>mfw I consider myself a fairly intelligent person.
>mfw when I find out I'm just a normalfag
How accurate is IQ /pol/? Can we look at IQ in certain demographics and correlate the bell curve to their economic success or failure?
http://www.queendom.com/tests/access_page/index.htm?idRegTest=3108
IQ is generally not indicative of much other than high IQ.
There's plenty of successful people with average IQ. There's also plenty of unsuccessful people with huge IQs, my family is full of them.
If you're down at 80 or below you're not going to be too bright, but anything 100+ is fine.
>>68102006
Interesting. Its strange to have watched people I've grown up with and almost all the brains ended up at mid pay jobs and the really financially successful people just had tons of balls and good social skills.
IQ is the greatest indicator of future success when given to children. However, an internet IQ test will not give you accurate information on what your IQ actually is. They do not ask the right questions. It is also far more complicated than just a one-dimensional number. For example, some people may have a better verbal or visual-spatial ability. I took this test.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wechsler_Adult_Intelligence_Scale
>>68102465
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wechsler_Adult_Intelligence_Scale
Where did you take the test at?
>>68102006
Success and IQ have nothing incommon. IQ is undestanding and problem solving.
>doing an iq test on the internet
>>68101907
Of course we can! Races have a 10000 year gap and a 15% dna diffrence (dog breeds have 25% diffrence). This is why blacks are below everyone else, then Hispanics, then whites, then east aisans. Although on avrage east asians have IQs 6 higher than whites, the asian lacks creativity. High testosterone with high intelligence = creativity and ingenuity. Low testosterone with high intelligence = copying and no innovation. This places whites over east asians. Now onto the topic of black iq. Blacks have high testosterone and low intelligence which means crime. blacks can't run their own nations well. Look at Ethiopia and Haiti, both were never colinized and both are completely incoherent desolate wastlands contiguous to nothingness. Blacks can't even run a city properly. Look at Detroit, the superintendent is illiterate! And if you study history you'll see that in the 1950's when whites moved from cities to the suburbs, the blacks destroyed the cities and as the government always does, money was thrown at it to try to fix this. This has never worked. Ever! So yes the races are diffrent.
>>68102006
IQ has a high correlation with income. There is a reason askenazi jews have the highest incomes followed by east Asians into the US.
>>68103359
Understanding and problem solving = money. Money comes from possesing skills not everyone can do.
>>68101907
I'm in the 98th percentile somewhere, according to Mensa. Studying to become an engineer.
I generally feel awfully fucking stupid all the time.
>>68103359
This. Intelligence is useless if you're a pathetic NEET virgin who has zero drive to succeed.
>>68104181
That may in fact make more sense than anything I have ever read about race on the internet.
>>68101907
Wew. We mensa now.
>How accurate is IQ /pol/?
On the internet, not very.
>>68104800
>>68104800
I took the emotional intelligence test lol wew lad.
>>68104800
Wewladm8.
>>68104374
>Understanding and problem solving + motivation/drive = money.
Stupid bastard.
>>68105118
How old are you if I may as anon? Good jorb.
>>68101907
You are smarter than half the people out there.
But if you were smarter you would realize that.
I'm a high school dropout. Apparently, iq means dick.
>>68105199
I'm not convinced being smarter equates to seeing a glass as half full. I'm also dumber than half the people out there.
>>68105228
People care more about social skills than actual intelligence nowadays.
>>68105228
High school dropout but what are you doing now?
>>68105190
I'm 26.
>>68105480
>
And what are you doing with your life financially? I'm just curious for anecdotes in context to the original post.
>>68105624
I'm an electrical engineer.
>>68105324
I'm just a factory worker
>>68105118
Damn. Good job anon. Feel really stupid now.
I did the same test and got exactly same score as you. This seems fake considering it wants you to buy something without giving more details. Ive done the official mensa test and i was around 133.
http://www.iqtest.dk/main.swf
This is the closest to a Ravens Matrices you'll find on the net.
130
I probably messed up the English word associations.
>>68101907
100 is the epitome of average if you're white. I just wish someone made a more interesting test that I didn't get bored after half way in, so I could know the real ballpark of my IQ. My guess it's about 110, since I consistently can get over 100 but I never complete more than 50-60%
127
Imagine if i took the test in my native language.
wew
desu i get 140-160 in all online iq tests
>>68106941
For the sake of anecdotal research... what is it you do for a living? HOW ARE YOU HARNESSING AND CHANNELING YOUR IQ POWER I MUST KNOW
I scored 124 (percentile: 95) but I didn't know some of the english vocab and skipped the last three pages because i lost interest.
>>68102006
>IQ is generally not indicative of much other than high IQ.
Youre wrong as fuck. It's highly predictive of life success and even things like longevity.
https://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1997mainstream.pdf
>>68102465
>It is also far more complicated than just a one-dimensional number. For example, some people may have a better verbal or visual-spatial ability. I took this test.
Subtest scores generally don't predict much and are only super popular with practicians (as opposed to researchers) because they can tell you about strengths, weaknesses and shit.
It's all about the g, baby.
http://humanvarieties.org/2013/04/03/is-psychometric-g-a-myth/
http://larspenke.eu/pdfs/Deary_Penke_Johnson_2010_-_Neuroscience_of_intelligence_review.pdf
>>68102465
The marshmallow experiment has a higher correlation with success than the IQ test.
>>68107056
I got 140 on wais and I'm a fuckup. There are lots of retards in Mensa.
But it's not that "hurr durr iq meaningless" it's often that high iq people become stuck in thought instead of progressing in life. Or they don't even care about achievements like normies do. Social awkwardness in general is also higher.
Basically super smart people seem to have a few obsessions in life that sometimes give you immense success or breakthroughs. But just as often you're dealing with the person who wins every trivia game and can solve sodoku and crosswords really fast. That is, practically useless intelligence.
My pet theory is that we're actively sabotaging our smartest by wearing them out in school instead of lifting them up. It's always "no child left behind" until everyone is a mediocre underachiever.
I never read a school book and I still aced everything. This just brought contempt, boredom and an inability to study later on. I'm not alone. Give gifted kids special schools and greater challenges. Let them specialize in whatever drives them on. So much talent is worn down and wasted.
>>68107465
>I never read a school book and I still aced everything. This just brought contempt, boredom and an inability to study later on. I'm not alone. Give gifted kids special schools and greater challenges. Let them specialize in whatever drives them on. So much talent is worn down and wasted.
True, in Germany the trend is in the opposite direction unfortunately. In some states they are pushing for one type of high school (historically there are three types for various levels of giftedness, the highest type has already been flooded with 50%+, in the past it used to be for the most gifted 10%).
>111 iq
Not bad, but considering it is an internet IQ test I'd take the results with a grain of salt.
So I'm willing to assume this shit is gifting with extra 20 points I don't have, taking in consideration the reported results of european posters and the median IQ of white people.
>>68101907
>104
>fairly intelligent
130+ or gtfo
>>68107828
I said "I consider"
Then I said "I found out" I'm not as intelligent as I thought.
