Libertarianism says tyranny is okay, as long as it's not by the government.
>>68224415
No, it doesn't actually. If you don't like your boss at McDonald's find a new job
>>68224506
If you don't like the boss of this gym then get outta that ehh jabroni outfit and let's settle this
Tyranny is OK, as long as you don't infringe on others rights to their own tyranny as well.
>>68224506
>>68224591
actually i was thinking more like some rich guy can buy all the property around you and then charge you oppressive tolls to pass for food or else starve to death. and as you say if you don't like it find a new landlord.
>>68224724
New law: Cannot circle around unbought land
>>68224833
government tyranny! less government the better!
>>68225908
Libertarians want the essential skeleton of our current government. Not anarchy. The scenario you presented sounds pretty essential so that people don't unjustly starve to death
Libertarian is the bottom tier of the redpill. Everyone goes through that phase, until they realise that it is just as unrealistic as socialism. Small Government is good, but nationalistic Government is better.
>>68227343
>The founding principles of the U.S. are as unrealistic as socialism
Oh wait, flag
>>68224724
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_to_roam
feels good man
>>68224724
You literally just described a goverment.
>>68224415
the less government, the more society depends on the way people treat each other
>>68227343
I'm sorry Australia...
>Libertarianism says tyranny is okay, as long as it's not by the government.
I misread this as Libertarianism says tranny is ok, as long as it's not by the government.
Government Trannies would be a bad thing to force down peoples throat.
As a Libertarian I would say tranny or tyranny by government is a bad thing. In the private sector you get what you settle for. I don't live in San Fransico's Castro district for a good reason even though I could afford it.
>>68224415
That sounds reasonable
No special bathroom tho
>>68224724
>actually i was thinking more like some rich guy can buy all the property around you and then charge you oppressive tolls to pass for food or else starve to death
TOP BAIT
>>68224724
>actually i was thinking more like some rich guy can buy all the property around you and then charge you oppressive tolls to pass for food or else starve to death. and as you say if you don't like it find a new landlord.
>or else starve to death
It's not like you don't have choices, and when backed into a corner you have the choice to use force as well.
>>68224724
>>68225908
You have homesteaded the right to leave your property by doing it in the past. Unless you or the people who owned it before you had never left the property at any point in history.
