because they'll never vote for us"
>>68317526
Somehow it keeps going to shit on Conservatives watch.
>>68317796
Yes I am, because it literally doesn't matter due to this single fact:
"Yes, we have created 11.5 million jobs as of June during the last five years of labor force expansion, but the number of full-time jobs today is 0.7 percent, or 822,000, lower than it was at the pre-recession peak and that was eight years ago. What we have seen within these numbers is a dramatic and unexpected increase in part-time jobs. We are living with a dismaying regression in wages and salaries growing at the slowest pace in three decades."
So in other words Obama has presided over the continued increase in wealth for the 1% (thanks to his QE policy of propping up stock markets and bailing out banks), the continued shrinking of the middle class, and this "recovery" has still not put us at pre-recession levels.
Just look at the Labor Force Participation Rate. It's down hard.
>>68317796
On top of that I'm sure the BLS massaged those statistics a bit (do you know why? because those statistics directly feed into Fed decisions which drive the entire world economy -- so they're not going to give you the raw jobs situation, because that would crash the markets)
>>68317480
Again, you pointing to or spamming links doesn't prove anything.
>NAFTA
Here is the caption for this picture
>U.S. President George H. W. Bush, and Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, at the initialing of the draft North American Free Trade Agreement in October 1992.
>>68317987
Because the money keeps flowing to their friends pockets.
So you have no gold reserves and oil-sands are not worth the expense anymore.
What do canucks have left? Lumber? Coal? Frenchmen?
>>68318183
It proves that Obama has presided over the continued increase in wealth for the 1% (thanks to his QE policy of propping up stock markets and bailing out banks), the continued shrinking of the middle class, and this "recovery" has still not put us at pre-recession levels.
Here's another link for you: the Labor Force Participation Rate has dropped HARD due to Obama's lackluster economic policies, which continue to drain the U.S. of good jobs:
https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/LNU01300060
>NAFTA
And Bill Clinton signed it into law. Never said a peep in complaint about it.
>>68312514
kek
>>68313884
sell low get high
>>68312227
Soros
>>68312666
He still has not even legalised weed
>>68317987
it goes to shit under every politician's watch, the difference is that with conservatives, you pay for it right away, while with liberals, you pay for it later
>>68318234
this is true for every politicians, regardless of party affiliation
>>68315612
>Largest drops came under Liberal prime ministers Pearson, Trudeau, and Cretien.
>Largest drop is between 1985 and 1993, when Mulroney was in power
>BUT LIBRULS
Are you retarded or just blind? You obviously can't read a graph.
Really hate when retarded Americans opine on my country's politics.
>>68318003
So just to recap here.
You agree with me that 95% of Obama job creation has been full time. This is a fact we both agree on. So you admit the charts I presented were correct.
>>68316076 (You)
>>68315381 (You)
We also agree that the Obama economy has created 14x more jobs than his Republican predecessor.
>>68314258
So what exactly are you complaining about?
>Just look at the Labor Force Participation Rate. It's down hard.
Because baby boomers are retiring. I've already explained this multiple times.
“Each day,10,000 baby boomers retire and begin receiving Medicare and Social Security benefits.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2014/07/24/do-10000-baby-boomers-retire-every-day/
You do know there are a record amount of job openings right?
America has near record 5.6 million job openings
http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/09/news/economy/america-5-6-million-record-job-openings/
>>68313500
Someone has to pay for those 300,000 refugee's canada's taking in this 2016
>>68318111
>On top of that I'm sure the BLS massaged those statistics a bit
Again with your crazy right wing fantasies with 0 evidence. Total fact free zone.
Only under Obama right? Before Obama I never heard a complaint from one right wing retard about the BLS. Every month the job report came out. It was never controversial or fake until a black man was president.
>>68313706
Refurbished means they were old and broke and overpriced to begin with
>>68317700
>even after years of Harper BC is only a pale shade
>BC can still be saved
I want to believe.
[spoiler]Everything west of Manitoba separating when? We don't all have to be the same country but a break between us and Ontario would surely push BC over the edge.[/spoiler]
>>68312227
Gotta get that weed money
great we get a fucking nigger who will cause the next world war, and canada gets legal weed by selling there gold, whats next free vodka in russia and sweden becomes white again.
>>68318352
So Bush and the Republicans crashed the economy destroying millions of jobs.
The Obama economy has created 14x more jobs than his Republican predecessor.
But you're still complaining? And you think Republicans crashing the economy are the answer?
