http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/19/us/neanderthal-human-interbred-irpt/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/19/us/neanderthal-human-interbred-irpt/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/19/us/neanderthal-human-interbred-irpt/index.html
Clinton New Network delivers what all niggers have been waiting for. What the fuck, /pol/?
>Scientists have discovered that Homo sapiens -- that's us -- made more babies with archaic humanlike species than initially thought.
>They learned that some Asians, Europeans and even the Melanesians of Papua New Guinea had Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry.
>The research discovered that all non-Africans who were analyzed in the study had traces of Neanderthal, and different groups from Europe, Asia and Melanesia had distinctive blends of Neanderthal genes, which likely means humans repeatedly ran into these hominins, according to Benjamin Vernot, a postdoctoral student in genomic sciences at the University of Washington, who led the project.
So /pol/, are whites and asians just subhuman hybrids, and blacks the true, pure humans?
>>68036522
They aren't pure, I forgot the name but they mixed with a humanoid that was common in Africa.
Whites/Asian/neanderthal mix is the most superior
look like dwarves from the hobbit
Maybe this is why whites and asians are so smart and successful
>>68036522
But Neanderthals were objectively superior, first of all they had bigger brains.
>>68037185
This OP they had proportionately bigger brains and better vision that Homo Sapiens. You fucking loser god dammit
>>68037293
>>68037185
>bigger brains
>better vision
conceded
>objectively superior
So, where are they?
>>68037185
>>68037293
They also had superior tools at the time, it's a shame they aren't around anymore. Hopefully in the future we can create a designer baby that's as close as possible to one and see how it fares
>>68036522
Does not matter. Our genes speak for themselves.
>>68037445
absorbed into the much large populations of homo sapiens.
>>68037445
They had lower fertility rates, much like the whites of today
>3016
>if whites are so much better where are they?
>>68036522
Then why are blacks malnutritioned? Oh wait it's because their bodies and brains are inferior.
Am I the rightful king of whites and Asians?
>>68036522
>>Scientists have discovered that Homo sapiens -- that's us -- made more babies with archaic humanlike species than initially thought.
So coalburning has been going on for millenia?
>>68037445
>>68037664
Funny thing how that is happening right now again.
>>68037035
Yeah, it's self-evident that blacks would have benefited from some Neanderthal DNA.
>>68036522
So despite being muh pure homos, blacks generally produced less cultural and scientific contributions to human society than the "subhuman" whites and asians? Niggers really are pathetic.
>>68037445
in asians and white people, evidently
did you even read your own post?
>pre-human group mixed other pre-human groups
Alright.
>>68038084
same exact thing I thought
I'm sure some tenured professor can't say it though
>>68036522
No it shows Africans are a prototype tier.
Reminder that Neanderthals are the original White People, and their race-mixing set us back thousands and thousands of years.
We wud be space kangs.
Can someone tell me why this whole story is wrapped in a "das rite" feel to the whole thing?
If anything it only further confirms white superiority
>>68036522
>scientists prove whitey has been right all along and races really do exist
AHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
>>68036522
Neanderthals were essentially a more intelligent version of homo-sapiens who lived in smaller social communities. There is evidence of them using complex tools and sailing the Mediterranean as far back as 110,000 years ago. They had larger cranial capacity then than modern humans do TODAY. If you're caucasian/asian congratulations, you've got about 4% Neanderthal DNA, and its likely the biggest reason we have larger average cranial capacity than the pure-sapiens Sub-Sahran Africans.
>>68037992
>bigger brain
>physically stronger
literally superior
just imagine how the world would look if neanderthals weren't outbred by homo sapiens
>>68037445
>So, where are they?
They were outnumbered 9 to 1 by the homo-sapiens, who live sin much larger groups.
When sapiens men fucked Neanderthal women, the children were generally infertile.
But when Neanderthal men fucked sapiens women, they created us. Hi!
>>68036522
I remember the meme that Aborigines were Denisovans. I wonder if that's still going to be parroted.
The real truth is pretty much any given stone age hominoid race was pretty much a barbaric dumbshit by modern standards. The problem with non-whites is not directly their genes, but rather their native culture and the Marxists teaching them to blame others for their own flaws.
Look at the Japanese. Are they superior because of their genes, which are mostly a mix of regular old Asian genes and the native Ainu inhabitants of Japan, or are they superior because they took one look at Europeans and said to themselves "I want to be just like them."
