LADIES AND GENTLEMEN ITS OVER
TRUMP TAKES MISSOURI
>>67609594
I still don't know who Cruz even is.
>>67609594
NOT
ONE
SINGLE
STATE
SNEK IS DEAD
>>67609697
tonsil ted, the boog-eating stooge
>>67609594
Can you please share what site you're using? Allahu bless you.
>>67609697
Canadian, eats tonsil stones, looks like a rat.
>>67609697
The Zodiac Killer
>>67609594
That was just an error, they're showing 99.3% again. It got my hopes up too.
http://www.decisiondeskhq.com/results/2016/primary/gop/president/missouri/
>>67609864
I was going to vote for Trump but after tonight's results I am now a proud #CruzMissle
Finally, our nightmare is over. Trump is the clear, undeniable front-runner, and no one can stop him.
Bernie's dead. Rubio's on suicide watch. Kasich is loved only in Ohio. Cruz is irrelevant.
On to the Cunt! Trump is the Cunt Destroyer.
>>67609594
Still no checkmark nigger
Probably gonna be a recount somewhere
pro-cruz jackson county now fully counted
only county remaining is pro-trump st. louis county
>>67609796
>>67609594
MSNBC JUST CALLED HILLARY AND TRUMP IN MO.
Who the fuck votes for Rubio honestly
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
Winning Missouri and Illinois makes Kasich winning Ohio meaningless.
>>67609594
Chi mo dead in the water
>>67610636
No it doesn't
Those are Winner-take-most states. Trump will open up a lead with them, but not enough to make up for Ohio.
Besides that, Trump needs to average his delegate % up or else he won't get the 50% of delegates he needs to avoid a contested convention. He's about 150 delegates behind where he should be. He needs to win a bunch of winner-take-all states. Losing Ohio was absolutely critical
>>67609594
Statewide results
3,041/3,041 precincts (100%) reporting
Donald Trump
381,720
40.8%
Ted Cruz
380,084
40.7%
John Kasich
94,430
10.1%
Marco Rubio
56,942
6.1%
934,957 total votes
>>67611051
Illinois is winner take all, and Missouri has a weird system that's going to give Trump like 80% of the delegates anyway.
it's over!
Trump won!
Is this it? I haven't heard of anyone officially calling it yet and it's close enough I wouldn't be surprised Cruz could try for a recount (assuming he's allowed under MO law)
>>67611734
Here's something:
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/primaries/MO
>>67611734
They already counted all votes, rato! Don't even try it!
You god dam beautiful bastards you did it you held the line any American i meet on holiday from Missouri will be given all the beer he can drink.
Is there a requirement to recount the votes if its within a certain percentage?
>>67611800
They're calling him the apparent winner so that's something, just isn't solid yet.
>>67612069
I'm actually a Trump supporter but he only won by about .2 percent which is a small enough margin that I wouldn't be surprised if Cruz could and would make a case for a recount.
>>67612650
A recount would only show him winning again.
CNN announced Trump the "apparent winner" too.
>>67611051
Don't be silly. Trump was at 104% going into his delegate target today.
He get 99/99 in Florida, 24/39 in Illinois, 29/26 in North Carolina, 9/0 in the Marianas, and 32/42 in Missouri. Overall, that's only 13 delegates short of his target today.
It would be closer now than we'd expected, but Trump can still very well win it. In fact, he's projected to win it still. Just not by as large a margin.
>>67613171
>24/69 in Illinois
Illinois is winner-take-all.
At least that's what everything but Google says.
>>67613171
What are you talking about? 29/26? That makes no sense. And Illinois is winner-take-all and Missouri has 52 delegates, not 42.
For those who are curious I just looked up Missouri's applicable laws and a recount is authorized if a candidate wins by less than one half of one percent which is what Trump did here.
>>67612812
Possibly. But with close to over 900k votes then by honest oversight (either in the first count which is then reversed in the second count or an honest oversight could occur in the second count as well) or voter fraud then that slim victory can turn into a slim loss.
>>67613674
>29/26? That makes no sense
He needed to win 26 to stay "on target" to 1,237 and he ended up winning 29.
>>67613803
Gotcha.
Regardless, Trump will probably take 42 delegates in Missouri, and 69 in Illinois.
>>67613509
Illinois isn't a winner take all state.
Also, did anyone else notice that google and NY Times have now reversed their tally and are saying that only 99% of votes have been tallied? Any idea why?
>>67614904
guardian reversed it too
they probably found some "extra" votes for ted
>>67615097
Oh great. This is ridiculous.
>>67614904
They tend to go with whatever the Secretary of State tells them. Apparently the SOS said 100% of the vote was in. That might have meant they had all the votes but the numbers they were releasing were only close to 100% and not actually 100%.
>>67613765
I will be extremely surprised if this count changes enough to give Ratface a win... a few dozen ballots to me would be a very big number of incorrect counts...
I see very little basis to expect substantial reversal..
Politico too. I don't like this.
I'm so proud that my state held the line. GG my fellow MO Trumpeteers for voting
>>67615829
Now back to being irrelevant