The Obama economy has created 14 million jobs, it's the best labour market since 2000, 72 straight months of job creation the longest streak in American history, stock markets are up, corporate profits are up, wages are up, unemployment is down to 4.9%, inflation is low, the budget deficit has been cut by 2/3, manufacturing is way up, the US dollar is strong, OBL is dead, gas prices are below $2/gallon and military casualties have been reduced from 100/month under Bush down to basically zero/month now..
WTF does Obama have to do, to please you retards?
I already explained to you, the labor force participation rate is down because baby boomers are retiring. Why do you think it's down when there are record job openings.
>>68318703
Well, it's obvious now you've totally spun your wheels and are out of arguments. As you saw clearly, I linked the 24-54y.o. LFPR, which has nothing to do with Baby Boomers retiring.
Also, if you're a curious person (which you are not), you might wonder, why 25-54? Why not 21-62 or 18-65? Well, because then you'd capture the stunning amount of millenials with worthless degrees who can't find work IN ADDITION to the "old people" 54-65 years old who are being forced out of their jobs into early retirement.
Obama has presided over the continued increase in wealth for the 1% (thanks to his QE policy of propping up stock markets and bailing out banks), the continued shrinking of the middle class, and this "recovery" has still not put us at pre-recession levels.
We want our 40,000 factories back. There's no need to sell us your bullshit any longer.
>>68319038
It helps jobs numbers when you go from 1 full time job to 3 part time jobs
>>68313710
>http://globalnews.ca/news/2508940/canada-sells-nearly-half-of-all-its-gold-reserves/
you know your country is FUCKED when your politicians have sold off all your gold reserves.. meanwhile Russia and China have been stockpiling gold for years...
>>68318824
No, actually I've been complaining about how they changed the CPI since Bush was president. So you assume I must be a racist now? Let me guess, you're a stupid nigger / POC who's mad that Obama turned out to be such a shit president? Well I'll have you know I've had a Lebanese, TWO black, a filipino, AND a persian girlfriend.
So I can't be racist, you dumb nigger ;P
>>68312227
they liquidated everything to prevent a surge in gold futures investing.
some one had to take a hit and canada was willing to so they could waste every cent on basic income for a couple of years for their citizens
its a mutually beneficial arrangement . nobody wants a gold rush on wall street since tech stocks would fall and canada doesnt want riots
in 2 years between their oil industry debt being paid by their government and basic income negative gdp growth is a certainty
>>68319211
>;P
kill yourself
just straight up, the world would be better without you
>>68314966
jesus christ
this guy is our PM
FUck all the morons who voted for this dipshit
>>68319067
>Well, it's obvious now you've totally spun your wheels and are out of arguments
Actually that's you. Nice projection. You're the one who keeps changing the argument and jumping from one topic to the next because you're getting BTFO each time.
1. You already agree with me that Obama job creation has been 95% full time.
2. You already agree with me that the Obama economy has created over 14 million jobs and is consistently creating over 200,000 jobs per month.
3. You already agree with me that the Obama economy is currently on the longest job creation streak in American history at 72 months and counting.
4. You already agree with me that there a record high job openings.
America has near record 5.6 million job openings
http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/09/news/economy/america-5-6-million-record-job-openings/
So now all you have left is the 25-54 labor participation rate?
>Just look at the Labor Force Participation Rate. It's down hard.
What are you calling down hard exactly? Can you describe this? Are you saying it's down hard under Obama? Surely that's not what you meant right.
Right now. it's exactly where it was in Reagan's 2nd term.
The main thing dragging down the 25-54 CLPR is too many Trumptards and right wing retards who are unemployable and too useless to leave their mother's basements and enter the labor force. That's not Obama's fault. These beta white males need to take some personal responsibility.
Like I said there are a record number of job openings right now, millions are entering the workforce and millions are finding jobs.
Why can't you?
Do you need me to help you apply for jobs?
Nebraska's unemployment rate right now is 3%.
indeed.com/l-Nebraska-jobs.html
The white unemployment rate right now is 3.9%. So what's your problem? I guess you're part of that 3.9%.... it is pretty low though.
>>68319038
>The Obama economy has created 14 million jobs, it's the best labour market since 2000,
Total bullshit.
>72 straight months of job creation the longest streak in American history,
which hasn't even brought us back to pre-Obama/Bush levels
>stock markets are up
Propped by Quantiative Easing. It's not natural growth, that's why volume makes new lows whenever the market makes a new high.
>corporate profits are up
They open talk about how the earnings are being artificially overstated on all the financial shows (CNBC/Bloomberg). It's an accounting thing, you wouldn't understand. Stocks are being artificially propped by the "Yellen Put" and company stock buybacks.