Now look at the Chinese. For most of the past 200 years, they've been bumfucked by Europeans. Why is that? Is it because of their genes or because their culture is utterly backwards and focused on muh tradition and muh superstition? And when they became successful, why was that? Was it because they got new genes or because they learned Western Stalinist tactics to control their populace and Western capitalism to improve their industries?
For all we joke about We Wuz Kingz, Africa used to have great Empires like Mali. Ever heard of Timbuktu? That's the ancient capital of a proud African empire. Why was it successful? It adopted Muslim culture and traded with Europeans. Why did it fall? Because it got into African tribalism again.
So the truth is every race, white or black, is one step away from being stupid barbarians and at the same time one step away from being a human worth admiring. The difference between the two is cultural upbringing, individual will, a little bit of luck, and in a small way good genetics. But genetics are not the end all be all.
tl;dr - stop pretending you have magic stone age genes, because if neanderthals were alive today you'd probably consider them to be as bad as niggers.
>>68036522
And this is why Africans are inferior.
Bad genes.
>>68037992
Whats this from?
>>68037992
Dayum nice, mine is only 2.9%
>>68036522
>2016
>Believing in the evolving Jew
>>68039015
>I remember the meme that Aborigines were Denisovans. I wonder if that's still going to be parroted.
Do you mean mixed with Denisovans? That's a long-proven fact.
>tl;dr - stop pretending you have magic stone age genes,
Your post makes so little sense. The biggest intermixing between Neanderthals and Sapiens happened tens of thousands of years before the stone age. There's nothing theoretical about genetic material.
>>68037445
>So, where are they?
Eurasia and America, mostly.
>>68036522
> The research discovered that all non-Africans who were analyzed in the study had traces of Neanderthal, and different groups from Europe, Asia and Melanesia had distinctive blends of Neanderthal genes, which likely means humans repeatedly ran into these hominins, according to Benjamin Vernot, a postdoctoral student in genomic sciences at the University of Washington, who led the project.
This also includes NORTH AFRICANS which are within the Eurasian sphere of influence.
Scandinavians have the biggest brains, its from the colder climates.
>>68037828
>lower fertility rates,
when will this meme die.
>>68039015
>it has nothing to do with genes
>everyone who became advanced just happened to adopt the culture of the group of people with a certain culture
>the group of people with a certain culture are the only type of people to independently develop this culture
>they have unique genes
>it totally has nothing to do with the genes guys
>>68040082
>higher fertility rates and lower infant mortality gave modern humans an advantage over the Neanderthals, who died off about 30,000 years ago, said the study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
>>68039015
Tldr this post is retarded, don't waste your time
>>68040082
The same day stupidity dies because it is that hard to look back to their grandparents and see how large their families were.
>>68040005
Japs have bigger heads than Sven and his wife's son
>>68036522
>So /pol/, are whites and asians just subhuman hybrids, and blacks the true, pure humans?
No, thats niggers.
Leave it to a nigger to take scientific data showing that all humans have neanderthal DNA but them, to mean they are the only humans.
>>68039015
>ok one look at Europeans and said to themselves "I want to be just like them."
The Japanese were literally forced to integrate or get destroyed,.
The Japanese were justified in WWII. The Japs are the real ISOLATIONISTS, the Americans are the real WHORE
>>68036522
>>68040471
Also, "sub-human" implies below human. If niggers are the only humans, they are sub-something else. Whites and Asians have the brain weight, not niggers and abbos.
>>68036522
rather be a neanderthal than a monkey, you fucking chimpanzee
>>68040326
I was referring to what this anon replied to
>>68040431
>>68039015
It's not like Neanderthals today would be the same as 100.000 years ago.
They would have undergone the same evolutionary process as homo sapiens and would probably be superior, simply because they were superior back then.
Sure, that's just speculation, the advantages could very well have disappeared over time, but it's not that far off to think a neanderthal in 2016 would be superior.
And blacks could evolve to be on the same level as whites and asians, but it would take hundreds if not thousands of years and would require that a majority of blacks would live in ideal conditions.
If they had access to good nutrition and education, and were subject to eugenics, they would as a group gain a few IQ points every generation.
Just look at american black vs. africans. 85 vs. 70 IQ. It's partly because of white admixture, but it's also thanks to much better nutrition and education compared to african nations.
>>68040431
>>68040719
>Scientist Erik Trinkaus of Washington University studied fossil records to get an idea of the life span of Neanderthals and early modern humans, who co-existed in different parts of the world for about 150,000 years.
