Are liberals getting more and more violent?
Yes and tbqh it's the consequence of not being able to beat your kids anymore for being snot nosed brats.
Liberals are the most violent when they have power. Look at Pol Pot. Or Rosie O'Donnell.
Because they are self-righteous. And those who think they are the only justice will always be extremely hostile whenever faced with any "different" opinion
>>68063355
Yes.
https://youtu.be/U1MYMVfyHi0
>>68063355
>Getting
They've always been violent.
>Liberals: Constant low level thrum of violence that builds to a large wave if not stopped.
>Rightists: Literally nothing for long periods and then short explosions of huge levels of violence.
>>68064089
For an example.
Liberals from the 60's to 80's constant riots, property damange and the occasional death from bombing campaigns in the U.S.
The right....nothing. Then suddenly in the 90's hundreds killed by a truck bomb.
>>68064089
I seams like since Bernie's clearly done, there seems to be more intense frustration and manic desperation.
>>68063355
Their arguments are increasingly based on dehumanization of their opponents. This allows them to discard logic when it comes to opposing viewpoints, but it has the side effect of lowering the threshold of violence against their opponents too. After all, it's a good deed to attack a monster.
Yes and they're going to regret it severely.
>>68063355
yes and only because they are now getting desperate
It hasn't even started. Right now you're just seeing the "peaceful" Bernie Sanders fringe of the Left in America. The rest of us are armed and ready when shit really hits the fan.
>>68063355
Yes, because there have been no consequences to their violence and the media has been actively encouraging it for years.
Eg: CNN all but caused Ferguson to happen.
They're self-righteous zealots. And we can see from history that any group of self-righteous zealots, once it starts to become the majority, gets violent.
>>68063355
Basic spergout isnt violence.
Id be more concerned about those nigger riots you guys have there almost like every fucking weekend
They are like worms and Trump is the rain they have always been violent Trump just makes them show themselves
>>68063355
/pol/ is liberal too
>>68063355
Yes because of a mixture of huge frustration at seeing Trump march to victory and the fact that they are mostly young millenials who grew up never being told no or being disciplined.
They knew growing up that if they wanted something they just had to throw a screaming tantrum and lash out at their parents and their parents always caved.
They can't understand or process the fact that their tantrums are only making Trump stonger. And they're finding out the hard way that, unlike their parents, Trump supporters will hit them back.
Then of course there's the nigger "liberals" but they've always been violent so no change there.
>>68063355
>mfw I thought Americucks had 2nd Amendment rights
What happened?
This board is full of wannabe Timothy McVeighs and people that want to lynch black people... and you are trying to call liberals violent?
Get real. At least two or three times a year there is a right wing terrorist attack of some kind against police, the IRS, abortion clinics, and so on.
Name a time a left-wing politically motivated terrorist attack killed anyone.
YOU'RE FUCKING A WHITE MALE
Millennials are getting more an more violent.
I don't know if it's the permissive parenting, or if it's the participation trophies, or if it's just the media..... but "kids today" are much more likely to resort to assault than those us of from 20 or 30 years ago.
Fuckers need to get a grip, on all sides. Life is tough. People disagree with you. You DO NOT have a right not to be offended. DEAL WITH IT.
>>68066051
>paying attention to laws made by old, white, slave-owning racists
>freedom of speech
>right of asembly
>right to rebel
All of these are oppressive and violent WHITE LAWS. You need to check your privilege, because it is currently the year subsequent to the preceding one, mmkay?
>>68066191
San Bernardino. I'm not surprised you don't know about it, because they did a great job shutting everyone up.
>>68066560
>San Bernardino
Those were muslims, not liberals. They were not even remotely motivated by american politics.
You're retarded.
>>68066191
>This board is full of wannabe Timothy McVeighs and people that want to lynch black people... and you are trying to call liberals violent?
They're calling liberals hypocrites who abandon their values at the first sign of adversity.