>wages are up,
You just flat out lied there. Wages haven't risen in 12 years in real dollars.
>unemploymemt
LFPR is down, not up. This means employment is down.
> inflation is low
except all of the everyday goods they removed from the metric. Price of rent is up, food is up, healthcare is up, newspapers/magazines are up, services are up.
>the budget deficit has been cut by 2/3
debt doubled under Obama
>manufacturing is way up
no.
>the US dollar is strong
which is only hurting our exports more
>OBL is dead, gas prices are below $2/gallon
had zero to do with Obama
>and military casualties have been reduced from 100/month under Bush down to basically zero/month now..
Due to doubling the amount of "inhumane" drone strikes, increasing civilian casualities, and basically just walking away from Iraq and letting ISIS take over.
And shitting all over Libya with no plan for the aftermath, so now it's just chaos and ISIS.
Wow, great job!
>>68319195
95% Obama job creation has been full time.
This has been covered.
>>68316076 (You)
>>68315381 (You)
>>68312227
Who cares?
Our country is a liberal shithole filled with cucks. We do shit on a daily basis that boggles the mind.
Suicidal shit. And calling it for what it is gets you branded as an extremist. Let it fucking burn. All of it.
White men will once again pick up the pieces and carry on.
>>68317480
>With NAFTA's passage alone we lost 40,000 factories.
Manufacturing jobs always go down under Republican presidents.
>>68319211
I'm a white Canadian actually. Who doesn't understand why right wingers are such retards and always vote against their own self interest.
So how did Obama change the CPI calculation exactly?
>>68319620
>1. You already agree with me that Obama job creation has been 95% full time.
And I've already showed you how there's 7 million Americans working part-time "involuntarily", meaning they would like to work full-time, but cannot. This is millions more than under Bush. You ignored this, and accused me of "spamming links."
>2. You already agree with me that the Obama economy has created over 14 million jobs and is consistently creating over 200,000 jobs per month.
The amount of jobs created mean nothing if MORE jobs than that were previously lost. You know what a "recovery" means right?
>4. You already agree with me that there a record high job openings.
No, many of those are not real job openings.
>Right now. it's exactly where it was in Reagan's 2nd term.
Right, so employment levels have backslid 25 years. Thank you for totally destroying your entire argument.
>>68319729
>Manufacturing jobs always go down under Republican presidents.
I'm so sick of this meme. You know there are such thing as lagging effects right? The companies didn't just instantly have the capital to close their factories and move all their jobs overseas, right? That process takes time. You can see the sharp drop off already started at the end of Clinton's term.
i want to die
>>68320093
>lagging effects right
for eight fucking years?
shut the fuck up
>>68312227
TL;DR
The Jews
>>68320170
Look up NAFTA. See giant cliff fall in manufacturing? That's the 40,000 factories going overseas. All due to a law signed by Bill Clinton.
What, you thought they'd have the millions of dollars to close a huge factory and teleport it halfway around the world instantly?
>>68319662
Look how butthurt you are at Obama's success. You can't handle it bro. You're down on America. You want America to fail.
>>The Obama economy has created 14 million jobs, it's the best labour market since 2000,
>Total bullshit.
"Total bullshit" is not an argument.
The Obama economy has created over 14 million PRIVATE SECTOR jobs.
>>68317309
It is the best labor market since 2000. Since 98-99 actually.
December jobs report could cap best 2 years since 1998-1999
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/december-jobs-report-could-cap-best-2-years-since-1998-1999-2016-01-01
>which hasn't even brought us back to pre-Obama/Bush levels
It's vastly surpassed pre-Obama levels. Pic related.
>Propped by Quantiative Easing. It's not natural growth
LEL QE is over. "Natural growth". Anytime there's growth under a Democratic presidents you losers bitch about it. Meanwhile it gets really natural when Republicans crash the economy.
>LFPR is down, not up. This means employment is down.
No retard. Unemployment is down. LFPR is not a measure of unemployment. This is the dumbest thing you've said all night. I've capped this to prove you're a retard who thinks that 80 year old grandmas are unemployed.
>debt doubled under Obama
Wrong. And that's not a counter argument to the fact that deficits are down by 2/3 under Obama which as you know is a fact.
Barack Obama claims deficit has decreased by two-thirds since taking office
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/jan/20/barack-obama/barack-obama-claims-deficit-has-decreased-two-thir/
>>the US dollar is strong
which is only hurting our exports more
Bitching about success. Typical conservative.
>And shitting all over Libya with no plan for the aftermath, so now it's just chaos and ISIS.
