>Flat Tax of 10%
>Everyone gets $20,000 a year regardless of income
Is there a flaw with this idea?
>>67540637
yea. even more niggers will sit around doing nothing but harming society. and even more niggers and sand niggers will move to your country.
>>67540637
The math. Under the current federal tax revenue, we only collect enough for a 10K NEET budget
>>67540929
>sand niggers will move to your country
Hey I'm just here to study medicine ;_;
>>67540929
This is coming from the Canadian lmaoing at your life rn
Aside from the fact that it serves no purpose except to redistribute wealth and enable more people to remain unemployed?
Make it like 10k and it would start to function from a math point of view.
Regardless, you just destroyed the economy and the lower gdp means you will forever have to lower that neetbux amount until your entire economy outsources itself.
literally everyone from mexico would risk life and limb to get over here
followed by everyone from central & south america
fuck i bet some african niggers would be trying to sail across the atlantic on rafts made out of mud
Why would you work when you can get $20,000 per year for doing nothing?
>>67540637
Yes your income is 12,000 per year
>>67540637
>Flat tax of 10%
Found the flaw
>>67540637
>Is there a flaw with this idea?
It involves stealing
Good luck buying your way out of the nigger ghetto when Tyrone makes the same as you.
What if you tax that 20,000 except for the lowest X% incomes?
I remember there being a proposed system like that. Can't for the life of me remember what its called.
Doesn't matter, the money will end up in the same hands when they're spent in the end.
>>67540637
Why would you need tax if there's universal income?
>>67541438
What's the matter with them being unemployed? As long as they still have the ability to consume thanks to the 20k it shouldn't harm the evonomy?
>>67540637
>supporting the laziest in your country the laziest way possible
why
t. neet
>>67540637
This would cost $5 trillion a year in the U.S., which has a GDP of 16 trillion. You'd need a much higher tax rate just to fund this single program.
>>67540637
Because it's nonsense. Take a tax class.
>>67542382
they dont produce, then they will expect more, when they dont get it, they would chimp out
>>67540637
Yes, math. The US GDP in 2014 was $18t. However, this does not represent income. Actual total US income in 2014 was about $14.7t. If you tax 10% of this with NO DEDUCTIONS (not even for charitable giving), you get $1.47t in revenue.
The US population in 2014 was estimated to be 319m. If you gave every living resident of the US $20,000, it would cost $6.38t.
With a 10% flat tax and nearly zero spending on infrastructure, military defense, education, etc. the most you could give is about $5,000 per person.
If you want to think about the math in a different way, roughly $46,000 was earned in income per person in the US in 2014. The most government can possibly give every person, regardless of income, is X% of $46,000, where X% is the effective tax rate.
>>67540637
Yes.
Money you get for free is worthless
>>67541075
you're okay buddy
>>67542158
The flaw with this is the same flaw in Office Space, people will work just hard enough not to get fired (or taxed, in this case). Just like the people making $15 an hour at their minimum wage jobs are voluntarily taking less hours so they can continue to collect government benefits.
They don't want better lives, they want more shit handed to them for less work.
>anything other than Fair Tax
>>67541747
i litteraly only made $19600.00 dollars last year. if that was raised to $39600.00 i would still work, because now i could afford better food, dental vison and hearing care not provided by the OHIP, I could put more away for retirement, luckily ontario is going to have basic income soon, it will lead to a healthier province and a richer province.