At least with the Muricans who go around waving 'Don't Tread On Me' flags and open carrying you're getting exactly what you see.
Liberals lie and and falsely claim to be on the moral high ground because they are tolerant of everyone and disdain violence.
Up pops a political candidate who upsets their feels and violence and fascist tactics follow from them.
People are more put out by the deluded, child-like fantasies of moral superiority than they are by a bunch of fucking Sanders supporting vegans thinking they're suddenly in the UFC.
>>68066560
THE POST REPORTED IT
THEN HAD TO CHANGE THEIR HEADLINE BECAUSE REALITY WAS TOO OFFENSIVE TO THE LIBERALS
>>68066728
>Name a time a left-wing politically motivated terrorist attack killed anyone.
This is what you asked. This is what I delivered.
>They were not even remotely motivated by american politics.
They killed in open defiance of American politics. That's motivation.
>american citizen
>hated american politics
>muslims sick of "muh oppression"
>californian
Explain to me how they weren't left-wing shooters. Unless you think muslims can't be left-wing, or you think that the left wing doesn't openly praise IS?
>>68066191
>Name a time a left-wing politically motivated terrorist attack killed anyone.
http://www.tmz.com/2015/08/26/bryce-williams-vester-flanagan-shooter-manifesto-abc-news-charleston-church/
>>68066425
It's because they have been failed on every level by society. Their parents, schools, government, media, everything has conspired against them to deprive them of the skills and understanding they need to be civilized, respectable human beings.
It's like American blacks with their lack of fathers and thug culture.
All it takes is one generation fucking everything up to kill a civilization.
>>68067162
They were not liberals, you moron. They were not killing people in the name of a liberal ideal.
>>68067291
The person that committed the Charleston shooting was a KKK member and wanted race war... and you're saying he's a liberal?
>>68065424
someone pointed out once that there's an underlying sense that the heavy lifting has already been accomplished by the civil and gay rights movements.
therefore, to satisfy the anger ginned up by liberal doctrination, millenials are focusing on smaller issues with increased ferocity.
REMEMBER DON'T BE REPORT SUSPICIOUS MUDSLIMES TO THE COPS
THAT WOULD BE ISLAMOPHOBIA YOU BIGOTS!
>COOL CLOCK AHMED
ENJOYING YOUR $15 MILLION OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS FOR WRONGFUL ARREST LAWSUIT FROM YOUR CLOCKBOMB SCAM?
>>68067335
You keep moving the goalposts, lad. You never asked for this, Jensen. You asked for:
>Name a time a left-wing politically motivated terrorist attack killed anyone.
And I gave you a left-wing couple of shooters, who were politically motivated and killed in the double digits. You blew it.
You can have Dylann Roof too, for bonus points.
The reason is that communists see revolution as necessary overthrow the system. Meanwhile, conservatives just want to preserve things, so they react defensively and only when necessary.
>>68063355
They've always been violent.
>>68067560
They were not liberal/left wing shooters. They were MUSLIM.
I moved no goalposts. You are just retarded if you don't know the difference between a liberal and a muslim terrorist.
>>68067508
Of course. They need a big enemy to fight, and to "resist". When the big enemies are gone, they'll pretend the small ones are big.
>>68067469
Leave it to a liberal to never read what's posted.
Do you even know who Bryce Williams was
>>68067560
Dylaann Roof was a KKK member and noe-nazi that wanted race war.
He was a liberal.
>>68067633
>They were not liberal/left wing shooters. They were MUSLIM.
Are you saying these things are mutually exclusive?
If so, you're the biggest idiot in the thread.
>>68063355
They've always been tantrum throwing cunts. It's just becoming more noticeable is all.
>>68067335
Then why is the left so quick to hop on Islamic cock at the very first second the opportunity arises?
>>68067747
>He was a liberal.
I know, that's why I mentioned him.
Have Eliot Rodger, too.
>>68067749
There is no evidence that the san bernadino shooters were liberal. All we know is that they were muslim.