How's Iraq doing? You know Bush spent trillions and 5,000 American soldiers to die.
Look how butthurt you are at Obama's success. You can't handle it bro. You're down on America. You want America to fail.
>>68320284
You insipid shit, do you know what TPP is?
>>68312227
Sold it to raise money for Syrian refugees lmao.
>>68320284
NAFTA, was almost a quarter century ago
>>68319951
>And I've already showed you how there's 7 million Americans working part-time "involuntarily", meaning they would like to work full-time, but cannot. This is millions more than under Bush. You ignored this, and accused me of "spamming links."
Actually this has fallen dramatically under Obama. Pic related.
So please admit what you just said is wrong and that you were lied to by right wing media.
Don't you think you're grasping at straws at this point?
>The amount of jobs created mean nothing if MORE jobs than that were previously lost. You know what a "recovery" means right?
I've already proven multiple times that jobs are way up under Obama. But I do agree with you we need to stop electing Republicans because they always crash the economy and then get mad at Democrats for not cleaning up their mess fast enough.
>No, many of those are not real job openings.
Proof? Source?
>Right, so employment levels have backslid 25 years.
Actually unemployment levels have all plummeted under Obama. From U3 to U6.
You keep confusing labor force participation rate with employment because you're a retard and don't know simple things.
>>68319729
Why does Bill get a blue arrow even though it went down during his time?
>>68320284
As I've already explained to you, NAFTA was a done deal before Bill Clinton even came to office.
>>68318183
U.S. President George H. W. Bush, and Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, at the initialing of the draft North American Free Trade Agreement in October 1992.
Once again you're criticizing a Democrat for signing something a Republican negotiated and agreed to.
The problem is Republicans, not Democrats.
You're just jealous because Bill Clinton has the highest all time job creation at over 23 million jobs.
>>68312227
They became crackwhores and pawned all their shit.
>>68320887
Cause he's a Democrat.
>>68320999
oh I see. I misinterpreted the graph
>>68320444
>It's vastly surpassed pre-Obama levels. Pic related.
You posted a pic that doesn't show pre-Obama levels. Also, you're using raw jobs numbers which doesn't account for population growth. This is why we use the Labor Force Participation Rate. It's a better measure of employment levels.
>LEL QE is over.
QE has not been over very long, but the implicit "Yellen Put" is not over. This is the belief by the market that the Fed will step in and do anything necessary to prop it (as they have demonstrated many times).
Market makes new highs on record low volume. All you need to know.
>LFPR is not a measure of unemployment. I've capped this to prove you're a retard who thinks that 80 year old grandmas are unemployed.
Did you seriously just disregard this for the SECOND time? The LFPR is down FOR ALL AGE GROUPS. You cannot expalin the LFPR for 25-54 year olds being down by "80 year old grandmas" or "retiring boomers" because they are not included in that statistic.
>Wrong. And that's not a counter argument to the fact that deficits are down by 2/3 under Obama which as you know is a fact.
The debt has doubled. And how is reducing a massive deficit by 2/3rds an accomplishment? We shouldn't be running high deficits at all. I'm against the $2 trillion Bush wasted on the Iraq war as well (would've made sense if it actually WAS a "war for oil" like the liberals kept screaming at us).
>You can't handle it bro. You're down on America. You want America to fail.
Nah, you just can't handle that Obama has been a totally shit president, bad on trade, totally doing the bidding on his Wall Street donors, JUST LIKE BUSH.
Obama has presided over the continued increase in wealth for the 1% (thanks to his QE policy of propping up stock markets and bailing out banks), the continued shrinking of the middle class, and this "recovery" has still not put us at pre-recession levels.
And just so you know the Democrats helped Bush crash the economy (sub-prime loan legislation).
>>68320170
you are going to see the same lagging effect with obamacare, specifically because the dishonest socialist cunts who wrote the legistlation specifically wrote in literal multi-year long breaks. If trump is elected, you are going to see huge spikes in insurance and medical care in america by the time 2020 hits, and it will all literally be due to obamacare pieces kicking in.
Of course, the liberal shitstains will blame the republicans for it.
>>68320548
>i mean come on, it's 2016
>>68320776
>Actually this has fallen dramatically under Obama. Pic related.
Why do you keep posting graphs that don't start before Obama's presidency? It's almost like you don't want us to compare and see how good it was before his term.