>He found about the same number of 20-40 year old adults in both populations, an indication that would reflect "similar patterns of adult mortality," said the study.
The fertility rate was roughly the same, humans had a slight advantage while also having a larger population.
Slight higher fertility rate + larger population = win
They were killed off by the incredibly violent and rapidly inbreeding population of Homo Erectus. It's predicted that the cross breeding of Neanderthals and Homo Erectus created a smarter breed of HE that was more prone to violence than the Neanderthals, making them more likely to succeed against the vastly inferior HE, which was only a step up from being a ape themselves.
>>68036522
Then why do blacks need lower standards to get into college?
>>68041033
poor people breed more because they can't do anything else.
When a human cannot grow Vertically, they grow Horizontally.
Vertical growth = less children
Horizontal growth = more children
So Europeans and Japs have have lower fertility now as they grow Vertically more than they did 100 years ago.
>>68041033
A rather simplistic way look at things considering ample evidence to the contrary.
>>68040782
>t's not like Neanderthals today would be the same as 100.000 years ago.
>They would have undergone the same evolutionary process as homo sapiens and would probably be superior, simply because they were superior back then.
Its incredible to think about. They had larger cranial capacity (1600 cm3) 100,000 years ago than modern humans do today (1400 cm3). Just imagine if they had access to the same kind of nutrition people in developed countries do now.
>>68037445
We fucked them to death, and we'll do it again too.
>>68039159
My 23andme results.
>>68036522
Neanderthals had larger brains and craniums. That explains the IQ differences. Plus, with the cold winters they had to plan ahead and save things, so they adapted more to save and plan ahead..unlike those (Africans) who lack the Neanderthal genome.
>>68038100
So...race mixing made us better?
>>68041701
Basically yes.
When whites fuck your women their offspring end up smarter.
I thought everyone on /pol/ already knew this considering it's old as fuck information.
>>68041701
from the homo sapiens persepective, yes.
from the neanderthal perspective, no.
Just like today.
For a white person, mixing with a black person is a step down. (on average, there are exceptions of course)
But for the black person, it would be a step up.
>>68041601
North Africans had native Neanderthal populations, most North Africans today have Neanderthal DNA.
>>68036522
>mixing is good
>Asians and Whites mixed with Neanderthals
>now the two most successful races
Liberals were right, blacks are inferior because no Neanderthal DNA
>>68040501
Such ignorance.
The Japanese empire entered the global stage when they stomped Russia in The Battle of Tsushima in 1905.
They adopted Western naval tactics and technology to accomplish this feat, wiping out the majority of the Russian navy at the time.
They also adopted Western technologies and cultural practices prior to this in the 1800s. They were curious and admiring of Western culture (while still proud of their own).
> The battle effectively ended the Russo-Japanese War in Japan's favour. The Russians lost 4,380 killed and 5,917 captured, including two admirals, with a further 1,862 interned.
China and Korea didn't accomplish anything remotely close to this, in industry, culture, or war, until after WWII.
Japan was definitely the first among the asian nations to enter the playing field with the big boys. They did this by adopting cultural and technological innovations from the West.
>>68042118
>The Japanese empire entered the global stage when they stomped Russia in The Battle of Tsushima in 1905.
You really need to be beaten to death on this.
>yfw this doesn't actually mean that whites/asians are descendants of "neanderthals"; it means that they are the descendants of the original humans before the symbolic Fall of Adam and Eve
>They'll try to paint us as "lesser humans" when we are actually just less-removed from how God actually wanted us to be
>>68036522
>>68036522
neanderthals confirmed for master race
>>68042426
Islam reduces the IQ.
>>68037992
they probably fucked homo sapiens bitches into their own extinction. This is why you should not race-mix.
>>68042184
>The Japanese were literally forced to integrate or get destroyed,
There's a wealth of information that directly contradicts your implication that Japanese culture did not adopt Western practices until they were forced to.
In fact, they were the first among asian countries to do precisely that, and thereby thrive, from the influence of the West.
mfw I realized that the fights today between races are just a continuation of the old war between neanderthals and sapienses. Neanderthals - us whites - are more intelligent but pussier than blacks who are dumber and more aggressive.
It's funny, even if you find that White and Black individuals have the same IQ distribution, White people are still superior because of the way they metabolize vitamin D.