>>68067633
THE SHOOTING HAPPENED BECAUSE OF LIBERAL PC BULLSHIT
THEIR NEIGHBORS THOUGHT THEY WERE SUSPICIOUS BUT DIDN'T GO TO THE COPS FOR FEAR OF BEING CALLED RACIST AND ISLAMOPHOBIC
RIGHT AFTER CLOCKMED DID HIS PR STUNT, ORCHESTRATED BY HIS FATHER WHO WORKS AT CAIR
SAN BERNARDINO SHOOTING IS 100% ON THE HEADS OF LIBERALS
>>68067863
that was a typo... he was a neo-nazi and white supremacists. He was a not a liberal.. if anything he was a denizen of this board.
unless you really believe that neo-nazi and white supremacist ideals are liberal. in which case you're retarded.
>>68066191
>time a left wing politically motivated terrorist attack killed someone
Kinda seems like no matter what, it'd just be a drop in the bucket compared to the most conservative estimates of 100 million or so that have been murdered under leftist communist and socialist regimes...
>>68067781
the left is mostly women. figure it out champ
>>68066051
Libcucks in america don't own guns.
The people who do are right-to-center leaning, and usually understand that we're at a precarious time in our nation, and a false move could fuck our rights up even more.
Basically anybody who's interested in a real american revolution 2: Electric Boogaloo don't want to shoot their loads early and get curbstomped by government forces when there's no real popular support for such an action.
Its kind of hard to justify yourself in the court system for going out and doing a drive by on Bernie supporters.
But with how the media basically glossed over/covered up that wildlife resort takeover or whatever, there's something rumbling. Give it a couple years.
Correct.
>>68063455
He gets it.
>>68067913
They were not liberal themselves, and they did not commit their acts in the name of liberal ideals.
meanwhile, last year we had the Charleston shooting, the colorado abortion clinic shooting, and multiple attacks on police in the south from terrorist groups like sovereign citizens and oathkeepers.
>>68067880
Then you can't prove that any shooter is a conservative, unless they shout "I AM A CONSERVATIVE" while they're opening up. You're stupid as shit.
>>68065539
>Id be more concerned about those nigger riots
It's not so bad. They only destroy their own black ghettos.
>>68063455
Also the consequence of double standards by the media and our President
>>68063355
Could AIDS Skrillex actually fight anyone and win?
>>68066191
>Name a time a left-wing politically motivated terrorist attack killed anyone.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Army_Faction
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbionese_Liberation_Army
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_Underground
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FARC
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_19th_Communist_Organization
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_directe_(armed_group)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_of_October_Anti-Fascist_Resistance_Groups
>>68068000
You've said it yourself, here:
>There is no evidence that the san bernadino shooters were liberal.
So I will say the same for Roof. You can't prove he wasn't a liberal.
Also, Eliot Rodger.
I'm just rather amused by the claim "left-wing terrorism doesn't exist" when the majority of terrorist groups in the world that are not Islamic, are Marxist.
Marxist Kurds just blew up five people in Istanbul, FARC has been killing for decades, BLM burned two cities, killed three cops, and two reporters, and people in this thread are literally pretending "right wing terrorism" is a thing to be worried about.
Stop reading HuffPo.
>>68068000
>neo-nazi
Nazis were leftists. National SOCIALISM is a leftist ideology.
stop with the modernist attitude op they're as violent as they've ever been
>>68068176
Dylaan Roof, who you wrongly quoted as being liberal, was a neo-nazi and KKK member.... obviously far right.
The colorado abortion clinic bombing literally confessed he was motived by the fake video they played on fox news. Not to mention the dozens of other abortion clinic shootings and bombings committed in the US in the name of right-wing anti-abortion politics.
The person I mentioned in my first post in this thread, Timothy McVeigh was a known right-wing anti-government militia member.
You have people like Eric Rudolph and the Unabomber who literally wrote right-wing manifestos to justify their right-wing terrorism.
