And so the amazing cuck does it again.
https://youtu.be/TQPY_1iWcFk
>>68093921
He shoves bananas up his ass.
>>68093921
establishment candidate:
trump--->debbie dooley--->tea party--->freedomworks--->koch brothers
Who could have seen this coming
>>68093921
Could this retard suck Sanders' dick any harder?
>>68093921
I can't believe my 14-year-old used to be intimidated by him. Now that I'm almost 22, I think he's pathetic. He's obese, shoves bananas up his ass, has gotten divorced, was forced out of his boyfriend's house at gunpoint, and has to beg for money online.
>>68094262
*14-year-old self
>>68093921
Reminder that this man is a sexual degenerate who left his wife for a teenage tranny that he tried to groom to be his sex slave. He also sticks bananas up his arse, and pours hot butter on his bollocks.
>>68093921
When I find out a grown man engages in rectal banana insertion and pours hot oil on what appeared to be his micropenis, I disregard his view.
>>68093921
How many fucking times do I have to tell you fucks
YouTube views = $
YouTube ratings - up or down -
And YouTube comments - good or bad
Are both fed into YouTube's " popularity" algorithm.
This in turn feeds into higher search rankings, more Showtime on the front page, more Showtime as "recommended video" for more people, and more Showtime as a "related video" on the sidebar for more people.
This in turn leads to more views, which means more $.
>Don't know how clickbait works
Either link a response video, or a copy.
>>68093921
Lol stupid cuck
>>68094317
wtf how were you intimidated by a fat slob on the internet
>>68093921
His wit has really dulled since he became a drug addict.
>>68094081
BANANA
A
N
A
N
A
>>68094335
>teenage tranny that he tried to groom to be his sex slave.
That same tranny also put a gun to his fat head and told him to gtfo.
Proof the second amendment works god bless America
>>68094623
and there it is
>>68094386
>>68094335
Also it was coffee
>>68094639
>That same tranny also put a gun to his fat head and told him to gtfo.
No that was that tranny's step-father.
>>68093921
So are you going to actually point out how what he says in the video is stupid or are you just going to call him "cuck"? Is that your argument?
MAKE DONALD DRUMPF AGAIN
>>68094775
Close enough desu
>>68094701
No it was melted chocolate.
>>68094623
Could have went my whole life without seeing that.
>>68094623
wow he really wants to get that vote in his ballot box
>>68094639
Please tell me that this is true
>>68094830
It was way too runny to be chocolate, unless he was using like syrup or something, but who would do that?
>>68094820
lmao
>>68094455
Impeccable logic he has here.
What if something regressed in content from point A to point B, while time progressed, and at point C someone wants to revert it to A?
His argument is a semantic one : that going back to point A is regression, because of chronological progression makes it so definitionally.
It can't be based on qualifiers within point A B and C independent of time.
>What are multiple senses of a word
>>68094262
I liked him a few years ago. That was until I discovered serious thinkers on youtube. Then I saw him for what he is: A fat, insecure manchild. He is absolutely uninformed but tries to disguise that under the pretence of being ironically loudmouthed and over the top.
Haven't followed him for a while, what was the story with his boyfriend and the gun?
>>68094777
>What he says in the video
People with signs
Wow so enlightened!!! What a very logical person!!!
>>68093921
So much cuckoldry.
>>68094777
Checked
someone tp his house already
dislike that shit
>>68094922
It really has to be read to be believed.
http://amazingatheist.tumblr.com/post/102976189751/the-end
>As soon as Kyle and Shannon were across the street, Rick’s demeanor changed completely from jovial to threatening. He said in a very hushed and gravelly tone: “I looked on the internet and I saw some stuff. And I think you are one sick, twisted, evil son of a bitch.” I was caught off guard by this remark, as Rick had hitherto been very friendly towards me in all of our meetings and telephone conversations. “And you ain’t takin’ that young’un”—(Kyle)—“anywhere.”
>“I ain’t taking him anywhere,” I said. Kyle is 22 years old and an adult. It is neither my right to take him anywhere he doesn’t want to go, nor Rick’s right to keep him anywhere he doesn’t want to stay. But it seemed like a bad moment to make such a point.
>Before I knew it, Rick pulled a handgun from his pocket. He was standing at a distance of about 15 to 20 feet, so I knew that there was no possibility of wrestling the gun from him before being shot.
>He then instructed me to put on my jacket and leave the premises, get into my car and drive away. I saw no alternative but to oblige his request. I complied with his demands. As I was putting on my jacket, he mumbled something about me being “cannibalistic.”
>As I was outside walking to me car, he was following at a safe distance behind me. He instructed me, “Don’t call. Don’t write.”
>So, Kyle and I are, for all intents and purposes, broken up. And not because of a choice that Kyle has made for himself, but because his mother has no understanding of mental illness and it is more convenient for her to blame me for Kyle’s issues rather than doing research. I will take no questions on this issue. I will address it no further. At this point, I am moving on with my life. There is nothing further that I can do.
>>68095038
>Breaks up with hambeast boring fangirl wife Holly
>Start dating tomboy tumblr ftm
>Goes to xir parents house
>What the fuck did you do to mu daughter? Haven't you done enough GTFO
>>68095038
I remember he wrote something about it on his Tumblr. It was pretty fucked up shit.
>>68093921
Does anybody pay attention to this guy anymore?
>>68095201
lol that's pretty funny, I checked your flag, but I'm sure as fuck not clicking tumblr so I'll take your word for it
>>68094777
The entire video is stupid. He assumes the people were 100% serious and not just half arsing it making these signs and he just attacks them personally.
It's a joke, there's no reason not to dismiss the video after the first 30sec, let alone watch the whole thing.
That said I have no idea why OP started this thread, just as much of a waste of time as the vid itself.
>>68095284
Yes. His audience has been growing for years.
>>68095201
>I hate the second amendment, who needs guns, it's 2016!
>if no one had guns, I could have had my own boipussy sex slave! I hate guns!
>>68094623
I hate you internet
>>68094623
And you cunts say we shitpost.
Look at the fat cunt, he's literally ranting as he pours butter all over the many folds of his stomach and cramming fruit into his arsehole.
There's a section of Clappifats who are by far the biggest shitposters in the solar system
>>68095038
Found it:
http://amazingatheist.tumblr.com/post/102976189751/the-end
>>68095438
Sad!
>>68095397
>I checked your flag
Check it again, idiot.
>>68095284
This is now a based YouTuber thread.
Let's Make This Thread Great Again!
>Black Pigeon Speaks
>Stefan Molyneux (le argument man)
>New Europe ANP
>CSmirrormirror /confederalsocialist/ stodles
>Spawktalk
>Integralmath/ The Justicar
>Millenium Woes
>Corbett Report
>What really happened /michael rice to podcasts
>Ry Dawson
>>68095512
I'm scared
>>68095626
>morrakiu
>uncuck the right
>libertarian realist
>richard spencer's channel, npi/radix
>>68095626
>>68095866
Murdoch Murdoch
>>68093921
You can say the smartest things but no one will take you seriously anymore when you stick fruit up your ass.
>>68095945
Why would that affect how seriously one should take his opinions? That makes absolutely zero sense.
>>68096052
You think I'm going to take someone who doesn't even know where to put a banana seriously?
>>68095626
>Can't Stump The Trump
>Face of a dying nation
>Grassroots Nationalism
>Political Islam
>>68096106
That's not an answer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4yBvvGi_2A
Daily reminder that the banana is the athiest's greatest challenge.
>>68096166
Yes it is. Just accept it, taa is a mentally ill faggot.
>>68095866
>More philosophical
NXSchell
Oswald Spengler
F101 /Fascism 101
I'm not MGTOW but these guys have good stuff
Thinking Ape
Bar Bar
Spetsnaz
Sandman
>Good at breaking down arguments
Vernaculis
Noelplum99
Thunderf00t
Karen Straughan
Skeptorr
>>68095626
>Mister Metokur/Internet Aristocrat
>>68095617
I did. Enjoy your tiny island, straya-in-training
Honestly, I like TJ on a lot of things. I think he's funny, and sometimes has some intelligent insight, but the dude is super left leaning. He has a lot of bias, which I'm sure he recognizes, but not to the degree he needs to.