Literally everything you post is "blah blah blah has dramatically improved under Obama" and then we see "oh, it's improved from how bad it was during Obama's 1st year!" What the fuck?? Just like the "2/3rd deficit cut" statistic -- it only sounds good because it was so astronomical during Obama's 1st year!
http://money.cnn.com/2014/11/20/news/economy/america-part-time-jobs-poverty/
http://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/Full-Time-vs-Part-Time-Employment
Once, again check out this "link spam" and you'll see how involuntary part-time has dramatically RISEN under Obama, not fallen. You see, just like Bill Clinton, he would have to actually REVERSE the trade policies of previous presidents in order to actually improve the jobs situation.
>Proof? Source?
Companies post fake job openings that require 5 years of experience that nobody has so that they can fulfill their obligation under law to look for an American worker first, before they hire an H-1B visa worker. We know they abuse this system with the intent to never hire an American, therefore I know there are fake job openings.
>You keep confusing labor force participation rate with employment because you're a retard and don't know simple things.
And you've used this same stupid argument 3 times without realizing that the Labor Force Participation has dropped for all age groups.
>>68320930
I didn't see Bill Clinton do anything to reverse those trade policies? I don't see Hillary doing anything to reverse those trade policies? She fully supported the TPP until Sanders went to the left of her on that issue and she was forced to change her position.
>>68321093
>Also, you're using raw jobs numbers which doesn't account for population growth.
The US only needs about 80,000 jobs per month to keep up with population growth.
Chicago Fed Finds 80,000 Jobs Will Steady U.S. Unemployment
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-06-06/chicago-fed-finds-80-000-jobs-enough-to-steady-u-s-unemployment
It's creating over 200,000 per month. That's why unemployment is falling dramatically.
>This is why we use the Labor Force Participation Rate. It's a better measure of employment levels.
You double down on your retardation? Labor force participation rate is not a measure of unemployment. If that were true, then that means that 80 year old grandmas, 30 year old stay at home mothers, 45 year old disabled men, or a 50 year old who goes back to school for an education or traning are unemployed. They're not unemployed. They're out of the labor force for a reason.
Until you understand this, you will be known as a retard.
Unemployment is a measure of unemployment. And all measures of unemployment from U3 to U6 have plummeted under President Obama.
You can't handle it because you want America to fail and you are disappointed that it hasn't under Obama. You want Republicans in power because you want America to fail. That is much clear. You want Republicans to crash the economy again so then you can blame Democrats.
>The debt has doubled.
The debt has not doubled under Obama. You obviously fail at basic math.
>And how is reducing a massive deficit by 2/3rds an accomplishment?
Because not 1 Republican President has been able to reduce the budget deficit by even 1 penny during their tenure from start to finish. Every single one of them has left a higher deficit than they inherited.
Meanwhile every single Democrat since Truman has reduced the deficit over their term.
Why can't you find a job? Do you need me to help you apply?
indeed.com/l-Nebraska-jobs.html
>>68321157
Republicans promised me Obamacare was a job killer but since it passed, the US has been on the longest job streak in American history.
Why did Republicans lie to me?
When will the Obamacare apocalypse arrive?
Also, when will Reaganomics finally trickle down? Been waiting 35 years for that shit.
>>68321569
He couldn't. It was a done deal by Bush. He did renegotiate a few parts.
But I do agree, it is terrible for the country when unfortunately, Democrats agree to stupid shit the Republicans did.
That's why it's important not to elect Republicans.
>>68321792
>When will the Obamacare apocalypse arrive?
In about 3 years when the time locked stipulations preventing people from openly abusing the system become active you short sighted cuck.
>>68321517
Dude can you leave me alone now? You're honestly fucking annoying. I think you need a boyfriend or something.
I'll respond to this tmrw if you want but seriously I'm not going to waste my whole night because you're lonely and want my D.
Alright see ya please don't try to find me in a different thread.
You got BTFO but you won't ever stop, you'll just keep replying with bullshit so I'm ending it.
What's a nice, non-cucked country to move to? I was thinking Switzerland.
>>68322135
Ok so tell all your Trumptard friends to vote Hillary so she gets stuck with the Obamacare apocalypse.
Deal?
Also,
>Also, when will Reaganomics finally trickle down? Been waiting 35 years for that shit.
>>68316627
>part time jobs to full time jobs and how it's been 95% full time.
>>Does this even account for underemployment?
>Is this just like a standard line that right wingers throw out?
It makes perfect sense. Take an intro to econ class, you fucking imbecile
>>68314726
Can't disrupt the dude weed lmao its 2016 circlejerk.
>>68317095
Again, you fail. Reagan is considered to be superior to Carter by 99% of scholars, yet you single out muh hurr durr debt and think that, by putting this whole thing into a kaleidoscope, your ignorance won't be obvious.