There are active terrorists groups in the US like the oathkeepers, sovereign citizens, and the brotherhood that have killed cops and invaded people's homes and killed them in the name of their ideologies.
>>68068335
>You can't prove he wasn't a liberal.
He had KKK and neo-nazi tattoos. On his body.
>>68068262
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_Underground
It's also cute how Soros, MoveOn, and Bernie Sanders supporters are now courting Bill Ayers, who is a literal terrorist.
But liberals sure have our best interests at heart :D:D:D:D;;d;dpDPDD
>>68068535
>neo-nazi
so he was a socialist?
Why are you even talking about those other people? I mentioned THESE THREE:
San Bernardino shooters
Dylann Roof
Eliot Rodger
I don't care about your other examples.
>>68067640
the gaping hole in these movements is pretty obvious. black lives matter has no clear intentions or ends. with millenials the enemy just shifts from patriarchy to racism back to patriarchy. generally i'd say the leaders of these movements have cynical underlying motives, but these kids just seem stupid and directionless.
useful idiots indeed
glad i got out of college 10 years ago before this horseshit
>>68068262
So, 50 years ago or more. Meanwhile right-wing terrorists attacks happen every year.
If liberals don't get their way, they will resort to terrorism.
>>68068477
GUD POST NICE 7S
>HuffPo
ITS FUN TO WATCH WHAT TRUMP DOES TO LIBKUCKS
HE'S GONNA CULL HALF OF THEM JUST FROM HYPERVENTILATION
>>68068535
>Oathkeepers
>Terrorists
LEL. Full libcuck detected.
>>68063355
They 100% think they are right and so in their mind they can rationalize its for the greater good and they're doing the right thing
>>68068746
San Bernadino shooters: muslims, not liberals
DyLann Roof: neo-nazi and KKK member, not liberal
Eliot Rodgers: I don't see any evidence that this was politically motivated or that he had any political affiliation. Looks like he was just mentally unstable and wanted to kill people because women were rejecting him.
>>68068953
They've killed people and cops, so yes they are terrorists.
>>68068758
>FARC
>50 years ago
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-33105398
Wow FARC alone has killed more people than "right wing terrorism" has in the history of Western Civilization. Neat.
>>68063355
Shut up, baby boomer.
>>68068758
Not sure if you have trouble reading, but plenty of more recent attacks have occurred outside of America.
>>68068755
I think they learned their lesson RE: goals a while ago. Fuck, I think we all did. We live in a world of war without end, because we are run, whether we like it or not, by military industrial complexes, by Halliburton, Blackwater and Private Military organizations. We don't have "war with the French" anymore. We have "war with terror", which will never end.
It makes sense that they think the idea of "resistance without end" is a viable response. They don't want "justice over segregation", which ends when segregation does. They want "justice over racism", justice over a concept, and not a law or action.
Even if racism is legitimately stamped out, by force and by blood, they'd still say that the lack of racism was "invisible racism", or "subconscious racism".
TL;DR: We're living in a non-fun warhammer 40k universe.
>>68069043
You're grasping at straws by using latin american politics and things that have nothing to do with the US.
Next you're going to tell me Stalin was a liberal terrorist.
Leftists have always been violent.
In fact they are the second most violent group. (The first most violent group is muslims.)
>>68069154
You said, and I quote:
>"Name a time a left-wing politically motivated terrorist attack killed anyone."
It turns out left-wing politically motivated terrorist attacks have killed several thousand last year alone.
Now you're shifting goalposts because you're trying to defend the indefensible :^)
>>68069029
[citation needed]
>>68069189
Where is this data from?
>>68063355
Yes they are
In class yesterday some leftists females white spic and nig said that a nigger from the 1900s was a hero because he shot and killed a bunch of white cops
>>68068983
>San Bernadino shooters: muslims, not liberals
Not mutually exclusive
>DyLann Roof: neo-nazi and KKK member, not liberal
Nazism is socialism. Socialism is a liberal ideal.
