>>68159046
They don't really make a difference anymore, so whatever
>>68159046
good. it save a lot of lives in WW2 and lots more by preventing another World War.
Good cause it prevented another global conflict.
Bad because if they ever fly, we're fucked.
>>68159591
I have to agree with this though
>>68159515
>don't make a difference anymore
>could literally destroy the world in a few minutes
>are also the reason why there's been no major European war since ww2
>>68160989
>could literally destroy the world in a few minutes
>could
Yeah but nobody would actually use them (currently)
Nukes are acumulators of warfare. They worked for now, but imagine if one side developes a countermeasure against ICBMs.
>>68161113
>nobody would actually use them (currently)
>>68161667
If he dropped a nuke on South Korea the USA would wipe North Korea out, so no, he wouldn't use them.
>>68161667
>they get blown out of the sky
>or
>they end up detonating in their silos
never been worried about NK's nukes desu tho
>>68159046
Very good.
>>68159046
It would've been better for them not to have been invented. Wars would've been bloody as hell, but at least they could've happened when they needed to.
>>68161945
He tested a nuke something like 2 weeks ago in response to a South korean-american joint training exercise... Clearly he gives 0 shits about the consequences
>>68161433
Russia did that in the 60's, America's response was MIRV's
>>68162457
But mutual destruction was stil guaranteed, wasn´t it?
>>68161667
Dont worry my leaf friend
Trebuchets don't have much range
>>68162376
He threatens the USA and South Korea a lot but he never actually does anything. He isn't that dumb.
>>68159046
It prevented WWIII, WWIV and WWV. So I'll say it is a good thing.
>>68162866
Yeah that is why America developed MIRV's so russians couldn't simply defend themselves from American nukes while Americans get killed off. Tho Nuclear artillery is unstoppable.
>>68159046
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lb13ynu3Iac
>>68159046
I still believe those explosions in Japan were about super fights like those in animes.
>>68159046
Good
>Prevent large global conflicts(More on this later)
>Rapidly furthered the development of Nuclear energy, which is very efficient and safe, regardless of what environmentalists say
Bad
>Although they have ensured relative peace, this prolonged peace has arguably made the western world into the weak, PC mess it is today.
>If an actual Nuclear war ever broke out, we'd all be fucked for thousands of years
bad because it made conventional warfare less possible except through proxy war
normal history modern countries have engaged in warfare for thousands of years not just to settle disputes but also for gold and resources it also confirms, smaller countries no longer have the opportunity to lift themselves to a better status through successful wars
i.e. japan beating russia 1905 and britain 1815
thanks to nuclear stockpiles, japan will always be a small country with no hope for expansion or improving their country in size except by buying land
the absence of war also drives peaceful societies insane (europe, USA)
>>68161433
Werent the ruskies shitting bricks because of the "star wars" program the US was talking about implementing?
