I Side With
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: I Side With
Take the test : http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential-quiz
Make sure to click "Other Stances" to see all responses, "Show X more questions", and to rate how important each issue is to you!
Bump for sliding.
>>68009672
Dis what I gots mayne. SHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEYIT.
Why do they pair you up with absolute randos
bump
>>68009672
Literally who
>>68009672
lel John McAfee
>>68009672
Shame on you, Americans! (why the fuck is lyin' Ted so high, tho? Guess they're just inserting him automatically for everyone. So, they are preparing for the brokered convention after all).
If you aren't matched with Don you should get out of here
>All these non Trump
SMDH
>>68015957
>tfw you beat me by 1%
I need to change something
>>68016037
I have the very essence of Trump inside of me.
>>68015463
MUDSLIME!
This fucking quizz is too damn hard for me
>>68009672
I got Austin too as top pick. Did he recently run or something?
Good
Build firewall
I'm a trump supporter. I took this quiz a few months back and I guess shits changed since then. I used to have trump at an ~85-90%
Sounds about right.
Nice to know I'd vote trump and not just for meme purposes.
>>68017664
>>68017416
>>68017376
>>68015463
>>68012933
>>68009672
/po. confirmed for libertarian
>>68018027
/pol/*
>>68018027
>>68018076
>Muh origami freedoms and liberties!
>>68016747
Even if I'm from Leicester, at least I'm integrated into an unbarbaric western society
Who's Gary Johnson?
>f-feel t-the b-b-bern
wut
Team Trump all the way
I'm a bern victim...
>tfw no Rand Paul ;_;
This test is a joke, it's extrapolating how I feel on entire subjects just on one question.
>>68018715
I just made this for you my paki friend
>tfw best muslim country
>>68009672
>Bernie
>Hillary
http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/2187630447
Don't worry, I'm voting Trump because I hate this SJW/BLM shit more than I care about anything else.
>>68009672
oh shit I fucked up didn't I?
MAGA
A
G
A
Rato sneaking up from behind though, I see through your schemes!
>>68020578
>saying "yes" to all the social program questions
Hang yourself, gibsmedat
I wish this quiz put a heavy weight on the politifact truthiness of the candidate.
Hillary says she'll do a bunch of shit I agree with but she's a total lying cunt and I'm not retarded enough to believe she'll do any of it.
Also, try expanding the number of questions so you get more accurate results.
Lul-biterian reporting in
>>68023213
>politi"fact"
>>68018999
Former Governor of New Mexico, he's been running as the Libertarian nominee for President since like 2008
50% bernie
40% hilary
>>68009672
who is petersen
>>68023880
Eh, what's wrong with it? Cite some examples pls
Is there another site to show the truthiness of a candidate? Particularly in regards to what platforms they ran on vs. how they vote?
Fucking plebs
This site is very unreliable. I remember taking the hardest BUILD WALL DEPORT DEPORT options just to test it out and it said I agree with Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush, even though they're for amnesty and are weaker on immigration than Bernie Sanders.
I sure hope people don't use this as any sort of reference for picking candidates, they list the completely wrong policies.
>>68025691
I would be very interested in seeing the code for this site.
Next election cycle I'll make something similar except open source the code.
I retook this with expanded questions and it looks more accurate: http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/2187726385
Basically I'm a socialist but think we need to deport the fuck out of illegals.
Voted Trump and still voting Trump in the general.
> 92% with Trump.
Wtf have you done to me /pol/?
>>68015216
Salam
shit....
>>68026996
>not voting for the candidate who supports your beliefs the most
>being this retarded
>>68027613
>not voting strategically
I voted for Ron Paul in the 08/12 primaries but Obama in both general elections because Obama did very good things for the right wing.
>>68028417
>voting strategically
>falling for the meme
>literally hitler
ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS?
>>68009672
>rato is at it again
On a side note i would probaly get trump if i knew how your healthcare system works
Godammit I hate the fuck rat. I always end up siding with hm
>>68028921
>how your healthcare system works
get sick. go bankrupt
El Rato is too high.
questions were lame and too specific. I'm mostly libertarian, but I'm OK with this outcome.
>>68009672
96%
>>68029085
let me fix that for you
>don't buy insurance
>instead spend your money on monster and PC games
>don't get a real job with healthcare
>get sick
>go bankrupt
>>68009672
>Trump 87%
>cruz 85%
>Austin petersen 69%
>Kasich 65%
...