>Eliot Rodgers: I don't see any evidence that this was politically motivated or that he had any political affiliation. Looks like he was just mentally unstable and wanted to kill people because women were rejecting him.
He was a liberal fan of The Young Turks. Had a subscription, posted his leftist ideas.
>>68068983
http://www.examiner.com/article/arapahoe-high-school-shooter-identified-as-a-very-opinionated-socialist
Karl Pierson, anti-gun liberal Socialist Colorado school shooter, shot people, had no problem doing it because it would just illustrate why guns need to be banned.
Regressives/Liberal.
Liberal = do what the fuck you want if you don't cause physical harm or loss.
Regressives (femnazis+SJW's):
ends justify all of their means
believes in safe space bullshit
censors 'offensive speech'
>>68069189
>jews kill more than neo nazis
>>68069286
You're using foreign politics to try to confuse the argument.
You don't see a bunch of liberals in the US getting guns and shooting people in the name of their beliefs, or trying to fight the government like hose Bundy retards in Oregon.
Every year in the US, there is at least one far-right terrorist attack, either on an abortion clinic, and IRS building, or something anti-government person killing a cop, or some white supremacist shooting some minorities.
Liberals in the US aren't terrorists, the right wing in the US are.
>>68069513
I meant regressives =/= Liberal.
>>68063355
I hope so. Don't pretend you're not dying for an excuse.
Elliot Roger was liberal.
His entitled views on dating equality is liberal as fuck.
>I deserve to own a woman right now because I exist
>>68069578
America was founded on fighting the government. The founding fathers were British terrorists.
If you won't fight the overreaching government you're a terrorist to the American spirit.
>>68066760
#BLM
GIBSMEDAT (OR ELSE)
>>68069144
PMCs don't have as big of a reach as you'd think considering the numerous laws against using mercenaries and at most they're hired to train personnel or guard things. The bigger problem is how private interests lobby nations or nations themselves use their own militaries.
Blackwater and PMCs are an interesting modern anomaly but altogether they're not what you should be worrying about, especially in regards to first world nations with their own large militaries.
Colt just fills orders. Its up to the US Army to ultimately create the need for those orders.
>>68063355
Can my dick get violent with Madeline?
>>68069893
>CAR handguard
You don't see that too often.
>>68069496
This does appear to be a case of a liberal trying to kill people... unlike the other dumb arguments posted here. I can't find much detail it though.
>>68069980
as soon as im finished
>>68069980
She is a qt, even if she's retarded.
>>68067469
Read the link there, Libby
>>68067335
>Muslim caliphate where white Christian males are subjugated and forced to pay the jizya to the oppressed brown minority or be beheaded
>not a liberal ideal
And you wonder why people don't trust you, when you lie about your true intentions?
>>68069762
The difference is that Britain was actually a tyranny at the time, and US is now a peaceful and stable democracy. Right wing-terrorist are not interesting in stable peaceful democracy. They just want to kill people that disagree with them on politic issues like gay rights and racism.
They are getting worse. It is simply due to the fact that the media encourages their actions and justifies it.
I had two Confederate flags on my vehicle today and as I was driving, these teens drove up beside me and started cussing me out and flipping me off. I paid them no heed and went to eat. I come back out and both my flags were gone. They had broken them off. A piece of flag had offended them so much that they had to destroy it. They allow themselves to be goaded into action because they are so sensitive.
>>68063355
yes, the feel thewind has changed and they are losing their influence
>>68070293
> The difference is that Britain was actually a tyranny at the time, and US is now a peaceful and stable democracy.
That's just like your opinion, man, and a shitty one, too.
>>68070253
I'm sure everyone in the US, liberal and conservative, agrees that a lot middle eastern countries are medieval. Liberals have huge problems with how muslims treat women and homosexuals, and their stances on free speech. You're trying to make a retarded straw man.
