What is /pol/'s opinion on filming people without their knowledge and consent?
>>68259374
In texas its 100% legal to do so (i.e.: take "creepshots" in public)
I dont really care, let it all burn
>>68259374
It's creepy, but they're in a public place
>>68259374
if u do then ur a creep, but i don't care
>>68259374
if women dress like sluts they should expect to be stared at. If you can expect to be stared at, you should expect to be filmed by some creepy SOB
>>68259374
Criminal Code section 162 sees this as voyeurism and it is illegal in Canada.
>>68259959
c u c k e d
u
c
k
e
d
>>68259959
So you can't film a public park?
if its in public property then its fair game since like you cant stop someone from looking at you at a park or walking by a store and getting on their CCTV, if they are in a private home or business and you dont have permission them fuck off
>>68259374
only the government is allowed to do it
>>68259959
Illegal to what? film it? publish it? view it?
it is absolutely fair-game considering the proliferation of all cameras and you should have no expectations of privacy in outside
You're all literally rapists.
You're violating these women by viewing and sharing their private photos without their consent. A big part of what defines the act of rape is the lack of consent and there is clearly a lack of consent here. The images are even more appealing to you because there is an aspect of "forbidden fruit" due to the nature of the nude photographs being stole and originating from celebrities, which basically means that you're being aroused because their non-consent turns you on. This is a form of sexual assault. You don't see it as such because you have been blinded by rape culture.
If I were to punch you in the face, you'd be in pain. If I were to shoot you in the torso, you'd be in more pain. Both actions cause you pain, but one more than the other; the lesser act of assault is not negated simply because you could be a victim of a greater act of assault. Likewise, the act of sharing and viewing these nude photographs is still a violation of these victims/women regardless of whether greater forms of sexual assault exist. If you sick individuals have a conscience, you will cease viewing and sharing these stolen photos because you are currently no different than a common rapist.
>>68259374
i think she uses massive pushup bra and her tits are pancakes
>>68260151
It depends if what you are doing is perceived as sexual in nature and it is without the consent of the person being recorded.
>>68260358
>>68260358
LOW ENERGY
>>68260289
Here you go Israel:
http://yourlaws.ca/criminal-code-canada/162-voyeurism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_2zfPJACXY
>>68259959
Filming people in general can be considered voyeurism?
Why can anyone arrest you for filming in public??
How does one know your filming it?
One can use phone and just pretend to film it or one can hold rock in hands with hodden cam... so nobody can know they can only guess.
>>68259374
You give consent by going outside
>>68260392
Is there some precedent on the matter
Like if your defense is that you were filming the landscape and not the women in frame what would happen?
>>68260358
Omg you're so pathetic! Go suck your step dads dick and get over it a normal abuse victim.
>>68260502
It can. Read the link reply I made above. I can't be bothered to post it again.
>>68259374
the guy filming was clearly white and fixated on the breasts
>>68260371
Don't care, still would fuck.
>>68260358
perfect timing for that copypasta
The only thing I got from that clip was that hot girls really suck at sports and the only reason they play is to show off their bodies. She was being an attention whore.
/pol/ will criticize SJWs for doing it when it goes against their agenda but will be fine doxxing people they dont like
its one of my few annoyances with this board, and everytime i try to talk about it they just call me a crypto SJW
>>68260616
this
but you can still start harassing the recorded person, as when he notices and denies verbally or with facts its consent.
It's basically a grey area
>>68260956
This anon speaks the truth!
>>68259374
weird nigga
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzysxHGZCAU
enjoy
>>68259374
Well most of these creep fags wouldn't film or talk image if there was nothing interesting to see, now am I saying we should go full Islam and women should cover themselves from head to toe to avoid this? no but I think a women knows what she is dressed like when she goes out and knows how she will get unwanted attention because of her ware.
>>68260450
>family guy gif
holy shit, go back to 9gag pham
>>68260371
this
>>68260691
Lots, yes.
>"The Crown relies on these statistics to suggest that there has been a significant increase in voyeurism and that the court needs to protect the public interest by deterring such action in the future via harsher sentences for the offence."
