Holy shit, /pol/'s been stumped this time for sure, there's no coming back from this. New York Times op-ed absolutely and unequivocally BTFO of Drumpf and his minions.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/20/opinion/campaign-stops/the-man-the-founders-feared.html?_r=0
>>68184248
>THE FOUNDERS LOVED IMMIGRANTS
Maybe they should go read our original immigration policy.
>>68184248
>Holy shit, /pol/'s been stumped this time for sure
And like that your thread get shitcanned.
>>68184248
>Wehner
>>68184248
The left is schizophrenic
Sometimes the founding fathers are evil cis scum that owned slaves, and then they are moral authorities that would warn against fascism
kek
>>68184248
>no pastebin
i'm sure they would have feared letting a stupid nigger run the show for a few years instead of a rich land-owning white man, who by the way, were the only ones ALLOWED TO VOTE IN THE FIRST PLACE, lead the nation
>>68184248
>wehner
>>68184248
This guy is a renowned good goy that is literally financed by the jews.
2008-2015
>tyranny will neber come to the us!
2016
>OMG TYRANNY IS ABOUT TO BE ELECTED TO THE WHITE HOUSE
haha "liberals"... am i right?
INCREASINGLY
>Wiener
>>68184498
Pastebin for those not wanting to give shekels
http://pastebin.com/BTv98LE2
>>68184248
Trump is the epitome of what George Washington, and the founding fathers, would have wanted. A wealthy LAND OWNER. Not some politician that gets kick backs, but a land owning male that has support from the people.
>>68184248
Drumpf
Isn't deadnaming a sin to you sjw cocksuckers?
>/pol/ suppose yet another person is Jewish just because he got a German name.
>>68184248
The founders would have killed everyone at the New York TImes
>Peter Wehner
I thought bullying built character. Why is this guy such a faggot?
>>68184761
Shoo shoo Mohammed
>>68184334
What was it
>>68184334
The original inhabitants of America did love immigrants, and it resulted in the near genocide of their people, the loss of all their territory, and the end of their way of life.
Moral of the story is, white people are the devil.
>>68184248
the founder kept slaves. should we bring back slavery?
>>68184248
The Founders would have exterminated all the commie traitors at the New York Times.
>>68184960
I'm glad they lost, now we just need to kill the rest of them.
>>68185017
Communism didn't even exist back them dumb faggot
>>68184761
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/author/peter-wehner/
>Since 1945, COMMENTARY has been, as our founder and first editor Elliot Cohen wrote at that time, “an act of affirmation.” It remains an expression of belief in the United States, perhaps most of all in America’s central role in the preservation and advance of Western civilization and, most immediately, the continuing existence of the Jewish people. COMMENTARY, in the words of Cohen, “is an act of faith in our possibilities in America.”
>>68184248
The Founders would vote for fucking Hitler if they'd known what a shithole America has become.
>>68184248
i like how he quotes lincoln in saying that "pride is the enemy". what a load of irony
>>68184947
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790
>This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free white persons of good character. It thus excluded American Indians, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks, and Asians.
>>68184248
Get HYPE /pol/ Furgeson & Baltimore lit the fuse. it's time!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvG3is7Bm1w
>>68184248
>kike
>whining about anti-Semitism
Just another day at the luegenpresse
The left is fucking running scared because they know Trump is going to fuck them so hard and undo everything Obama did.
>>68184248
>Wehner
Goddamnit, I hate being right all the time sometimes.
>>68184248
>the Jew York Times trying to stay relevant
top kek
The man the founders feared is already in charge and his name is George Soros.
>>68184248
>"We need womyn on our money and get rid of these evil, old, racist, slave-owning white devils! The 2nd Amendment was made with muskets in mind, we should get rid of it, these old whiteys didn't know shit!"
>"The Founding Fathers warned us about Trump, they are oh so very wise and we should listen to them!"
>Jew York Times
>>68184960
They also liked eating each other and scalping children.
who fucking cares what they liked?
>>68184248
120+ countries... kikes never learn
>>68185374
The founders were more afraid of the masses than rich jews.
>>68184694
>Trump supporters bring violence
>No mention of Bernie "Blacks r us" Sanders and his cuck army.
>Literally thinks GOP should shit all over their supporters
>>68184248
So we should sacrifice our country because the Founders MIGHT disapprove?
How do we not know that the Founders wouldn't have included an emergency clause had they known about the threat of Bolshevism and Progressivism?
The Constitution should be replaced if it can't deal with the left.
>>68185128
existed, but the merchant hadn't given it a name yet.
>>68185959
Okay, you need to die if you're calling for fascism to replace the Constitution.
>>68185808
but rich jews are buying and brainwashing the masses
>>68184248
>op-ed
Trashed. It's the equivalent of reading a blog. I've seen youtube commentators with more thought out and convincing arguments.