>>68063455
fpbp
>>68063355
>>68063355
yes, but now they are funded by super rich fags like Soros.
Check out trump rallies, the "protesters" have thosands and thousands of dollars worth of gear. Those poor fucks cant even afford the gas to get there, nevermind the equipment they are buying
>>68069578
>You don't see a bunch of liberals in the US getting guns and shooting people in the name of their beliefs
http://www.tmz.com/2015/08/26/bryce-williams-vester-flanagan-shooter-manifesto-abc-news-charleston-church/
>or trying to fight the government
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-30190224
http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/27/us/baltimore-riots-timeline/
>or something anti-government person killing a cop
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/suspect-trooper-death-black-lives-matter-backer-article-1.2360320
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-30572042
>Liberals in the US aren't terrorists
Sure thing.
Wake me when Trump supporters start a riot at a Bernie or Hillary rally.
It's Trump's fault they're violent, not theirs
>>68069932
I'd hope that you were right, but American politics is a quagmire. These PMC outfits and weapons manufacturers are going to be at least part owned by those who have big pull in politics and are able to lobby for greater military budgets, and have people vote on every war to push their profits up.
Anyway, that's beside the point. I think that it's a good example for what's happening with these regressives. They want war without end, because they need something to fight, and something to fight about, without actually getting hurt.
One more for good measure
http://gotnews.com/breaking-blacklivesmatter-supporter-david-conley-iii-massacres-8-including-kids/
Wew. Bet you didn't know anything about this guy.
>>68065424
this
Killing your opposition is the most effective method of shutting them up.
>>68071088
>implying
If you kill your enemies they win
>>68069144
Been thinking about the war on terror analogy recently. Such a tactic is a smart move in the hands of the right people, but aside from modern feminism, which is on a winning streak, BLM is already eating its own tail. The violence, rudeness and incoherence of their actions is unappealing even to their own people.
>>68068115
You don't need large numbers when targeting individuals, congressmen for example.
The IRA were reasonably effective (for a short time) doing something similar.
If you could remove a total of 5 senators from government, it would significantly change the American government.
>>68070701
>Wake me when Trump supporters start a riot at a Bernie or Hillary rally.
>>68070525
Then why do you faggots always deflect to le evil white man when asked about crazy Muslims irl?
>>68071339
It might seem like a smart move, but it's never-ending. Eventually, the adherents of these philosophies will eat each other up. We've seen it on a global political scale. The US has installed leaders only to turn on them, and sold guns and weapons to insurgents only to have to fight them later on. Now, in this case it works. Because the war feeds into itself.
In SJW circles, it doesn't. It makes them look disorganised and idiotic. Feminism is waning because it's turning on people, turning on its own because all the battles are gone. Same with the BLM shit. When there's no immediate fight, they lose their identity. So they create them with whatever's to hand, and in an echo chamber, all that's to hand is other adherents of your faith.
>>68070664
any more proof that the guy who rushed trump was a plant? i'm generally interested in that idea, and i think we should find more specific instances like this and ID people if possible.
>>68071777
Nailed it desu. Really interesting analogy when you break it down that way.
>>68072370
Thanks. It's been nice chatting with you.
>>68071716
carl, will donald really be the next president?
>>68063355
THIS IS ONLY THE BEGINNING
>>68067335
This. Since when is a religious ideology that oppresses women and kills gay people liberal? Kek.
>>68074062
Nobody actually thinks they are liberal. What pisses me off is when you use fantastical Muslims as lackeys and tacitly approve their agitation of the straight cisco male western patriarchy
>>68066728
I get the feeling you're a female
Of course
Those weak little fucks want to feel strong eh?
I'll put em in the ground.
>>68063355
YOU'RE
FUCKING
A
WHITE
MALE
Anyone have some good San Bernardino crime scene pics?
>>68064284
R u saying teddy k was a lib?