Are you retarded?
>>68107465
> le smart but lazy meme.
Can someone explain the first 2 questions for me? I can't figure these two parts out. I mean I can pick the correct answers using my chink cheating instinct, but I just cannot reason myself into those answers.
>>68107774
/pol/ euros aren't a representative sample of euros. We're quite retarded but probably less retarded than the general public.
pic
>>68108180
I couldnt figure those out either... hence 104 score. lol
>>68107465
This guy is right
>>68108159
Same for me. All other visual tasks seemed super easy but I can't find a logical consistent pattern for the first two.
>chink
what's your result, qin?
>>68108227
The rest of the questions are pretty retarded.
But those 2... I just can't... Are they like counting crossing points in Fibonacci sequence or shit? Or I have to do Fourier transform and shit? They make no sense to me
>>68108180
Leftmost
>>68108159
K, L, M, N
The next is O.
>>68107465
150 IQ on official test here, can confirm that.
Our school system (at least here in France, pretty sure it's like that pretty much everywhere) is based on repetition. The problem was, for me, that I did not need repetition, I understood everything the first or second time, and the 20 times following were killing me. Even after skipping a grade, it was still true.
Because of that, I never learned how to learn. How to study. I aced everything without trying. Except on the latter years, it's just not enough anymore you need to do your exercise and shit to git gud, and I had not the skill to do this.
I barely got a networking diploma while not going to half the class, and things only got better when I did a one year infosec formation that I aced because it's what I was already doing on my spare time.
I have tons of story where even prof were acting like bastards with me because I got excellent grade clearly doing nothing in class and not listening.
>>68108313
Its letters, first answer is O second is F
134 reporting in.
Master of mathematics, autistic as fuck.
>>68108180
Maybe the left and right side are rotated vertically, but where does the line in the second one come from?
wierd shit.
>>68108283
147?... But I never filled "i don't know". Honesty is retardation. With I don't know you are bound to lose point. But choosing one likely answer even you don't know have a chance to win points. That's my dishonest chink instinct.
>>68108358
wrong
>>68101907
>takes a random test on the internet
>look at my IQ!
You're stupid, alright.
>>68108180
c d e f.
>>68108283
>can't into alphabet
>Filling internet "IQ tests"
This sole fact makes you look dumb as fuck.
>>68108358
I meant second to left, lol.
Its letters still. C D E F
>>68108360
damn daniel
>>68108180
The F looking one.
Can it be they all used abstracted letters in the shit?
>>68108369
C, D, E
The next is F.
>>68108389
Yea, at first I thought it was something clever like taking the first image and 'pulling' each end until they crossed over and created a new image, and then taking that pattern and applying it to the third image, but now I realize its just a lame fucking letter thing.
>>68108180
C D E
next is F
Haven't you ever played DOOOOD?
>>68101907
If niggers are at the bottom it is 100% accurate.
>>68108360
Hori fucking shit. Then it requires prior knowledge of alphabet letters. This IQ test is meme-tier right?
>>68108493
>>68108433
Fuck man this isn't culturally fair.
The high school I went to originally had a mandatory IQ to qualify for admission. However, the teachers complained and they switched to a luck based lottery system. My graduating class was split between those who had an IQ of approximately 120+ and those newer untested students. Now that it has been over a decade, I can tell you with great confidence that the original students were far more successful in terms of financial and social achievements. That is just an anecdote to consider.
>>68107056
I'm this guy >>68104800.
I was constantly moved ahead and put in top sets in school, but got bored and let others catch up. Eventually went away to private school and passed anyway without really doing any work. Graduated from the number one rated university for my subject (English). Taught English two years (the best) in Japan. Came back, did two years of shit office jobs while trying to get into the civil service. Two years in civil service doing finance. Quit. Two years pothead wow playing /b/tard neet trying to get teacher training. Migrated to /pol/ during this time. One year teaching. Quit before end of training year.
The main reason I quit my professional jobs is because I'm a stereotypical 4chan autist, very introverted, and literally cannot deal with people. My only friends are a group of bros I've known for over 20 years since school and see a few times a year. Also, I couldn't stop daydreaming about novel writing and would rather invest my time in that.
Now working as a driver for a car auction company and love it. Drive all over the countryside and never have to deal with stupid people for any length of time. In my free time I'm training myself to be a romance novelist. It's only a matter of time till I can make a professional wage from it. My objective is to become self-sufficient from the system, move to the countryside, live off property investments (a business I have with my mum), small time antique dealing and writing, and have lots of white chilluns. Pic related is all I want from life.
I'm Christian socialist (nat soc), 8/10 spooky skeleton king of manlets.
>>68108546
>>68108554
Yea this IQ test is absolute shit, no one should pay it any mind.
Probably get more of a mental working solving these fucking captchas jesus fucking christ I hate them
>>68108554
I'm Russian, if it helps.
Taкиe дeлa.
>>68108546
>This IQ test is meme-tier right?
(General) Intelligence is quite easy measure and the items are likely to have a decent g-loading (among native english speakers for the vocab loaded ones). The only issue is the scoring, you need a representative norming population and these online tests rarely document where they got their norming data.
http://drjamesthompson.blogspot.de/2014/03/digit-span-modest-little-bombshell.html
http://humanvarieties.org/2013/04/03/is-psychometric-g-a-myth/
>>68108668
Sounds comfy
>>68108546
m8 please tell me your'e joking. Of course you need to know the fucking alphabet to read the test in the first place, retard.
Fun fact: there can be no intelligence test that is culturally neutral as language and writing is culturally derived and conditioned.
I'm pretty insecure about not having an IQ as good as it could be, I can tell because when you do those Raven's Progressive Matrices stuff the more complex ones I have to start writing shit down, I can feel the limits of my brain's RAM being pushed to max capacity, and I can completely understand that somebody could do the thing that I am struggling to do with paper, in their head in a split second.
>>68101907
> posting a veiled argument as a question
Subltey: 2/10
>>68108364
Holy shit I can relate to this.
>>68108668
Your life sounds about mine except you are I'm sure much smarter. I feel though I live a double life from the neet shut in. I am a real estate investor and 29years old. I'm pretty well known in my small county and have good relationships with all the local successful businessmen. Everyone thinks I'm this really normie kind of guy and I just force all the normie shit. I have never watched a full sports game on television from beginning to end. I'm a Christian as well... I'm curious about your nat soc stance. Would you vote for Bernie Sanders if you were here in the states?
>>68102006
I scored 83 from an IQ test (2 from the intelligence in the army) and I have a master's degree on computer science, working as a software architect in a multinational company. I've always thought IQ as something like penis size: it's nice if it's big, but if it doesn't see any use, what is it good for?
The last time I took an IQ test I scored 149. I was half drunk and people were texting me. I'm former army intel, former building contractor and now drive a semi. If I hadn't met my wife when I did I'd be that crazy old prospector living up in the mountains looking for gold. Or possibly a Walter White.
>>68108879
But non-English speaking people will be in disadvantage recognizing English letters compared to native speakers. It's not as deeply ingrained in their brains.