White people require 1/4th the amount of sun that Black people require for daily vitamin D intake.
Low vitamin D intake is associated with tiredness, fatigue, and ill health.
if you take two individuals who wish to study all day, the White person only needs to be outside in the sun for 10 minutes -- 1/4th the amount of time necessary for Black individuals.
>>68042558
Maybe.
Islamic relations between sexes encourages inbreeding which results in lower iq offspring.
>>68042426
>hurr durr Lynn's research is credible
>no guys i swear a society could survive with an average IQ of 56
Fucking idiot.
>>68036522
so this proves that race is not a social construct?
>>68042636
The Japanese at one point built a wall on their coastline to keep foreigners out.
>>68042656
go back two or three generations and tell me how whites are pussies. Shit look at Iraq American rednecks trashed that entire country.
>>68036768
Chinese Red Deer peoples.
>>68042770
>inbreeding which results in lower iq offspring.
No.
>>68042770
>inbreeding causes lower IQ
Source? Pretty sure all inbreeding does is bring out recessive genes. If those recessive genes are better than IQ will go up.
>>68036522
>and blacks the true, pure humans?
Blacks are homo erectus, which are barely part of the homo genus
So this confirms that niggers are NOT the same race as europeans and asians?
>>68042778
>bushmen society
topkek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKA9_FlsZqE
The research isn't by Lynn himself.
>>68042656
>>68042890
>>68036522
this is old news bub, we already knew the superior races were hybrids
>>68042656
Dude just stop.
Neanderthal were much stronger and had larger cranial capacity. You don't survive in the frigid north being a pussy. whites and east asians have up to 3- 4% neanderthal dna while most blacks have none with some retaining ~1%
>Homosaps
>Neanders
>Davidsons
>Hobbits
Where were you when Tolkien knew more than he ever let on?
>>68042921
>>68042975
Mudslimes marry their first cousins. They have higher rates of retardation. In modern society, it's more likely defects survive.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1392217/Muslim-outrage-professor-Steve-Jones-warns-inbreeding-risks.html
>>68041701
Or from another perspective, it made them worse.
So all non-blacks are some weird kind of mutant non-human being thing? Disgusting
>>68036522
This has been known for quite some time.
Also, apparently our ancestors were smart as hell, well some of them.
It would be pretty interesting if it turns out we are all just an inferior breed of humans or something, like the Kali Yuga or the age of decay is even biological.
>>68043151
>>68042426
Nords confirmed as inferior.
>>68043245
Because those genes are present but are recessive. If they were dominant the genes would never have survived this far. But because they are recessive they got passed on. Like I said inbreeding brings out recessive genes and should only be practiced by people with pure genes
>muh neanderthal mixture is why Eurasians are superior
Australian Aboriginals have Neanderthal admixture and literally the most retarded race on the planet.
Native Americans have more of it than any other race but barely ever got above nigger-tier.
It doesn't directly contribute to anything and it's a minuscule part of the genome.
As for people seeming to think that cranial capacity is correlated with intelligence, we still don't have an official verdict on that.
>>68037445
IF ARISTOTLE WAS SO SMART HOW COME HE'S DEAD.
CHECKMATE ATHEISTS.
>>68043245
This is a Nurture and Nature.
The Nature of these people is defined by how they're Nurtured. I'm talking over centuries of time.
>>68036817
one of the new evolutionary trends is that westerners are losing the strength in lower jaw because the food is too soft and you dont rip it with your jaw anymore.
also, loss of muscle mass, we are quite close to cattle today.
>>68043466
>Nords
>>>/v/
>>68043092
All non-africans are pretty closely related compared to the distance between Africans and others.
>>68043302
Evolution is all one giant mutation if you want to follow that road.
>>68043245
>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1392217/Muslim-outrage-professor-Steve-Jones-warns-inbreeding-risks.html
>Studies have shown that 55 per cent of British Pakistanis are married to first cousins – and in Bradford, this rises to 75 per cent.
Holy shit. What a fucking mess.
>>68043535
I would say it's a feedback loop.
>>68042839
That does not refute his point. Try again nigger.
>>68043151
>IQ tests from the mid 1900s
>implying there is a way to correctly get a representative sample size in 3rd world countries
>implying environmental factors aren't a massive part of that
You couldn't even have a functioning hunter gatherer society with an average IQ below 70. And regardless of how much these tests have improved since the mid 1900's they still do not measure pure genetic IQ "potential". Just look at a guy like Michael Oher:
>Oher was also successful academically at Ole Miss, and his tested IQ score increased 20 to 30 points between when he was measured in the public-school systems growing up and when he was measured in college
20-30 point increase because he started living with a white family? Take any kid in Africa and put them with a white family and I promise you they will have an IQ closer to 90 than to 60.
