Do you believe in evelution and dinosaurs, and God at the same time?
>>68026143
Whos to say god did not set evolution in place?
>>68026143
Yes, I do, but that's because Catholicism is the only true religion.
>>68026143
dinosaurs had feathers
>>68026557
Believing in God and Evolution is not Catholicism.
It's a new type of Relgion, called "Evolutionism Theism" or, in my words, Tyrantheism.
>>68026248
he did. anyone that takes genesis literally is a fucking retard. for all we know, '7 days' just means 4 billion years. it's an adaptation of an even older story, which is shared by all old cultures. It's probably true, at it's heart, but likely poorly translated.
there's no way to know really, thanks to faggot ice ages fucking up the archaeological record.
>>68026143
God evolved into dinosuars
yes
t: protestant
>>68026804
Catholics officially believe in evolution. or some variation of it.
we definitely don't believe in the 'snapped his fingers and poof' theory, like protestants.
>>68026945
God is a genius, he was created things out of his own thinking, if that's true, then anything is possible, time travel, anything is possible with God.
>>68026813
Im an agnostic, but that is how I always interpreted the story of genesis. A day for a god is probably much different for us.
>>68027318
according to hugh ross, day is translated from the hebrew yom, which could mean either a day or a long period of time.
then there was this israeli professor who had a theory that day could mean cosmic day or something.
God: yes.
Old earth: yes.
Jesus: yes.
Dinosaurs: obviously dragons.
Global flood: clearly happened.
Logic & reason: yes, but never to "find truth." I'm a skeptic.
Theoretical physics masquerading as science: no.
>>68027318
Genesis is mostly a parody of ancient creation myths. I won't attack your literal take on the text, but at least realize it has to be taken within the historical context.
>>68026143
I believe in picardy.
>>68026143
God created scientists to test our faith.
>>68027773
What
>>68028380
And historians to make us wise.
>>68028008
>I won't attack your literal take on the text
I dont have a literal take on the text. I highly doubt that the earth was created in 6 days, however like >>68027724 said, the "day" part might be whats messed up,
Who is to say that 1 day for a god is not 1 billion years for us? Fuck if I know, thats why I'm agnostic. I just dont know.
