>RICHEST 62 PEOPLE HAVE HALF THE WORLD'S WEALTH
>RICHEST 62 PEOPLE HAVE HALF THE WORLD'S WEALTH
>RICHEST 62 PEOPLE HAVE HALF THE WORLD'S WEALTH
>RICHEST 62 PEOPLE HAVE HALF THE WORLD'S WEALTH
>RICHEST 62 PEOPLE HAVE HALF THE WORLD'S WEALTH
why is this okay?
can you argue one human being is worth 100000000x times more than another?
Oy vey
>>68268522
What's morally wrong with someone having way more money than you?
I have no problem with someone being fucking rich unless he's a jew
>>68268626
literally 62 jews there m8
Unless you are ready to arm yourself and take it from them, stfu you gibsmedat nigger faggot kike.
>>68268522
>all thanks to Obama being in power for 8 years
Obama ruined this nation. Middle and lower class families have fallen so low they're down to 1970s levels.
>>68268522
>undertale
>Bernie talking point
hi r/s4p
if you want to go be one of those 1% go earn it fuccboi, that's a distribution of resources found in most animal systems
That's about enough people for a Large game of Civ V if including players and City States
>mfw those 62 employ the other 7 billion
this is what Hitler fought against
>>68268522
Source?
>>68268522
Niggers.
Yes, yes I can argue that very easily.
Please tell me the worth of these gentlemen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMe4rD7qMew
>>68268522
>can you argue one human being is worth 100000000x times more than another?
Yes. It depends on what this human is willing to bring to the table. If it's a lazy idiot getting Government money and doing nothing else, then he's not worth the same compared to a rich person who owns multiple successful businesses and provides jobs to hardworking individuals.
>>68268522
~ pay gap ~
[data tagged]
>>68268522
the richest 62 people are all trying to force globalism, nothing will ever take their wealth away, and certainly not your silly "socialist revolution"
All that will do is finish off the middle class and make everyone equally poor while the same global elite get even richer and control more aspects of your life.
>>68268787
>capitalism is fundamental, like nature, so there are big winners and the rest die in natural selection
>this is somehow, its biggest moral selling point
>>68268778
>thanks obama for creating a right wing problem
>>68268522
Watch the entire channel.
Tell me you're not worth 23489234x than these thugs.
Then tell me these thugs would be as benevolent as the current rich would be if the situation were reversed.
Check out South Africa friend.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxot145bg-A
>>68268522
tem such a cute!!!!1!!11
no one man should have all that power
>>68269099
>middle class disappearing because taxes makes it tumble down the poor
>right wing problem
Well I don't believe in equality, so I laugh at the notion this needs to be justified.
>>68268522
>why is this okay?
Because monetary wealth is flows through all levels of society. Just because the 62 have control of that wealth doesn't mean they're the only ones who benefit from it. Those people likely employ hundred of millions of people around the globe
>can you argue one human being is worth 100000000x times more than another?
Yes, someone that can facilitate the growth of wealth is worth way more than someone who cant
>>68269036
>bringing jobs to hardworking individuals
>not contributing to slave labor by shipping jobs to china, while giving starvation wages for the longest hours in america
>also dodging taxes like no fucking tomorrow
>I think the poor are lazy because FOX and conservative lobbyists told me
>>68269197
>Tell me you're not worth 23489234x than these thugs.
nope. i'm worth exactly the same as them.
>implying wealth is finite
>>68269099
beats every other system implemented by a wide margin, call me back when ANYONE pulls off anything else and becomes globally relevant
>>68269381
Where is the money?
Is it with the poor?
>>68269099
>people making money is a right wing problem
>>68269522
And even in that example they provide more than a Government handout welfare queen.
Should be possible under freedom.
If they have commited crimes, prosecute and jail them.
Some men can't be bought or reasoned with OP.
Remember that
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efHCdKb5UWc
>/pol/ hates jews
>"ITS OKAY FOR THESE PEOPLE TO BE RICH"
simply epic
>>68269099
>Right wing
>A problem
kek
>>68268522
I do have a problem with that. What /pol/acks need to understand here is that one cannot get rich without someone else getting poor. On the other hand, you can't blame them if they got and keep their money through legal means (buying off puppet politicians to make your laws still counts as illegal)
>>68269988
>one cannot get rich without someone else getting poor
I pay you $5 to make a sweater for me. You make it and I give you $5. I find a guy who buys the sweater from me for $10.
