It's not how we're used to him sounding.
https://youtu.be/Rksd80-FCAw
>>68059736
2:39 "You create JERRRBS"
lol thanks for sharing this. This show much more of the real Donald behind his current presentation persona.
>>68059736
BAWMP
psy-op
>>68059736
BASED Trump
>>68059736
Fuck, he could be getting insane poll numbers right now if he didn't talk like a fucking autist.
Why doesn't he talk like he does in the video?
>>68062596
He knows what he's doing. He's just dumbing it down for the general public right now.
>>68059736
He is waiting patiently to reveal his true power level when he has the chance to tear Shillary a new cunt hole in the presidential debates after he wins the nomination.
>>68062596
the american population is fucking dumb.
what hes doing is pandering to the disillusioned americans who hate liberals. once hes in a one on one with hillary he'll go full businessman/moderate and itll steal a shit ton of votes from her. hes one of the most well spoken guys ive seen in business and he'll use that when he feels its appropriate
>>68062596
>he could be getting insane poll numbers right now if he didn't talk like a fucking autist.
No, he would be looked over.
He's succeeding because he relates to the average joe.
Doing this smart talk is just going to alienate most people, like Ron Paul did.
>>68062596
No. If he spoke intelligently like Ron Paul, he'd be overshadowed.
>>68064133
This and also because making inflammatory statements and having simple policy soundbites are easiest to generate free media attention for you to captivate your average American idiot.
>>68062596
It's mind-numbingly boring and the flaw of democracy is that it must pander to the lowest common denominator - the common person, of common intelligence and perception.
And talking factually as he does here could never inspire the ardent admiration, enthusiasm, joy and ASMR's that you or I share for hearing him speak.
>>68063790
Even the Bernie folks are starting to feel the Trump so he will most likely crush Hitlery Cunton in the election:
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/18/bernie-sanders-supporters-could-vote-for-donald-trump-expert.html
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/13/bernie-sanders-supporters-consider-donald-trump-no-hillary-clinton
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/33-percent-of-bernie-sanders-not-vote-hillary_b_9475626.html
http://www.salon.com/2016/03/16/america_is_mad_as_hell_if_sanders_voters_switch_to_trump_anger_is_what_the_country_has_in_common_now/
https://www.rawstory.com/2016/03/feeling-the-bern-for-trump-sanders-voters-may-turn-their-backs-on-hillary/
>>68062596
>doubting don's campaign strategy
will you ever learn
Trumps campaign is an act
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvVfj0ov8k8
He knows what he is doing
>>68062596
yea ask rand paul about all that
>>68065627
It's not "covert powers of persuasion", it's Rhetoric - "How To It Right."
It's no more manipulation than etiquette.
Did Hitler just want to control people? Is the Pope actually a Christian?
This is why Trump is going to win in a landslide.
The entire left doesn't even know he is pretending to be a simpleton when he is secretly a genius.
Some random idiot doesnt just become a billionaire and start crushing a completely rigged election system out of the blue
>>68062596
the entire reason he's popular right now is because he's dumbing it down for white working class joe bigsby
>>68065726
This.
The majority of the country is retarded. If you speak intelligently, retards take offense.
>>68064378
I think he is doing it on purpose. Gain the majority, and then when he goes against Hillary, then he turns on his more intelligent character. A man as competent as Trump as planned his all out, i have no doubt.
>>68066420
Will he actually win? I want to bet - sorry- invest money on Trump's success but he seems to be the (as always) sensible but unpopular option.
>>68062596
There are people who understand his capability and positions, and those swayed by emotion who need rallies and coddling.
was as interesting watch, ty
>>68062596
It's called appealing to the lowest common denominator.
>>68062596
Notice how few people -- even on this board of people riding his cock -- bothered to sit through the video, even long enough to post an opinion. He knows what he's doing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEPs17_AkTI
>>68059736
>tfw listening for 30 minutes already
His voice is so soothing
>>68059736
A video of him exploiting a very minor recession caused by the business cycle to ask for favorable tax treatment for his industry over other industries? I'm shocked.
For those not familiar the Tax Reform Act of 1986, it lowered tax rates in a revenue raising way by removing nearly all special treatment. 15% was 15% for everyone making that amount of income. 28% was 28% for everyone making that amount of income (plus a bubble rate). Passive income sources, especially real estate, became less appealing without special treatment.
I don't recall if the favorable treatment for real estate investment was inserted back into the tax code in 1993 or 2001, but even 1993 was already after recovery was underway. Trump just wanted special treatment, but special treatment wasn't necessary for recovery.
THIS IS A MOVEMENT! WE WILL NEVER SURRENDER TO THE VIOLENCE AND THREATS FROM THE FASCIST LEFT. THE WORLD NEEDS TRUMP, RIGHT NOW! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=a3n45oqSwOI
>>68070748
IVANKA GOD I WANT HER SO BAD SHE IS SOOO CUTE!