I'm sorry, /pol/. I have failed you.
Please forgive me, God Emperor Trump.
>>68017376
>>68023373
>>68023452
Friendly reminder to NOT vote for the Murderous Malware Man.
>>68029441
>US healthcare system is good
People like you give us the burger reputation
Question: Is there a link to each of the candidate's and their answers to the questions? I only seen links to their answers after you take the quiz. I don't want to have to take the quiz every time I want to read their answers.
>>68030238
Okay this is bullshit, I didn't have insurance for most of my life and any time I needed to go to the hospital all I had to do was write a letter saying I couldn't pay and the debt was completely wiped every single time. That might just be because Florida Hospital is based but I've rarely had to shell out a dime for healthcare.
I give up, I don't know who I can support.
WELP
>>68031277
You wut mate?
They are essentially polar opposites in this campaign.
>>68009672
I guess Cruz has more libertarian views than Trump.
Damn right I do.
>>68009672
LMFAO
I got Bernie lol.
I wonder. Is there a certain percentage threshold that means you and a candidate are on the same page and thus it is in your best interest to vote for him or her? It's one thing to get a candidate in the top spot but its another for you to agree with that candidate 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 100%.
As an aside, to agree with the other candidates only means so much as how much emphasis you put on the issues you agree with. You could agree with a left-wing candidate on a good number of issues, even compared to more right wing candidates. This explains why a lot of /pol/ are getting left-wing candidates that this board generally deride with relatively high percentages . But if you hold right-wing economics in higher regard to a more left-wing foreign and civil rights policy then the right-wing candidate would be in your best interest.
>>68009672
hahaha i i knew it
>>68032341
Well desu it doesn't really matter I mean Sanders is in this shit. Honestly I don't understand why the fuck anyone is voting for Shillary. This year is a joke.
WOOOOO, GO GREEN PARTY
>>68009672
American first, spic last
>>68031277
>>68031615
Answered and revised a few questions. Now this is what it should look like.
>>68009672
Fairly accurate
Jillary Clintonstein
>>68009672
Kek, I agree with Sanders on science and environment but agree with Trump in immigration :D
>>68030424
bookmark your results and then compare answers
>>68030533
i didn't have insurance and had to go to the ER any time I got sick. I contacted them and they said they could put me on a sliding scale but it'd still cost thousands of dollars that i couldn't afford. after 5 years of being sick, i ended up owing this hospital tens of thousands of dollar i'd never be able to pay.
i'd be happy to pay, but thousands of dollars to take an xray? that's called exploitation.
>>68032534
>As an aside, to agree with the other candidates only means so much as how much emphasis you put on the issues you agree with. You could agree with a left-wing candidate on a good number of issues, even compared to more right wing candidates. This explains why a lot of /pol/ are getting left-wing candidates that this board generally deride with relatively high percentages . But if you hold right-wing economics in higher regard to a more left-wing foreign and civil rights policy then the right-wing candidate would be in your best interest.
This is why there is an ability to pick how strongly you feel about certain issues. Do you know how to internet yet babby?
>>68032630
>Honestly I don't understand why the fuck anyone is voting for Shillary.
People vote for Hillary because she lies to them and tells them she'll do whatever they want.
This iSideWith site puts weight on a candidate's "conviction" (how much they flip flop). As a result, Hillary almost never beats any other candidate.
She lies. People are stupid/gullible.
This group's name is high quality cuck meme worthy, but their videos prove how fucking stupid and uneducated Hillary supporters are: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8-LPJUa7Ps
Here's more proof Hillary voters are actually the stupidest voters: https://i.imgur.com/nbTcUzy.png
>>68033207
Good job changing your answers specifically to align with the meme you're loyal to. Sure am glad you're voting. :^)
>>68034259
Same, I agree with Bernie on pretty much everything except immigration. I agree with Trump on immigration.
Hillary will get the nod and I'll "throw my vote away" on Jill Stein.
>>68009672
Who is Austin Petersen?
>>68034990
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=austin+petersen
>>68034990
One of the irrelevant Lolbertarian candidates.
>>68034990
>Who is Austin Petersen?
The Libertarian Party's only hope to become a viable, serous political party beyond consisting of perpetual presidential candidates who do nothing more than fill the ballot.
Austin Petersen’s philosophy is that of a classical liberal, in the style of our third President Thomas Jefferson: fiscally conservative, and socially tolerant. Austin will fight to restore limited government values, and help create jobs by lowering barriers to entry into the marketplace.