>>68043466
Neanderthal artifacts are found in the Sahara.
Shows more that niggers once again are a separate species. Whites and Asians (Japanese/Korean) are the only races on this Earth at this time that amount to anything.
Imagine a world without Niggers, Arabs, Abbos, Kikes and spics. Whites and Northeast Asians would've sent this world ahead so fast.
>>68042890
>>68043176
>>68043208
Ok mates, I stand corrected. t. >>68042656
>>68043577
Skyrim didn't invent the term Nord.
>>68043092
the genetic distance between abbos and bantus is greater than between two subspecies of chimp. if biologists were honest we'd be classified as different subspecies.
>>68043667
Exactly, look at the storm, what do you see in the eye? Nothing, peace, and tranquility yet a storm rages around it.
>>68043466
youre fucking retarded
Are there any middle eastern / Arab / Shitskin countries that are based and practice Islam?
Best i can come up with are the Persians.
>>68043514
They also have large amounts of Denisovan Dna (4-5%) and far less neanderthal than europeans and even asians.
>>68043514
abbos are denisovans
>>68043355
Yeah, the more you study Neanderthals, the more you start to feel like apocalypse already came. We are only the 2nd best primate that this world has created.
>>68043852
Pakistan is honestly not bad. They have some decent scientists and Islamabad is OK.
>>68043828
What a clusterfuck of a graph
>>68043514
>Australian Aboriginals have Neanderthal admixture
Abbos are mixed with Denisovan Humans.
>>68044058
here's the original (open in new tab)
>>68042426
>That small 56 IQ country
How the fuck
>>68043852
>>68044022
They're all shit, but Pakistan isn't *as* shit. Not good by any means, though. Tunisia's okay too.
>>68044143
it's the bushmen not the general population which is majority bantu
they live like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKA9_FlsZqE
the results are based on raven's progressive matrices (like the ones on http://www.iqtest.dk/main.swf). the bushmen simply don't get the patterns
>>68036522
Doesn't that prove that race may not indeed be a social construct and that blacks might lack the thing that allows Asians and Whites to create civilizations?
>>68036522
when will black people l;earn that this isnt a issue for whites and asians. its a issue for every one else
you might like to think homosapien is better but between neandethals being in the northern hemisphere longer and homo sapien doing nothing in africa gor a couple hundred thousand years never advancing
and modern standardized test scores well their descendants are not the weak link. they do the best in terms of critical thinking for instance
some reading material
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/09/03/sat-scores-drop-and-racial-gaps-remain-large
>>68043514
Interestingly all advanced societies in the Americas were in South America.
>>68036522
>Dennisovans
>>68037565
Sauce?
How do blacks on /pol/ not kill themselves?
>>68036522
>posts meme scientist
How come some blacks who do DNA tests get European results?
https://youtu.be/p3D3KX0l7M8?t=5160
>27-year old Dave Reed, a budding fashion model/actor/artist, was profiled for "The Human Family Tree." Reed can trace some of his ancestry back to the mountains of central Asia, along with about 50% of all European men. Reed's roots, along with 35% of all African-American men, trace back to European lineages.
>>68043993
Makes me wonder if all those Out of place Artifacts were Neanderthal, and who knows, maybe we all naturally degrade when we dont have any predators fighting against us.
>>68043704
>You couldn't even have a functioning hunter gatherer society with an average IQ below 70
That's an absurd claim. Raven's matrices measure abstract reasoning. How much of that do you need in a bushmen society? I'm not going to bother with the rest of your desperate rant which you wrote with tears in your eyes. Pathetic garbage.
We have hybrid vigor
>>68045008
Das rite.
>>68044631
well they're genetically very close to east / south east asians
>>68044978
Because they have been mixing with white people for generations
>>68044978
American slave owners used to mix Africans with other groups, notably the Irish.
>>68044978
>>68044978
African Americans are slaveowner rapebabies.
>>68045000
~ everything will feel better after ~
K, what else is new?
>this still goes on to this day :3
>>68036522
black sumpremacy movement when?
>>68036522
I literally don't care.
>implying this is damning
Eurosian DNA displays itself to be the most superior.
