>>67264850
I think that we should dispose them in turkroach land.

>>67264850
Yeah we should only let the guys who don't give a fuck about laws own nuclear warheads.

>>67264850
nukes will always exist. they are the ultimate weapon, and once you achieve that power you don't want to give it up.

>>67264850
>implying nukes exist
We just firebombed the shit out of japan. Some of the footage from the nuke was from fucking Kyoto.

>>67264850
Nukes are the only reason ww3 never broke out.

In an ideal world, yes. But this is nothing close to an ideal world.

>banning nukes

And who would enforce such a ban? The "world police"?

>>67264850
>Should nukes be banned?
What is the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty?

>>67264933
Cockroaches are immune to radioactivity tho

>>67264850

The world became doomed the second Trinity was detonated.

If we do not destroy nuclear weaponry eventually it will be used; by accident, by sabotage, by a rogue state, or by a horrible sequence of misunderstandings and posturing gone wrong.

If we do destroy them world war three will break out (because MAD is no longer in effect) and someone will redevelop them, probably becoming the sole world power in the process and bombing everyone else back to the copper age, irradiating themselves in so doing.

If countermeasures to modern nuclear systems are ever developed, the side lagging behind that doesn't have such measures will nuke the other side preemptively before such measures are fully deployed because the only other option is utter capitulation.

Mankind will suffer a nuclear war and it is extremely likely to happen in the next half century.

>>67265609
>implying the countermeasures wouldn't be absolutely top secret until they were actually operational to avoid a pre-emptive strike

>>67265394
Fuck. That's true.

G E N E V A
E
N
E
V
A

Of course, nukes are the only thing stopping a third world war and millions of innocent casualties, no country wants mutual destruction. It's the same reason the Soviet and US top politicians we're keeping contact at all times during the cold war.

/thread

>>67265727

>Implying it even matters

Even a 100% effective and fully deployed system of that type wouldn't stop those same thousands of missiles from heavily irradiating the world with a literal cloud of radioactive ash which would cause worldwide collapse as cancer and birth defect rates incline by a hundred times.

>>67264850
We've had this topic a million times. Nukes are a necessary evil, they suck, they're terrible, but if you don't have any you're fucked. In a perfect world they'd be banned, but in the real world we have people who would take advantage of the fact like Best Korea. We need them more than we can't allow them.

>>67264850
and where all the funny would reside ?

>>67264850
Russia: Try taking my nukes away, faggot

>>67265933
What if they built a giant dome around their country and made Mexico pay for it?