Taking Over Government To Leave Everyone Alone
http://austinpetersen2016.com
Meet 2016 Presidential Candidate Austin Petersen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMfq50y6uOU [2:26]
Would you like to know more?
Libertarian Party Presidential Candidate Austin Petersen's Platform Explained
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEluv14XKIQ [45:23]
Taxes and Spending with Presidential Candidate Austin Petersen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GX1V4hZpSk [2:48]
Related: 6 Ways To Fund Public Services in a Libertarian Republic
http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/6-ways-fund-public-services-libertarian-republic/
Petersen 2016 Military and Defense Policy Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_KjnAs_heE [3:40]
Libertarian Petersen offers constitutional solution to ISIS terrorism
http://www.examiner.com/article/libertarian-petersen-offers-constitutional-solution-to-isis-terrorism
What is "Free Banking?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-PUf-hArdQ [15:56]
>>68035281
Libertarianism sounds nice until you realize corporations would exploit the proletariat with an iron fist within a couple years.
If you have no problem with corporations exploiting people then carry on, but I'll never get behind that kind of shit.
>>68009672
>all these people with high agreeability with both Trump and Hillary at the same time
How?
>>68009672
13% cucked
>>68009672
Who are these guys?
>>68035281
>The Libertarian Party's only hope to become a viable, serous political party
>this delusion
Kek
>>68035917
And those corporations often have similar agendas to the politicians because they're all rootless cosmopolitan elites. Libertarianism is a mind virus designed to trap right wing thinking into a box of autistic logical principles like "non-coercion" and objective rights, which will just lead to the same place in the end as leftist ideas. Rothbard even called himself a leftist for a while.
>>68035917
Corporations are creatures of the government. If it is the thought of corporations not being held accountable then change the laws.
What is a corporation anyway? Isn’t it like any other association of people?
http://freespeechforpeople.org/what-is-a-corporation-anyway-isnt-it-like-any-other-association-of-people/
Pls rate my triumvirate
I can't believe it put Cuck Sanders ahead on man-hating Hillary.
>>68011603
Cum-Dumpster alert.
Please validate my opinions, anonymous internet people.
If you didn't get Trump as your candidate head back over to /r/politics you dumb redditor.
>>68036363
>toeing party lines this hard
because we're not retarded and can hold multiple viewpoints instead of what the media and parties tell us we have to believe.
like, i'm socialist, but i think people should obey the law. so i mostly agree with bernie but think illegal immigrants need deported.
>they didnt get Trump
literally kill yourselves
I do not want this communist
why is Trump so far away god damn it
huh? these people aren't Trump.
>>68009672
I lean more libertarian on most social issues, but I'm not throwing my vote away.
Trump 2016
This election is the first time I align more with the Democrats than Greens.
look at the filename
>>68037500
>because we're not retarded and can hold multiple viewpoints
Not really when it comes to this quiz. It's single choice answers. I'm asking this based on the fact that I answered every question and most of them are stark yes or no answers, even under the additional answers. How the hell can someone get 75% Trump and Hillary, it doesn't even seem possible in this quiz. As someone who answered every question it seems like the only way it seems to be possible is to not answer a lot of the questions trump and hillary disagree on.
>>68009672
Literally who?
Huh. I thought Gary Johnson would be higher. Cruz was a surprise.
>>68009672
>Austin Petersen
must be sad that after the flop of the newer star wars movies (george lucas ones) he has to become a politician to make a living anymore
Loved him in Enemy at the Gates though
>>68040539
The questions cover most of the political spectrum
A lot of people just want a wall.
>>68037392
>hurrh if you don't like who i like then leave
make me faggot :^)
>>68038518
>voting for who you believe in
>"throwing your vote away"
>being this smart
Let government evolve to you, don't devolve to it.
>>68038834
same
>>68040539
>Not really when it comes to this quiz. It's single choice answers.
No it isn't. It multichoice. Click "Other choices". how_to_internet_babby.jpeg
>most of them are stark yes or no answers, even under the additional answers
that's not true and can be disproven easily. pic related
>How the hell can someone get 75% Trump and Hillary
>>68037500
>>68040767
>>68035140
E/B/IN
>>68041403
>How the hell can someone get 75% Trump and Hillary
Probably because most people are more centrist but agree with specific issues of those people
Rate me
About as expected. I was a huge Cruz shill until about a month ago. Now I see the God Emperor for who he is and I've repented.