In the second question, the reflected E looked like Chinese character 王 and I was preoccupied with this thought. It is by no means fair. 王 干 田 曰 口 曱 甲 日 工 Fuck me
>>68107465
I think the problem is that education can only give you so much. If you couldn't be bothered in even reading 1 book at school, is more intense education actually of value to you?
I've always seen education as a springboard rather than a means to an end. I've studied at some of the top institutes in the world and even there the basic requirement for passing postgraduate classes was almost nothing.
I don't think the answer is to make intense schools for smart but lazy kids. I think it is to almost take school away from kids.
Make them do independent projects from the time they are wearing diapers, give them enough lessons to cover the basics, and then assess by giving kids either a pass or a specific award.
>>68109204
>English letters
it's the latin alphabet
>>68102608
With a medical professional most likely, when he was being tested for autism.
>>68109295
Latin/greek alphabet is also why we advanced so much quicker than the chinks. 26 characters so much simpler than arcane oriental hieroglyphics!
>>68109213
this.
schools are just a means of people with money (old rich) and political influence (niggers) of sorting themselves into LEGALLY BINDING categories such as degree holder, that give them an excuse to hire rich people/niggers over smart people, and sue you if you don't.
make our society purely meritocratic and we remove 99% of the problems.
as long as ANYTHING other than pure iq rules over hiring practice, people will lie, cheat, and steal, and fight for influence, simply because they can. then, by design, the liars, cheaters, and killers will be the ones who end up with jobs, instead of nice, smart people.
>>68108360
maybe those retards were right when they said IQ tests were highly culturally biased
>>68108879
>language and writing is culturally derived and conditioned.
raven's progressive matricies aren't though.
a fucking square and a dot being rotated is not something cultural
How can anyone be boethered to sit through a whole test, I got bored and just started guessing towards the end.
>>68109690
>maybe those retards were right when they said IQ tests were highly culturally biased
Depends. An IQ test ite that requires vocab knowledge is obviously biased against people not native in the language (i.e. they are less predictive for non-native speakers). But most claims of bias (against african americans etc.) are total bollocks.
This is the definitive textbook on the subject:
http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=7e67f021496b4a099459976c94689f8e
>>68109301
>>68101907
The real IQ, i.e. the intelligence in various forms, is the determiner of just about everything.
However, the IQ tests as they exist are very primitive and false.
>>68110035
>However, the IQ tests as they exist are very primitive and false.
you don't know shit about mental testing desu
>>68109690
culturally biased tests actually show a LARGER performance gap between whites and blacks, because, wouldn't you know, when forced to sit down and shut up, whites are capable of absorbing more information and sitting still longer
iq tests display, quite literally, the MAXIMAL performance of blacks. the gap only grows wider
>>68109835
To be fair, I can see why "ability to fucking pay attention" is important when considering someone's intellect. I got bored as fuck too.
At least I'm not cripplingly retarded... according to an internet back pat site.
>>68108364
I can relate.
One of the worst things is when your teacher says some absolutely stupid shit and you correct them, but then they get super offended.
E.g: my elementary school math teacher said: "All parallels cross in infinity" I told her that parallels by definition, never cross. I asked her to tell me why does she think that. She just said that people way smarter than me figured this out. I guess she read something about non-Euclidean geometrics and thought she'll show off.
My high school chemistry+biology teacher told us the old "le we can sense different tastes with different parts of out tongues" maymay and wouldn't believe me that it's all bollox even after telling her to just read about it on wikipedia and check the sources.
>>68110083
I know enough about it to know that they are quite inaccurate and false. Above 130 even on the "best" tests the results in any dimension cannot be accurately measured. Furthermore, the questions don't actually test intelligence resp. Intelligenz, but rather depend on one's reinforcement to answer questions in that wise (simple behavioral psychology, which somehow eludes the pseudopsychologists behind IQ testing). The IQ test then, quite inaccurately, measures not intelligence per se, but a certain "Kombination" and only in context. Even if these so-called IQ tests correlate to intelligence that does not mean that they measure intelligence - not at all.
>>68110222
I was a lot more beta back then, so I was the quiet guy with long hair at the back of the class. My stories are more in the range of teacher giving everyone their graded test and commenting ("Nice you made some effort, Anon that was bad you should try to do X and Y") except for me and flinging the paper to my desk without even looking at me. Or shit like you answer a question wrong when asked and the teacher smirk and told me "Not so smart now anon".
Most of the time when asked shit I was replying "I dont know", even when I fucking knew. Thats way they eventually leave you alone. I only gave the right answer when my class neighboor was asking me shit, or when it was group excercises.
Fuck this shit mate. English isn't my first language and therefore I had troubles understanding most of the advanced words and some of the difficult questions.
it's a decent test, but I scored this after selecting the matrices answers completely at random (and still apparently got a 25? percent? weighted grade?)
The logic/word problem questions though are 5/6th grade tier.
>>68110535
forgot image.
>>68108818
It's been fun.
>>68108982
I've bought the memes and would vote Trump now. But probably yeah a few years ago I would've voted Bernie purely based on him calling out Bernanke on youtube. If he would keep America white, I'd vote for him, but I strongly distrust socialists to do this now. In the UK I'd vote Labour if they would return to proper English-style Christian socialism, but they've gone full marxist and have tried to and will continue trying to destroy the anglo saxon nation on behalf of jews and muslims. I'm also a hardcore monarchist, unionist, eurosceptic and established anglican. Labour are a declared threat to all these things. Ukip are the best bet.
I really have nothing against anyone. I judge individuals as individuals. If you're Christian, I don't care what race you are, you're my brother. I love all people. But I want the anglo saxons and our culture to survive till the end of time. Everything else is subordinate to that. And it doesn't make much sense to me to fill my nation's ancestral homeland with unaesthetic, low IQ, cultureless people who pose an existential threat to us. There are enough of those as it is.
Sounds like your onto a good thing anon. Thinking about starting a family? What way will you go in the elections?
>>68110222
parallels do cross in non euclidean space. in space time, all straight vectors converge on their origin point. the general effect of this is gravity. vectors are calculated as geodesics, temporary euclidean projections of straight lines upon a non euclidean space that we aren't even capable of currently defining.
as space time displacement increases, orbits within local space collapse upon themselves, which results in a spiral type pattern.
as far as we know, all space is defined by space-time displacement, which allows heatm movement, mass, ect to all be expressed via the rate of atoms interacting with subatatomic particles, most of whom only directly interact in one dimensional space, e.g. a loop. as the ability of this matter to extert energy within a local space increases via gravity, it further reduces 3 dimensional projections of space into straight lines, e.g. vectors and orbits, and eventually spirals.
but what do I know. your teacher was probably a shit head. most of them are. but some of them just don't get a change to actually teach you anything, so they say somehting that sounds dumb to you, and then you hate all teachers just because of the limits imposed on them by stupid students.
>>68102006
wrong
>>68110683
IQ only vaguely correlates with intelligence.
