What legitimate reasoning does anybody have for voting for Bernie, Hillary, or any of 'those' Democrats? Why are the Jim Webbs cast aside? I read some things about him and he doesn't seem that bad, but he was forgotten in the whirlwind of the MSM. What is the allure behind Sanders or Clinton? Mark my words, the ID above my post will not be used to meme your stance out or deride you needlessly, I legitimately want to know what your opinions on, say, Sanders, are and your reasoning behind them. Let's try and keep it mature, I'm sure there's another thread about Cuck Carl you can go to if you want to shut down stances without just cause. If the argument is worthy of that tier response, however, expect the worst.
Bumping once.
Bumping twice.
>>68098332
>A
>FUCKING
>LEAF
>>68098332
>What legitimate reasoning does anybody have for voting for Bernie, Hillary, or any of 'those' Democrats
Mental illness.
>>68100423
I may never meet you again, this may have been our last encounter, and this is what you have to say. Memery is a double-edged sword. Soros may die, but so does a part of the caster as well. Tread carefully, remember to be civil when it calls for it.
>>68100472
What about it is mentally ill. Pretend I'm a blank slate, politically speaking. Right now, you sound as convincing as Sarah Silverman dressed as Hitler imitating Trump.
There's not a significant mainstream democrat voter base on /pol/. You should know that if you lurked for more than about 10 minutes.
But here's your answer anyway:
The Jim Webbs of the democrat party are relics. The modern democrat party is moving further and further to the left and "moderates" like Webb have no place on the ticket.
Bernie Sanders represents the future of the DEM party. He's an unapologetic Socialist that is interested in the "democratic revolution" that is the US abandoning free market capitalism for government own/run business and all the other socialist reforms he can shove down our throats. The only reason he isn't the frontrunner in 2016 is that Hillary is the party champ. He's only been a democrat for 6 months, where as she's been an operative inside the DEM for decades. This is her year, her election.
As for the "reasoning" behind Bernie voters, it's the same reasoning you get in south american countries. Enough people have been told enough lies/promises that they're willing to vote for handouts for themselves despite reality. They'll vote for any increase in the size of government as long as someone promises them some sort of freebie. Free healthcare, free education, free housing, guaranteed jobs, doesn't matter, promise free shit and the dictator gets his votes.
That's what Bernie is, he's the future of the Democrat/Leftist party. Santa Claus with the might of the federal government behind him. And all he needs is your money and your rights and you can have something free in return.
>>68098332
Its because politics is poorly taught nowadays in fear of offending chilluns and their parents. So they grow up and just pick the one that offers the most free shit. Probably more reasons but its 2 in the morning and i have shit to do tomorrow.
>>68098332
Vote for Bernie if you hate Hillary. Also Bernie would DEF get beat by Trump so there's that.
>>68102189
Yup, also
>>68098332
Demoshits are mostly blogfag hipster libtard SJWs and femnazis. A large portion of them are niggers and spics too because "hurr durr free shit"
>>68098332
>quote taken out of context
>in context, he talked about how you're more likely to be poor and marginalized by society if you're black
>OP doesn't care about facts, just cherry-picking to support his uninformed opinion
That's why people vote for Bernie. They are informed in a way you will never be, or even consider.
In all seriousness I'm too autistic to get a job so I just want NEETbux from Bernie.
>>68101113
Well put, thanks for your comment. Unfortunately true; now that you mention it, the changing tide is becoming evident.
>>68102491
Do you believe that you are more likely to be marginalized by society if you are black? What is your definition of marginalization, and what is its cause in this case? Do you think the quote has just grounds? If so, what are they and why do you think so? I think that it does not have just grounds in any circumstance. I do not think it is taken out of context to strawman the argument because it is, in itself, the perfect statement that summarizes his argument, which advocates for a guilt-orientated narrative aimed at disillusioned and malleable/warped youth who want a slogan to fight under, regardless of its legitimacy.
>>68102491
>quote taken out of context
>considers himself more informed
>this is what Berniefags actually believe
>Because Reddit and my friends says it's cool and I need to belong.
>>68098332
Because being a Webb slinger requires at least a level of logic involved
>>68101113
>the losing nominee candidate who only didn't get BTFO sooner because of support from voters with no party affiliation represents the future of the Democratic party
I doubt it.