>see R v. Pan
>>68261170
>he doesn't understand multi-level irony
>>68260691
You'd have to prove that, by proving that you've filmed landscapes or such things in the past, and that you weren't using the women in frame as a focus of a sexual nature. I've never seen or heard of stuff like this happening though, people don't just randomly film parks.
>>68261290
>I got called out for doing something stupid so i'll just claim to be using irony.
>>68261420
>4chan is serious business!
>>68260491
Every one commits an offence who, surreptitiously, observes — including by mechanical or electronic means — or makes a visual recording of a person who is in circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy
>is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years
You can go to jail for up to 5 years if you're caught watching voyeur porn?
>>68260956
it's really disappointing whenever you search for videos of girls playing sports naked and they always suck at it.
>>68259374
I don't get it, it's just boring looking. Why not just go to a strip club?
>>68261689
Does the smell of freedom offend you Semite?
>>68260967
nothing wrong with using the tools of the enemy against them, it's called being hoisted on your own petard
There is no expectation of privacy in public.
Even a female judge in DC or something semi-recently threw out a case of a guy taking "upskirts" of bitches sitting on public steps.
"It's your fault, dumb slut" said the cunt judge.
>filming w/out consent
>for the lulz
>>68262560
This needs to happen more often.
>>68262405
This too.
>>68262560
40 points.
>>68260759
>canadian freedom of speech
>>68259374
it's beauty in motion, it is art.
>>68259374
a Romanian cunt tried to pull that shit off at work. He didn't understand why it wasn't OK to record people without telling them. Almost got his illegal bitchass fired. Anyone who thinks its aok to film and/or record people without their knowledge isnt a real fucking American
>>68261145
This NEVER gets old. Holy shit.
>>68259374
I did this once.. I filmed a girls with an awesome butt walking along I felt like the sleaziest scumbag degenerate imaginable..lol
>maybe don't commit crimes
>niggers
>ffs never mind
>BLM
>>68262728
is that real?
>>68259374
Creepy. Once caught some mexican perv trying to film my gf at the park. Literally just snatched his phone and tossed it into the lake.
>>68262851
/thread
>>68260335
This.
If you're in public around lots of people there is probably a camera on you somewhere.
>>68263026
yes canacucks have be fined for twitter fights
>>68262560
>muhdik
requesting youtube video of the guy who walks around the city filming everyone and just says, "its cool, im just taking a video" while everyone gets pissed off
>>68259374
you are in public. If I can legally look at it, I can legally film it.
>>68260501
Freaking goobers, man...
>>68259374
Legal if done in a public area, but still rude.
>>68259374
There's a difference in filming in a public place and filming someone specific in a sexual manner without their knowledge intending to distribute said imagery.
>walking down the street, filming houses and traffic
This is fine
>following young girls to take upskirts of them
No
>>68262992
you can see his community college registration papers in his hoodie if you look real close
>>68263469
just saw that posted. thanks anon. this shit is gold
>>68263368
girls should just wear fucking pants. I bet cops would stop you if they were 10 year olds though
>>68261145
Oh god its hilarious they all respond the exact same way.. I would engage.. people are gay.>>68261145
>>68262728
>the prison is in his head
Subtle.
>>68261145
holy hell man
>>68259374
it's imperative for any legal system that allows law enforcement statements to fucking mean anything in court. Oh officer mcdogshooty stated that "blank" yet the video clearly shows "bang" yet the recording of the officer wasn't with his consent preventing it from being evidence allowing a conviction of an innocent man.
Don't want people staring at your tits on a screen after they recorded it, you shouldn't show off your tits in public.
>>68259374
Public space should be open season.
Private spaces, only with owner permission. Additionally signs should be put up for spaces where there is an expectation of privacy (ie. toilets, showers etc).
>>68260358
If you don't like rapists why do you let smelly refugees run wild in your country?
If you're in a public place you have no expectation of privacy.
its creepy and if I ever trans into a girl I deck the dude.
>>68260477
checked and his energy is so low his reactor is shutting down
>>68260725
>>68263949
>newfags don't even recognize basic copypasta
Lurk moar desu senpai
>>68259374
iF they have titties like that I ofcourse approve
"why would I want to join your cult if you're not very nice?"
lol
>>68264371
those titties are exceptional...
