Obama nominates Merrick Garland, who wants to overturn D.C. vs. Heller, which guarantees Americans' rights to own firearms.
>>67653879
There's a simple solution if it's overturned, and it involves bullets.
If Garland is appointed, the Supreme Court now has enough anti-gunners to remove D.C. vs. Heller. Every anti-gun case that will go all the way to the SC can now pass and will be enforced at the federal level.
>Assault Weapons Ban
>Magazine restrictions
>Limits to amount of ammunition at home
>No more CCW
>Weapons must be stored in safes, separate from ammunition.
>>67653879
If he even gets a hearing this will kill his nomination, and he's not getting a hearing.
>>67653879
Why does that say MYTH as if it will disprove he has a "very liberal view on gun rights"?
What website is that from?
>>67655365
It was a MYTH, but confirmed by the website, mediamatters to be correct
http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/03/16/myths-and-facts-on-the-nomination-of-judge-merr/209286
MYTH: Garland's Vote To Rehear A 2007 Case On D.C.'s Handgun Ban Reveals A "Very Liberal View On Gun Rights
http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/03/16/myths-and-facts-on-the-nomination-of-judge-merr/209286#myth1
"Garland, currently the Chief Judge of the Washington, D.C. Court of Appeals, is viewed by some to be left-leaning on gun control. In a 2007 case, he voted to review a restrictive gun law that had previously been shot down. The law included a requirement for guns to be kept unloaded and disassembled, unless they were being kept at a place of business or were being used for legal recreational activities. "
>>67653879
Why does obongo hate guns so much? Why can't he just accept that no one in this country cares about dead niggers?
>>67656453
Because guns killed all his sons.
>>67656453
Because he and all other democrats represent the globalists who want total control of the American people
If your congress lets him get elected your Surpreme Court will consist for 4 Jews and 5 Catholics. Not a single protestant despite being the largest religious demographic.
Where to start new land of free if this one falls?
>>67654203
The last one is understandable.
Everything else? Hell no!
Why did I just read 'memos' as 'meme-ohs'
Mitch McConnell wants to delay approval of the nomination because he 'wants the American people to decide'. What the fuck did we elect Obama for? We decided that we wanted Obama to nominate Supreme Court justices.
Makes no sense to me.
>>67653879
Time to put that amendment to good use before empress shillary tears apart the whole constitution
the supreme court is a joke. just a bunch of people coming up with fancy arguments for what they want even if its obvious its unconstitutional
>>67656922
>Not a single protestant
See? There's always a silver lining.
>>67653879
I thought the dems passed a resolution in the 70s forbidding any possibility of a supreme Court Justice nomination during an presidential election year?
Or did that become inconvenient here recently?
>>67653946
This. I would rather they just come out and tear up the social contract than undermine while letting people still believe in it.
ANOTHER jew? ANOTHER ONE?
>>67656453
>obongo hates guns
Obama's just a monkey order follower. Just love trump or Clinton will be. I don't understand why people think it matters who president is.
>>67657751
i didnt vote for obama and neither did half this country
>>67654203
> enforced at the federal level
> implying most states give a rats-ass about federal legislation
good luck getting states like Wyoming and Montana to enforce magazine restrictions and denying CCW permits. The Irony is when Liberals will whine about this yet turn a blind eye to weed dispensaries which federal legislation still deems a control substance
>>67658119
i dont know about that, but they called for blocking bush's nomination in 2007
>>67657433
>keeping your guns away from your ammo
That literally defeats the purpose of having a gun in your home
>>67653879
>Boss already ruled on something
>Boss dies
>G-guys lets go over this again we obviously missed something :v)
>>67655358
Better for Obama to nominate a moderate and have the republicans consider that person than wait until Hillary gets elected and nominates ultra leftists.
The republican party once again overestimated their support and was overconfident in assuming a republican would win. At this point it's more unlikely than ever that a republican will win in november, so the senate has essentially shot themselves in the foot.
You guys are delusional. 2nd amendment isn't going anywhere. Can't happen here.
>>67660133
Guys they aren't spying on you, that would violate the fourth amendment.
Guys they aren't setting up free speech zones, that would violate the first amendment.
Guys they aren't legalizing detention and assassination of American citizens without due process, that would violate the fifth amendment.
>President Barack Obama on Wednesday will nominate Merrick Garland, a veteran federal appeals court judge with Jewish roots
Every fucking time
>>67653879
You fucking retard my created garuntees my right to bare arms. Not some shit court decision
>>67662009
>creator
>>67655789
>http://mediamatters.org/
trusting anything Soros is funding
>>67662009
>guarantees
>>67653879
Of course, that's why they killed Scalia before Obama got out
More joooz to take your gunz
>>67663113
Yeah, I'd like to see any attempt to actualy do gun control.