Even in this video, he says Bernie is "Slightly left of center". He's not an SJW, but he's still a cucked leftist, so he defends Islam at every turn. He has more nuanced views than your average leftist, but I just wish he recognized that to an average American he's pretty radical.
It's weird, I think I'd hate him in real life, but I watch every video he makes. About 50% of the time I really like them, the other 50% I don't.
>>68096412
go to bed, butt monkey
>>68096166
Holy shit you drunken Finn, we're taking the piss, and loving how flustered you're getting trying to logically argue your points.
Yes we fucking know banana man is an ad hominem.
>>68096412
C U C K
U
C
K
>>68096265
>you shouldn't take him seriously because of x because you shouldn't take him seriously because of x
That's not circular at all.
>>68096052
Do you think i am going to click on a video when i know this person puts a banana in his ass ?
https://youtu.be/TQPY_1iWcFk?t=59s
>Make America Swole Again shirt
I want it.
>>68096412
I wouldn't say he defends Islam at every turn. Way too much yes, but he also says stuff like "Islam is way more violent than any other religions"
>>68096496
>>68096466
The point was, I think he could be turned. He's shown himself to be malleable. He was a libertarian at one point, now he's a socialist.
>>68096552
You're just repeating yourself. I don't think you understood the question.
Remember when he pussied out of a debate with fringelements?
>>68096501
Stop idolising him. You can do better than that. Idol worship is haram.
>>68096620
Why the fuck would you want weak mentally ill people to support your position?
>>68096620
>Implying he's dumb enough to be a Trump supporter
he might stick fruit up his ass, but he's not retarded
>>68095626
>>New Europe ANP
God damn
<3
Why doesn't he make new videos often?
I miss his old economics stuff.
>>68096619
He totes the liberal line of saying "not all muslims are violent."
True, but as someone who claims to have super nuanced views with a lot of depth and thought. No, not all Muslims are violent, but they are complicit in violence. Believing in the words and the ways of a warlord would normally make you a pariah, but it just makes Muslims Muslims.
>>68093921
Is this supposed to surprise us?
Remember the video of him rubbing food all over his body and shoving things up his ass?
Yeah.
>>68096660
If I had to choose between listening to the opinions of someone who's farts don't smell like tropical fruits and someone's who do, I would pick the one who's don't.
>>68096800
Because he reaches millions of people. I don't think he would, just because I think at this point he's indoctrinated, but if you present a good argument, maybe he'd give it the time of day, attempt to refute, etc.
It would be a good exercise anyways, and might reach an audience that would otherwise be locked off. If he doesn't support Trump, fair enough, but if we represent ourselves as fair minded I think he'd respect that.
>>68096974
Fuck that shit
It just fills my heart with joy knowing the great among of butthurt he carries knowing that his kike candidate is losing to an old fart.
didnt he say he was voting for Trump if sanders didnt get the nom?
didnt he say he was voting for Trump if sanders didnt get the nom?
he definitely hates hillary
>>68097150
He changed his tune once it became clear that Bernie was going to lose. He's now going to abstain.
>>68095626
>Bill Still
>The Doctor of Common Sense
>Wayne Dupree Show
>Milo
>>68096412
>Honestly, I like TJ on a lot of things.
So did I from the time I was 12 to 17. Then I realized other people are better informers, better debaters, deeper thinkers, more provocative content makers or all around better presenters.
Every thing he claimed to be, there were others that surpassed him.
> the dude is super left leaning.
>he says Bernie is "Slightly left of center".
> I just wish he recognized that to an average American he's pretty radical.
Here is the lowdown. TJ used to be a right wing libertarian that "disproved" the stance with faulty arguments, then moved toward the left and a bit to authoritarianism . Now he's trying to be edgy in the other direction.
> he defends Islam at every turn.
I'll give him this- no he doesn't. Cucker hates pisslam and he participated in Draw Muhammad Day
> He has more nuanced views than your average leftist
He doesn't have any nuanced views. Most of the other YouTube atheists branched off into something interesting.
For example thunderf00t started making anti feminist videos and videos on war logistics.
Others began taking about pychology, sociology, nationalism, economics, etc.
All TJ does is pander to teenagers , rehashes old news, and insults conservatives and theists. All the while his quality was degrading, he was E-begging , shilling his book, doc, site and merch, mishandling donations and berated people who told him to get a job
>>68094623
micropenis shit smearing atheist lol
>>68095512
unreal...
>>68097266
TJ probably makes more anti-feminist videos these days than anti-religion videos.
>>68095160
>girls wearing bloomers not skirts
>autistic pose for "funny picture" without stopping to think about it
>>68097266
I don't disagree on a lot of points. He isn't the best youtuber. I don't like him the most. I disagree with him a lot of time.
And he does defend Islam, not as fervently as other leftists, but he does. He wants "refugees", he doesn't mind their growing numbers, he thinks it's all fine.
>>68095201
This looks like it was written by a lawyer
>>68096811
Ryan Faulk works /goes to school/ is busy having gay orgies on poppers and meth. He should shill his cute little camewhoring ass and runner's bod online again.
Spawk works full time iirc.
>>68095626
>>Stefan Molyneux
Where were you went Stefan went ghetto?
>>68097650
I think those stances on Islam and refugees stems from the fact that he's totally US-centric and only really cares about what goes on in his own backyard. So he doesn't do a lot of research on the effects Muslims have on Europe.
>>68096251
God damn it.
>>68095452
>>68095201
Ahahaha what a fuckboy, thank God for guns
>>68094569
His mind seems to primarily wander between getting marijuana legalized and being on the right side of history when it comes to sucking Bernie's flaccid Jew cock.
TJ has his flaws but I like him overall.
What I like most about him is that he's openly a sell out, he doesn't try to lie or bullshit you, he owns up to his actions and I respect that. I don't agree with everything he says but I mostly do on topics like atheism and feminism
>>68097746
Not an argument.
>>68097895
>being on the right side of history
I hate this term even more than "problematic".
>>68097947
>I like him overall
a fucking leaf
>>68095512
This is just fucking sad. For the dyke I mean, ffs the banana loving faggot should be the one in mental ward. Sometimes I think he based his live uppon the Confederacy of Dunces.
>>68098007
I hate it as well but I know he's a worthless fuck that would use it unironically.
>>68097974
Nigga I know it'd be universally preferable for you to fucking behave
>>68097746
he is literally one of the worst people on planet earth
>i know not an argument
>>68094025
Haha where did you find this one?
>>68095512
>http://amazingatheist.tumblr.com/post/102976189751/the-end
I couldn't finish it.
>"your son/daughter was a sexual deviant long before I met him/her"
>Look at this profile they wrote detailing these specific fetishes
That poor lady
>>68094262
Okay I've heard everything except the gunpoint eviction
Details?
>>68097818
Then that's not a fair insight into what they do. I honestly don't know why Europe is doing this to itself, it's so obvious this is warfare to anyone not looking from the inside (I guess).
Islam has not been reformed, and until it is, they will always be at war with the west. You shouldn't forget that. I pray every day for Germany.
>>68098236
>NOT
>>68098236
>AN
>>68098236
>ARGUMENT
>>68095512
>http://amazingatheist.tumblr.com/post/102976189751/the-end
Holy fuck, I knew TAA was a demented liberal but I had no idea the extent of his mentally ill cuckery.
>>68098236
Stefan is based. Shut you mouth you whore.
>>68098825
stefan would like to shut his mouth. around my dick.
>>68098236
not an argument
>>68098825
thank you
>>68094623
Oh no. Oh no no no. No.
No. Why.
>>68098959
I'm going to donate $20 to him right now you cuck.