>>68261145
16:08 hahaha. muricca!
>>68263045
And you didn't get arrested? Or did you leave that part out in your story?
>>68260491
"in circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy"
That is defined in Canada as any place not visible from a public place, even within your own home and on private property. If someone by any means can observe you from public property you had no expectation of privacy even if it is in your own bed room with the blinds mostly but not totally shut.
Further Canadian nudity laws or public indecency follow the same angle if someone sees you from a public place you better have clothes on.
I'm 100% for filming people that are visible from a public place.
>>68264641
common pham, you know white people in america Are the police
>>68263484
Kekd
>>68264641
Police can't arrest you for events that only took place in your head.
>>68261689
>You can go to jail for up to 5 years if you're caught watching voyeur porn?
Nope. Because their is a difference between viewing and observing.
A person that makes a recording would then observe that person when watching. However everyone else is simply viewing a recording they are not observing.
>>68259374
Absolutely Haram.
If you don't want people to take notice of your body in public, maybe you shouldn't show it off so much? You don't see many men complaining about being filmed in public because we have some fucking respect for ourselves and dress with dignity.
It's a thought-crime to look at women that way goy. Don't you know public property is women's property?
>>68260967
There ARE crypto SJWs who try to influence this place so it's not like that came from nowhere. Additionally, liberals think pointing a camera at someone makes them untouchable, see any sovereign citizen video.
Eh, depends, you shouldn't need permission to film in a public setting, but it gets blurry if you are filming specific people with certain intents
>>68263026
>is that real?
Yes and no.
Prior to 2011 Canada had a much more restrictive non criminal hate speech law. That was removed. Now Canada only has a criminal hate speech code that is wide enough in it's exemptions that it's almost never filed as a charge and convictions are a few handful.
Anything you say that might have public interest is protected. Anything you honestly believe to be true is protected. Anything you say that can be interpreted as being a solution is protected. Anything about religious text is protected.
For example illegal;
We should kill all the natives.
Legal:
I believe we would be better off without the natives.
If all the native were dead things would be better.
We need a solution to the native problem.
Illegal:
Muslims are rapist scum!
Legal:
I think that Muslims are rapists.
Muslims commit more rapes and are scum because of that.
Muslims have a problem with rape.
We have a problem, the Muslims are rapist scum.
What's more you don't need a strictly legal sentence, so it would be fine to say Muslims are rapist scum if you then within the same communication made any sort of reference to a social problem of Muslims raping people.
>>68265339
please, those savages would encourage raping them because it's their own fault for leaving the house dressed like whores
>>68259374
When you enter a public platform, like a park, or a street, or the beach, then I don't see how you can complain about being filmed.
If you are being stalked and filmed constantly, that is wrong. That is harrassment.
If somebody films you (which is fine) and then puts it on the internet or television, and causes you damages, then you should have the right to sue them in court.
If you film someone and then choose to make that film public, you are liable for any damages caused.
>>68259959
>>68266395
i've seen footage of guys following them for a while.
still in public, sometimes they're dressed so whorish he's not even doing an upskirt.
but like following them near a beach, or at a track or something.
>>68260967
This is a culture war, idiot. You don't fight with honor in war if you want to win - you cheat, lie, and steal. If your enemy is using an effective tactic against you and you aren't using it on them out of some sense of ethics, you are going to lose the war.
The fact is, it IS a fucked up, unethical thing to do. But the genie is out of the bottle - SJWs will continue to use this against us, and the only effective way to respond is to fight fire with fire.
>>68260358
Fix your country, faggot
>>68259374
Only the government should do it
>>68260358
Nice bait.
Too bad it supplies no reasoning as to why creepy public recordings are any form of assault, esp. when all one is doing is collecting photons.
>>68266343
i know most of those creeps are arabs or totally desperated subhumans.
women can dress how they want pretty anywhere except muslim countries.
This is a sign that we're turning into islamic caliphates and won't be anymore free democratic countries.
>>68259374
She knows..
>>68264911
that image is fucking cancer. straight out of 9gag
>>68265608
i see a few legit SJWs but i feel like a lot are shitposters
any proof that theres a huge SJW infiltration and not just a bunch of bored neets desperate for the (You)s?