>>68184248
The founders also loved guns, faggots.
>>68184248
>Wehner
>>68184248
>Wehner
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/conservatives-republicans/the-future-of-jewish-conservatism/
site is broken as fuck, still title says enough.
>>68185808
>The founders were more afraid of the masses than rich jews.
yeah bullshit.
the founding fathers armed the masses.
they saw what was happening with the bank of england and the rothschilds.
and the rothschilds couldn't wait to get its claws into the US
>>68184455
It's the same relationship they have with Jesus, really.
They have no love for the founders, what matters to them is that they can use the founders in an argument to manipulate people who disagree with them.
>>68186081
Ironic, considering that you seem to view the Constitution as an infallible suicide pact.
We're on the verge of losing our country. You can always bring back the Constitution. You can't bring back your nation once it's overrun with third-worlders whilst ruled by progressives.
>the founders FEARED a leader who enforced immigration laws, balanced trade, kept taxes low, avoided unnecessary foreign intervention, protected the 2nd amendment at all costs, and defended Christianity
>what they really wanted was someone who would submit to global business and foreign governments while destroying Christian values and European-American culture.
Hmm, I seem to have a far differing view as to what the founders feared.
Oh wait,
>Wehner
>>68186465
I trust the Constitution more than I trust the anonymous faggot calling it "infallible" just because it doesn't support your FOTM demagogue, you worthless piece of shit.
>>68184334
Everyone just assumes that since the founders were good, they surely must have held the same values and attitudes as they
>>68184248
>Wehner
You know what? Fuck it, I'm done.
Hitler was right. The Jew is a cancer on this planet, always was, always will be.
Fuck this kike nonsense. There's a new anti-Trump Jew article every goddamn day and I'm sick of it. I hope he gasses them all.
>>68186643
If only the founders had feared shekel grabbers
>>68186660
So you trust that a piece of paper can defeat progressivism?
>>68186909
Liberia has the same constitution as the US
they also have cannibal warlords
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRuSS0iiFyo
guess which really matters race or paper?
>>68186978
heh
listen to this man he knows wha'ts good for you, goy!
>>68185508
Convince an sjw of that. Play the noble native fiddle to argue against their ideas and you have a chance.
Cherry picking history. This is what liberals do best. They love it. Let's just ignore things like the Alien and Sedition Acts (which allowed John Adams to deport scores of agitating Frenchmen), our very first immigration law, which only naturalized whites, Jefferson's unconstitutional Louisiana Purchase which, though illegal, ended up being one of the best decisions a President ever made (a land deal that truly would have made Trump proud) or the fact that the founding fathers were intensely economically protectionist. Let's just ignore all that, and Andrew Jackson (the first Trump) too.
>>68187208
what's the point?
They'll never believe it leftism is based on ideology not facts.
>>68184248
The founding fathers wouldn't have been collectively for/against Trump. They would have all had different opinions on whether he was the best fit. In general though, most of them would have supported him having the ability to run, regardless of whether or not he should be it, as this country was founded on the ideals of Democracy.
>>68184248
The NYTimes also a few day ago had an editorial that was supporting the TPP. The TPP will destroy the internet. Obama is pushing the TPP. Republicans in Congress support the TPP. Only Trump so far as I know has opposed it. This is something everyone on 4chan should be vigorously against. Everyone that enjoys the internet should be against the TPP. Not to mention that it will take away jobs from Americans.
>>68186117
Just another day at the office for them.
>>68184248
>giving a fuck what the nytimes says
>this level of cuck
>>68184248
>the man the founders feared
>because he defends the constitution
Obama, Hillary, and Bernie are the men the founders were fighting against.
>>68184455
Good point.
>the man the founders feared
>not FDR
>>68187363
This. It is a failing rag. Sad!
>>68184248
This guy's such a tryhard faggot
The founders hated Muzzies more than Trump ever could
>>68184455
No they're just using them as either for when it suites their rhetoric
>>68187259
I came here to post basically this.
>>68187526
Muslims were fucking with the US just years after its birth. Fucking North African scum I HATE LIBYANS AND ALGERIANS
>>68187429
To be fair, FDR deported a shit-ton of Mexicans.
Even the leftists of that time period cared about the country.
>>68186420
>the founding fathers armed the masses.
>muh second amendment
Read a fucking book for once in your life faggot. They were legitimately concerned with the possibility of a populist getting into office and trying to steal wealth from the "opulent." That's why voting rights were originally restricted to just land owning white men.
