Question for lawfags, why didn't the first amendment protect Gawker?
>>68019205
What are you talking about?
Companies aren't comrades
>>68019277
Kek confirmed communist
>>68019276
>>68019205
Oh nevermind. Well, a sex tape is private property. Invasion of privacy isn't protected by the first amendment.
>>68019205
Because the Hulk ran wild on them.
>>68019397
Did you realize we have ID's on this board?
Embarrassing desu.
It did protect them, that's why they didn't go to jail.
Doesn't stop a jury finding you guilty in a civil suit regarding damages caused by the act, if those damages are measurable and proven, which is what Hogan's lawyers did prove.
invasion of privacy
>>68019277
>>68019397
kek
Samefagging faggot doesn't realize /pol/ has poster IDs
>>68019277
>>68019397
Its so painful.
>>68019205
The constitution is routinely ignored in every facet of life.
>>68019624
This.
Hulk Hogan is a public persona while Terry Gene Bollea is a real person.
The article was not considered newsworthy. If it had been, then they would of probably won.
He was filmed without his consent.
They defied a direct court order to take it down.
Most of all, Hogan's lawyers painted Gawker in an EXTREMELY bad light. Especially with the child pornography comments that one of the editor's made in his deposition.
>>68019205
The protection for freedom of the press only means that you have freedom to print whatever you want BUT, AFTER you print you are liable to be punished under certain scenarios (such as libel). If a court knew GAWKER had the tape, they could not order them not to publish it. BUT, the second they, they could be charged for damages. Its called NO PRIOR RESTRAINT
>>68019205
oh and watch out Peurto Rico
>A quarter of the island’s 3.5 million people will probably get the Zika virus within a year, health officials predict, and eventually 80 percent or more may be infected.
nytimes /2016/03/20/health/zika-virus-puerto-rico.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
>>68019850
>Hulkamania fucks your wife
>You film it and release it
>People publish the Hulkster pounding a QT3.14 into the mat like it's wrestlmania
>Needing consent
>>68019850
This is the correct answer.
Pro-tip, if you're trying to win in court. Don't say that you'd post Cp on your companies website.
>>68019205
Ok now I just fully read about this.
This is the best thing that has ever happened. Ever.
These sjw fucks talk about how evil the fappening an such is, but when it comes to a guy in a sex tape, they don't give a shit.
Fuck these faggots. They got what they jave coming, I hope this next judgement against them makes them pay even more money. What a good verdict this is. Damn.