>>68069521
>a very minor recession
that's rich. progressive listen-and-believe grad student detected. Picture related is BLS real unemployment for 1991. Lightest areas are 9%, darkest areas are 20+%
You should be smart enough to notice when you're engaged in motivated reasoning to butres your political bias.
>>68069521
For contrast, here's a heatmap of 2009
>>68061165
>2:39 "You create JERRRBS"
And your contention is that only the government creates jobs, mohhamhead? You're such a smart, smart guy.
>>68062596
Because he panders to retards aka "his voters".
The Trump persona is literally crafter for idiots who believe shit like "WALL" etc.
Hes a genius.
And here's 1999, a few years before the tech bubble burst.
>>68062596
>Fuck, he could be getting insane poll numbers right now if he didn't talk like a fucking autist.
>Why doesn't he talk like he does in the video?
You're looking at future trump. General election trump.
Anyone actually listening to what he's saying? Trump is hardly a conservative with his mentality to regulation.
>>68059736
I'll follow every kill order he issues
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Geu0R4xGAi4
>>68071276
>Trump is hardly a conservative with his mentality to regulation.
Increasing incentives for investment is hardly liberal. He's a moderate conservative, not "hardly". A conservative from a long, long time ago.
>>68071085
What? No, I was just having a giggle at his Boston accept that he must have worked so hard on to drop in recent times.
I see the sense in everything he's talking about, even when it goes far beyond my paltry understanding of economic theory, Jamal Welfarenandez
We're going to have to invent new words. Liberal and conservative have become too contradictory at this point in history. The snake is eating its own tail in terms of the definitions conflicting with the reality.
>>68071456
What he's suggesting doesn't create incentives, but rather creates a deterrent (that is - one for sitting on liquidity).
>>68071648
OK, and what do you do when you don't want to sit on your liquid assets, hmm?
are you just trying to be retarded because of your flag?
>>68071648
>creates deterrents
well, an incentive for going outside is a deterrent for staying indoors. the glass is half empty if you're a pessimist, half full if you're not.
>>68062596
It's an incredibly dumb idea. Most American voters cannot understand Washington's farewell speech. When you can make the most complex ideas sound simplistic you understand.
>>68071761
You act like creating market-agnostic deterrents via the state is a good thing. You're effectively a moron or a Keynesian (is there even a difference).
>>68059736
Trump speaks so his audience understands. Its a principle of effective communication.
>>68072045
and you are from reddit
>>68072045
>You're effectively a moron
ad homs on /pol/ = opinion discarded
here's the tl;dr you were looing for
>>>/reddit/
>>68067289
99% chance of winning. Hilary would have to rig the system. Even if the GOP forces him to run independent he has a a 65% chance of winning.
>>68071087
Meanwhile your country is a heartbeat away from muslim catastrophe. Such brilliant voters in that part of the world.
ficki, ficki
>>68071276
In truth he's much closer to being a moderate than conservative or liberal.
His biggest political point of difference though is that he is a nationalist instead of a globalist.
>>68072204
>>68072282
>>68072464
>Australia
>producing the only response that is coherent
You're absolutely right, too.
Of course Trump is smart, he's just hiding his power level.
People really don't want a smarter leader but someone who they can level with. He's playing the "Hey, I want to have a beer with that guy." card.
Also, Carson wouldn't blindly endorse Trump. I imagine they had this off the records conversation Trump showing his real side.
>>68072329
At the moment, Donald has odds of 5/2, Hillary is running at 4/9. These seem like very even odds.
Hillary's delegates are in the thousands, The Don's are in the hundreds. I can't find numbers on regional voters. What does this mean, briefly? and please could you enlightnen me on the figures for national support?
Ok so what is Trump? Centrist?
>>68071549
Now you're sounding like the Nigel Bunsby Murdstone Chuzzlewit Grimwig Magwitch Traddles we all know and love.
>>68073020
She has thousands because there are only 2 people running on the democrat side.
>>68072464
When I went to school it was still okay to be a nationalist. In fact, it was expected. We all stood up and pledged allegiance to our country monday the friday and went to church on sunday (kicking and screaming).
>>68073088
A patriot
>>68073020
There are way more delegates to be won on the D side. They use different systems.
>>68070879
>>68071034
>>68071165
thanks for your informative posts.
>>68062596
It's intentional. He's not going to load up his speeches with political and legal jargon because more people aren't going to understand what it really means. And when people hear someone speak in terms they can understand, they tend to gravitate to that person. You see the polls; he's doing great with lowly educated voters, and that's the one of the largest voting blocs. It's the sign of a great communicator really, being able to dumb things down for others to understand.
