Trump supporters,
Why would you vote for someone who wants to renew the Patriot Act and expand the NSA?
>>67749932
bump
bump for interest
>>67749932
I don't like his gung-ho support for all things government authority, police and such. Can't have it all I suppose.
>>67749932
Because I don't like sand niggers shooting/blowing up my country and not a pedo scared for my precious pizza
Because all viable candidates support that.
>>67749932
If you have nothing to hide, why is it a problem?
>>67749932
Which side do Cruz and Kasich fall on?
I will vote for anyone who fucking takes control. The government can listen to me phone masturbating.
>>67749932
Because he's the only one that doesn't want The West to be made into the Middle East.
As long as he keeps white civilization safe from those savages he can do what he wants with the NSA, who gives a fuck?
>>67750700
This. I was against it at first, but really it just protects us. Besides all the crazy liberals promoting assassination deserve to get locked up.
>>67749932
there's other reasons to vote for him, though hopefully that's one that will change in time.
>>67750700
>nothing to hide
No problem officer. Don't mind the noise upstairs.
>>67749932
Clinton?
Are there any who wouldn't renew it?
>>67749932
I honestly don't care that much. I kind of wonder why I ever cared that much about internet privacy. Sure, it's nice to have privacy, but it's not going to be the issue that decides my vote.
Kind of a silly question anyway, since it's going to be Trump versus Hillary, who will also take privacy rights away.
>>67749932
Source it up
>>67749932
Hillary wants to renew the Patriot Act and she wants to expand the NSA. In fact, she voted for the Patriot Act twice and she voted to increase NSA's budget twice.
>>67750700
>"If you're not doing anything wrong, why do you need to have rights?"
:the argument. Literally.
>>67750847
He's straight establishment and also thinks Israel is our greatest ally. He is literally part of the oligarchy
>>67750878
>screw these other candidates that offer everything I want. I'm gonna vote for an evil because social ostracization
>>67750850
As if you need the NSA to stop those idiots, especially if they're public about it
>>67751138
Which other candidates are you talking about?
>>67749932
because I'm not an autistic whiny libertarian
>>67751305
well if you actually care about freedom, there's Gary Johnson, if you actually care about more socialist policies, there's Jill Stein.
Clinton is literally Trump - Trump is literally Obama 2.0/Bush 3.0.
They're literally the same on exactly every issue that matters. From Trade deals to Military budget.
>>67751917
>Jill Stein
>>67750850
Because it's another word for police state.
The line between taking away 2nd amendment rights and PA is very thin.
>>67751917
Too bad none of them have any traction in the public consciousness.
>>67750850
I've never seen so thinly veiled a shill on 4chan before. It feels weird.
>>67751917
take the red pill. Its all crap. Somebody owns them.
>>67751138
they don't offer anything i want so your point is? i'm voting for the candidate i like best so obviously that would be the one i agree with the most.
>>67750895
Read that as
>Don't mind the nose upstairs.
>>67749932
because SEIG HEIL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPRI9AmyVvY
>>67752174
Nonsense, and a fallacious shill tactic. Somebody indeed owns the candidates that get ANY sort of publicity on television. This is evidenced and corroborated by the now infamous "Ron Paul treatment".
If you play the game, you get to be in media. It's amazing how tons of shills started pushing that - I mean people conveniently forgot that as soon as Trump started running
>>67749932
So which candidate still running wouldn't renew the Patriot Act and expand the NSA?
>>67752202
So you agree with Obama and Bush then. So you're agree with unconstitutional, treasonous acts, and you want more government.
Got it.
>>67752637
>Somebody indeed owns the candidates that get ANY sort of publicity on television. This is evidenced and corroborated by the now infamous "Ron Paul treatment".
that's some pretty dodgy logic, maybe the reason ron paul didn't get much treatment was due to his unusual policies, public opinion at the time, lack of party support, and personality that didn't win much attention? i mean i like ron paul, but i'm not so delusional to jump to the conclusion the reason he didn't win is because money.
that's something that sanders supporters are doing now with the "why are people voting against their self interest" shit.
>>67752751
no, i didn't? you're putting words into my mouth because i disagree with you. i said i like him because i agree with him the most. that doesn't mean i agree with him 100%. i hate the atf jackboots and nsa wire tappers as much as the next guy, but there's more to this election than just the patriot act and it's already a very controversial subject with a lot of facets to it. considering he's playing off the fear of isis, going against the patriot act would seem hypocritical.
>>67752837
can you remember the last time a third party candidate was allowed into a media-organized presidential debate?
>>67750828
What is phone masturbating?
>>67753153
hardly ever, but it makes sense when you consider the voter mentality in this country. you're either blue or red, hell that color scheme wasn't even a thing until recently. that's an issue with our society at the moment, third parties just don't win. they never have.
>>67753320
>third parties just don't win. they never have.
And this, of course, obviously has nothing to do with the influence of the parties and media keeping it this way, right?
I mean, surely they have nothing to gain from disallowing competition.
>>67749932
Because you god damn faggots didn't glass the right people after 9/11 and now the whole fucking world is fucked, with a high probability of terrorists embedded everywhere. Not to mention the growing treat of radicalised individuals because of how piss poor the middle east situation has been handled.
>>67750700
Im pretty pro NSA, but, people hiding things should be allowed to hide them. That should be our default position. A person with privacy has something to hide, namely his privacy. Thats okay. He should be allowed to hide that.
>>67753534
this is a rabbit hole and i'm sorry i'm too tired to go down it so i'll just ask you, do you think the majority of the country would have voted ron paul into office?
>>67749932
Is there still a candidate in this race who wouldn't?
>>67753851
I think he would have gotten more votes than he did if he was given a chance. Maybe even enough to affect the outcome of the election.
>>67752994
Nothing you're saying makes sense. To agree with Trump means you're for all those things I mentioned. I'm sorry that's not my opinion - he's for expanding the military budget, expanding the NSA, renewing the Patriot Act, Trade deals that destroy American jobs, not dismantling the Fed, citizens United - the list goes on.
You're either for liberty and respecting the constitution or you're not. And if you agree with Trump/Clinton then you are not for those things. I suggest you reevaluate your life and come to terms with your pride.
>>67753851
Yes, if the media hadn't portrayed him the way they did. This is reality. Why do you think people who watch Team Red channels agree with Team Red candidates, and vice versa for team BLue channels? It's because people are susceptible to propaganda.
OP, do you think Trump will pick Hillary for VP?
>>67749932
It's not that I particularly care for Trump.
The establishment's goals are naked. Every post their shills make, every major news outlet, every action of the government - it's not about serving the interests of the people. Not for them. What they're after is dominance. They want us to submit to the yoke.
They want us to be predictable. They want us to fear them, they want us to be powerless to stop them. Fuck them.
I'm going to do my damnedest to get Trump elected.
>>67754761
You are quite literally retarded or not getting paid enough for that post. He is working for the oligarchy. He is after dominance. And seeing how he wants more govenrment, it's not him that's going to be doing the dominating.
>>67749932
Cause he knows absolutly know nothing how internet work like every people above 50. Look at Hillary in her mails. Not even twitter He litteraly retweet a guy named @mussolini13.
But NSA or Patriot act are now a meme. There are not the real danger now. And he will be advise by the bests on this.
Internet is a way to much important tool for the economy to be castrated with invasives privacy thing. People are litteraly WILLING to give their personals infos for a free flappybird app.