Most of it is just how interested you are in getting the answers, really. That's how reinforcement works, i.e. real, hard, scientific behavioral psychology, in contrast to this only semi-scientific psychometric botch-job.
>>68110316
>Above 130 even on the "best" tests the results in any dimension cannot be accurately measured.
That's bullshit tho. Even SAT is highly predictive and able to discriminate in the highest range of ability (way above 2σ). Even standard tests (WAIS) can accurately measure up to 145.
http://infoproc.blogspot.de/2016/01/smpy-at-50-research-associate-position.html
The issue with measuring in the high range is the size of norming samples you'll need, not the development of test items.
>The IQ test then, quite inaccurately, measures not intelligence per se, but a certain "Kombination" and only in context.
Please explain more detailed.
>>68110770
In other words, the easier questions that test for the 90 - 110 range are all that really tests for anything, and any more difficult than that and it is a matter of interest/reinforcement.
>>68110316
IQ test do a VERY good joob. IQ is a function of largely 2 things
1. the presence of uncommon, beneficial intelligence alleles
2. the absence of deleterious mutations in the genome
when you have 1, but NOT 2, you have high functioning autism.
if you have 2 but not 1, you might be "Street smart" if you have both, you are almost certainly very smart. if you have neither, you are definitely, definitely, more dumb than average.
these are specific genetic capacities that are VERY well measured by basic tests of competency. some iq tests might not measure specific capacities, but because 1 is a function of breeding, thereby almost alwys determined by class background, the "genius lost in the haystack" is actually very rare. the smart guy from a low class background does not, out of nowhere, gain a good allele that was developed over thousands of years. he simply doesn't have bad mutations.
you're not as smart as you think.
>>68110770
>IQ only vaguely correlates with intelligence.
How would you know if you can't measure intelligence? Do you even know about g?
>>68101907
>129-134 IQ depending on the test
>INTJ personality
Feels good mang
>>68110623
don't sperg out, mate, as I said:
we weren't talking about non-Euclidean stuff at all. It was elementary school, about 6th or 7th grade. She didn't even mention non-Euclidean one single time. She was talking about standard,Euclidean geometry - we were doing a text book example and she just simply told us how if these parallels would continue outside of the board, into infinity, they would meet.
>>68110770
It's not vague. IQ would be HiGHLY correlated. It's also highly correlated either success in life among many other things. While having s high IQ can't garuntee you a good job, having an IQ below a certain level almost certainly excludes people from jobs.
>>68110788
Intelligenz = Gedankengeschwindigkeit jeder Art.
Kombination = das Kombinieren.
The intelligence can only be measured in higher ranges for the "peak performance" of a person, which however is not necessarily going to present itself in response to boring test-questions - actually psychologically is rather unlikely to. Thus, higher ranges do not measure intelligence. Maybe mid ranges measure normal functioning, but that's it.
>>68110619
Id like to start a family. Its really hard here in the states to find a woman that I would want to do that with. I went through a phase in my late teens and 20's sleeping around with girls and its just the most empty feeling in the world + you feel really dirty. I just want a fairly conservative girl that is christian that also isnt some "'I'm a country chick durrr" that wears camo north face jackets everywhere.
I have never registered to vote because my state will never elect a conservative nominee. We work off of electoral votes and in the past 20years it has always been won by the Dems/Liberals. I'll have to google some of those monarchist, unionist, eurosceptic terms lol no idea what any of those mean.
>>68110619
>>68110858
You assume IQ results from very simple genetic criteria, which it does not, and you cannot demonstrate that it does. A correlation is not enough to draw such a conclusion.
>you're not as smart as you think
I'm probably one of the smartest people in this country, judging by my work.
>>68110454
that sounds really bad, m80.
you got that stuff figured out by now - I mean confidence, mainly? did you turn out alright?
you know, an IQ 60 person is a retard.
that is 40 IQ less than the average. When someone's a retard, it really shows, right?
Well, when you have an IQ of about 140, the average person will seem a retard. School was painful for me too, but as an adult life gets less frustrating.
>>68110936
Also, she was the stereotypical teacher who started teaching because she was dumb for anything else. She was an adult model in men's magazines before that.
>>68110894
>>68110864
I can observe intelligence, and I also have been in circles with many "high IQ" people. For example, my uncle was measured with a super high IQ, and many people in my family, including me, have a high IQ, but some of these high IQ people are in my estimation not really all that smart. There is some genetic component of it, hence the family relation, but there is much more to intelligence than that capacity to aggressively attack problems and puzzles, which may even be related to certain kinds of psychopathy.
>>68111229
>She was an adult model in men's magazines before that.
do you have any pics to share?
I used to think I was a complete retard
Thanks for making me feel better, OP
>>68101907
That's my IQ. Most I ever earned was 50k a year. I knew plenty of people in Uni with far higher IQ's than me. Most of them now are a bunch of leftist autists and one of them is a Tranny. The intelligence most respected in society is linguistic intelligence you often see average people manipulating so called smart people.
>>68110989
Yeah, but you just said yourself, it only has meaning in the low range, i.e. the absence of some basic function. The high ranges are less correlated because it is not actually an accurate measure of intelligence, but just of normal or abnormal function.
>>68110936
where else am I supposed to sperg out? my job is shit, I lost my grant, and my friends just jack off to chinese cartoons an do drugs.
she was probably just trying to make you interested in math by "blowing your mind."
because she's right. straight lines a re just an abstraction. the only reality is vectors expressed as loops in space time via their mass.
I learned about this in 3rd or 4th grade, I can't remember. back when I still went to private school, my teacher could tell I was smarter than everyone else, and would pull me aside during recess and teach me this shit. it was awesome.
then my family became fucking poor, and I got sent to public school with mexicans, and I never heard about this shit again until university. because in high school we still colored with crayons. because of mexicans.
she was just trying to make you interested. which is what schools should be doing with smart kids. today's smart kids have their overpaid union teachers playing TED talks o nteh projector. what "privilege!"
>>68111229
Yeah i'm almost out. I did my time in school like a submarine, now I got a job after only two weeks of searching and it's been a year now. It's shitty at time for the moment, mainly because I litteraly have nothing to do and I often work night shift / holidays, but I will soon advance and get a regular day rythm. In the meantime I lost weight and got ripped, so I can start a social life as soon as possible.
>>68111292
>i feel i know better than these tests
Have you tested the predictive power of your judgment?
Generally expert judgment is embarrassingly shitty compared to standardized testing.
did anyone else needed more time with it, it was impossible for me to do the test in 30 min, i completed it in 46:30 without using pen and paper, or any calculator
>>68111184
iq DOES result from very simple genetic agglutination. it's been proven that genetic code programs in scalar functions. that is messed up VERY easily by a single coding error, and limits plasticity in terms of future mutations. an example of COMPLEX genetic coding that leads to "dead ends" where nothing can change because the genetic code has been specialized, are say, various insects.
the genetic criteria IS very simple, so stop being a retard. and before you say "muh epigenetics" epigenetic structure is even SIMPLER than noncoding RNA, and DEFNITELY works off of scale of signalling, which is why it all looked like junk until 10 years ago.
but you're so smart, right? what's your "work?" because it's obviously not genetic.