>>68095410
Pretty much this, plus I hate the guy and figured pol does too.
>>68099006
lol
he is a chosenite
I guess what he says goes...
>>68093921
>He's still trying to shill for Bernie when it's clear he will never get the nomination
>>68099018
Liberalism is a mental illness, that's why.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkaZujSr6DM
>>68094262
>intimitated
atheists are intimitating at first. but always remember, you're a shining warrior of light with the grace of god and the atheist pleb is just some weak undead lich who dies quickly since he doesn't have any faith.
This is a Stefan thread now, post your rares Stephs.
>>68095201
>the same guy who stuck his fingers in his ears to depict the conservative viewpoint on gun control
Sound like a nice healthy dose of butthurt to me.
>>68099474
god isn't real no matter how hard you make believe
No but seriously how can he pretend trump supporters are weirdos when he literally filmed himself shoving a banana up his ass?
>>68098306
>NOTE: Kyle is Transgender and much of his family still refers to him as her, despite his strong wishes to the contrary
Yeah these people shouldn't exist what the fuck
>>68099706
>weirdos
He's not saying they're "weirdos" he's saying they're imbeciles
>>68094623
MY EYES
Y
E
Y
E
S
>>68099810
Bananas go in mouth not asshole. Children know this but apparantly he doesn't. Which makes him an imbecile
>>68094455
>implying all progress is good
>>68094262
I used to think he was sensible back when he made a video about Clinton/Oprah/etc making fun of men who suffer while that wouldn't fly at all vice versa.
Then he got all too cringey fedora like.
>>68095201
Jesus christ what the fuck happened to this guy??
>>68099915
But for some people putting them in their asshole makes them feel good. So they've found a new way to make themselves feel good. That's smart.
>>68098236
I wouldn't say the worst people... but he's a pandering dishonest faggot.
>>68094623
posting this image on his twitter gets you blocked pretty quickly lmao
Anyone got a picture of his trap bf?
>>68100153
Assholes are for pooing, Sweden
>>68100153
but then you cannot eat the banana afterwards
if you are so inclined to shove something up your asshole, why waste perfectly good food?
>>68100153
you are fucking retarded bro
>>68100340
I wouldn't know, no social media for me.
>>68099657
time to die, vile creature!
DEUS VULT
>>68100532
The poo will only touch the outside skin of the banana you silly Aussie. Peel that off and it'll be fine to eat.
i love this guy
>>68100791
I know you're probably joking, but that is truly disgusting
>>68099053
That's pretty cheap for some oral..
>>68100791
dude gtfo of pol
what the fuck are you even doing here?
>you have to go back
>>68100391
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVNaTeN9jqc
around 3-4 minutes in, he's the mousy looking fella
>>68093921
What is it about being anti-Trump that causes a man to break?
>>68100850
It was supposed to be a joke but now that I think about it the banana really would be fine to eat. You would just have to peel the banana using paper towels so you don't touch the poop.
>>68101143
LOL
>I do love pol sometimes
why are you spending so much time hypothesizing about a poo covered banana?
>>68094623
>Try to post this
>duplicate image already exists
Proud of u
>matt STOOOPERAAAAAAAAA
>"heeee iiiiis a fuuuucking douuuuche thaaaaat iiiis theeee fuuucking truuuuth"
why
why can't you just fucking talk
why do you have to be random and quirky
be a normal fucking human being
fuck
>>68101143
It'd probably absorb some of the poop juices like crappy sponge
>>68101143
Great Khan would be dissapointed.
>>68101517
Pretty hard to do that when your as far from normal and human as you can get.
>The Amazing Cuck was on JRE one time
>Joe have talked about him like 3 times after that
Fuck that shit.
>>68095201
>He was standing at a distance of about 15 to 20 feet, so I knew that there was no possibility of wrestling the gun from him before being shot.
Yeah I'm sure that's what he thought about
Wait, he's a faggot?
Is this real life?
>>68100999
Fuck is that golem? Looks like the amazing cuck is holding the ring hostage from it
>>68096603
broscience sells them
>>68102363
But that's totally correct. Exercise is important for health and helps weight loss a lot but diet is most important for weight loss. It's way more efficient of a way to get a calorie deficit.
>>68097650
>he does defend Islam
Watch literally any one of his videos on Islam and you'll learn differently
>>68102566
The only way to lose weight by changing your diet is to literally malnourish yourself you idiot
If you eat a healthy diet, you neither gain nor lose weight. Not eating enough gets you malnourished, eating too much gets you fat.
If you want to lose weight, you need to exert more energy while on a healthy diet
>>68102566
Diet will allow weight loss, yes, but it won't increase your stamina nor create muscle or anything resembling an atheistic male body.
Unless you enjoy the flabby I-used-to-be-a-fat-ass-but-I-decided-to-starve-myself look, then more power to you.
>>68102363
diet is more important than an exercise regimen for weight loss.
that is a fact.
diet along with exercise is even better, but what is crucial is eating below maintenance.
>>68102631
I believe what he meant was that he defends Muslims. He is not as hostile towards them as most of /pol/ is because he repeats the "Not All Muslims" meme every once in a while.
>>68094847
>>68095469
>>68097087
>>68099018
>>68099489
>>68099811
Must be new, this image gets posted on /pol/ frequently much to our dismay.
>>68102548
Thanks, mate
>>68097947
I agree. I love his videos on feminism, SJW bullshit, and Islam. /pol/ likes to call him a "cucked leftist" because he's not a religious authoritarian or blatant racist, but he's constantly critical of the regressive left and their shit.
>>68094775
>My wife's so--- Ahem, I mean daughter.
>>68102714
TJ is a fat ass who eats unhealthy food and probably takes in 3500 calories a day. You're telling me that if he reduced that to 2500 calories a day from healthy food that would be "malnourishment"?
>>68102888
Nice trips, he probably intakes those calories rectally.
>>68093921
And he's blonde. Everything you want in a white aryan male., so now tell me how whites are superior
>>68103238
>one undesireable white vs the entirety of Middle Eastern culture
Do we really need to spell it out for you Ibrahim?
>>68096251
God has a good sence of humor
>>68093921
how can anyone watch this faggot?
i cringe myself almost to death 5 seconds in
>>68094623
a micropenis
could this guy get any more pathetic?
>>68096052
It's not even the banana, he literally spends 90% of his videos on poorly made personal attacks against strawmen constructed out of pedantic nitpicking of the world's dictionary definition without ever even attempting to understand what they were trying to actually convey.
He's the kind of guy who declares himself a victor the moment his opposition misarticulates his case by attacking a point their opponent was never trying to make.
Most of the time he does not even address any points at all. He just uses ad hominem
>>68095626
>The Justicar
his gun control vids are based as fuck. just wish his production values were a bit better.
>>68102363
he's right though
>>68103894
I've noticed him do the pedantic nitpicking thing you mention. But when he's actually debating someone he stays on point. When he debated Adam Kokesh on Libertarianism on his podcast he made his arguments lucidly and responded to Kokesh's counter-arguments.
The vid in OP is definitely not a good example of him making points, it's clearly a video he just churned out because he saw that Buzzfeed thing and thought "this is video material". A better example of him saying something of worth would be this recent video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFjndBbLDZc
>>68093921
yup, just as expected, nothing more than banan memes. at least admit that the people in the buzfeed article were beyond retarded
>>68094623
... WHY
>>68106208
Sexual pleasure.
>>68093921
I hate this commie loving motherfucker with a burning passion.
>>68106490
But Bernie is the best candidate by such a wide margin it's ridiculous
>>68095626
Styxhexenhammer666. Based as fuck. He used to post here under his name too.
I watch his vids all the time.
>>68095626
Face of a dying nation
Can't stump the trump
>>68106647
Finland pls.
>>68103557
Looks like a 4 inches penis in erection
>>68093921
I don't see why you can't bash trump supporters that are stupid shits.