>>Carter was done by high inflation caused by OPEC.
Lol, so now foreign policy counts! Well Reagan had to spend because of Carter, yet you've not taken that into account. Moreover, Bush had to spend for the wars, one of which was pretty much bipartisan
>>68322291
All rates of unemployment and underemployment have plummeted under Obama.
> Take an intro to econ class, you fucking imbecile
Right back at ya.
>>68321691
>>68318485
underrated
>>68314187
Hey! If you're still in this thread, I was thinking about going to the Yukon too! We should make a settlement up there for right-winged Canadians.
>>68322466
This doesn't answer my objection, or even pertain to it remotely. If you struggle with diction, I can refer you to a dictionary.
>>68321691
>He posts another graph that doesn't start before Obama's term
Man, you are on a roll here. Desperate much to show how Obama was such a great president?
Obama has presided over the continued increase in wealth for the 1% (thanks to his QE policy of propping up stock markets and bailing out banks), the continued shrinking of the middle class, and this "recovery" has still not put us at pre-recession levels.
I've noticed how you never respond to that ^ paragraph, because you just can't.
>You double down on your retardation? Labor force participation rate is not a measure of unemployment. If that were true, then that means that 80 year old grandmas, 30 year old stay at home mothers, 45 year old disabled men, or a 50 year old who goes back to school for an education or traning are unemployed. They're not unemployed. They're out of the labor force for a reason.
>80 year old grandma
Wow, that's the 4th time you've used that lie now. We're talking about the 25-54 year olds, not grandmas.
>30 year old stay at home mothers
Hmmm, probably not that, considering these days more than ever you need 2-incomes to raise a decent family.
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/09/03/the-disappearing-male-worker/
Plus this nice research report shows male employment is down more than women, so...
>45 year old disabled men
Any proof of a sudden uptick in disabled people under Obama?
>50 year old who goes back to school for an education or traning are unemployed
Any proof of this on a mass scale? Or is it simply that people have been laid off, forced out of their jobs into early retirement, replaced by H-1B workers, etc.?
Also explain this:
http://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/millennials-and-employment
>The debt has doubled.
It will be $21 trillion soon with the new budget.
>>68322148
Job participation rate is dropping and has been since about 2001. This isn't because more and more people are going into retirement. Many people are just giving up looking for work. And nothing Obama has done has changed this trend.
>>68322148
>Dude can you leave me alone now?
Not until you stop with your Obama cocksucking.
>>68322588
buddy, you're wasting your time. If you do finally beat him, he'll just start ignoring you
I just do it for the autism tbqh
>>68312514
Are swizz the Jews of Europe?
>>68322706
that was my last post. I have to admit, it's fucking hard to defend Republicans.
But there's nothing worse than a brainwashed liberal who thinks Obama has done any better.
wait. did canada really sell all its fucking gold to buy federal reserve notes? Without any kind of reserve... they don't even qualify as a proper country anymore.
>>68312458
He fucked up by unironically saying it while the meme was in it's infancy.
>>68322813
>I have to admit, it's fucking hard to defend Republicans.
Read up on Eisenhower, Nixon, and Reagan. Even HW is easier to defend than this dishonest clown lets on.
Keep in mind he focuses only on economics (and not even that as a whole, he cuts pastes portions of it).
That said, Obama is not a bad president imo
>>68321691
>presidents makes the deficit.
Republican congresses are the cause of democratic presidents not having a budget deficit.
Bill Clinton had to work with a Republican congress.
>muh librul president
Congress is more important since it's actually decided by popular vote
>>68322590
RARE
>>68317095
>democratic congress in power during Reagan's time
>Debt must be 100% from reagan
>>68322588
Jesus fucking Christ. Are you trying to suck me in with your sheer stupidity? Is that what this is?
>>He posts another graph that doesn't start before Obama's term
>Man, you are on a roll here. Desperate much to show how Obama was such a great president?
HOW THE FUCK IS OBAMA responsible for something that happened before his presidency?
WTF is wrong with you? How can anyone possibly be this stupid? I'm dead serious. Are you missing a chromosome or something? What are you afflicted with?
If we're talking about Obama's record, then shouldn't we show Obama's record?
It's not enough that he inherited the Bush Crash and Republican Recession which was the worst crash since the Republican Great Depression. That's not enough?
WTF is wrong with you?
>I've noticed how you never respond to that ^ paragraph, because you just can't.
I just did. I cannot believe you're so mentally retarded that you think Obama's record should include before Obama is President.
I don't understand the level of mental retardation that that takes. I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt but you doubled down it.