>>68009672
That said, of the things I disagree with Peterson on, some of them I disagree with very strongly, such as companies being required to label GMO food and H1B visas being restricted.
I agree with Don on alot
>>68011123
that site ignores the fact that cruz is a fucking maple snake shill
>>68009672
I dont like trump but this test claims I agree with him on 91% of issues. Too bad he has no relevant political experience
>>68009672
Here's my profile. R8 me goys.
>>68025421
the site is incredibly biased towards bernie to a retarded degree
Petersen confirmed for shitposter
https://www.instagram.com/p/BByo6-GKlkf/
>>68042413
I promise to never talk to you or your wife's son again.
Hail Trump!
>>68042291
I agree. I'd like to see candidates weighted by how many corporate contributions they've taken.
That said, it DOES take into account how often the person has flip flopped on issues so it's no surprise former-democrat Trump seems to be losing to Cruz frequently.
Same with Hillary losing to Bernie.
>>68042413
>side with Bernie Sanders 94%
>>68041403
>It multichoice. Click "Other choices"
Single choice meaning you can only choose one as opposed to choosing all that apply. I realize it's difficult for you to wrap your mind around that given I used the words single choice so you immediately thought of multiple choice format. The other choices you mentioned are the additional answers I mentioned and your image does nothing but prove me right. Hillary is pro choice and Trump is pro-life. It's black and white with slight shades of grey, but at the end of the day they can't agree and that's the point.
And while your at it stop talking like a teenager, you sound like an idiot.
>>68042420
Cite examples. Happy to be red-pilled.
>>68042413
are you kidding me?
>>68042664
Name one single good thing about this old shoe
If it wasn't for Trump I'd probably vote for McAfee, I'd say I agree with him a bit more but Trump is the first tolerable candidate to have an actual shot for a long time
>>68042750
there was that image where trump was said to wrong , while he was factually right , but not for the right reasons , so the truth in his statement was discarded
>>68016747
rare
>>68009672
Any test which tells you you side with both Ted Cruz and Bernie Sanders is poorly written uninformative Jewery. At least I know for 2020 that people buy into dumb shit like this. My shitty site will make me a killing in ad revenue.
>>68009672
>Petersen
Enjoy your neo-conservative masquerading as a fucking libertarian.
>>68011123
Cruz is sorta "libertarian"
too bad he's a fucking liar, probably as much of a liar as hillary
>>68009672
1-10 how cucked am I?
>>68018027
[Foil Mythic Rare]
>>68009672
Did Cruz just copied everything from Trump?
>>68042781
Nah m8.
>>68011603
>>68011603
wait fucking how?
I fear that this will be the case come election
>>68043307
>John McAfee
Hahahaha wut. That's the only person that could give Trump a run for his money in terms of just not giving a single fuck.
>>68035281
>The Libertarian Party's only hope to become a viable, serous political party
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/features/gone-viral/os-ap-florida-senate-sacrificing-goat-20151005-story.html
>>68043662
Well in terms of not giving a fuck McAfee blows him and damn near every sane person alive out of the water.
who even is this man
>this thread
>>68011123
I get Cruz every time because the site doesn't understand that he's a lying shill.
Also who the hell is Austin Petersen
Am i a living meme?
>>68045006
this kek
>>68045006
a shitposter and a memester
https://www.instagram.com/petersenforpresident/
>>68045046
No. It's kind of pitiful how hard that guy tried to meme himself. I guess he gets credit for being marginally more recognizable than all the other lolbertarian candidates, though.
who /tuff/ here?
>>68037257
If I were a cum-dumpster I'd be a Bernie supporter
>>68043593
I believe in reasonable restrictions on abortion which is what Clinton also believes in. Sanders doesn't believe in any restrictions at all. I don't believe in defunding Planned Parenthood. I ideally want a President with a little bit of hawkishness because I think it's preferable to the alternative. I dislike Islam and consider it a social and political threat to Western civilization. I think the government should aggressively pursue renewable energy sources. I dislike illegal immigration but I don't think they should all be deported; I think a point-based system with points for education and skills should be established to decide who gets a chance at legalization. Millions would probably still be deported but I'm fine with that.
With all that I wind up mostly Clinton but also a lot of Trump.
>>68042717
There are a few of them that are YES, REGARDLESS, NO.
And all of them will let you suggest additional options.