Daily reminder if you actually give a shit about politics you know that the majority of your votes comes from stupid people.
But hey, people that vote actually think their vote matters. Spoiler alert: it doesn't, voting is pointless
>>68095512
Makes sense he's against guns now to me, but how many people for guns have actually been threatened with one?
>>68106490
Same here, him and the people who follow him are truly dangerous to human life and prosperity.
http://imgur.com/a/4B3OZ
>>68106647
OUT
>>68094455
everything has been done before, there also is no objective definition of "progress", every change is "progress" from some subjective standpoint.
>>68094990
>mfw he just gave a verbose "current year" argument
>>68093921
I did hear my banana phone going off
I just checked his channel and all of a sudden he has a hundred thousand new subscribers and every video is now getting 200k views
The fuck happened? Why the sudden increase?
>>68102714
>The only way to lose weight by changing your diet is to literally malnourish yourself you idiot
Getting fat from food isn't a norm. Eating just the right amount of calories each day will put off weight, you moron.
>>68093921
I enjoy the occasional video where he calls out feminism, but he never holds any of his beliefs up to the same standard he holds them, so I have come to avoid his videos.
His problem is he presumes moral and logical superiority. He never explains any of the logic behind his opinions, and, while he (correctly) questions the logic of the religion of the Church, he holds no such skepticism towards the state.
As a fellow atheist, I see him like I see the Christian who tells the Shintoist that his faith is wrong: an utter hypocrite.
>>68108288
>http://imgur.com/a/4B3OZ
>they seriously think tossing all their money to a scheming socialist jew will save them
>mfw Trump is self funding and doesn't ask for anything except your vote
What a bunch of fucking losers.
>>68108221
>he's against guns
He's for stricter regulation like stringent background checks and the like. He's not against people owning as many guns as they want.
>>68108772
>and, while he (correctly) questions the logic of the religion of the Church, he holds no such skepticism towards the state.
I find that to be incredibly ironic. He champions reason and skepticism, but never applies that same thought process to the government.
He's a buffoon.
>>68108884
>He's for stricter regulation
Which doesn't work.
>>68108610
TAA has always been popular on youtube. Also he is currently in a feud with another youtuber so that could be it.
>>68108610
He has lately been putting his podcast on that channel too because of DMCA bullshit. That might've helped. But he's been growing consistently anyway.
>>68108981
>TAA has always been popular on youtube.
He had 700k subs and was getting 90k views last I checked.
>>68108888
I've come to call him, and people like him, State-theists.
>>68108927
What does that mean? You think it's not easier to get guns in the US than in certain European countries? Or Japan? Just because regulation isn't perfect doesn't mean it won't have an effect.
>>68109011
I used to watch the DP podcast all the time but the leftist propaganda was getting too much. I replaced it with Trump rallies and went back to AJ's show.
It was getting to where it wasn't even funny anymore. And Paul is an insufferable, unfunny piece of shit.
>>68109048
That's pretty good.
>>68109108
We have gun control here as well as states with a heavy ban.
Case in point: Chicago. Highest crime rates in the US.
>>68100074
Atheism of course. All atheists are degenerate
>>68109212
This. Only idiots are atheist.
>>68109212
Shut up, Norway.
>>68098306
>That poor lady
it's a man
>>68109247
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2395972/Atheists-higher-IQs-Their-intelligence-makes-likely-dismiss-religion-irrational-unscientific.html
http://aattp.org/new-study-shows-that-atheists-have-higher-iqs-and-self-esteem-than-religious-people/
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2010/09/28/130191248/atheists-and-agnostics-know-more-about-bible-than-religious
>>68095201
>A few days later, after not hearing from Kyle, I figured that I should at least make sure that Kyle’s stuff got returned to him. So, I wrote his mother the following letter:
Shannon,
A good deal of Kyle’s stuff is still here, so we need to make arrangements for it to be returned to him.
Either you and Kyle can come get it, or I can ship it back to you at your expense. Rick is not welcome here under any circumstances, since he pointed a gun at me and threatened me with death if I did not leave (as you no doubt planned with him previously).
But, I am not here to further stir the drama pot. You have won. I will make no further attempt to contact Kyle or be involved in his life. Congratulations on isolating your adult son from someone who loves and supports him with threats of violence.
You will ship me back my clothes, my suitcase, and the iPhone that I bought for Kyle. If you do not, these items will be reported as stolen. Alternatively, you can bring them with you when you come to pick up Kyle’s stuff.
Thank you,
TJ
P.S. I believe you also owe me $140 for when you deluded me into thinking we were family and I gave you financial assistance.
>>68109186
>We have gun control here as well as states with a heavy ban.
>Case in point: Chicago. Highest crime rates in the US.
Forgive my ignorance but if I'm not mistaken it would be 10x easier for someone from Chicago to procure a weapon from another state with lax gun laws than it would be for example for someone from Japan to procure one from another country.
>>68109353
It's a female to male transgender AKA mentally ill lady
>>68109442
Then we shouldn't have bans. The more citizens have guns, especially CC, the less crime there will be.
>>68109212
>Not being able to avoid degenerate activities by using logic, instead relying on texts that tell you that planing two crops side by side is punishable by death, as is wearing a cotton shirt with a polyester stitch.
At least I try to follow logic and morals that make sense.
>>68109510
>The more citizens have guns, especially CC, the less crime there will be.
Using what logic?
>>68109514
People who hate others because they don't believe as they believe (in terms of religion) are insecure in their own faith. It means they don't want to be questioned and want an echo chamber/hugbox.
>>68109478
Are you kidding me ? you still shilling in this thread.
>>68109426
>You will ship me back my clothes, my suitcase, and the iPhone that I bought for Kyle
what a petty autist faggot
Ohh I care so much for that piece of boy meat I didn't get but do return the iphone I bought for him since I dont get to fuck him I want it back
disgusting fucking degenerate
Here's why every ancient civilization avoided degeneracy and faggotry like this, once its legal and out in the open society collapses
>>68109620
Common sense.
Let's say you have one mentally ill fucker like Elliot Roger. He went to a place where everyone is disarmed. He was one kid with some weapons.
Now, do you think he would've tried that shit in a town where a lot of people are concealed carrying & trained in how to use them?
>>68109639
I must spread the truth about the internets most hated neckbeard
>>68109379
>using I.Q tests to measure actual intelligence
>Thinking intelligence is a narrow path
It's almost as if you are using an old outdated method to prove a point. Not very good sources and quiet below average for a person on this board.
>>68109761
>excuses
Expected as much. Creationists can never debate or argue honestly. Lies and logical fallacies are their forte.
>>68109262
Atheism are the reason we have homosexuals, trannies, otherkin, genderfluids and other degenerates walking around. It's the reason why less than 50% of American youth considers themselves heterosexual.
There are no secular basis for objective morality so no atheist are moral they only mindlessly follow what they want to do and do not have any moral dicipline.
>>68109478
oh... Alright
>>68102858
Other way around. It was a girl who wanted to be a guy.
>>68109514
Atheists have no morals, there is no secular reason to have morality. If someone gives you $5 to murder a baby and you can get away with it then there is no reason logical reason to avoid murdering the baby with a atheistic world view.
>>68095512
Well that just convinced me. If he's against Trump, I'm for Trump.
As long as I do the exact opposite of what he does my life can't turn out too bad.
>>68109831
>How dare anon question my faith in science, it must be an excuse!
>I'll assume the worst, that'll show them how scientific I am.
Here is your "typical atheist" response.
>>68108884
>He's not against people owning as many guns as they want.
He totally is.
>>68109870
Homosexuals existed before Atheism. So did trannies.
Internet has given these odd individuals the support/echo chamber that they desired.
>>68109870
>Atheism are the reason we have homosexuals, trannies, otherkin, genderfluids and other degenerates walking around
Yes. It's all because of the thought process of rejecting theistic claims based on lack of evidence. It has nothing to do with leftist propaganda or anything. This is, of course, a single issue thing where there are no other factors.