>>68111459
I know behavioral psychology, and how dependent performance is on reinforcement and motivation. That's definitely therefore a major component of the higher end of the so-called IQ bell-curve. It's the case with any "sport", so to speak. Also, you'll notice yourself that if you just study logic (e.g. the work of Raymond Smullyan and the like) your ability to take these tests will increase, because a lot of it if not all of it is just seeing how things fit together and then simplifying them into a simple logical formula.
Clearly the self-called "IQ-testers" are grievously overestimating their capacity to measure intelligence, being quite overencouraged by the correlations they observe which however, as stated above, have many alternate explanations. Yes, very low IQ is usually significant. Very high IQ, as you said yourself, however, is not so significant.
>>68101907
The marshmellow test has a higher correlation to success than IQ.
IQ does not measure intelligence, it measures how well you do on IQ tests.
No IQ study has ever produced a correlation coefficient above 0.7. Now most of you probably don't even know what that means, what it it means is that IQ is just a mild curiosity and nearly worthless.
>>68111614
Of course function or absence of function is correlated to genes. However, on the other hand, as of yet it is plainly laughable to act as though there is some genetic combination you can give a person and then automatically they will be a "genius", i.e. someone of actually high intelligence and not just high "g", which, again, is confounded by all sorts of other factors such as aggressiveness when tackling a problem, previous reinforcement for like problems, motivation, etc.
I do find it ironic how these people ostensibly testing "intelligence" are themselves, well, not so intelligent.
None of them does, or am I missing something? Don't post the correct answer, if there is one.
>>68111844
>don't post the correct answer
The answer most assuredly is either 2, 3, 4 or 5.
>>68111844
Oh wait I got it, nvm.
I've always been certain I'm a complete idiot, been fine with it even though I feel dumb sometimes trying to keep up with my friends who all got useless degrees. Happy to learn I'm at least normalfag. Hooray!
>>68111614
I don't deny the influence of certain genetic lineages. However, you are making some seriously erroneous assumptions about deleterious mutations, etc. For example, the Ashkenazi Jews reportedly have high average IQ, yet they have lots of deleterious mutations due to inbreeding depression, etc. Why would there not also then be a lot of low IQ people among them? Selected out? By what? Or maybe the whole thing is a myth based on biased sampling.
>>68111844
Imagine the "initial" state of the picture.
3x3 black squares standing on the angle.
>>68101907
There's literally no point focusing on IQ, rather you should pay attention to what you achieve.
Nevertheless I always feel a sense of slight superiority when it's brought up despite never taking any form of IQ test.
>ATAR and UMAT (Australian SAT and MCAT) both put me in thhe top 1% nationally
>Have a portfolio an inch thick of various national and state level exams through primary school and HS recording perfect scores and top 1% performance
>Report cards consistently used the word gifted from 9 years old
>Never really had to study through HS and the first two years of med school
>>68107465
>My pet theory is that we're actively sabotaging our smartest by wearing them out in school instead of lifting them up. It's always "no child left behind" until everyone is a mediocre underachiever.
>I never read a school book and I still aced everything. This just brought contempt, boredom and an inability to study later on. I'm not alone. Give gifted kids special schools and greater challenges. Let them specialize in whatever drives them on. So much talent is worn down and wasted.
You might have something senpai
The one year I went to an inner london comprehensive with a council estate in the catchment area was the year I got mediocre results. Then I returned to Australia and went to a selective school (which you have to take a test to get into) where I jumped back to being gifted.
>>68101907
This test blows - there's no way I haven't drunk myself retarded by now. Cheers OP.
>>68111791
I noticed my post omitted half a sentence. neural networks are scalar, and their maximal capacity is determined almost entirely by genetics. scalar genetic functions are robust against mutation, and we can currently track and directly establish causation with basal mutuation rates in genomes at all ranges of IQ.
I never said high iq will teach a child how to read. you still need parents. by defining iq as performance ceilings, which they are, is not denying environmental influence. but DEFINING the role iq plays in neural fnction.
you're a fucking idiot, for one. and for two, you never defined your actual "work." please don't tell me you opened a practice.
oh btw the majority of "environmental" influence is downward, which is why IQ has a nearly perfect distribution like all genetic traits, but poverty and the like have a fat left tail. you can drop a kid on its head and lower his iq, but htere's no way to drop him and make him smart.
get cucked, idiot
>>68111457
sounds good, wish you all the best, frogfag
>>68111301
no, at that time internet wasn't big yet in my country, I knew of a person who had a magazine which featured her.
She started doing it as a sidejob, than the school found out and banned her for 5 years. She tought me after the 5 years went by.
>>68101907
104 is pretty good. For a non white/east asian of course.
>>68111651
Go suck a dick, you dumb faggot. There's scientific consensus that IQ measures general intelligence, and the scientific community was so fucking sick of the kind of bullshit you're spouting that they actually wrote this piece back in 1994, in order to correct the mainstream opinion that IQ wasn't an accurate way to measure intelligence.
They also confirmed that it's the most reliable predictor of success.
https://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1997mainstream.pdf
>>68107465
Can relate that.
Never read a textbook and did generally great except the classes that strictly require memorizing texts.
>>68112103
You're clearly a firm believer in these so-called IQ-tests.
How much do you know about behavior analysis? Have you ever studied it? If not, why not?
And what precisely makes you think that these tests are measuring intelligence?
>>68104181
>Races have a 10000 year gap
Try 60.000 to 100.000.
>>68112008
the ashkenazi lines have high mutanagenic load in their BASAL line, which is what results from inbreeding. it's unrelated to their mutanagenic load for IQ, which would be related to individual family health, as are other traits such as attractiveness and height.
you clearly don't have a background on the subject, and you're making educated guesses based on your "world knowledge."
jews don't have a high iq genetic load fro the same reason that blacks don't have a high genetic load in reference to their fast twitch muscle fibers. but they DO have a high genetic load in their brains.
think about it. read up. you're capable of understanding this if only you'd let go of your pride.
>>68111129
I've given up on finding the perfect girl. Just need to find a qt who will let me dominate and turn her into a lady. As long as they're open minded and not brainwashed by feminism then they can be reasoned with.
To be honest, I've never voted in a general election, probably for opposite reasons because the constituency I grew up in is tory stronghold till the end of time and it seemed unnecessary. Nowadays I much prefer the tories even though they are cucks and will do anything to keep labour out.
>monarchist
Pro-queen.
>unionist
Against Scottish independence (dad's from Scotland).
>eurosceptic
Will be voting to leave the EU.
>>68111151
GET BACK IN YOUR SHED CARL.
140
I pick up skills very easily, but I get bored easily too.
I'm mostly autodidactic because I hated most aspects of the curriculum, not surprising really because I was schooled in the middle east with mudslimes and niggers.
I wasted years of my life in menial jobs, I became a chef for a while, being a chef taught me that I hated being a chef. I still like to cook though.