Way to see the country collapse into civil war
>>67663264
Less guns for us means more guns for Israel.
You don't want Israel defenseless, do you?
>>67653879
Did they ever say how Scalia died?
>>67653879
Time to overthrow your Government. Hey it's what you always tell us to do, and you have guns so no excuses.
>>67664827
Natural causes :^)
>>67656541
Underrated post.
>>67665398
That may be in order, unfortunate I'm not looking forward to it
>>67665398
Garland won't make it past the Senate. Let our political process of check-and-balances do it's thing. It's what separates us from the savages.
>>67656453
Because you dont arm your slaves
>>67664827
National Enquirer said that the CIA hired a hooker to inject him with something.
>>67656922
Protestants are too degenerate to be trusted with the highest court in the land.
>>67665961
>liquid Viagra
>>67653879
They have to try and ban guns before the inevitable race war starts.
>>67665731
Repubs control the senate and can basically just deny anyone Obama puts forward, right? They're not required to rubber-stamp his shenanigans.
I don't really understand why this is such an outrageous contentious thing. The supreme court is a tad hamstringed by having an even number of judges, but they can last a year, presumably. Unless some serious Washington backroom shit goes down, there's a pretty predictable outcome to all this.
>>67666113
Give it to the child touchers instead, much less degenerate
>>67666113
Protestants founded this Nation, faggot. Know your place.
>>67653879
Guns are easy enough to make, ammo is the hard part.
>>67653879
/pol/ is always right...
>>67666950
Freemasons**
>>67666405
>I don't really understand why this is such an outrageous contentious thing.
Because somewhere along the line people decided checks and balances are too slow and old fashion and having a rubber stamp government is much better even though everyone ends up complaining about pretty much everything they do.
>>67657433
>keeping guns in a way that you cannot defend yourself in a home invasion
>reasonable
Also this isn't even going to a vote. Biden bide himself in the ass here.
>>67656453
>Why does obongo hate guns so much?
The politicians that want to ban guns are the one most worried they will be shot for the oppressive laws they want to push
>>67666630
Cmon, not all Jews are pedos
>>67667469
![Ta81w2Q[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/8xu1WIw.jpg "Ta81w2Q[1].png")
Next step to being closer to where Canada currently is. After we move to UK tier laws, you guys will follow.
>Fuck these assholes.
>Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), the longest serving Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, offered his own thoughts on who President Obama should nominate to fill the seat left open by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia last week.
>“[Obama] could easily name Merrick Garland, who is a fine man,” Hatch told the conservative news site Newsmax, before adding that “he probably won’t do that because this appointment is about the election. So I’m pretty sure he’ll name someone the [liberal Democratic base] wants.”
top lel. No matter your political opinion this is the best guy Obama could've picked to be a moderate voice on the Court. The Republican Senate has to decide now if it wants to wait out this guy and risk an appointment from Hillary if the Republican nominee doesn't win, or go with the safe guy in this and go back on their bitching about not giving a hearing at all. I love election cycles.
>>67656453
Because the 2nd amendment has been wrongly interpreted for hundreds of years. If you guys actually wanted to change something in the country (like ever gun owner threatens) attacking Bernie was the wrong choice. PR and technology win battles now, not guns.
>>67667604
There is nothing moderate about someone who intentionally undermines the constitution.
There is no such thing as a moderate justice. Justices do not get the benefit of opinion. They rule on the LAW and only the LAW.
There is no moderate, only degrees of corruption and how far you will deviate from the law to achieve personal goals that apply to everyone.
>>67656541
Top kek
>>67667670
How's it been wrongly interpreted?
>"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Since you need to be able to form a militia to prevent tyranny (implied to be both internal and external threats), the people (in the modern context there only limit on who qualifies is their citizenship) have an unlimited right to bear arms, and this shall not be infringed.
>>67667670
>>67667670
Only it hasnt.
200 years ago I could carry a pistol on my hip and have a cannon in my front yard. You do those things and you will be arrested and convicted immediately.
We don't have to look for interpetation, we can just look at how things were applied, and what people were allowed to do.
>>67667670
>wrongly interpreted
Fucking progressives man
>>67658119
Reagan nominated a justice in 87 and he was accepted in early 88.
>>67666986
Who gives a crap about zip guns when you can blow things up with gasoline and ice packs.
Heisenberg type of crap that even a high school kid could do.
>>67668133
>arrested for carrying a pistol on your hip
???
>>67657433
>nigger breaks into your house and points a knife at you
>hold on friend let me open this here safe to grab my gun and a different safe to get the ammo
>k let me load my gun
>GOT YOU NOW
They will have to approve him. The Republicans will never get better than him. If they leave the court as it is that defeats the whole object.