See this is why you're a moron.
>30 year old stay at home mothers
>45 year old disabled men
>50 year old who goes back to school for an education or traning are unemployed
ALL OF THESE ARE INCLUDED in the 25-54 civilian labor force participation rate.
I was proving to you why you're a retard for thinking it's an unemployment rate.
So you think that stay at home moms are unemployed. That's what you legitimately think. You think disabled people are unemployed. That's what YOU THINK. YOU SAID IT.
Now do you see why you're a retard.
Now admit you're a retard for thinking that.
Civilian labor force participation, either 16+ OR 25-54 IS NOT a measure of unemployment. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR TINY BRAIN.
Unemployment rate is a measure of unemployment.
>>68322563
I already answered your question. Your just too stupid to realize it. Look at the chart.
>see le weed man thread
>no mention of soudi connections/advisers
/pol/ i am of disappoint
>Job participation rate is dropping and has been since about 2001.
THANKS OBAMA!
> This isn't because more and more people are going into retirement.
Yes it exactly is.
>>68322590
>>68323062
Actually
>Many people are just giving up looking for work.
OH REALLY???? AHAHAH IS THAT SO? Then why is U4 unemployment at 5.3%. READ THE CHART CAREFULLY. Then answer that question.
>And nothing Obama has done has changed this trend.
He's done a lot actually. As you can see the U4 unemployment rate has PLUMMETED on his watch.
>>68323283
>I already answered your question. Your just too stupid to realize it. Look at the chart.
No, I see what your intention was. You made a mistake common among economic illiterates, and I'm waiting to see if you're able to correct it.
>your too
kek
By the way, some of your previous charts also work in favor of Bush, since it takes months just to pass economic legislation, never mind the effects.
Reagan's real problem was mandatory minimum drug sentences.
But democrats didn't really improve that, Clinton's tough on crime bill ripped apart a lot of Black families and economically demolished a lot of Black areas.
>>68322813
>>68322706
I actually I just responded and I BTFO both of you retards. I love how I have to respond to each one of you constantly, debunking your right wing lies. The moment I go to another thread or something, you have to tell yourselves.
You get soo butthurt if I don't reply back. Seriously you guys are losers and right wing retards. I BTFO both of you every time.
You guys think 80 year old grandmas and 30 year old stay at home moms ARE UNEMPLOYED.
I can't imagine the stupidity.
Trump got a PANTS ON FIRE rating for that stupid shit and you retards still believe it.
Can you leave me alone now? Have you losers had enough yet?
Donald Trump says the unemployment rate may be 42 percent
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/sep/30/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-unemployment-rate-may-be-42-perc/
Why can't you losers find jobs? Seriously?
Do you need me to help you apply?
http://www.indeed.com/l-Nebraska-jobs.html
You Trumptards need to find jobs. You're dragging down the labor force participation rate.
>>68323394
>Congress is majority Republican since 2010
>Everything that is done right is thanks to Obama
>>68322908
Lol I just noticed you guys are chatting about me. What a bunch of homos. Maybe you 2 should go out together?
Fucking loser faggots.
>and not even that as a whole, he cuts pastes portions of it).
No actually each of my responses and custom and apply to what you retards are bullshitting about.
You're the ones who keep responding with he same shit over and over.
>MUH PART TIME
>MUH LABOR RATE
Same shit every time.
You clowns are predictable af.
>>68322961
>What is the 1993 Omnibus Budget Act that raised taxes on the rich and corporations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnibus_Budget_Reconciliation_Act_of_1993
>What is Bush had a GOP Congress
>What is no Republican president since Eisenhower has balanced the budget.
>>68323755
>Lol I just noticed you guys are chatting about me. What a bunch of homos. Maybe you 2 should go out together?
>Fucking loser faggots.
lol u sound angry
>No actually each of my responses and custom and apply to what you retards are bullshitting about.
Why? You're too illiterate lel
>You clowns are predictable af.
enjoy your autism
>>68323241
Dude, you just aren't even trying anymore. My criticism was obviously that you cannot compare one presidency to another without even including previous presidencies in your graph. Glad to see you're finally starting to understand that, because that's been your shtick the whole time. Again, involuntary part-time workers is higher under Obama, and has never returned to pre-recession levels:
http://money.cnn.com/2014/11/20/news/economy/america-part-time-jobs-poverty/
http://www.usnews.com/news/the-report/articles/2015/08/23/the-part-time-economic-recovery
>the "Bush crash"
Which the Democrats helped cause with their insistence (along with Bush) that we "increase home ownership in America!" by artificially forcing banks to lend to people who cannot afford it. Barney Frank and all the Democrats supported this. Clinton is funded by the major big banks, just like Obama was.