I'm richer, the man who made the sweater is richer, and the one person with less money has a nice sweater.
>>68269099
>>capitalism is fundamental, like nature, so there are big winners and the rest die in natural selection
>>this is somehow, its biggest moral selling point
>implying this is a bad thing
you can bitch and moan about it however much you want. it won't change. the world is a harsh place. get used to it.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with someone having a lot more of anything than someone else.
There are many problems with someone being jealous of that.
Thou shalt not covet. Nigger.
>le wealth meme
The reason these people have so much wealth is because they own enormous companies. If you owned 1/7,000,000,000 of Apple, what would you do with it? Nothing productive, I expect
>>68269099
>a right wing problem
>>68270358
>contribute nothing to the economy
>make extra money
>there are people who do this for a living and they have more money than everyone else
>this is ok
Hi.
I own 100% of the money I made, which is a lot, and so ''I'm worth'' 100000x times many people in the entire world.
Is there something wrong?
>>68268522
Half the world is subsistence farming, which by definition doesn't accumulate wealth.
A lot of the non subsistence farmers are in debt due to mortgages/car loans/etc so they have negative wealth
This is literally not news
>>68270358
>the person with less money has a nice sweater
Exactly. It sounds funny on a smaller scale, but think of how people constantly take credits to buy all kinds of stupid, over-priced shit and become wage slaves for life. It means that, after paying their monthly debts to the rich, they have just enough money to not starve to death. They are kept alive with minimal investment, their labour is free and they even get to choose a gift occasionally, that is regarded as 'expensive'.
>>68270359
>mankind follows the same rules as nature
>what the fuck is civilization
>>68268522
If I'm worth $1 and you aren't worth anything, I am infinitely more valuable than you.
So liberals are essentially jealous children who don't like it when someone has more than them. Got ya
>>68269988
>What /pol/acks need to understand here is that one cannot get rich without someone else getting poor.
You're retarded.Read or listen to M.Friedman and his famous quote of "economy isn't a zero sum game".
>>68269905
good joke
>>68271322
>what the fuck is civilization
Nothing new.
>>68268522
>worth 100000000x times more than another
>worth
What do you mean by this? Money represents an ability to levy goods and services from people. There is nothing wrong with somebody having created 1 billion times more value for the world than another. Do you actually believe that a person who has created 1 billion times more value than another deserves to have any less than 1 billion times the ability to exchange back for that value?
Now, if you mean "worth" in the philosophical sense of "what is the value of a human life?", it's unfortunately a subjective measure. I would argue that many people have negative value and should be killed. Some people have no value and their existence is inconsequential. Some body have extremely little value. Some people have 1 billion times the value of others. Some people have had incalculable value.
>>68269099
>>68269522
Are you only pretending to be a faggot to bait or are you being legit?
>>68271036
>spend half a day looking for someone who wants a sweater
>somehow find a guy who wants it for $10
>suddenly the asshole who agreed to make it for me for $5 wants it back because he sees me sell it for $10
The solution is to tell the asshole to fuck off and stop being terrible at everything.
>>68268522
>>68268522
I don't care who has wealth, as long as they get it in a non-coercive way.
The problem with the 1% isn't that they're rich, it's that they use governments to rig the game. Governments should be shrunk down and not interact with markets. Then we can watch and see who protests.
>>68271322
>all these wars and atrocities committed throughout history
>he still thinks we're not savages at heart
wew lad
>>68271401
You advertised that with an ad hominem. Now I assume that it is as stupid as your argument is. Perhaps, if you were to give a reasonable argument, I would feel more intrigued to read it.
>>68268522
>implying race, gender and geopolitics aren't a convenient smokescreen to distract from the somehow increasing class imbalance
>left wing thinks it's undoing the mistakes of the past while still being proletariat cattle, and so is placated
>right wing retaliates on the left wing's actions, and so is diverted
Someone has to do the dirty jobs, but such a divide in any other theater would be considered farcical
>>68272364
what if I told you human behavior changes depending on the environment
look at the stanford prison experiment or the abu ghraib torturing
>>68271804
I'm both nigga
>>68272612
Who decides what "balance" the classes should be in?
>>68268522
Have you noticed how the majority of them are jewish?