I imagine it's difficult to write a program that would take every possible answer into account and I think this format is pretty close to accurate.
Can't you just skip over questions if you don't agree with any of their answers?
>>68045398
I forgot mine.
>>68045046
would give my life in an instant in the fight for privacy and civilian rights, Fucking authoritarians are the ultimate cucks
>>68045436
pretty tuff
Literally killing myself today
>>68045006
The site DOES understand if he lies. It weights flip-floppery.
>>68045753
>1% difference between Sanders and Trump
How
>>68045046
>tfw 76% Bernie
>68% Cruz
>55% trump
Am I turning into a cuck?
>>68045436
i'm only 8% /tuff/ :^(
>>68045441
you can/should suggest new answers.
>>68045611
"b-b-but muh trump" - /pol/
>>68045907
Because Sanders and Trump have have similar stances on specific issues. They are not polar opposites of each other.
Left was...damn, probably over 4 months ago id say, near the beginning.
this election has changed me.
also i may somehow agree with Cruz but hes not anywhere near as trustworthy. better then a democrat but thats REALLY not saying much.
I keep getting bernie, damn my marijuana and ecological stances.
>>68045910
no, you were a cuck when you blindly believed who /pol/ meme'd you into voting for.
real men vote for whoever aligns with their beliefs the closest.
apparently that's bernie for you
>>68045620
kek
>>68045753
Go to hell, KEK FAGGOT
>>68045620
>Hitler
>Libertarian
>>68046238
if you care more about immigration and shit set it as very important to you and marijuana as little important.
if pot is more important to you, vote bernie or else you really are a cuck
>>68029008
Maybe because you are Canadian just like him.
>>68042413
Burn in hell, cuck faggot
>>68014657
you are cucked out of your mind my friend
>>68019773
indoctrinated
quickly find a red pill thread and take your dose you faggot
>>68022651
whats wrong with you finns?
who told you that you were entitled to stuff, huh?
bunch of children with a nanny for a state
>>68023645
whats it like being wrong about everything?
>>68035281
>$0.05 liberty bux have been deposited into your freedom coin wallet
>>68035917
>corporations would exploit the proletariat
if there's more competition and lower barriers to entry, it makes this harder to do, because you could just start your own company provided you find some investors and lenders and thats getting easier to do all the time
>>68009672
>Bernie: 86%
>Jill Stein: 82%
>Hillary: 79%
>Gary Johnson: 78%
>John McAfee: 77%
>Austin Petersen: 66%
>Cruz: 59%
>Trump: 52%
>Kasich: 39%
Oh no, not Ratto!
Our foreign policy beliefs are completely different though.
What the fuck... John McAfee from McAfee Anti-Virus is running for president?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MG0bAaK7p9s
HOLY SHIT, HE'S A LIBERTARIAN.
MCAFEE/NORTON 2016
MAVIS BEACON FOR SECRETARY OF EDUCATION.
t. socialist
This is first test ever to call me libertarian.Rofl.
Ayyyyyyyyyyy
JUST
>>68009672
Feel the Bern.
>>68018027
Only because anarchists don't run candidates, desu
Btw, I was a Martin O'Malley supporter. Bernie is degenerate but he is what I have left.
>>68014807
>why the fuck is lyin' Ted so high
Because there's no option for "I don't want a president who's married to GS and is Canadian."
I think I did it right this time
Honestly I don't love the way some of these questions are presented, but it's not like a multiple choice test can really dig into your thoughts on certain issues and their implementation. I think Gary Johnson should be a bit higher based on his full stances. The only problem I have with Libertarian ideology in America is that there are too man poor and stupid people for it to work here.
The other numbers all look good, except for that lying rato piece of shit.
>All these non Trump replies
Absolutely disgusting.
>>68052042
>All these Trump replies below 90%
Step it up, hue hue.
>>68009672
Well...
I know Gary Johnson, but who is this Austin Petersen?
I'm still voting for Trump either way tbqh family.
forgive me god emperor
>>68009672
#AP4LP
>>68053706
whoever he is i hate the stupid look on his stupid face
>>68016165
You and half the trap escorts in New York.
>>68053706
The only pro life libertarian running.
Basically has the same Ron Paul
>>68009672
Hail the god emperor!
THE GOD EMPEROR
>>68009672
Didn't expect ted cruz at the top, but seems about right otherwise. Still unsure who I'm voting for, though.
>tfw in heart and mind you know that you side with The Trump.