I have studied anatomy and art and technical drawing to a proffesional standard and some of my artwork has been used in the music industry, (Album covers mostly) If any of you are familiar with modern music you will have seen my work, I can guarantee it.
I'm a misanthrope and a nihilist and I haven't been able to get my head out of my ass for many years due to heavy drug use. I've been a degenerate for too long, so now I'm clawing my way back into the world.
tl;dr: I think circumstance and luck factor greatly into whether you will be successful or not, but IQ can determine how you will make use of the opportunities that life throws at you.
120 iq here. Hasn't really helped me that much.
If I don't understand something right away or after very short research I usually just give up on it. Fucked me over in school on numerous occasions.
>>68112465
Good man.
test was too long, and I'm pretty sure I fucked up the English word part
>>68112570
I also can't spell professional
>>68112635
Same here had to pretty much fill in 'don't know' with the English part, apart from irreverant and obsolete
i didnt even pass the first question
when do i kill myself lads
>>68112314
we've found specific genes that enable the ability of an individual to do vector math. literally, without htese genes, a person has EXTREME difficulty in almost all cases doing vector math.
2. we see thousands of causal variants that are present in high functioning individuals, and ABSENT in low iq individuals, autists, and low iw races
3. well, weve already established that knocking out specific genes DESTROYS brain function, and we've established that brain genetics function off of scalar signalling systems to establish fractal networks. we've discovered that RNA functions via SCALAR mechanisms to establish epigenetic effect without coding for protein, and we've discovered many of the thousands of causal variants exist in this RNA "junk." it's obvious that epigenetic effect will, by environment environement, IF IT HAS THE PRESENCE OF THESE GENES will use them to enhance intelligence
5. one mechanism is "methlation" which is targeted in specific parts of the genome. the most important ones! wow! let's take a look at what areas methylation targets: testes and brain function. curiously absent: liver function. is that a coincidence?
so, either you believe the brain is full of god-proteins that beam cognition into the brain via divine powers, or you realize that the mechanisms outlined above are the gears inside of our brain, and allow us to function.
I mean, you can CHOOSE to be stupid. it's up to you.
>>68112314
IQ stands for Intelligence Quota. By definition it is a way of quantifying intelligence. I'm not saying that they are reliable though.
>>68112382
I'll look into it in more detail. However, from my own experience with my family and with other "high IQ" families, I know that IQ Is not an exhaustive measure of intelligence, even though it is correlated to brain-function, etc.
Since this thread deals with what "stock" people are from, I'll say that it is interesting that my family is mostly of British descent, but my great grandfather's parents were from Galilee, where they were Christians. This means the genetic combination in my family is almost identical to that of the original R1b-lineage Israelites, before admixture by the various Hebrew tribes (if you don't know, look at the present Jews' very diverse haplogroups and read about the Habiru). Also, during the crusades this same combination was produced in Italy by crusaders bringing wives back from Palestine, and many descendants of these lineages became seminal figures in the Renaissance, such as Galileo.
Perhaps this is not a coincidence.
However, East Asians have a higher average IQ according to these tests, but definitely the highest level of intelligence reached was in Europe, where the R1b lineage predominates.
>>68111439
>in high school we still colored with crayons. because of mexicans.
Politicians are frantically trying to understand why standards are declining and we are falling down the maths and english league tables compared to asians. IT'S BECAUSE YOU'RE FILLING OUR SOCIETIES WITH LOW IQ SHITSKINS AND DUMBING DOWN EDUCATION TO ACCOMMODATE THEM.
120, skipped a bunch because I didn't keep track of time and expected it to stop at 30 minutes.
can't say it's too accurate because of the 'opposite of/most equal to' questions. my english is good, but not that good.
Milkshake Juice Gin Whiskey Milk
which was the odd one?
>>68113398
maybe the right answer is I don't know, like that autism test with electricity, gas, and water, where you must recognize that it is impossible to solve the puzzle
>>68112994
I don't know anything about behavior analysis. I'm assuming it's a part of clinical practice for psychs, which I consider to be invalid because of the replicability crisis your field is undergoing.
I suppose that answers my questions about your line of work.
look, I respect the idea of what you guys do. but the idea that you guys think you can refute geneticists and neurologists is fucking ridiculous. you guys need to learn your place, which is CLINICAL.
I don't barge into CERN and tell them they're all stupid. genetics won this intellectual war. your practice hsould be concerned about putting into PRACTICE the science which has already been established. that's your duty to your patients. it's NOT intellectually masturbating by arguing with people who know more than you about neurology.
>jews, stock, east asians
I've seen arguments that the highest iq was reached in a circle between london and paris in the early 1700s, when peasants were dying and nobles sons ended up tending the fields. some predict that core european iq at the time could have been 120 on average.
I disagree with you on asians. asians, for the majority of time, have almost certainly been the most intelligent. that could have changed in the 1700s. dysgenic pressure has certainly changed since then, and destroyed the european gene pool.
I an not a blank slatist by any means, but the thing holding east asia back is almost certainly their finance structure. geniuses are not allowed to thrive, they are forced to "prove their work ethic" which prevents them from making things.
however, brain scans show their brains think less abstractly, which is specifically in physics and math, a detriment. it is, not coincidentally, great in concrete systems thinkng, such as genetics and engineering, which tyey are destroying us at.
>>68101907
Logic can only go so far.
I know a few of MENSA members from my highschool days...
What you need to get rich and successful in this world is "the drive" and social skills.
The things is most high intelligent people don't have "the drive" because since the invention of the internet they can just enjoy themselves on moderate incomes and simply work to finance their hobbies.
Anyways the Mensa members I know graduated college more or less on time and then simply went to travel or sat at home NEETing it out. There was no drive to get materialistic things because they I guess didn't feel like they needed them.
If you're poor and inteligent or you want to actually works as a scientist thats "the drive"
But most high IQ people don't really enjoy materialistic things I believe.
You know who does? Low IQ people that want to drive around a Buggati and show off to girls.
>>68112891
By the way, can you cite these studies?
>>68113398
All are beverages
Gin and Whiskey are alcohol
Milk and Milkshare dairy
Juice furthest away
>>68113398
Milkshake for sooo many reasons
>>68113106
yeah it's pretty fucking rage inducing. here I am, disgraced from grad school, fucked out of a career, and people are publicly paid shit tons to get niggers in school to color with crayons
I'm moving to china, desu. the language is hard, but not THAT hard, but maybe I'll be appreciated there.
for fucks sake, I don't want to get shot by a nigger and then be blamed for it.
I also kind of sperg out with how people talk about shit they don't know anything about just to sound smart. it pollutes the well of knowledge when everyone does that. chinese are big on making sure idiots know they're dumb.
>>68104723
that's because it's nonsense, and if you're posting on /pol/ you probably have a high predisposition for believing nonsense
really /pol/ stay away from trying to do science. you're a bunch of fucking idiots.
>>68113547
Behavior analysis is totally replicable and scientific, unlike most of psychology.
No, I'm not a psychologist. I just have an interest in it.