Now, I do agree he should, at least in some interviews, speak like he does in the video. It'd help him appeal to the more educated voting blocs. He needs to mix it up a bit, especially when we get to the general election.
>>68073020
Ignore the delegates counts. Each party runs a different system, the raw numbers are incomparable.
National statistics for support are incredibly unreliable right now, and will be for some time.
The figures you get now are based on the current landscape:
The democrats and GOP are both against Trump.
All avenues of the media are against Trump.
Trump is running on an angry, oversimplified, platform based on (mostly) conservative issues and a cult of personality.
If Trump gets the nomination (brokered convention or through getting the magic number) then the GOP falls in line. If they don't then I can't tell you what happens. Every bet is off. Anyway, assuming Trump gets the nod and the GOP falls in line, then accordingly the majority of the conservative media will fall in line as well. Suddenly having speaking head DEFENDING Trump will change his favourability ratings instantly. The conservative media will then also start concerning itself with Hilalry, instead of putting 80% of it's negative powers into Trump. Again, this will cause an instant change in Hillary's favourability will fall (not by much because of WHO is talking, but there will be some drop).
If the hunch around these parts is right, then once it's a 1 on 1 race Trump's entire demeanour and platform will change (though he will still have an angry edge at time, especially when attacking Hillary's character in the way that only he can). He DOES have some liberal and liberal leaning opinions, he just barely talks about it and everyone is attacking him on his character instead of policies right now (and the few times they do attack on policies it's on the 'conservative' talking points). His favourability with liberals and more importantly independents will rise.
In all honesty, as long as the GOP really does embrace him when the time comes, and there are no fuckhuge scandals (doubtful there will be any), then this election *could* be a landslide for Trump.
>>68059736
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohmajJTcpNk
>>68062596
We're going to see a lot more of this Trump when the general election debates with Hillary roll around
>>68063494
That pic is great...
@ 20:45 "We can spur the economy through taxes....
can someone explain this. Sounds unlike his current rhetoric.
>>68073258
>>68073622
>>68074127
Look, is that a 'Yes, do it' and are you going to do the financially sound thing and do the same? I could kick myself for not voting on the UK Conservative party to win last time or Mayweather to win on points against based Pacquiao. I could have so much free money.
>>68059736
"You have a city Boston, you have other cities, and so many other cities"
"The retailing business. The retailing business.."
>retail
>genius
Shilling like always. You un-ironic Trumplets are scary stupid if you think this man has had an eloquent and intelligent day in his life.
>>68073020
You can't compare delegate between the two parties; they use different systems.
There are a total of 4763 delegates in the democratic primaries. 712 of these delegates are superdelegates, which get to pick whoever they want for the nomination. To win the democratic nomination, you need 2382 delegates.
In the republican primaries there are 2472 delegates, with no superdelegates. You need 1237 to win the republican nomination.
As far as national support goes, it's hard to say until we get into the general election, and the candidates being to take shots at each other. The polls that have hypothetical match-ups against potential nominees this early are bogus; they have been bogus in nearly every election cycle thus far.
The best we can go off of, in terms of national support, is to look at how many people are voting in the primaries, and overwhelmingly thus far, there has been a staggeringly high turnout in the republican primaries and very low turnout in democratic primaries, even in the states that traditionally vote democrat. It's basically a reverse of the 2008 election, when the democrats has massive turnouts, and the republicans had low turnouts.
>>68068488
if they had, they'd realize that djTrump was advocating for more taxes to "spur the economy" and for a bigger government taking a more active role in the market
>>68073088
A nationalist protectionist.
>>68074881
There are a lot of variables at play.
There IS a very easy to see pathway for him becoming president.
Personally I wouldn't be placing any bets right now.
The biggest obstacle is the GOP removing the stick from their arse, and getting the media they control/influence to start shilling FOR Trump.
The second I see a few specific establishment mooks change their tune, and see a few positive pieces across several different conservative outlets is the second I place money on him. I thought the last debate might have been the time, the way Kasich was refusing to attack him at all even when the moderators kept giving him great opportunities, but I was wrong.
>>68075170
fuck youre right trump is actually gay
who do we support instead
>>68074170
Holy mother fucking shit.
Give it a brew of ten years and i for one welcome our AI overloads.
>>68072179
>Utter not base and frivilous things amongst grave and Learn'd Men nor very Difficult Questians or Subjects, among the Ignorant or things hard to be believed, Stuff not your Discourse with Sentences amongst your Betters nor Equals.
George Washington said that. I guess you could argue that Trump has violated the "hard to be believed" bit, but that's politics baby.
>>68075170
>You un-ironic Trumplets
You unironic Cruzlets, Randlets, Bernlets, and Shillfags can't argue. Ad homs = not an argument.
Your perpetual salt is always easily discarded, how can you even compete?
