What does /pol/ think of this?
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/03/when-graded-on-tech-issues-2016-presidential-candidates-dont-do-well/
>>67657028
>broadband and infrastructure
>only scored based on how they felt about the internet
really?
>>67657028
Clinton is so open on privacy that she sends classified information using her personnal address?
>arstechnica
Dropped.
>>67657325
Underrated post
>>67657028
>Hillary
>Privacy & Security
>B-
So leaking TOP SECRET/SIP information is a B-. I wonder what Trump did, leak Putin's sex tape?
>>67657028
>arstechnica
Thats like The Economist of the tech geek publications.
That shit sucks establishment cock hard
>The third category, "education, talent and the workforce,"
On these issues, Rubio earned an A, since he supported more high-skilled immigration, although the card notes his record on "comprehensive" immigration reform is mixed. (That's the kind of reform generally preferred by Democrats, which would combine more high-skilled immigration with other types of visas, like family reunifications.) Sanders got a D+ for his "overall opposition to the US attracting and retaining global talent," as well as saying he has "serious problems" with Uber. Trump (F) has been "silent" on education and said "virtually nothing positive about immigrants." Clinton gets a B+, Cruz a C-, and Kasich a B-.
WE NEED MOAR STEM IMMIGRANTS, DUDE LMAO
>>67657028
>Intellectual Property
Is lower scores for or against restrictive intellectual property law?
>>67657028
>"education talent and workforce" is literally all based on how candidates feel about immigration, instead of actually having anything to do with education
>trump gets F's because reasons
>Hillary "I dont know how to use a safe mail account" Clinton gets a B- in privacy & security
>>67657325
BA DUM TISS.
>>67657028
>Privacy and Security
>B-
>>67659189
Trump openly supported the FBI stopping Apple from encrypting files so they can get data from them.
>>67657028
>All but Trump support TPP
>He somehow isn't getting amazing marks
What a shill paper
Luckily Donald Trump will not be the White House IT guy.
>>67657028
Every single one of them is bigger on security compared to Hillary. What is this fucking Jew shit website?
>>67657028
Why does Rubio get an A for wanting to destroy the tech industry?
>>67660565
>encrypting files
You're a fucking retard.
The phone is naturally encrypted, he's against Apple trying to pull a big fucking meme with their hardware securing. They've given the FBI files before.
One of them is going to cave, and 98% chance it's going to be the FBI.
>>67657028
Oh wow, a biased scorecard. How incredibly useful :^)
>>67657028
Gee, I wonder what candidate this chart is biased against.
The jews in Silicon Valley want to open borders and inflate the job market with indians.
>>67660565
You understand tech as well as Trump
>workforce
>trump gets f
enjoy losing your jobs to pajeet
>>67661058
it's already happening bro. they just outsource right now, but the open border policy will help them be able to replace positions that require more training than answer a phone and follow a script.
oh no not an F that will go on his permanent record
arstechnica would say that.
They are leftists and have articles on data security aimed at protecting paedos.
The truth is Trump wouldn't be the best for privacy, but would be great for security. Good for intellectual property, inapplicable for education since that would go to the states, great for talent and workforce, and on broadband access and infrastructure he would be the best one running, maybe along with Sanders, since he has said he would break up regional monopolies in healthcare, there is no reason he wouldn't do the same for broadband.
>>67657028
So I take it that the worse score they give you the less you adhere to their liberal groupthink.
Looks like Trump is the best option