I strongly recommend picking up a book on behavior-analysis. "Principles of Behavior Analysis" by Miller is a good introductory textbook.
I disagree that East Asians were ever the most intelligent. It may just be that they have less genetic diversity.
>>68113617
true dat, you're right, dank
>>68113547
You are why we need a cure for autism as soon as possible.
What's up with everyone having skipped classes in school
am i this retarded lads
>>68102391
Balls and action are way more important. My IQ is over 140 and I am a total loser because life is meaningless and all that matters is eating, pooping, having a place to sleep, jerking off or getting laid. Everything else is extra.
>>68104363
Wrong. You're confusing IQ with EQ, which has a WAY higher correlation with income.
>>68113905
No it's usually best to not skip classes for social reasons.
>>68113583
people enjoy doing things that are just a little above their comfort range. just barely difficult enough for them, so that they're motivated to improve, but not so hard they give up.
the problem for most MENSA people is that they have no outlets for their skills. institutions are controlled by monied interests, but also idiots who earned tenure by dedication instead of intelligence, who will defend their stupidity to the grave. like any gov. institution, they'll attack the smart people who threaten them, and promote sycophants.
so MENSA people have few places to go. almost all work is too simple for them, and everyone else is too dumb to care about what they have to say.
I'm convinced the majority of them go crazy from the fact they can't find balance.
>>68104473
Stupid people generally feel smart all the time.
>>68113939
In other words, you have what I call a low "geistige Intelligenz" but perhaps a high "materielle Intelligenz."
>>68101907
Youre about as smart as Obama IIRC.
>>68113596
not off hand. steve hsu runs a blog about quantitative genomics called infoproc.
gene methylation and noncoding RNA is fairly well understood stuff now, although a text would be outdated, there's a new consensus
fractal patterns in neural networks and biologically coded systems isn't really my field. shouldn't be hard to find though.
>>68101907
I accidentally refreshed the page and deleted my last answer to 157
Plus, I have super bad ADHD, so I had to read each question about 15 times to get it and my cat puked right next to me while I was testing, which disracted me.
>>68102006
>IQ is generally not indicative of much other than high IQ.
What books on IQ have you read to be making these statements
oh right, none
>>68109014
Non sequitur
any other tests i could try out?
>>68113583
>But most high IQ people don't really enjoy materialistic things I believe.
HAHAHA
LOL
You're not only a fucking loser but a moron as well
Here's the real deal for you:
Everyone wants to be rich and have power. Everyone who earns more than you is more intelligent than you.
There are no "intelligent but lazy" people on this planet. Thats just a dumbfag meme. Intelligence floats to the top and always ends up at least with a moderate income.
If you're poor then you're just fucking stupid
Great fuckin site
>>68104181
>Races have a 10000 year gap and a 15% dna diffrence
Don't humans and apes have a 1% Dna difference. Calling BS, man.
>>68114315
That's still not a matter of intelligence so much as being selfish, which anyone can potentially choose to be.
>>68106934
They don't have the test in Arabic?
>>68111925
>>68112023
I don't get it, could you pls tell me
>>68113812
>behavior analysis
wait, I just did a 30 sec wiki. this is what those retarded autism counselors use.
>behaviorism
>ever
sorry bud. these people just make hack theories for grant money. trying to explain behavior without accounting for neurological and genetic pathways is just retarded. RETARDED. explain a clock without its gears, why dontcha?
you are REJECTING the VERY BASIS FOR CONSTRUCTED KNOWLEDGE by rejecting PHYSICAL STRUCTURES IN REALITY.
sorry. rejected. this sort of shit is why I decided to leave science.
I suggest you read some essays about physicists who get sidelined by flavor of the month hacks. I don't know much about phsyics, but it sounds enraging. because these idiots are in EVERY field. they are absolute hacks, and they gear everything they do to steal attention and grant money.
FUCK these behavior analysis guys. it's some dark ages tier denial of reality.
the problem isnt that they're WRONG. ti's that they claim the mantle of SCIENCE away from people who are actually doing science, and they do it for pure status.
fuck them. FUCK them.
>>68114571
It's 4
>>68101907
127
Got bored of the last part and just woke up
Am a general failure in life and pretty chill with it
>>68114315
POLÁCI plz.
Do you really think thats true. I mean I can name you a list of dumb as fuck people that are incredibly rich and simply lucky they're born into influential or rich families.
You know whos smart?
Jeb Bush
You know who was dumb as fuck yet successful?
George W Bush
History if full of these examples. Dumb confident people that can force their opinions on the lazy and complacent always win.
Why do you think Nerds are bullied in school? Do they win?
>>68114619
why?
>>68114574
>explain a clock without its gears, why dontcha?
Drive a car without knowing how to build the engine, why dontcha?
Use a GUI without knowing the code, why dontcha?
Obviously a fallacious argument. Furthermore, behavior analysis is based on simple logic.
>>68114683
>Why do you think Nerds are bullied in school? Do they win?
simply not true
>>68107325
What does this mean? That people don't have different innate talents at different interllectual domains? Seems insane to say this?
Also what about the smartest people (da joowz) having a really high verbal IQ, but below the white average performance IQ? Surely it makes a lot more intuitive sense to say that it's possible for people to have genuinely different innate abilities at certain tasks, but that for most people these abilities happen to correlate well enough for 'g' to appear -- not that this is necessarily so?
>>68101907
I don't think it's very accurate.
I got several tests from 10 to 18 and always scored 140 to 149.
Got 127 on this one, no way I lost 15 points in 3 years.
But then again, maybe I got rekt on the time due to english comprehension skills.
Also can't figure out the first pic for the life of me.
>>68114704
use photoshop. it completes the chessboard pattern )
>>68114774
It's probably a matter of contextual interest, rather than varying overall intelligence, although of course there are many different possible areas of intelligence. See: behavior analysis.
>>68101907
>114
not as high as I was hoping but it was really fucking hard.
>>68114574
Hi, I have a degree in Neuroscience. Behaviorism is this basis of modern Neuroscience and you're retarded. Good day
>>68114704
It makes it a nice 3x3 grid of diamonds. Which makes more sense than the other options
In this moment I am euphoric, not because of some phony god's blessing, but because I am enlightened by my own intelligence.
>>68104181
>the asian lacks creativity
Objectively false, you obviously don't know anything about Japanese technology.
High testosterone with high intelligence = creativity and ingenuity
Source
Whites don't have high intelligence, on average they have average intelligence.
>Blacks have high testosterone and low intelligence which means crime
This is based purely on the bell curve and it's misleading to not cite that. These factors are not exclusive to blacks and are not indicative of all blacks, only the average. When factored for IQ races commit crime at more or less equal rates.