They keep being proven wrong and that causes their undyig faith in their cause to explode and they act irrationally because they are unable to look at situatuons from another perspective
>>68071373
> FBI: The Post
nice try FBI, not gonna condone any such action here on this board. We're reasonable, level headed, calm and collected.
THIS IS A MOVEMENT! WE WILL NEVER SURRENDER TO THE VIOLENCE AND THREATS FROM THE FASCIST LEFT. THE WORLD NEEDS D TRUMP, RIGHT NOW! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=a3n45oqSwOI
>>68068758
Every public shooter in the past decade has been politically liberal
>>68068758
can you name a few? or are you just talking out your ass?
> inb4 ARE YOU SERIOUS?
>>68075946
Dylan roof?
>>68063455
no its from families not remaining whole anymore
when every other kid is raised by a single parent, there is a fundamental problem with society
>>68063557
>Or Rosie O'Donnell.
>>68074062
YOU'RE BARLEY A WHITE MALE
>>68075816
He was an anarcho-primitivist, so he has to be bundled with them although he despises the libs
>>68063355
in the sense that my goldfish gets more 'violent when I forget to feed it for a day, yeah.
>>68063557
>Pol Pot
>liberal
Do you know the fucking dictionary definition of liberal?
>>68064866
This applies to many, many people other than liberals.
>>68067576
>liberalism is communism
>>68067469
KKK are and always have been liberal
>>68063355
Is it just me, or is that AIDS Skrillex playing on guitar:
https://www.facebook / stlouisundergroundgallerypage/?fref=nf
>>68063355
>betas
>getting violent
That can only end well anon
>>68068477
truth
>>68069043
Right wing terrorism against workers and labor unions has killed at least a few hundred people in the U.S. over a bit more than a century.
Right wing terrorism in Latin America has by far eclipsed its left wing counterpart in bloodshed. The mainstream media just doesn't mention this because they're too busy convincing people here that any leftist rebels in Latin America are automatically KGB agents trying to take over the world.
>>68069475
>Nazism is liberal
nice meme
>>68069701
Not a liberal idea.
>>68071588
They don't. Generally.
>>68065202
Liberals with guns. I have really heard it all now.
>>68077889
Liberal in this context means leftist which we equate to statist. Context clues and reading comprehension are important.
>>68070738
YOU'RE A WHITE MALE
>>68069475
You're right that Muslim and liberal are not mutually exclusive but just because liberals support Muslims doesn't mean all Muslims are liberals. There is no reason to believe the San Bernardino shooters had motivations besides Jihad which is Islamist and explicitly anti liberal.
>>68069475
You're right that Muslim and liberal are not mutually exclusive but just because liberals support Muslims doesn't mean all Muslims are liberals. There is no reason to believe the San Bernardino shooters had motivations besides Jihad which is Islamist and explicitly anti liberal.
>>68077322
>Hey, I have a great idea. Let's all dress as Klansmen, brandish Confederate flags, and spout racist bigotry at a Trump rally. We would be doing it ironically, we would be making fun of those that actually do these things.
>That's a great idea, lets do it.
>Wait, why are we dressing as the KKK? Is that necessary, and what about the shit about being racist, this makes me uncomfortable?
>You are looking too far into this, it will all be done ironically, so it really doesn't mean anything. Think of it as a satire of actual Trump supporters, we would be doing a good thing by calling black Trump supporters niggers. We would be pointing out and bringing attention to all those people that actually are racist.
Fast Forward a Week
>Hey, I have yet another great idea, let's ironically lynch a nigger. I know it's sounds drastic, but I think it's really the best option we have. When we went to that Trump rally and were viciously attacked by that animal, it opened my eyes as to just how racist those Trump supporters really are and how important it is that we stop him. Any questions?
>Wait, did you just say we are going to hang someone? And I believe you may have used the n-word?
>Don't worry about it, it's ironic so it's ok. You are yet again looking way to far into this. Don't think, just do. This is the best way to end racism in America, don't you want to do that? Those racist Trump supporters do things like this all the time, all we would be doing is shining a light on the situation by doing it ourselves.