>>68268522
>>68269099
>>68269522
>>68271036
>>68271322
>>68272650
all the pics you posted reek of newfaggotry. Stick around new friend
>>68268522
but those values are theoretical at best, they don't literally have half of the world's cash sitting in bank accounts. The vast majority of their wealth is tied up in companies, physical assets, and debt. If they were to liquidate their fortunes into real cash it would be a fraction of their actual "worth"
>>68268522
When people make statements like this, I realize they are really financially retarded. Do you believe that these people have piles of gold and bathe in hundred dollar bills every night? Yes, they have homes and shit way fucking nicer than your average person, but the majority of those assets are in stocks and keep the world fucking running. No one has billions in liquid assets.
One human being contributes 100000000x to society as another. It's that simple.
Are you telling me aids niggers in ethiopia are producing anything of value? Compare with, say, a heart surgeon in the civilized world saving lives on a daily basis. Little Mutumbu has three cents to his name, while the doctor earns 3 million a year, or 100000000x as much. Seems right to me.
>>68272832
I've got no illusions of this trend possibly reversing if that's what you're saying.
They are worth more than you worthless scum. Deal with it.
>>68273849
You imply that a sort of imbalance is forming to the detriment of mankind. Tell me about this "imbalance".
>>68268522
If you gas the kikes, that problem goes away, it's like magic.
>>68273831
I can't believe anyone could be racist on the internet
little whatshisname could easily be anything if he were afforded education, food, and money, or the internet, or hell anything
>>68268522
Why ISN'T it okay?
>>68268522
Yes
A man who starts multiple companies that employ thousands of people is worth 100000000x times more than some faggot kid 4chan shitposter
>>68274351
This!
Anyone can be anything.
We just need to pump money into them and throw more opportunities at them UNTIL they succeed. We must FORCE people to succeed WHATEVER THE COST.
Everyone has equal intelligence!
>>68269614
>What is increasing welfare population
They're having less and less whites each year in the country and you wonder what happens to the state
>>68273338
>they don't have billions in liquid assets, they only have hundreds of millions
>>68268522
What does it matter who has the money as long as it contributes to the economy?
Only money that doesnt move is bad.
>>68274214
An increased imbalance in wealth is all I'm referencing, I didn't say it was to the detriment of mankind.
Unfair yes, but not damaging, just like how an owned slave is not damaging to a household.
>>68274720
you say this like it's wrong
>>68272650
the fact that both of those things happened still reinforces my point that we are all animalistic savages at heart, thus making civilization imitate nature. it's sink or swim m8
>>68275014
It is wrong. The risk/reward ratio in that scenario is like 99.9%/.00000001.
Some people can run really really fast and others have no legs. Why is that okay? We should cut off the legs of people who can sprint!
>>68275014
it is wrong. if that was the case, than why would anybody have any motivation to work?
>>68268626
They're all jews. All 62 of them.
>>68268619
I don't suffer so much as a Latin American or South Asian peasant or factory worker does.
>>68269036
>le ebin poor people are lazy meme
>>68275557
if they're smart and driven, they'll claw their way out of their fucked situations
>>68268522
how does this personally affect you?
>>68269577
That doesn't invalidate all criticism of capitalism. Also, billions of people would dispute that capitalism is the best thing ever.
>>68270359
Not an argument
>>68269577
It would be a lot better with out the corruption, nepotism and cronyism. Also these 62 wealthiest actively use their power to make it harder for other people to get even close to their level. I.e. Warren buffet and his shilling for higher taxes.
>>68268522
It's not like any of it is yours, cry more faggot
>>68268626
oh anon..
>>68276031
it's not an argument. it's objective fact. it's the way the world is. you can't change it. you'll just wear yourself out trying to do so.
>>68268619
Because in capitalist societies, money buys power (see: regulatory capture, monopolies, special interest funds, lobbying etc).
Buying power means power is concentrated in the hands of the wealthy few.
History has shown time and again that concentrating power in a small number of people leads either to ruinous war (WWI, WWII) or brutal revolution (see: 1918 Russia).
>>68268522
they gathered all the money they could, now they can use it all to buy opposition for nationalism
>>68273831
Not true. A factory owner doesn't do a whole lot that couldn't be done otherwise. Profits just go to him first because he claims ownership. The workers of the world are indispensable because they provide the bulk of the labor needed to create wealth.