>ALL OF THESE ARE INCLUDED in the 25-54 civilian labor force participation rate.
You don't know what the structural drop in the LFPR is due to. Those were just your personal theories. Employees have been forced into part-time work (to exempt them from the requirements of Obamacare) and older employees are being quietly forced into retirement all over the country.
Not to mention a growing segment of discouraged workers and millenials not entering the workforce.
That is unemployment.
>>68315300
> Implying Presidents create jobs.
> Implying every year had the same job growth for the entire presidency.
> Implying that ANY government policy doesn't have a lag effect.
>>68323065
That's funny. Carter had a Democratic Congress too. What changed? Oh right, Reagan became president.
Turns out tax cuts for the rich don't pay for themselves.
>>68323836
>>What is the 1993 Omnibus Budget Act that raised taxes on the rich and corporations.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnibus_Budget_Reconciliation_Act_of_1993
>>What is Bush had a GOP Congress
Clinton himself defended that, after having signed the Bill. I thought you said the president was most important, right? So Clinton crashed the economy.
>What is no Republican president since Eisenhower has balanced the budget.
Unfortunately they have to spend to undo the damage of imbeciles like Carter :(
>>68323836
Bush's debt only began to stack up once there was a Democratic congress in power.
>>68323903
>Carter had a Democratic Congress too.
and he was a shitshow.
>Reagan became president.
And led us to prosperity
babbies first keynes
>>68312227
What the fuck.
How is it humanly possible to fuck up this bad?
Are they trying to mimic Zimdesia's economic success?
>>68322684
Never. I won't stop. So just fuck off already and get a boyfriend.
All I'm doing is posting factual charts debunking right wing lies and look how much it pisses you off.
>>68324230
nigga i think you're gay
Republican governors have the highest approval ratings.
Then again, the gop religious right tends to have the lowest approval ratings, but who cares about religious reactionaries.
>>68323874
>No actually each of my responses ARE custom and apply to what you retards are bullshitting about.
Let me know how your date goes with your boyfriend. Just please don't talk about me when he's fucking you in the ass.
>>68324287
Says the guy who was jerking another guy off talking about me.
>>68322706
>>68322813
>>68322908
>>68323394
>Muh unemployment rate
Unemployment rate is actually a misnomer. It really is Job seeking rate. To be listed as unemployed you have to have looked for a job in the last 4 weeks. That is it.
The Labor Department simply stops counting you as unemployed if you aren't looking for work.
This chart shows simply prime age workers, it doesn't take the whole population into account, and even among them labor force participation rate is down. So stop it with your unemployment charts. Anyone who has studied macro-economics knows that they are not the be all end all indicator of a strong economy.
You are nothing more than a goddamn shill. Get out.
>>68324380
Actually it's clear you've been triggered tonight. Look at all the paragraphs you used. There's like 25 paragraphs in each one of your posts. Bookended by closet homo projections.
>>68324380
>having gay fantasies about me
lol faggot
I rek'd you in politics now I'll rek you in your little fantasies
butter up buttercup ;)
>>68324463
t. gay fantasies in every post>>68324380
>>68322148
>>68324364
https://morningconsult.com/2015/11/how-do-voters-feel-about-your-governor/
Chris Christie used to be popular but that changed recently.
Probably because of Trump.
>>68312675
And Muslims
>>68324470
>To be listed as unemployed you have to have looked for a job in the last 4 weeks.
WRONG. You just made that up.
Please read the description and type out the chart that I linked you:
>>68323394
You didn't even read it. I warned you to not make yourself look like a retard but you did it. '
I'll post the chart again. I'll give you another chance to see if you can break through the hold that failed right wing lies have on you.
I'll post the chart of U4 unemployment rate and see if you can figure it out.
PROTIP: Read the chart this time retard.
Read it and tell me what it says.
>The Labor Department simply stops counting you as unemployed if you aren't looking for work.
Let's see if you figure it out. Your mind is about to blown.
>>68318632
Now you know how it feels, asshole
>>68324473
Are you serious? You have 25 posts in this thread too retard.
You're welcome for the education by the way. It's amazing how I can throw facts right in your guys faces but you don't believe them. You cling to your right wing lies. It's actually pretty incredible. You retards need to be studied.
NASA needs to study you retards. Your brains need to be examined and we need to eliminate the retardation gene that must be present in all Trumptards.
>>68324756
>>68324909
doesn't account for underemployment sorry faggot