>Yeah, but this seems a little drastic, plus if this were happening like we have been told, wouldn't there be more people protesting Trump and his supporters? Maybe he isn't that bad? We seem to be the only ones doing racist stuff...
>Are you kidding me? Trump is literally Hitler and you keep asking questions that everyone here knows the answer too already. You do want to be on the right side of history don't you?
>Liberal in this context means leftist which we equate to statist. Context clues and reading comprehension are important.
Durr
>>68069408
Complete pic
>>68063355
Yes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jDvWtnA8IY
>>68079816
>>68063355
Juat ask this guy
>>68080235
RIP bald martyr of kebab removal
>>68080736
It is supposed to be progressive to have a gay prime minister right?? But no the left killed him because he doesn't align with their views.
>>68063355
can someone explain this to me, link?
I can't wait until one attacks me.
I have years of weightlifting and martial arts under my belt and years of suppressed rage.
>>68070399
Buy another pair of flags and stash a hidden camera next time. press charges against the little cucks.
>>68078497
Check out the environmental terrorists.. 12 attacks with 4 wounded. 0 dead.
I figured I'd be better off coming here.
Who is this dickface? I already know about AIDS Skrillex and I want to see if this dude is even more punchable.
>>68078971
You're right, it's a male feminist / white knight idea.
>>68076777
holy triples confirm, as do mine tbqh famalam
>>68071777
>We've seen it on a global political scale. The US has installed leaders only to turn on them, and sold guns and weapons to insurgents only to have to fight them later on. Now, in this case it works. Because the war feeds into itself.
Those wars are the reason why the rapefugees exist in the first place. I'm pretty sure most people would be OK if muslisms rape and mutilate women on their own nations rather than creating caliphates on Europe
>>68082612
its from the same vid as aids skrillex.
His appearance is brief but memorable.
>>68085339
Yeah I only just realized it. AIDS Skrillex completely stole his thunder.
>>68085339
In my opinion, they both have a place in the great book of /pol/.
>AIDS Skrillex is lower middle class white trash at best. His childhood dream of becoming a rockstar has been crushed. He has no education to fall back on and lives with his mother. Reality is starting to set in, and he has turned to Tumblr-tier politics as his last resort.
>Meanwhile, Carl thinks that he is going places. If he didn't come from money, then he took out a student loan and is currently attending university. A beta nu male through-and-through, he's the sort that jumped on the Obama boat, and, while perhaps not exactly stupid, mindlessly believes whatever he hears from the liberal media without question.
Both are the enemy.
>>68078872
>National Socialism
>Not liberal
Nice history book
>>68063355
yeah. it's like dealing with a retarded child throwing tantrums.
>>68063355
They hate us cause they ain't us.
>>68071716
I'm keedeeng you yes?
>>68068928
such awful typography
>>68063355
ARE
>>68063355
LIBERALS ARE THE NEW NAZIs
THEY ARE FILLED WITH HATE
THEY WILL USE VIOLENT MEANS TO STOP ANY WHO DARE OPPOSE THEIR VIEWS
THEY WANT TO SILENCE AND SUPPRESS ALL POLITICAL OPPOSITION
THEY SUBVERT THE TRUTH AND BRAND THEIR ENEMIES AS "EVIL" JUST EXACTLY LIKE THE NAZIS DID TO THE JEWS
LIBERALS ARE BY FAR THE MOST VIOLENT, HATEFUL, NARCISSISTIC AND CRUEL POLITICAL ELEMENT IN AMERICA
THEY WILL STOP AT NOTHING TO DESTROY TRUMP AND HIS SUPPORTERS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMSKx78nZyc
>which one of you did it!
>>68063355
I would argue this is their natural inclination. Now though, they feel like they have the numbers. They don't.
>>68063355
It's like history is repeating itself. Look how crazy the commies were about one hundred years ago. Red Terror soon, comrade.
