>a daily propaganda piece by a pro war mag telling you why the other guy loves war and propaganda
1. What are your 3 best news/journal sources?
2. What's one news/journal source that you think everyone should read?
1. What are your 3 best news/journal sources?
>/pol/
>/pol/
>/pol/
The Economist is a highly respected weekly publication. Just because you don't like what it says doesn't make that any less true, you fucking /pol/ retard.
>>68112164
The Economist has been virulantly anti-Russia ever since Putin killed Yeltsin and decided russia would no longer be a cuck country
>wh-what do u mean u don't want neoliberalism and western companies stealing urs countries wealth r u a racist I bet u want a new cold war btw why won't u let us bomb syria and de-neutralise Ukraine omg like how could u say that wat do you mean crimea was denied a referendum on joining russia in the 90s and overwhelmingly backs being in russia thats not tru and u can't prove it because I am a respected publication and say that is not true
It's a very good article and they're completely right. I also wouldn't call TE "pro war", they just generally think western dominance in world affairs is a good thing, which they're also completely right about.
>>68112111
ding ding ding we have a winner
>>68112431
yeah and there's nothing wrong with being opposed to Russia's fake democracy and the strongman at the head of it all.
What's up with the economist lately?
>>68112111
>>68112537
>Britcucks are really this stupid
This is just sad..
>>68112639
>taking /pol/ seriously
oh my, you must be a new friend.
>>68112607
And yet The Economist is pro-Turkey
Here's a game for you:
Which country locked up more journalists last year, Russia or Turkey?
>>68112067
>www.4chan.org/pol/
>www.4chan.org/pol/
>www.4chan.org/news/
>>68112709
Turkey is a member of NATO.
>>68112111
>Trips of '1'
>Says /pol/ is the only One
>Three times
Holy fuck
>>68112607
Nothing wrong at all...
Threw in Corbyn just to show how lazy the economist is.
>>68112814
>it's okay when our friends do bad things!!
The Economist is a great magazine but it has a consistent worldview that the /pol/ hivemind generally dislikes.
It's basically Globalist Capitalism: The Magazine. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, but they rarely don't have perspectives on issues other than neoliberal economic policy (free trade, open borders, privatization, and deregulation as the end-all be-all of economic policymaking), cultural/social liberalism, and Western military interventionism.
>>68112639
>being this autistic
Consider suicide.