>>67667670
>a well balanced breakfast, necessary to the start of any good day, the right of the people to buy and consume food shall not be infringed
>oh, breakfast has the right to food, not the people
>oh, and the SCOTUS has only determined that it's people for hundreds of years
>oh, and the whole reason we have this is in the event the government became corrupt beyond return
>I mean let's just ignore Venezuela guys
>oh, it's all irrelevant anyway since laws defined what a militia is and the 14th amendment extends it to everyone
>oh, it's out of date we need to update it
>lol let's ignore the fact that mechanics exist to change amendments
You don't have a leg to stand on.
>>67668714
Open carry is illegal in the majority of states.
It has been challenged as a provision of the second amendment and has fried regularly.
>>67653879
If only the Republicans could grow some balls and actually stop something for once the fucking feckless faggoys
>>67657751
>Mitch McConnell wants to delay approval of the nomination because he 'wants the American people to decide'
>What the fuck did we elect Obama for? We decided that we wanted Obama to nominate Supreme Court justices.
And when Obama proved to be a complete fuck up (see: ACA), WE THE PEOPLE made changes in the senate and the house to make sure he couldn't do even more damage.
Case in point, the retarded judge choice.
>>67668714
Waifu material
>>67669486
That's the most false fucking statement I've ever seen.
>>67669688
>retarded judge choice
He is qualified with a strong focus on civil liberties. The Republicans might never get the presidency again. They rigged the court in their favour for years, if they leave it 4 on 4 now it defeats the entire object.
They have to confirm him. Otherwise they will look like obstructive, petty imbeciles. When you have an approval rating of 7% you cannot afford a long, protracted sequence of dickhead behaviour.
Garland is a Jew.
another fucking Jew.
that would make 4/9 of the justices Jewish
>>67670013
They'll ignore it.
There's a federal ban on Marijuana and Colorado did it anyway.
Many states have passed legislation saying all federal gun laws shall be nullified and not enforced.
>>67653879
If Obama gets a nominee in office we lose the 1st and the 2nd. It's that simple
>>67670117
And if that's the case, and the people agree, then several senators and congressmen will be replaced this cycle and during midterms. Then the judge will be passed.
Wow, it's almost like we actually have a system of government with checks and balances instead of some old cunt making her people the cuckholds of sandniggers.
>>67659515
Leftists do the same thing with sanctuary cities, where they refuse to follow federal law on immigration. Naturalization and immigration is a power explicitly granted to Congress in the Constitution, unlike regulating marijuana, and the left still ignores it.
The good news is that if the fed tried to take your guns, states like Montana and Wyoming would absolutely tell them to fuck off.
>>67670384
If Garland does get put on the court I fully expect many more Firearms Freedom Act style pieces of legislation to be passed by states. Likely with provisions similar to Alaska's that prevent state or local law enforcement from co-operating with federal authorities and maybe a few hardcore ones that obligate the state police to arrest federal agents trying to enforce laws.
>>67653879
>D.C. vs Heller guarantees Americans right to own firearms
The constitution is iron clad. "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
>>67670373
>checks and balances
Leaving the court a man short for no good reason.
When people ask a politician why they are doing something, they need to be able to explain in adult talk or they look stupid. Stalling the confirmation of a qualified and capable judge makes them look like children, or idiots.
They are never getting the presidency back. You understand that don't you?
>>67670758
Why doesn't Obama nominate a conservative judge to keep the balance if making sure the court has 9 members is so important?
>>67670646
Based Idaho.
Think I'll move there after I graduate. It's a nice, quaint conservative state.
Though if push came to shove, I doubt Indiana would comply with federal gun laws.
It's not about the second amendment.
It's about giving Puerto Rico statehood to give Hillary 7 backup electoral votes.
>>67670758
>Leaving the court a man short for no good reason.
I'd say blocking some cuckhold from taking away our 1st and 2nd amendments is a good reason.
But since you live on a faggot, rainly island where knifes are illegal and you can be arrested for saying nigger on social media, I wouldn't expect you to understand.
>When people ask a politician why they are doing something, they need to be able to explain in adult talk or they look stupid. Stalling the confirmation of a qualified and capable judge makes them look like children, or idiots.
>because they are taking your rights away
Easy enough.
>They are never getting the presidency back. You understand that don't you?
>In the U.S.
>the nation of back and forth
Totally bro.
>>67670013
>>67670246
Only it's not.
Even within the states listed as having open carry, local governments frequently ban the practice.
I don't need a license to practice a right. It is still restricted in those states, almost always with specific laws prohibiting carry within a certain distance of schools, parks and other places that make open carry completely inpracitcal.
The states you have in red are nearly half the population anyway.
It is a lot worse than it looks. You have to keep fighting or they will chip away at it.
>>67671173
I live in one of these states:
>>67670646