>There are no secular basis for objective morality so no atheist are moral they only mindlessly follow what they want to do and do not have any moral dicipline.
Laughably absurd.
If you need an ancient book that includes rape, incest, murder and talking animals to tell you common fucking sense, consider therapy.
>>68109994
There is no faith in science. Thank you demonstrating what a dense and ignorant buffoon you are.
>>68093921
This fag is the biggest cuck of all time.... Tommy Sotamayor (the black guy) called this fag a racist white boy and this fag apologized for being racist, even though he didn't do anything racist... What a complete fucking cuck.
>>68093921
I remember watching a video of his where he said that he used to lie about being molested as a child because he wanted to have an excuse for being so fucked up
>>68109956
There is no secular reason to have morality. But morality doesn't need to be legislated, by religion or by government.
Don't harm anyone or their possessions without their explicit consent, unless they are harming or attempting to harm someone else.
Treating others how you wish to be treated has nothing to do with religion.
>>68094262
His ENTIRE following is 14 year olds who think they are the smartest people on Earth for being atheist.
>>68110074
>There is no faith in science. Thank you demonstrating what a dense and ignorant buffoon you are.
Look how well you reacted again atheist. No faith in science! ohhh anon must be making excuses! dur hur hur. We'll there is faith in science I'm sorry to say you are very wrong on that.
>>68110074
>Laughably absurd.
Great argument, if you ever found a objective reason for morality that applied to atheist then I am sure that they would let you lecture on moral philosophy at cambridge. No philosopher in the history of mankind have found such a reason.
You degenerate faggot.
>>68109747
Yeah I think I'll take the fact that countries with proper gun control have low gun violence over some hypothetical scenario.
But let's engage it for a while. It's true that it can be a success story in stopping an assailant. But are you really sure that would've resulted in good things in a case like the Aurora shooting? Guy comes into a loud, dark theater and starts shooting. No one knows what's going on but people in the crowd start pulling their pieces. You really trust the average American to be some badass operative who will instantly recognize the assailant and shoot at the right people?
But regardless, these mass shooting scenarios are very rare compared to normal American gun violence. This is not taking into account the extra amount of shit that would happen when everyone has guns. People go into a rage, people get drunk. If they go into a rage and they have a gun around they might just use it, no matter how much of a "responsible gun owner" they normally are.
>>68110173
Religious morality isn't objective, you fucking cuck.
>>68110102
Don't bother. He has an infantile and surface level understanding of religious apologetics.
>>68110157
>We'll there is faith in science I'm sorry to say you are very wrong on that.
Ok. Demonstrate how and I will gladly refute them.
>>68110216
>Yeah I think I'll take the fact that countries with proper gun control have low gun violence over some hypothetical scenario.
Like Australia and the UK?
All you leftist fucks claim you're not anti gun and then it turns out you are.
>>68110295
R A R E
A
R
E
>>68098369
This, any details?
>>68110102
>Don't harm anyone or their possessions without their explicit consent, unless they are harming or attempting to harm someone else.
Why should a atheist follow that rule, what if they want to harm someone? Nietzche considered that to be a good thing to harm someone if you were of a "master class" of humanity, it expresses your freedom and therefore was morally good to harm someone.
The "Do not harm, but serve other people" slave morality comes from abrahamic religions. It was not part of ancient greek morality or pagan europe in general.
>Treating others how you wish to be treated has nothing to do with religion.
Yes it does, the only reason you think it has anything to do with moral behaviour is due to religious indoctrination. There is no secular reason why you should follow a biblical rule like "Treat others how you wish to be treated". It makes no sense to follow such a rule.
If a atheist wants to rape and kill a child and he knows he can get away with it (maybe he is emperor or it is socially acceptable) then there is literally no logical reason why he should avoid it. It's not like if he rape and kill a child then suddenly he will be raped and killed as a child himself. The world don't work that way you stupid idiot.
>>68098369
>>68110332
Someone already posted the link in this thread.
>http://amazingatheist.tumblr.com/post/102976189751/the-end
>>68110216
Im from Baltimore, like murder city here in the USA... but I went to an open carry state here in the USA... people were getting food with their gun strapped to their side... And I must tell you, I literally felt safer than I've ever felt in my life... NOTHING bad was going to happen... someone would get lit up in like five seconds. The issue is blacks and minorities. Blacks make up 13% of the USA and commit 53% of the murders. And Latinos make up most of the rest of the murders.
>>68110295
Yes it is. Religious morality is objective because it does not vary based on any subjective notions. Killing the innocent is wrong even if you want to kill the innocent, while a atheist have no reason to think that killing the innocent is wrong if he wants to.
>dude traditions are heritage are dumb magical sky man xDD
There I summed up 99% of what this fat homosexual says.
>>68110483
>Why should a atheist follow that rule
Because actions have consequences, and unless you're a psychopath who already has intentions to harm, a rational person will think about it beforehand.
>>68110308
Faith that tests will favorably work. That the outcome will be positive, faith is what u have while waiting on the result of scientific "proof". Had you bothered to look into other areas that u could be wrong in your mind wouldn't be so settled. Multiple intelligence tests are far more telling of intelligence. But I wouldn't expect you to know being spoon fed someone elses opinion. Maybe you haven't grown out of that phase yet.
>>68110483
>a biblical rule like "Treat others how you wish to be treated"
That doesn't originate from the bible you retard
>>68094847
>>68094864
>>68095469
>>68097087
>>68099018
>>68099489
>>68099811
>>68106208
hello red dit and n ewfags, nice of u to join us
how do u not know about the amazing banana
>>68110483
>what if they want to harm someone?
Then you run the risk of having others do the same thing to you. Alternatively, prison sucks.
I don't need the fear of hell to keep myself from going to my retired next door neighbor's house, breaking in, and beating her head in, and taking her shit. I understand society's rules, and am happy to abide by them.
>Nietzche considered that to be a good thing to harm someone if you were of a "master class" of humanity, it expresses your freedom and therefore was morally good to harm someone.
Neat. Doesn't follow my moral code, which is derived from logic and wanting a peaceful life.
>There is no secular reason why you should follow a biblical rule like "Treat others how you wish to be treated". It makes no sense to follow such a rule.
I wasn't even aware that this rule was in the bible. It's such fucking common sense.
>If a atheist wants to rape and kill a child and he knows he can get away with it (maybe he is emperor or it is socially acceptable) then there is literally no logical reason why he should avoid it.
Except that this would help lead to a breakdown of society where he could suffer the same fate. And he can most certainly be raped and killed.
I'm honestly starting to wonder if you should pick up this book, because it's like you think that without religion, there would be no logic, despite the fact that there is a lot of logic absent in religion.
>>68110566
>Religious morality is objective
And we're done here. You are infantile.
>>68110604
>Faith that tests will favorably work.
That's called expectations based on results and previous testing. If a scientist has an idea and wants to test it, it's just creative thinking. Faith is the religious thought process of believing something as ABSOLUTE truth (without question) based on 0% evidence or proof.
There is no faith in science because science requires empirical evidence.
Try again.
>>68110308
Yeah... all leftists are anti-gun... it's the only way they can take away the freedom of speech, they must take your guns away first... it's rule #1 for fascism... and that's all the left is... fascists that want to silence what they don't agree with. People in France go to prison if they mention refugees raping someone.
>>68110798
I know. Thankfully, the leftist commie scum are exposing themselves to everyone with heir recent acts.
>>68110589
>Because actions have consequences
But if the consequences of murdering a baby only are good (for example a good paycheck and respect by your peers like in Auswich), then it's ok? That's what I thought. There is no reason why an atheist should avoid murdering a baby.
>a rational person will think about it beforehand.
The rational thing to do would be to do what has better consequences, which in this case would be murdering a baby. Atheists have no rational reasoning behind avoiding that. Except religious indoctrination that murdering the innocent is wrong, but that is not rational for a atheist.