>>68036522
One more example in the box of african inferiority.
>>68037185
They dominated the weaker primates. They fucked them. They spread out. They developed sciences and technologies. They conquered the planet. By the time they reached southern africa, the natives there hadn't even developed the wheel.
>>68036522
Stupid article concludes that our "human ancestors" still came from Africa and interbred with what they are implying to be non-humans. Within the context of "humans" being niggers because they go on to say niggers don't have the mixed genes. Only non-Africans do.
My ancestors didn't come from Africa. There were back migrations to Africa. Into Africa if you will. Into and out again. The oldest proto-humans were two million year old remains classified as homo erectus found in Georgia quite far away from Africa on the fringe of Europe and Asia.
The evidence for out of Asia is piling up so much that even Dienkes anthropology blog now favors it. CNN is just trying to be inclusive to niggers who are more likely the mixed result of a non-human archaic ape and a human ancestor who migrated into Africa from Asia
>>68036522
In other words, niggers are the only ones that didn't evolve?
Sounds about right.
>>68045182
Not really, but they used to fuck them. Black people prefer lighter skin, so mixed people were in demand as mates.
>>68043577
>Autism speaks
>neanderthals had bigger brains and were more intelligent
>only races not to get the neanderthal mixing upgrade were africans and australian abos aka only races with IQs in the medically retarded range
>>68036522
this is nothing new. Everybody has known this for a long time now.
Not having Neanderthal genes makes you a nigger.
>>68037445
Their bodies required three times more calories than we do in order to function, and their legs weren't as well developed as Cro-Magnon man's so moving expended more energy.
>>68036522
>So /pol/, are whites and asians just subhuman hybrids, and blacks the true, pure humans?
The fact is: we evolved. From monkeys to humans.
Niggers didn't.
By the way, why you b8ing?
>>68045381
N O W
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fd2xynKzRFQ
>>68044347
It's hard to believe their are a race of people dumber than abo's.
>>68047035
Neanderthals were shorter than the average Human
White and Asian manlets are more Neanderthal than taller counterparts?
Manlets are Neanderthals?
>>68037565
very interesting. humbly requesting source
>>68036522
Sooo if niggers weren't so lazy they could be pushing the world into new scientific and cultural breakthroughs?
>>68041936
Why can't eugenics and gene manipulation just make super people already? Fuck taboos. I was one of the few people who saw gattaca and thought it was a great idea. Start with something everyone can agree on, like slowly phasing out genetic diseases over a couple generations. Then get into cool shit, like designer humans made for special purposes. Like a caste system but your genetic potential determines placement.
>>68042890
Is there a rule in the military that only rednecks are Kiowa pilots? Those guys are insane.
>>68042426
Revision of maths and reading can heighten your IQ and with a culture as in Asia to study non stop until you're dead, especially in Korea can alter the actual outcome. Anything above 100 IQ point is considered a give or take of 15 to 10 IQ points due to the higher you score the less reliable it is.
>>68048142
The Chinese are working on it.
>>68036522
All this proves is that pure humans are fucking stupid and cannot build a civilization.
>>68036522
How is this news?
We've known that everyone except black people have had Neanderthal DNA for a while now.
>>68037445
Individually they were objectively superior, their only downfall was their numbers.
Kinda reminds me of something.
>>68042791
It's been proven. If you look at the America. Anthropological Association and the paper that announced it as a construct and then go look on the vote for it. They were basically split 50/50 or 40/60 with the higher number being against race as a social construct.
Quite literally the only people who believe it is are either a)liberal or b)brainwashed thanks to propaganda media
The story is mexicans and whites came from angels
and everyone else came from monkeys
>>68046831
>Their bodies required three times more calories than we do in order to function, and their legs weren't as well developed as Cro-Magnon man's so moving expended more energy.
Two negatives which would be mostly irrelevant in a modern society where we sit on our asses all day and consumer more calories than we need.
>>68036522
I read somewhere that Neanderthals were actually predators of humans. Also their eyes are gigantic and they have no forehead, I doubt they looked like us at all.
>>68048785
>>68048580
Why aren't we all working on it? I mean, I get the cultural backlash, but why can't we convince people that this will eliminate the need to treat expensive genetic diseases? Growing up I figured we'd have this done by now. Young me is disappointed in humanity.
