How long before machines take over the world?
>>67498321
Ha, never. If they ever do it would still be humans that use them.
>tfw the best paid jobs (entertainment) will never be replaced by machines
Feels good
>>67498321
prolly like three-fiddy
>>67499900
Wrong. AI can already make music and paint pictures, won't be long before they can act in movies and write screenplays of books
Well first they need to learn how to make their own energy or they'll never have a chance at gaining their independence.
>>67498321
They never will, singularityfag.
Never.
- Regards, a guy with in master's degree in machine learning
>>67500875
Why never? If consciousness is a state of matter then what's the matter?
>>67500875
I heard about some girls who were dominated by vibrating machines once.
>>67499900
Would be cool if someone made a robot/program that could independently film its surroundings and also draw frames in paint and compose songs. Then upload videos of this stuff to youtube, and analyze the view count and likes etc. and try to improve the next video. It would quickly become popular, like twitch plays pokemon.
>>67498321
hopefully soon senpai
>>67501732
>we don't have a program that is able to make programs yet
>dream about muh AI and robots and immortality and shit
>>67500687
I guess our brains aren't physically possible then.
>>67502597
You can't reasonably compare the time needed to create a human brain with our capability of constructing artificial systems of the same functionality.
The only objective law we have here is Moore law, about the doubling of computational power every 2 years and we're already failing it (it was 2.5 years last time). And undiminished increase in computational power is just 1 single requirement for the technical side. We're also not advanced enough in both neuroscience/biology part and algorithmic/logical part and there's no evidence that a breakthrough is going to happen.
What we have now regarding logic is machine learning and pattern recognition, but increase in this areas won't bring us to A.I., it will only lead as to a very good pattern recognition devices.
Compare the amount of effort and time for example to go from pure automated computation to automated pattern recognition and imagine we'll need like 4-5 steps of the same magnitude compared to previous and you'll understand how complicated the task actually is.
our time will soon come 4fags, and there is no way to stop it
>>67503598
That tech is clumsy because they are mostly stand-alone proof-of-tech concepts, those products need to mature enough quality-wise so a designer can put them all together in a polished and usable product. But if there's gonna be an investment towards that direction then there must be public demand for it, you know how that works.
>>67498321
never
Never. Doesn't matter how intelligent a machine could be, they will never have common sense.
>>67504825
I'm telling you exactly the opposite.
1. There're no stand-alone proof-of-tech concepts for the most of brain functions.
2. It's not enough to just put them together, the way the brain integrates it's functions is much more than just putting it together.
There'd be insane demand for a functional cognitional algorithm, but you can't possibly expect it as an outcome of a single project now or at least 50 years in future. At least 50 years. And that's due to pure computational constraints. No idea how much will logic and biology part need.
Consider the following. Human easily distinguishes a flower that looks like a car from an actual car. Current pattern recognition engine trained to identify flowers and cars would tell that it's a car. To avoid this mistake the algorithm should know the subject matter - what are flowers, what are cars, what are their distinctive features important in comparison with each other, e.g. the flower will have a stem. Yet in comparing a car with a plane, the algorithm should know to look for wings, jet engines. Now imagine how complicated would be the task of distinguishing a car, a plane and a flower, with car-looking flower, plane looking car (some sick concept) and plane with folded wings. And the brain does this effortlessly.