>cheers on physical assaults and intimidation at rallies where his supporters outnumber protestors (both silent protestors and disruptive protestors)
>won't even go near the building when things are balanced between protestors and supporters
>whines about protestors being too mean, loud, and violent
What a fucking pussy
>>67378005
You berniecucks just can't hold back your fascist ways can you?
>>67378005
>Canceled plans to make Trump hotel the tallest building in America because of 9/11.
We have a tough guy on our hands.
>>67378101
>muh free speech
>not yours though, only I get free speech
o-oh yeah, the CPD told us there were safety issues so I left
what's that? the CPD didn't say any such thing and I never went near the building? geez why are you guys being so mean, I never encouraged violence before, buy my steaks
>fighting Trump's "violence" with actual violence
And the hypocritical left strikes again
>>67378005
Why fight a battle you know you can't win?
At least with a handful of protesters it is a lot easier to deal with than an army of hardened nogs from the pits of Chicongo's ghettos
With those kinds of numbers, a few people were bound to get killed in the onslaught
>>67378430
>actual violence
gathering and yelling slogans is not violence, you big fat lady.
The physical altercations that broke out after the cancellation, I won't defend or cheer on, which is more than I can say for your "I'm gonna cheer on physical assaults and pay the legal fees of the old racist who sucker-punched a nigger" chieftan.
No one should assault anybody, but it's not like this is new, or limited to us.
>>67378005
That sounds like pussy shaming, OP.
You need to be...
Corrected.
You cant turn this around and make Trump look like hes the one inciting violence when people come by the thousands to start riots at his rallys and try to rush the stage and attack him, doesnt work that way bud
>>67378005
I wouldn't go near a building filled with thousands of people who hate my guts either.
I guarantee you there were at least a few people in that protest who might have been willing to assassinate trump if given a shot at it.
>>67378903
>start riots at his rallies
Protests aren't riots, and physical altercations didn't break out until after the cancellation, and it's unclear who threw the first punch. But I already disavowed violence, which is more than I can say for Trump.
>rush the stage to attack him
Different event, and I don't approve of that cunt's actions, either. Secret Service should've at least broken an arm.
But it seems remarkably whiny to laugh and talk about how you'd like to punch people in the face and pay legal fees for a guy who punched someone in the face and never, ever tell your supporters not to engage in violence, then to flee like a little girl because oh man you might face a hostile audience.
>>67379069
So your guy's the one who'll face down Putin and he can't handle a protest?
>>67379127
>So your guy's the one who'll face down Putin and he can't handle a protest?
I don't even know what that's supposed to mean. Answer again when you have a real response to what I said.
Trump avoided the Chicago event because he knew the protestors would get violent. It would be even worse if the event went on. But I guess you wanted to see even more violence you violent Bernout
>>67379504
My "real response" is
1) Trump, if he can't handle the first real fucking protest he's had to face, is the biggest pussy playing tough guy in American politics. Roosevelt finished his speech after taking a bullet in the chest, your big bad tough guy who'll make the world fear America again won't even ENTER A BUILDING because some people there are mad at him? Do you think he can just hide from crowds for 4-8 years? How do you think that'll look?
2) You're fantasizing about imaginary assassins because it makes your pretend-tough-guy seem less like the pussy he revealed himself to be.
>>67379884
So you wanted Trump to incite more violence by angering the mob of chichongo pavement apes? I thought bernie supporters were peaceful and wanted to avoid conflict.
>>67381497
>delivering a speech despite protests is "inciting violence"
>unless there's only some protestors, then laughing and applauding when your followers shove them around as they're being escorted out of the building is not inciting violence
You can't stump the Trump, unless you bring him to an environment that is not literally 95% on his side.
What's he gonna do if beaners march on Washington? Hide under the blankets?
>>67378232
Holy hell I didn't know this.
How the heck does one man manage to have *all* his ground covered? Fuck, Trump... that man's a freakin' genius without any doubt whatsoever, mark my words.
>>67378005
I've protested a lot of shit op
but we had the decency to do in on the front steps
this is not about what trump says it is about the radical left attempting to silence his right to say it
>>67378005
>I post this every time that I find a thread like this, and I post it a lot. A lot of people see it, and they read it too. I post these things, and people agree with me. I'm probably one of the best posters around here. If I had a tripcode, my replies would be huge. Anyway, I'm telling you right now that your posts are not something that we can believe in. The words you use aren't the ones we use. The tone you use isn't the tone most of our people use, and your reasons for why you supported Trump aren't the reasons why we did-and you know what? It's embarrassing. It really is. I feel bad for you-I do-because you don't even know it, but you're wasting your time. You're an embarrassing mess. You're just a big fat mistake.
Honestly, look at all of the time you've wasted posting things that won't get through to anyone. You post these things, but your posts are low energy. I post with lots of words, but yours are just bad information! Ha, can you believe that? Every word, and every post that I post is full with energy and good information. People LOVE reading my good information. Nobody takes you seriously. Nobody is paying attention to this. You're just wasting your time. You have an energy deficit with 4chan right now, and that's a bad deal. Not me though. I have a GREAT deal. This pasta I just posted just got 10 lines longer, and you know who paid for it? Reddit and tumblr did with their energy. That's a good deal, and that's why we're winning. We're the ones making good deals.
>>67379884
>>67381811
You're trying to portray trump as a coward because you assume that trump supporters are extremely concerned with trump's presentation as a tough guy because all the commentators have been blogging about how "trump voters want to be protected".
But that's not the reason people are supporting him and your tactics aren't going to work. Back to the drawing board.
He pissed himself visibly when the protester charged the stage.
>>67382036
>free speech is only free speech if it's convenient for me
he has a fucking microphone, dude
Oh you're telling me that the New York trust fund baby who dyes his hair and spray tans is a pussy? That is shocking to me.
You disrupt somebody else's rally, you are violating their free speech. If they kick your ass, good for them
>>67378232
Holy shit, this reminds me of the building in Gremlins 2
Fuck
>>67382281
he also has the right to say whatever he wants at a private event and trumps supporters had a right to hear him speak
if you feel that his beliefs are not correct for a president that fight is to be had at the voting booth but for the supporters of a candidate not yet nominated to disrupt the process of the opposing party is disgraceful
>>67382409
>fight speech with more speech
>unless I don't like your speech, then shut up
>>67382733
>free speech is about gathering up as many people as possible so that you can shout down the opinions of people you disagree with