Trump does not care about you he is a rich fuck that is in love with himself
>>68187595
Barbary Wars my friend
>tfw we'll never remove kebabs like true American heroes again
>>68187873
hmmm
>>68187330
>those stats
holy shit, I knew the world was more peaceful today than ever before but didn't realise it was that ridiculous
>The founding fathers were a bunch of old white guys, the private ownership of firearms is an outdated concept.
> T-Trump's evil guys, the f-founding fathers said so.
They're not even trying at they?
>>68187699
Yeah, they didn't want parasites voting themselves what the producers made.
What's your point?
Land owning white males were the majority. And this county would be much better off if it was still that way.
>>68184248
The shit that passes as journalism these days.
The Founding Fathers waged a terrorist gorilla war against the thieving tax collectors of the imperialistic British Monarchy and the paid mercenaries the British hired to protect them.
When they kicked the british out they never intended the USA to even have a standing army--it would be militias, of the people who protected theor home soil.
The Founding Fathers would be like one of those backwater militias that the FBI & Homeland Security run operations to subvert and arrest. You know, those "crazy rednecks" who protest the thieving IRS tax men of Washington and waging imperialistic wars of aggression on foreign soil with mercenary armies? REMIND YOU OF SUMBODY?
Please. If the Founding Fathers were alive today they'd be leading the Tea Party.
>>68184248
Kek
>>68187699
>They were legitimately concerned with the possibility of a populist getting into office and trying to steal wealth from the "opulent."
So, Bernie Sanders?
We're unlucky the founding fathers didn't explicitly say all the rights expressed in the Constitution were only applicable to white males, they just thought it was obvious and didn't need to be stated.
>>68184960
They liked them because they gave them superior weapons to use on other natives.
>>68184455
>>68184650
>>68185276
>>68186221
>>68186665
>>68186660
>>68186909
>>68187259
>>68187553
the author of this is a conservative, and worked for conservative governments. what does someone have to do to avoid being called a 'liberal' anymore? be a fucking nazi?
if you want to swing people to your side try not to be a fucking retard. I'm voting Trump too (yes I'm an American) but you fucking idiots are the reason no one takes us seriously.
>>68188344
>checked
Imagine if Lincoln wasn't assassinated and all the former slaves were shipped back to Africa?
America, the world, would be so much different...
>>68188161
>Land owning white males were the majority
No they weren't. Like I said, read a book.
CALLING ALL PATRIOTS
HELP HELP HELP
>>68187945
>>68187945
>>68187945
>>68187945
>>68184334
I'm sure they did love immigration... from Europeans. If someone had told them ottomans would be coming over by the thousands in boats they probably would've blockaded the ports and sunk the ships
>>68188431
Not making ridiculous claims about the founding fathers would be a good start.
The founders would have obviously been against the idea of unlimited immigration, especially of muslims. It's not even a question.
>>68188431
He worked for George W. Bush. Anyone who worked for George W. Bush is a criminal and should be arrested. They're not conservatives.
>>68188326
Correct. They might have found Trump to be an asshole but assholes were not what they were afraid of. The Constitution is all about protecting citizens from the government because they were acutely aware of how the majority could use the state to oppress a small minority.
Actually the founding fathers wrote in explicit detail about how they hated mega corporations influencing government and even washington himself warned people of the false dichotomy that is the two party system.
>>68188344
>We're unlucky the founding fathers didn't explicitly say all the rights expressed in the Constitution were only applicable to white males
No, they probably wanted the basic rights in the bill of rights like speech, firearms etc. available for everyone.
Then people could form their like minded communities.
Votes not so much.
They wouldn't be into this abomination of today where votes are given out just because "voting is patriotism, it doesn't matter who it's for".
>>68188560
They were the majority of white males. Kill yourself retard.
>i-it's not my job to educate you shitlord
>>68184248
Founding fathers would fear a self made rich white male?
A candidate that breaks the two party system, one not backed by foreign interests?
Interesting
>>68186872
>>68188780
>They were the majority of white males.
Still not true. I'd suggest you stop because you are making yourself look pretty dumb.
the founders also feared giving women and black people the vote
how can the left use them as a reason after decades of saying the constitution is too old to be relevant anymore?
>>68185049
Why? They build hotels and casinos.
>>68188431
>what does someone have to do to avoid being called a 'liberal' anymore?
have a backbone
>>68189546
Don't worry dumbass. I'm here educate you.
http://www.crf-usa.org/bill-of-rights-in-action/bria-8-1-b-who-voted-in-early-america
>Becoming a freeholder was not difficult for a man in colonial America since land was plentiful and cheap. Thus up to 75 percent of the adult males in most colonies qualified as voters.
>>68187699
trusted the masses with guns, but not with voting
hmmmm
>>68188304
muh sides have been kek'd
>>68185808
>>68187699
>>68188560
>>68188691
>>68189546
>i took college history class once therefore i'm smartest guy in the room!
