>but the senate must consent
So Obongo's literally raping the senate?

>>67845364

I'm sad he didn't get the nomination. I love you Rand, but now I'm helping get the First Trumpet to sound.

>>67845628
It's okay though, I think he's much more effective in the senate.

>>67845364

>The president can't nominate someone because they might have committed a constitutional over-reach, thus causing a conflict of interest

But under that logic, no president can nominate, because any of their actions can be retroactively considered unconstitutional over-reach.

He's literally going against a moderate. The guy is Posner levels of loved on both sides.

>>67845364

Good. The guy they're nominating is totally anti-guns. Fuck him.

Not a Rand-fan but good for him. Step in the right direction in my eyes.

>>67846075
He isn't a moderate you idiot. Liberal shills have rebranded him as one minutes after the announcement.

>>67845364
Rand probably is better of in the senate, but he has a real fire under his ass, I wonder how he would be as president

>>67846075
he's not a moderate, he's a "tough on crime" statist

he's going to make Apple decrypt all the iPhones

>>67845364

All talk

He's a KEK and it will get through, the only reason thell block it is because they don't want to give trump ammo

>>67845364
All I want is Rand to be Chief Justice of the Supreme court.

He's still young and would tear assholes.

>>67847049

>Trained as a doctor
>Be chief justice

That's not how that works.

God forbid the President try to do his job.

>>67847234
He knows more about the consitution than most of those jewish shmucks currently on the sc

>>67847234
Being a lawyer isn't a prerequisite

>>67848312

There's no prerequisite, but literally every Supreme Court Justice has had Law training and accreditation.

>>67848312
He's not going to have the depth necessary to understand the legal arguments and precedents brought before him.

>>67848993
>>67848602
>>67847234

This is the problem.

The supreme court should be filled with people who know the Constitution forwards and backwards, and who will interpret the Constitution from a literal point of view, not like poetry.

Fuck activists and fuck the statists.

>>67849270

>and who will interpret the Constitution from a literal point of view

You have no idea how constitutional interpretation happens.

Go read Martin v. Hunter Lessee

>>67845960
This desu senpai.. he'll do more good for the midwest interest in the Senate then he ever could in the executive branch.