>post anonymously
>each poster does not create a reputation, and is judged only by the content of what he says
explain how /pol/ isn't communist. protip : you can't
>>67451178
>post anonymously
>each poster is based upon the content of what he says and the stereotype of his nation, race, religion, and whatever information he gives about himself that is generated from both the public sphere and niche /pol/-based stereotypes
Anyway, you posted a non-sequitur.
Start with the Greeks.
>>67451178
In what way does communism promote anonymity?
How high are you?
Because only the best* posts are noticed and receive any recognition, which is the essence of capitalism. If /pol/ were communist, you would be forced to reply to particular posts, so the (you)s are distributed equally.
*best not referring to best quality discussion necessarily, but also the best shitposts, memes, bait, etc...
>implying we aren't judged by our flags
>>67451178
>post anonymously
>posts are judged on the quality of their content not who made them
Thats straight up meritocracy, something leftists and communists want to destroy because it makes people unequal.
Not everyone gets a share of these (you) 's
>>67452478
when (you) reply to op theres no (you)™
The market place of ideas. Ever hear of it.
tripcodes
There's no force or coercion here.
I didn't have to reply to this post. I can turn off my computer
>>67451178
>merit based
>communist
Pick one
>>67453312
are for faggots.
DUDE
>>67451560
He's a leafposter, so I'm assuming very high
>DUDE WEED LMAO
>>67452153
This. I only post when I expect replies, or when someone deserves a reply.