>>68110625
>That doesn't originate from the bible you retard
It at least did not originate from any atheist because it does not make logical sense for atheists.
>>68110566
Religious morality is just as dependent on subjective notions as well. I hope you're not a Christian. Those Abrahamic race traitors deserve to be deported alongside the Jews and Muslims.
I feel sorry for people that let their religion go to their heads. Amazing Atheist is one of them. He thinks atheism is a religion. I hate being in the same category as this dick.
>>68110947
Nah. His religion is the state. The state can do no wrong, and is completely benevolent.
Ironic, since history has proven this to be false countless times throughout the course of history.
>>68110859
>There is no reason why an atheist should avoid murdering a baby.
Perhaps he himself made up his fucking mind on his own that its wrong? You're absurd. You think people are incapable of any kind of thinking without the ridiculous claims of religion burrowed into their heads.
>>68110947
If he needs to huddle around others for something that's common sense to any intelligent person he can fuck himself. With a banana.
I'm secure enough in my atheism that I don't need an echo chamber of other atheists (especially leftist pseudo commie scum) to remind me that I'm right. It's just a church at that point.
>>68110797
>I call it something different based on my own set of beliefs to be assorted accordingly
So a definite definition of a word you find offensive doesn't matter because you don't want it too? How deluded are you anon thinking that why but following something by ur definition would label u a cultist. But here you are claiming to be in the right. How expected of you to act with ur liberal sciences.
>>68096806
rato pls go
>>68111110
>off by one
fuggggggg
>>68111065
>The state can do no wrong, and is completely benevolent.
My father is the same way. Sad.
>>68111073
>So a definite definition of a word you find offensive doesn't matter because you don't want it too?
What? You're not making any sense.
>>68110782
>Then you run the risk of having others do the same thing to you.
No you don't if you steal from someone then you don't run the risk of getting stolen from any more than if you avoid stealing in the first place.
>Alternatively, prison sucks.
But it is ok to harm people if you don't risk prison or any bad consequences right? That is what atheists think because there is no rational reason to think otherwise.
>I understand society's rules, and am happy to abide by them.
Rules that originate from religion.
>Neat. Doesn't follow my moral code, which is derived from logic and wanting a peaceful life.
It is derived from christianity which you mindlessly follow the morality of. It makes no logical sense for any atheist to follow ANY moral code, what is your logical reasoning behind following A moral code at all?
>I wasn't even aware that this rule was in the bible. It's such fucking common sense.
It's not common sense unless you believe in some sort of universial magic. If you stab a baby does not mean that you will get stabbed as well. Christians, muslims and so on believe that they will get retaliation in the afterlife, but there is no logical reason why a atheist should believe that.
>Except that this would help lead to a breakdown of society where he could suffer the same fate.
No it won't just because you stab babies or steal money does not make other people want to do the same. People do that all the time without everyone doing it. And most never get raped or killed.
>>68110859
>because it does not make logical sense for atheists.
"I wouldn't want my stuff to be stolen so I shouldn't steal my neighbours stuff so that we can live in a functioning society together where people don't steal"
Seems pretty logical to me.
>>68110859
>There is no reason why an atheist should avoid murdering a baby
There's no reason a Christian should avoid murdering a baby either, as long as they hear God's voice commanding them to do it.
>>68110797
>And we're done here. You are infantile.
Great argument, atheists always run away or turn to violence when you point out your logical flaws.
>>68102844
He is part of the regressive left,Ozzie.
>>68111065
Where do you get this idea? He constantly makes videos wherein he shits on American politics and politicians. Literally the only politician he likes is Bernie.
>>68094262
ohgodwhy.jpg this perfectly describes me. I thought he was the coolest shit in the world when I first discovered him.
>labels himself an atheist
>is a cuck
wow who could've seen that one coming guys
>>68111225
The only people I see doing that are the religious who think God is on their side. No, Norway, some people just see that your arguments are garbage, full of logical fallacies, and there is no point in debating a brainwashed victim who's not interested in changing his mind, but is rather just talking at you.
>>68111162
Did you even look at the image I posted with the big red sign leading u to the definition? Or would you feel better that I hold your hand. All you proven is that you're the frog in the well.
>>68093921
I remember hearing that this guy dropped out of school in the 8th grade, is that true?
>>68111070
>Perhaps he himself made up his fucking mind on his own that its wrong?
Based on what? FEELING? That is completely irrational and n ot logical at all, but if a atheist FEEL that it is right then he is suddenly wrong?
That is a logical contradiction, you atheists love logical contradictions it's in all parts of your faith.
>>68111196
>"I wouldn't want my stuff to be stolen so I shouldn't steal my neighbours stuff so that we can live in a functioning society together where people don't steal"
That reasoning only applies in cases where you tell your neighbour that you have stolen his stuff, there is no logical reason why a atheist should avoid stealing if he don't tell about it and if he can get away with it. Your argument has nothing to do with the morality of it, you are just claiming that it is impossible to steal without being caught which is empirically false.
>>68111213
>There's no reason a Christian should avoid murdering a baby either, as long as they hear God's voice commanding them to do it.
I am not christian, but christians follow the bible and if they follow christian moral traditions then there are many reasons why they should avoid that even if they want to and even if they hear voices.
>>68111363
I've been called a traitor by other atheists because I support Trump and am a nationalist gun supporter.
How I can be a "traitor" to a simple thought process is beyond me.
>>68111384
>Did you even look at the image I posted with the big red sign leading u to the definition?
Yes. Faith in someone and faith in religion are two different things. One is trust and the other involves superstition.
>>68111474
>I am not christian
Then what are you, if not an atheist?
>>68110216
>Yeah I think I'll take the fact that countries with proper gun control have low gun violence over some hypothetical scenario.
This assumes the lack of guns are the reason for the lack of crime.
How many black people do those European countries have? I mean holy fuck our country is huge and varied. How many Detroit equivalents are there in Europe? Genuinely curious
>>68111474
>Based on what?
The consequences of his actions as well as his own personal thoughts.
>That is completely irrational and n ot logical at all
Then your FEELING in thinking God is real is completely irrational and not logical at all.
>>68111559
>The consequences of his actions as well as his own personal thoughts.
But it's ok to murder babies if the consequences are good and if the atheist likes it? Is that what you are saying? That there are no real reason why atheists would think murdering babies are morally bad?
>Then your FEELING in thinking God is real is completely irrational and not logical at all.
Who says anything about that I feel God is real?
>>68111499
>Faith in someone or something
Yes two different things but used with that single words meaning. So you can say "there is faith in science", science may or may not require a belief to have but they do share traits. There is faith in science.
>>68111474
If I base my ethics on the idea that life forms have value and the value of a life form is determined by the complexity of its cognition then I can say it would be objectively wrong for me to do harm to my neighbour just as it would be wrong to do harm to me as we are both life forms with the same cognition.
>>68093921
SOMEONE CALL HIM A JEW RIGHT NOW
>>68111175
>No you don't if you steal from someone then you don't run the risk of getting stolen from any more than if you avoid stealing in the first place.
Then I would request you to tell me why I'm not going 3 blocks down, to some house I don't even know, and do that?
>But it is ok to harm people if you don't risk prison or any bad consequences right?
No, because that is not how people should treat each other.
>That is what atheists think because there is no rational reason to think otherwise.
I believe differently, and am atheist. It is entirely logical to treat others how you wish to be treated, and to stop anyone who wishes to break that rule without the victim's explicit consent (say, a submissive person in a relationship with a dominant person).
>Rules that originate from religion.
Not in this country, buddy. Explicit separation from Church and State from it's origins. If you wish to state otherwise, I am open to the possibility, but the burden of proof is on you.
>It is derived from christianity which you mindlessly follow the morality of.
You could just as easily claim that I don't steal because of Islam. You need to prove why it's not critical thinking, but is Christian, while not being any other religion that has similar rules.
>It's not common sense unless you believe in some sort of universial magic.