>>68114736
I'm sorry for the harsh language I used earlier. I sperg out on this shit because it consumed 6 years of my life. you're very civil and I hope you educate yourself on the issue and spread actual knowledge concerning genetics and iq
but these BA guys are flavor of the month hacks making huge promises for grant money. it's about a 30 year cycle that tracks the career of the people who establish influence in the lobbying circles.
it's not even contestable. it's an established fact, and good science needs to wait 30 years every time for one of these dickheads to die so that the field can finally move on.
either way, I'm gong to sleep. but please read about some of the criticisms of the field concerning lobbying and methodology. these people aren't unique. it happend in psych 30 years before them, and it's happening in 30ish year cycles in most soft science fields, and even phsyics.
good night. but seriously, fuck those guys.
>>68114704
Are you rapefugee? No way a german cannot figure this out.
>>68114574
>this is what those retarded autism counselors use.
I don't know about "retarded autism counselors" (though maybe you have some experience with them?, sorry, couldn't help it), but no, it's what B.F. Skinner demonstrated works on humans and animals the same way, and is entirely scientific.
>>68114800
lmao the first pic is the alphabet
> yes I couldn't work it out either
this test is fucked desu, way to go making people feel retarded on the first question.
Anybody that got 120+ literally googled the fucking answers you retard.
>>68107056
I get 140+ in all online tests too. It's just thinking man
>>68104181
Kek, Haiti was colonized by the French, that's why they speak French. It was very rich and peaceful when the whites were in charge and the blacks were slaves, then the black slaves revolted and killed every single white person, and then it turned into a dangerous shithole.
>>68114910
Good come back, Upvoted ! xD
I think modern life sciences fail to take in some account the enormous amount of genetic control and inheritance on all aspects of life.
I think it has to do with two things : it bothers them because genes make for unequal individuals and therefore it challenges the cultural marxist dogma; and second because people don't like to think that they're programmed, that they don't have that much control.
>>68114910
did you mean to say quantitative genetics is the basis of modern neurology? great, as long as we're on the same page.
>>68115022
Lol, he is definitely a repfugee
>>68115099
No dude, you're just retarded
>>68104540
>low sex drive
Guys, I got perfect christian gf about a week ago and stopped jerking off. What's wrong with me?
>>68114683
Dubya graduated from Ivy League and flew jets for texas national guard
I guarantee he's smarter than you or me
Highest IQ ITT
>>68109014
>83 on iq test
>smart
>pick one
>>68113946
Pretty much. People only brag about their IQ if they're autistic NEETs. You need great social skills, get people to like you, and confidence to secure a high paying job.
>>68114888
But the variation in Jewish scores is massive! They literally move down over 20 points from the verbal to performance subsections, I really don't think that can be explained by contextual interest!
>>68115085
Top fucking kek anon
Welp, that's embarassing
>>68107056
IQ is a measure of potential. Success requires drive, interest, and risk taking along with some good old fashioned luck as well.
>>68101907
Damn bruh, I was worried I might come out a nigger.
>>68114774
>That people don't have different innate talents at different interllectual domains
Nope, let me explain:
Each individual test item measures different things:
unsystematic component: random measurement error
item specific
one or more group factors: things it has in shares with some other items
general factor (g): things all mental test items known to men share.
The g factor is the most important when it comes to predicting actual real world outcomes in the general population, the group factors are much less important.
>>68107465
confirmed being intelligent is useless in school if they're not challenging you.
>>68113939
Spoken like a true sage
>130+ iq
>awake at 6 am doing iq test
wew lads. Im glad im putting this iq to good use.
>>68101907
>be me
>go to class and spend my time telling the teachers when they are factually wrong
>pull lots of pranks around the school and spend most of my time drawing instead of doing schoolwork
>despite fucking off most of the time get extremely high marks on exams and pass almost every class above 80% with history and math in the 90s (Only class I didn't score high in was physical science, only a dismal 74% in my last year, because I was banned from the lab by the fat bitch teacher for eating sugar that was to be for experiments)
>school selects 2 boys and 2 girls from each class to take IQ tests
>have 129 IQ, highest in school
>get retested because the school refused to believe that someone who got in trouble as often as I did was that smart
>get 131
I scored exceptionally high in mathematical and problem solving areas, while closer to average in other fields. I'm an ENTJ personality type who works as a graphic artist and creates redpill propaganda in my free time, and while I consider myself socially Left I'm fiscally Right. I support Donald Trump not because I really believe in him or what he says, but because he pisses off the stale fart that is the political correctness establishment and between him and Hillary it's better to support the devil you know than the devil you don't.
>>68108364
Omg this sounds exactly like my education up to about 3rd year in engineering at University, when I discovered I needed to practice / study and didn't even know how.
>>68114965
Still, Chinese, Korean, and Japanese culture do not promote creativity at all. There is a saying in Japanese culture that the nail that sticks out gets hammered down. The whole culture is about conform conform conform, bad to stick out, must all get same plastic surgeries. Read more about Confucianism, it sounds grand in a textbook sense, but denies individualism and self identity. China could have conquered the world, but they felt no need to because they viewed everyone else as savages, Europe took interest and valued other culture's creativity. East Asians are robots.
>>68102391
Welcome to forced equality in action. it all boils down to social skills, networking, and nepotism.
Meritocracy is 75% dead. It's very difficult to differentiate yourself from others through intelligence.
>>68108313
I would say higher IQ quantitatively minded people are more likely to miss this than dumber more verbal people.
>110
Damn well I guess I'm just average. Thank goodness for my somewhat decent writing skills or I'd hang myself.
>>68115452
Another issue with group factors is that they're highly dependent on test construction and method of analysis while the same g can be derived from any test battery provided it has a a sufficient level of item diversity (in terms of content and difficulty) irrespective of specific test content.
see:
http://gen.lib.rus.ec/scimag/?s=10.1146%2Fannurev-psych-120710-100353
Real not-online IQ test score: 134.
Master's degree in mathematics.
IQ score for this test: 111.
ghay/8
>>68114630
>there is no time limit
>you can use a calculator
Ye I gave myself a 30 mins limit and didn't use a fucking calculator
What kind of IQ test uses a calculator to begin with ?
>>68101907
Your waifu a shit
>>68107069
Same as you.
I use it solely for shitposting.
>>68104181
I like when white racialists accept that east Asians have higher IQs but still try to contrive a way in which whites are superior. I've never seen anything fielding testosterone and creativity. In fact after a cursory Google search it would almost seem like creativity correlates negatively with higher testosterone. There's a reason why inventors and artists are usually not alpha chadbros
>>68116370
No wonder you're a professional shitposter.
>>68110623
you are a smart burger, here is your reward
>>68108546
I thought it was the last answer choice. All of the examples have a horizontal line segment at the bottom. Didn't even think to look at then as sideways letters wtf
>>68109301
That feel is too real, heimdall.
I've been there before, I remember the tests. I wasn't autistic, but my percentile scores were all in the 99.6-99.9th percentile range and my folks hid them from me and I didn't find out until I was in my 20s.
>>68113617
Except milk is the only unprocessed, naturally occurring drink (juice needs extraction from the vegetable or fruit). Additionally, milkshake is the only drink created by shaking. It's a shit question where at least 3 answers are viable. Juice can be used to form alcohol, milk and milkshakes can't. There are literally more reasons why it shouldn't be juice than for it to be juice.