Fuck
>>68009672
I didn't know who austen Peterson was until I took that test. We match close OP
>>68009672
I got some cuck called John Mcaffe
>>68058712
My friend, John Mcafee does the cucking.
Software Mogul John McAfee Is Crazy, Because Drugs, Money, Women
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOgLC8urj1Q
>tfw neutral
Libertarians will defend this.
>tfw you support Trump despite not agreeing with everything he says.
>>68009672
I guess it shows me with 2% more for sanders than for Trump. Still gonna vote Trump though. Also, I guess I only had a 29% match with 4chan.
How tf
mcaffee
gary johnson
peterson
jill stein
great.
>>68027377
How did you fuck up this bad?
Based Trump.
This poll doesn't count the fact that teddy is a lying fucking rat.
I wish I was American so that I could vote for the God-Emperor.
Literally who?
Pretty happy with that virtual tie for Trump, I answered genuinely and I consider myself a Libertarian.
Idea
>Do a straw poll for /pol/ on all the questions
>Answer the questions in that way
>See which candidate is ours
>mfw we don't get Trump
(jew here)
get on my fucking level cucks
BUILD A WALL
>>68063512
That's the guy who made an anti-virus program McAfee.
He looks like a very weird dude. I get a feeling he would be more of a meme candidate than Trump if he got popular.
Everyone below 94% should be dropped into the other side of the wall.
>>68063548
That's an interesting idea. The logistics would be brutal though. Especially considering this quiz taken to its fullest extent is so long.
Don't want to do it again.
>>68009672
I side with is a highly biased and inaccurate site
Now ban everyone who got Bernie or Shillary as their candidate.
>>68046291
Are you a shill for that site?
Just look at what they say the libertarian candidate values
Or hell look at their source for Trump being anti space travel
If you think a site this well made and well known isn't biased politically you're kind of being ignorant
MAGA!
Bullshit, i aint no dumbass trump supporter, just because i dont want people from terrorist filled countries to enter mine.
>>68009672
I have my candidate.
I fucked up
>>68065911
Cuck detected.
Imagine a world with
Rand Paul as the Republican Party nominee
Jim Webb as the Democratic Party nominee
Austin Petersen as the Libertarian Party nominee
aaayyyy
Yep
>>68009672
huh... OP we are bros apparently. Although your Bernie score is a little too high for comfort, you might want to work on that.
>>68009672
>mfw El Rato above Trump because I don't support NSA, Patriot Act, etc.
I know that I support Trump....but I was surprised at how close it says I am to agreeing with Cruz.
>>68066798
>detected
Take those memes to reddit faggot
Not much of a surprise
Who /Constitution/ here?
>>68071510
I was equally matched with libertarian and constitution parties.
>>68031833
>>68047457
reaffirmed
i want those 5 minutes back
I always hated Hillary, but I had no idea I sided with Jill Stein on more than Hillary.
AP for the win. He's a lot more like Ron Paul than the LP platform.
>>68009672
>http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential-quiz
MAKE
AMERICA
GREAT
AGAIN
>>68071831
>hillary clinton
>criminal
The site knows.
Ayy
>One of the questions is whether illegal immigrants should get government-funded education
Cmon lads this is getting embarrassing.
>thinking fuck probably not gonna get Trump
>actually do with 93%
My support has now grown for this man.
baka desu senpai
Not booger-eating Cruz
>>68009672
Am I guaranteed replies?
>>68037932
How reliable is this test? Because I saved my results (on the site) so I could check in on them later, and they're already different. I didn't even change any of my answers.
Also, I'm not quite sure how I feel about these in depth results. Especially the siding strongly towards socialism part.
tfw
I thought I'd get John McAfee.
MAGA
Am I cool enough /pol/
>>68009672
I had my deal with central americans comming here as immigrants; fuck them
I had my deal with chinese immigrants; Fuck them
All hail the emperor
>>68014657
stay away from america freindo
>get to the bitcoin question
>there's no "haha fun bux joke money" option
into the trash it goes
Can't Stump The Trump
Trump 2016
>>68024863
Proof that 4chin is autistic. HOW HARD IS IT TO MAKE A FUCKING GIF?! SERIOUSLY YOU SHACK OF SHIT
>>68026381
VOTE FOR TRUMP tho k?
Last time I got Cruz and now this. I actually want Trump to win.
PLEASE RATE AND SUBSCRIBE
rate please!
be i good!?!