>>68049019
They had a forehead similar size to us but it was a receded forehead
wwwow
>most successful people on earth are whites and asians
>least successful are blacks
if that is true thank fucking god we are part neanderthal, it seems to have done us a lot of good.
only reason people would dislike it is because of the unjustified stigma around neanderthals who we, admittedly, know nothing about regarding intelligence apart from a few minor details
>>68049051
Its okay bro
>>68037565
It's sad that science like this is so demonized and there isn't more studies done about the realities of race.
>>68043538
You have no idea how evolution works
Not surprising considering where you're from
I bet you and Lamarck would be pals
>>68038141
Its called rape you asshat. Same reason there are so many redheads in scandinavia
>>68043538
That makes no sense though. Strong jaws get women way wetter than most other singluar features. They're a sexually selected trait, like blue eyes.
Gimme a link to the study slavbro
>>68037035
This. I don't see why blacks think this is a negative thing when evidence shows it has been overwhelmingly benificial. It's like they are incapable of critical thought.
>>68036522
>So /pol/, are whites and asians just subhuman hybrids, and blacks the true, pure humans?
All this is saying is niggers (i.e. "pure humans") have more of their ape ancestor features, and non-niggers are more evolved from apes than them.
WE
WUZ
HUMANz
AN SHEET
>>68049516
Blue eyes are only a selective trait for other people with blue eyes.
Ashkenazi jews have neanderthal genes
Friendly reminder that this adds further weight to the argument that niggers are a separate species compared to the rest of humanity
>>68043538
What?
No you dumb fuck.
It's selective muscular atrophy. The smaller and weaker jaw muscles resulted in an expansive cranial capacity and increased brain growth.
It's one of the contributing factors to the increasing IQ of humans.
>>68049699
What I meant is that they're so common because, even though they had no obvious function, they were considered attractive because they were different. And so they were desired for breeding, hence why so many Europeans carry the gene today.
Blue eyes exist because we wanted them, it wasn't natural selection
>>68049699
Not true but i'm not going to start shit with fellow Europeans over eye colour all our eyes are a lighter shade compared to shitskins.
>>68049798
Their foreheads creep me out way worse than the nose
>>68043466
Nords are a tribe of Germanics who went north...
>>68036522
Whatever we may be, the world was built by us.
Imagine a world without whites or asians. We would still be using stones as a hammer to put sticks in the ground.
>>68049974
Having lighter eye colour has benefits in low light conditions no one really does research on this though.
>>68036522
HOL UP
So you're saying whites and asians are more diverse than negroes?
This changes everything...
>>68050384
True but it's such a small difference that it's insignificant and primitive people's would not have known this. The improved night vision isn't why the gene was successful.
>>68036522
Neanderthals were carnivors and generally were stronger than Homo Sapiens.
The fact that they had a bigger brain didn't mean they were smarter.
Two of their major problems that led to their decline were the fact that they only ate meat meaning that they had to constantly hunt which was time consuming and that they weren't capable to adapt as fast as the homo sapiens
>>68048973
But they mattered in a time where food had to be chased.
>>68036522
Well apparently that Neanderthal DNA is the difference between building the entire modern world and living in mud huts, bathing in cow urine for thousands of years. Can't be a bad thing.
>>68039015
Every race was sucessful in the world, the world only started to go to shit when globalism became a thing.
>>68036522
WE
>>68051722
DIDN'T
>>68036522
>g-genetic diversity is good goy
>LMAO WHITES INTERBRED BETWEEN HOMO SAPIENS AND NEANDERTHALIS
>>68051965
WHITE
>>68051722
PAY DENBT
>>68036522
>whites want to 'preserve their heritage'
>only even exist because blacks fucked them
>>68049152
I agree.
>>68051139
>But they mattered in a time where food had to be chased.
They peak mid-game, but lost their lane to an early rusher.
homosapien mixing with neanderthal was the greatest thing to happen to the human race.
Niggers are 100% homosapien.
Think about that.
>>68052852
Not quite. We don't know if Out of Africa is correct, or if the populations that show Neanderthal admixture today were already separate from the non-mixed Sub-Saharan humans. But either way, it was the male Neanderthals fucking the human females which created us, the offspring were infertile when it was the other way around.
>>68053360
They aren't, they mixed with some archaic species as well from the last data apparently.
>>68053101
>>68049152
Modern mainstream of >humanity comes from French Revolution
>>68036522
>implying neanderthals weren't more intelligent
We literally out-bred them. The same thing which is happening to us now.