Actually, it is. Thinking you are going to burn in hell for all eternity requires the belief of magic. Saying, "I won't hurt you if you don't hurt me," is just how mankind grew to live with one another. There needs to be a certain level of trust, and consequences for breaking it.
>No it won't just because you stab babies or steal money does not make other people want to do the same.
By your own logic, it would make other atheists want to do the same, wouldn't it? Hundreds, of millions of atheists in the US all doing that would cause a breakdown of society, because the trust in the "fellow man," would be gone.
>>68111175
Also, what's with the focus on stabbing babies? Is it a personal fantasy of yours? It's the only reason I can think of as to why you would focus on it so much, while saying atheists would do it if they could get away with it. Would you do it if you lost your belief in a higher power?
>>68111671
>But it's ok to murder babies if the consequences are good and if the atheist likes it?
It depends. What would the good consequences be? Why would this contradict his feelings and thoughts?
Are you telling me religious people are incapable of feeling these things as well?
>Who says anything about that I feel God is real?
Because you said religious morality is objective and hate atheists.
>>68111680
>Yes two different things but used with that single words meaning.
That means there is a difference.
>So you can say "there is faith in science",
No. Because science isn't a person you dense fuck.
>>68111280
No, he likes the nanny state.
>>68111849
>Would you do it if you lost your belief in a higher power?
He's admitting to being a psychopath if that's the case.
>>68111698
>If I base my ethics on the idea that life forms have value
There is no rational secular reason why you should think that life has value. Purely physically it is just a bunch of chemicals with electrical impulses in it, there is no reason why you should feel it has more value than a wet sponge with a battery on top. Physically speaking it is approximately the same as life.
> and the value of a life form is determined by the complexity of its cognition
There is no scientific proof that anything is cognicient like yourself, it is a irrational belief you have.
>then I can say it would be objectively wrong for me to do harm to my neighbour just as it would be wrong to do harm to me as we are both life forms with the same cognition.
Why is it wrong to harm life forms even if you think it has value? So you think that is a atheist don't value human life then it is morally ok to harm people? If that is your reason why it is wrong for you, then it must be right for people to do it where those EXACT things do not apply?
>>68111868
Universal healthcare and education equals "nanny state" now? Just because he wants those things doesn't mean he has some great allegiance to the state, it means he wants those as guaranteed rights for citizens.
>>68111852
>dense fuck
>Gets something they consider evidence but has an opposing view point
>"How can they think that, they must be wrong!"
See what I mean? even using your own way of deciding if something is true or false you will always assume they are false. I'll never understand the hypocritical thought some people like you have. Atheists live in a world of double standards as evidenced by how you type. Almost as if they were parroted opinions on "science". But even if we consider there is "no god dur" it doesn't disprove intelligent design even a fool like you can agree the more we explore the more questions we have than answers. Or are you two retarded to even come up with anything urself?
>>68111966
>There is no rational secular reason why you should think that life has value
I don't understand why you're telling other people what they do or should think.
Cut the bullshit. We all know your life is shit and you're afraid of dying. So you cling to the idea that you'll live forever in the sky when you're gone.
You're an emotionally fragile person who's easily persuaded by myths in an attempt to feel better. Now you're narcissistic and spiteful because others don't share this inane belief. Because you think this belief gives you power over others. Whereas you have no power in reality.
>>68111966
>Legions of atheists are telling you that they have no belief in a higher power, but no desire to harm others unless they or somebody else is at risk from someone who broke the non-aggression principle
>Still don't believe it.
You must be a real sociopath if religion is the only thing keeping you from harming others.
>>68112104
>Universal healthcare and education equals "nanny state" now?
Yes. You are giving up responsibility for yourself and your children, and putting it in the hands of the State.
>>68112193
This. Religion should only be taken to better someone and not used as a discount anti-crazy pills. My faith has made me stronger.
>>68112167
>ven using your own way of deciding if something is true or false you will always assume they are false
I just demonstrated to you why your definition has different meanings. And then you go off on a tangent with random babble for some reason.
>But even if we consider there is "no god dur" it doesn't disprove intelligent design
ID (aka creationism) is thoroughly debunked.
>even a fool like you can agree the more we explore the more questions we have than answers
Correct. Except science actually finds those answers and the book of ancient bullshit you cling to has been wrong more times than you can fucking count WHILE claiming to have all the goddamn answers.
Protip: see all these? They weren't found with fucking faith.
>>68111966
>There is no rational secular reason why you should think that life has value.
Of course there are, there are unlimited ones because I can assign value into anything I want.
>There is no scientific proof that anything is cognicient like yourself, it is a irrational belief you have.
Oh look, babby took philosophy 101. There is absolutely no reason to believe in the opposite. This is as poignant as saying "there is no scientific proof there isn't an ethereal pink dragon living in your closet".
>Why is it wrong to harm life forms even if you think it has value? So you think that is a atheist don't value human life then it is morally ok to harm people?
According to their morals, yes. But their morals are generally speaking not conducive to human flourishing.
>>68112307
How? Genuinely curious.
>>68111779
>Then I would request you to tell me why I'm not going 3 blocks down, to some house I don't even know, and do that?
Religious indoctrination from your culture and laziness.
>No, because that is not how people should treat each other.
Because.... you are literally just saying "ARE YOU KIDDING ME?" without giving a reason because atheists CANT figure out a reason.
>It is entirely logical to treat others how you wish to be treated
It is a unfounded belief that you can not logically reason yourself to.
>and to stop anyone who wishes to break that rule without the victim's explicit consent
Why? That can have bad consequences, you might get hurt. As all these atheists in this thread have mentioned, good moral behavior depends on consequences and the consequences from that are generally bad.
>You need to prove why it's not critical thinking, but is Christian, while not being any other religion that has similar rules.
Other religions DO NOT have similar rules, did the ancient greek have moral rules like that? No... They wrote a lot about morality but in general they felt that it was ok to steal and murder people of a lower class or foreigners. The same was the case in viking scandinavia and so on. Murder was legal here until King Håkon "the Good" made it illegal, but he was baptised.
>Saying, "I won't hurt you if you don't hurt me," is just how mankind grew to live with one another.
But there is no logical reason why you should not hurt him if you can overall benefit from it.
>By your own logic, it would make other atheists want to do the same, wouldn't it?
No, because they are indoctrinated by religious rules and norms.
>>68111849
Who says anything about me having a belief in a higher power? I am just pointing out facts, talk about the matter at hand instead of attacking my person. My beliefs have nothing to do with it, we are talking about how atheist have no rational basis for moral behaviour.
he's just salty cause his hick dad fucked him as a kid.
>>68112307
Seconding.
My pre-faith life was dark and angsty.
>>68112307
>My faith has made me stronger.
Based on our conversation, it has made you incredibly ignorant and arrogant. You're unbelievably dense.
>>68112466
>NUH UH: The Post
>>68093921
He actually talks about Bernie like he can win.
>>68112253
How is that bad? I thought nanny state means an overbearing state, not a state that provides basic fucking services for its citizens. Why does universal healthcare equal "nanny state" but the state handling roads, fire departments, police etc. etc. doesn't?
>>68111852
>It depends. What would the good consequences be?
Maybe someone offers him $10 to kill the baby
>Why would this contradict his feelings and thoughts?
Because he value $10 more than any baby or maybe he get a sexual satisfaction from it. Does not matter. But you are saying that it depends on the consequences and feelings.
So if he thinks the consequences are acceptable and feel alright about murdering the baby then there is no logical reason why it should be morally wrong.
>>68112178
>resorting to ad hominem attack
great atheist logic there, no wonder you are a atheist with reasoning like that.
>>68112439
>According to their morals, yes. But their morals are generally speaking not conducive to human flourishing.
Morality does not need to be, the claim that morality does is something that comes from certain religions. The ancient greek never necessarily believed it was a neccessary part of morality.
>>68112466
>Religious indoctrination from your culture and laziness.
