ARE
Nah
YOU
KIDDING
ME??
>>67939645
delete this
>>67939575
WHITE
>>67939823
RICE
>>67939575
I've been watching you faggots as you go about attempting to harass my friend who you all seem to think is called "carl."
well guess what, this ends now. I'm literally reporting everything negative i see written about him to the authorities aas we speek. i hope you enjoy dicks in your ass, because you're gonna have a lot of them in jail.
>>67939823
FUCKING
>>67939880
NIGGERS IN MY ASS
>>67939645
first post best post
>>67939701
>Saturday morning 1:30
>Shitposting on a Nepalese graffiti forum
>>67940213
IM LOSING CONTROL OF MY LIFE
>>67939909
KIKE
ARE YOU
Hey guys, I’m the person who originally recorded the video of “Carl”. I have to say, I didn’t expect it to blow up like this. And now that it did, I feel a bit bad about it. let me explain...
Firstly, let me start by saying that when I uploaded the video, I knew it would piss you guys off because it portrayed “Carl” as exactly what so many of you hate: An arrogant, stuck up liberal who thinks his opinion is superior to yours even though he can’t even defend it. A “SJW” who depends on feels and not facts, and will yell whenever his opinion is challenged.
Well, it seems that’s exactly how so many people on 4chan took it. And the meme blew up. But i feel a little bit deceiving for it. The truth is, it wasn’t such a simple interaction. After Carl went “ARE YOU SERIOUS?” He started talking about how Hitler’s rise to power depended on blaming a specific group of people and promising to eliminate them from our society. He talked about the rise of fascism when the establishment fell apart, hitler manipulating, blah blah blah. He even said some stuff about the language they use. It seems like he really did his research honestly.
So, there you have it. I don’t agree with Carl. But he DID explain his reasoning. I figured people would realize this considering the video is only 4 seconds long (not nearly enough time to explain his reasoning). So yeah. Can you please stop bullying this kid? He may not support the same candidate as you do but to harass this kid for being an arrogant liberal is just dishonest. Instead of attacking him with ad hominem, we should actually focus on addressing his arguments. Otherwise we look like a bunch of insecure rednecks who will focus on attacking a person rather than their reasoning (ironically, everything we supposedly stand against)
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
>>67941225
>haha, yeah guys this is 100% true
Need more of these