>>68275916
>That doesn't invalidate all criticism of capitalism.
So, what are your alternate suggestions?
Oh, things that are NOT capitalism, the best system in the history of mankind?
Well then, yes, that DOES invalidate that criticism.
inb4
>hurrr real communism/socialism/distributionism/whateverthefuckerism hasn't been tried
>>68275234
Not an argument against taming the savages.
>>68275373
Ebin strawman
True wealth isn't about how much money you have, it's about what's in your heart. :^)
>>68268522
REMINDER THAT IF YOU MAKE MINIMUM WAGE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA YOU ARE IN THE TOP 7% OF THE WORLD IN TERMS OF WEALTH
>>68275748
Go to a slum in India or Latin America and try saying that to yourself.
>>68268522
>POOREST 30 PERCENT OF PEOPLE HAVE NEGATIVE 1.9 TRILLION DOLLARS. THIS MAKES SENSE SOMEHOW!
You Amerifags seem to have quite a Marxist problem in your country, you best fix it before there's a poor person / nigger uprising
>>68268522
>is warren buffet a better human than pajeet poostreet?
>yes
>>68276912
>best system
Hundreds of millions of laborers and farmers worldwide would dispute that. There's no denying that there's lots of room for improvement. No amount of strawman "hasn't been tried" memes can dodge that or silence all opposition.
On paper. In money created by computers that means nothing
>>68268522
They are worth that much because they earned it. Earning is something millenials and cultural Marxist don't understand. In other words, if you don't get it, it's time to bleed out and die
>>68276838
That's stupid. The owner assumes all risk. He should reap the rewards. You sound like a commie faggot.
>>68278014
the 1% aren't some shitfuck nobody millionaires. They're multi-billion and trillionaires who pull shady con scams because they have the funds to make everything they do legal. When you control both sides - everything is fair.
>>68279363
And remember they actively work to keep everyone else poor. I would have no problem with their vast wealth were in not for this one fact.
Are you starving?
Do you not have a roof and bed?
Who gives a fuck otherwise.
>>68268522
>Richest 62 people have half the world's wealth
That isn't true and doesn't even remotely approach truth.
Let's imagine that every single one of those sixty-two richest people all had the same amount of wealth: $53.5 billion USD. That assumption is extremely far from the truth; the fiftieth richest person has less than than $15 billion, for instance. But, to give your incredulous claim the best possible chance, let's pretend.
53.5 billion multiplied by 62 equals 3.317 trillion. 3.317 trillion is substantially less than the GDP of Germany, a country which makes up 4.3% of global GDP, not 50%. Furthermore, global gross domestic product is not the same as global wealth. Global GDP only represents how much has been spent in a year, not the total amount of wealth in the world. Global wealth is around $241 trillion, leading our imaginary collection of 62 people with $53.5 billion USD each to represent only 1.37% of all the money in the world.
So, even if we pretended that all sixty-two of the richest people on Earth have the same wealth as Carlos Slim, they'd still represent only less than one a half percent of the world's wealth.
The reason it can be said that 2% of the world's population controls 50% of the world's wealth isn't because those 2% of individuals are insanely rich, but because the bottom 50% of individuals are insanely poor—within a margin of error from jack squat.
>>68268522
Go ahead and call out the jew. If you SJWS are gonna be at least somewhat useful, fight Das Juden for us.
>>68281605
I'll also add onto this that aggregating wealth includes subtracting your outstanding debts, even debts you don't have to pay immediately (like mortgage payments), from your assets. In other words, a man with a six figure salary and a new car actually has a net worth of less than zero dollars if he recently bought himself a house, and is therefore near the bottom of that bottom 50%—a lawyer in a Ferrari with a multi-million dollar mansion can absolutely be in the bottom percentile of wealth if he bought it all on credit.
tl;dr OP is factually wrong, and figures on income inequality can be incredibly misleading.
>>68277596
>Hundreds of millions of laborers and farmers worldwide would dispute that.
This isn't the 30's. Farmers and blue-collar workers are overwhelmingly conservatives.
>>68269099
let me take a fucking guess, communism is superior because its never actually been implemented?
>>68268522
You know, capitalism is fine as long as law is fair.
Thing is that rich bought the law.
Sharpen the knives, because without violence we will solve nothing.