>>68039015
>real truth is pretty much any given stone age hominoid race was pretty much a barbaric dumbshit by modern standards.
Humans wouldn't exist today if they were dumbshits. The only difference between then and now is density and narcissism.
>>68049798
They remind me of Beetlejuice, when the dead guy elongated his face.
>>68050384
Also, lighter eye color is an indicator of a higher tolerance to alcohol.
>>68053398
I've never really subscribed to the out of africa theory, mainly because of the prevalence of "white bearded wise men" that brought civilization to the central americas. They are even revered as gods.
Testing on Ramses II showed he was generally "fair skinned, and had red hair."
>>68037992
Do you have a sloped forehead?
>>68036522
Haven't we already known?
Cool study, doesn't change the fact that white and Asian men rule the world.
>>68036522
wait a sec, are you telling me niggers and non-niggers are DIFFERENT SPECIES?!!
>>68036522
>yfw whites are the new neanderthals. They inherited a little too much beta.
>>68037445
#HomoSapiensWelcome
What's the worst that could happen?
This argument does not make any sense. Neanderthals and Sapiens each had their traits; Neanderthals were intelligent and powerful but not socially developed, Sapiens were more social and expansionist; the two combining created a superior product: asians and europeans; whereas pure Neanderthals went extinct and pure Sapiens; ie blacks and Australoids are less developed. This is just more evidence that race isnt skin deep
>>68038100
if niggers be da reel mvp homos, den wees be da superhoomans
>>68041701
neanderthals are a different species, not a race
just like Whites and Blacks are different species
>>68038869
>When sapiens men fucked Neanderthal women, the children were generally infertile.
source?
>>68041311
implying the neanderthals didn't just leave in their space ships
>>68044347
I find this video rather unnerving, but I'm not sure why.
Neanderthal lives matter when?
>>68042778
>no guys i swear a society could survive with an average IQ of 56
deer and bears seem to have survived, even without the ability todo calculus
>>68037445
They weren't able to make a very wide range of sounds so their language skills would have been very limited. They were never strictly wiped out, they interbred completely with their dumber cousins who had a wider vocal range.
They're here and they're us.
is this why blacks and sandniggers want our women? to create a more genetically diverse and therefore superior offspring?
>>68049152
There is a problem with that though. Genes are still hard to manipulate and have far reaching effects. Yeah in a few generations it would be a good idea, but as of right now there are a lot of dangers.
>>68037035
Neanderthals had much higher brain sizes than humans. It's speculated that they were more intelligent but couldn't breed as rapidly as humans due to larger skulls killing more women in childbirth.
>>68044631
There were mound builders and architecture advancements in North America, not to mention complex systems of laws. Of course, many were savages, but there were some civilized culturally advanced tribes.
>>68057335
Have they thrived?
>>68057876
deer and bears?
they done preddy gud
>>68036522
>all the most successful humans have Neanderthal genes
>this somehow makes them subhuman
???
>>68044978
Degenerates have existed for ages.
>>68056749
No evidence of Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA has been found in modern humans.[12][13][14] This would suggest that successful admixture with Neanderthals happened paternally rather than maternally on the side of Neanderthals.[15][16] Possible hypotheses are that Neanderthal mtDNA had detrimental mutations that led to the extinction of carriers, that the hybrid offspring of Neanderthal mothers were raised in Neanderthal groups and became extinct with them, or that female Neanderthals and male Sapiens did not produce fertile offspring.[15]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaic_human_admixture_with_modern_humans
>>68052618
MALE
>>68059004
interesting
![M%25C3%25A9xico-Tenochtitl%25C3%25A1n[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/V8zSVtS.jpg "M%25C3%25A9xico-Tenochtitl%25C3%25A1n[1].jpg")
>>68057838
Tallest buildings in the world by 1500 were in Mexico and Peru.
Conquistadors never saw anything like that before.
>>68059004
Well, they were pretty fucking ugly if any of the facial reconstructions are even remotely accurate. But it's damned weird that zero maternal offspring survived.
>>68043885
the only answer
>>68037565
This interests me, MAO-A inhibitors make me trip balls.
>>68057564
sounds way too familiar...
>>68059004
Or that Neanderthal chicks were ugly as fuck and the men wanted some of that sweet sweet exotic tang and were stronk enough to take it by force or smrt enough to figure out how to get it.
According to 23andme, 3.4% of my DNA is from neanderthals. How great am I?