Already nixed that.
>Because.... you are literally just saying "ARE YOU KIDDING ME?" without giving a reason because atheists CANT figure out a reason.
Of course there is. I've explained it. Multiple times. You just keep saying, "Nuh-uh," while fantasizing about me stabbing babies.
>It is a unfounded belief that you can not logically reason yourself to.
No, that would be the belief in a higher power.
>Why? That can have bad consequences, you might get hurt. As all these atheists in this thread have mentioned, good moral behavior depends on consequences and the consequences from that are generally bad.
Please provide some links as proof.
>Other religions DO NOT have similar rules,
Thou shalt not steal. Sharia law states that anyone who steals should have the hand cut from their arm. Just proved a similar rule. You're welcome.
>But there is no logical reason why you should not hurt him if you can overall benefit from it.
You keep stating this, even though I've already countered it. Do you kill people? If you don't, is it due to the belief of a higher power? If so, if the higher power is proven indisputably to be false, would you kill people? Why or why not?
>No, because they are indoctrinated by religious rules and norms.
Prove it.
>>68112449
Meditation as an excuse for personal reflection. Time in the rat race gets hectic and generally exhausts a person mentally so taking the time to simply sit down while entertaining other thoughts like how out of control some times are to you and trust the world will be the same wither ur in it or not. In my experience if a person things in the third person like trying to judge everything everyone is going to do. Its fruitless. In short its just a bit of me time, while pretending what Jesus's reactions would be. Of course this is just in case of me. I can't speak for everyone but I have become capable of more understanding.
>>68112664
Because all that power can be abused. And you're seeing the results of public schooling from government teachers and public universities by government-funded teachers on youtube all over the place.
>>68112759
>Maybe someone offers him $10 to kill the baby
And if he refuses because it conflicts with his personal feelings/morality?
>Because he value $10 more than any baby or maybe he get a sexual satisfaction from it.
So do religious people.
>But you are saying that it depends on the consequences and feelings.
Like everyone else on the planet.
>So if he thinks the consequences are acceptable and feel alright about murdering the baby then there is no logical reason why it should be morally wrong.
His personal choices or thoughts doesn't negate the act and following consequences. He's just a psychopath in that case.
>>resorting to ad hominem attack
Because it's true. You're an unreasonable person. You're a lonely and miserable faggot who wants to live forever because his life sucks.
>>68112853
Sounds like Buddhism, which I always considered more of a philosophy, so long as you take out the belief in Nirvana.
>>68112897
For education I can see that angle but not for healthcare.
>>68112853
>I have become capable of more understanding.
Not in the slightest. You're dense and arrogant.
>>68112511
All you've done is throw insults around and proven you won't allow yourself to give way to simply accepting you could be wrong. I'll pray you realize how "dense" your being, maybe u should pick up a dictionary and look up the meaning of arrogance cause there are two different means and words. I would be confident. You would be arrogant.
>>68112979
Ya I know, but I believe in an afterlife and not nirvana lol.
>>68113121
>All you've done is throw insults around
No. I tried reasoning with you. YOU countered them with
>GOD U FUKIN ABLESTS R SO STOOPID LOL
>you won't allow yourself to give way to simply accepting you could be wrong
I've listened to every theist argument on the planet. All are bullshit that heavily rely on lies and conjecture and logical fallacies.
>>68113045
Money in healthcare research plummets in the nations that implement it. It also needs constantly rebuilding, because it keeps failing.
Proof: Britain's healthcare system. It's been remodeled a LOT since its inception back in the 40s.
>>68111764
HE IS A JEW!
Actually he is just an obese guy show shoves bananas up his ass that does not understand that some of these signs were jokes or fake. Like the slavery sign no one would do that shit it was probably a fucking buzzfeed employee with a trump hat.
>>68113068
>running damage control and defending with insults.
Why do you have to be so salty, did the spanking I gave was too much? Here is a pic ull actually understand..well I hope u do cause ur gonna need to lube up more if this is how ur acting with ur flimsy argument. That post wasn't even aimed at u bby.
>>68112825
>Of course there is. I've explained it.
You have never given a logical reason why atheists should avoid doing harm that applies when it benefits said atheist.
>Please provide some links as proof.
That you can get hurt by trying to help someone? http://tucson.com/news/blogs/police-beat/man-stabbed-trying-to-break-up-fight/article_5f6529cc-e276-11e5-9d08-e719dca526c1.html there are tons of similar one's learn to google.
>You keep stating this, even though I've already countered it.
You have not countrered it because then you would have actuallly countered it instead of trying to pretend that you had at some point to throw off any casual reader.
Atheists have no logical reasons why they should avoid hurting someone if they benefit from it themselves.
>Prove it.
Just read another atheist prove it:
Friedrich Nietche "A geneology of morality" where he points out that it only makes sense for people who follow "slave morality" like chirstians.
>>68113297
>obese guy *who shoves bananas up his ass
God damn it I made a typo now some obese shitlord will make a youtube video about it with a really snarky voice because he hates his life and is on the edge of suicide.
>>68113121
>I'll pray you realize how "dense" your being
Or you could argue your points like a fucking man.
>maybe u should pick up a dictionary and look up the meaning of arrogance cause there are two different means and words. I would be confident. You would be arrogant.
It truly is amazing how ass backwards you are.
>>68113323
>defending with insults.
You've utterly refused to make any kind of coherent argument and insult when I knock them down anyway. Give me a reason why I should bother to give someone as uneducated as you anything more than a middle finger and overall assessment of your character.
>>68113323
>Here is a pic ull actually understand..well I hope u do cause ur gonna need to lube up more if this is how ur acting with ur flimsy argument. That post wasn't even aimed at u bby.
Are you 14?
>>68112976
>And if he refuses because it conflicts with his personal feelings/morality?
Then it does not apply in this case because we are talking about someone who would not refuse.
>So do religious people.
But they still have reason to believe it is morally wrong, atheists don't.
>His personal choices or thoughts doesn't negate the act and following consequences. He's just a psychopath in that case.
But the consequences are viewed as good.
>>68113420
Go ahead and look up Ronald William Brown.
>>68094025
I really really like this image
>>68113523
>Then it does not apply in this case because we are talking about someone who would not refuse.
Oh ok so you ONLY pick specific hypothetical situations that fit your narrative designed specifically for you to attack. Gotcha.
Dishonest coward.
>But they still have reason to believe it is morally wrong, atheists don't.
What if their religion says its good?
IE: Islam's honor killings.
>>68113420
>You have never given a logical reason why atheists should avoid doing harm that applies when it benefits said atheist.
I have, you've just denied that it's logical, while giving proof to any alternative you assert.
>That you can get hurt by trying to help someone?
No. Proof that, "As all these atheists in this thread have mentioned, good moral behavior depends on consequences."
>You have not countrered it because then you would have actuallly countered it instead of trying to pretend that you had at some point to throw off any casual reader.
See my first response in this post.
>Atheists have no logical reasons why they should avoid hurting someone if they benefit from it themselves.
You're a broken record. I've given reasons.
>Just read another atheist prove it:
Not all people who don't believe in God believe the same things, much like Jews, Christians, and Muslims all have variations in their morals, despite believing in the same God. I don't agree with Nietche, regardless of his lack of a belief in God. I find it to be illogical.
>>68113523
>Then it does not apply in this case because we are talking about someone who would not refuse.
I'm an atheist, and would refuse. What now?
>>68113463
>someone as uneducated as you anything more than a middle finger and overall assessment of your character.
>trys to go for age as a weak point
>makes every attempt to go out of their way to call me stupid for questioning their belief
>Says they were calm and reasoning all this time
Anon I don't care about how you actually think of me. I'm starting to actually belief u are crushing on me now. You are being the person right now that u are describing I am. Hows it feel being a hypocrite and not knowing it? all this reason u keep spouting and it turns out there is none. Only feelings. And who argues using feelings? the Left.
And you know me oh so well from a random message board.
